Jesus & Obama: Two Unnatural Hybrids
December 2, 2011 Leave a comment
Jesus+Obama -Two Unnatural Hybrids PDF version
Jesus & Obama: Two Unnatural Hybrids
The most fantastic issue in the long history of American Presidents is the issue of a President who is not even eligible to be the President, -a President who violated the oath of office by taking the oath of office. That oath requires swearing to support, defend and protect the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Yet by taking that oath and assuming the office of the President he violated its clear limitation barring all person from that office except those who are “natural born Citizens”. Since Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, his ineligibility is unquestionable.
The proof of his ineligibility is revealed by many examples taken from principles of natural law, which translate into the political equivalents that govern human law. One such example is that of the hybrid nature of Jesus, which is the basis of the Christian faith and the writings of the New Testament.
The four gospels portray Jesus as having been sired by the Holy Spirit, making a virgin young women pregnant with a child that was both human and divine. That made for a person who was not wholly human nor wholly divine, but instead was both human and divine. The belief in that hybrid nature is the foundation of a faith that changed the world. If he had been only one or the other, the world would not have succumbed to the appeal of a divinely human savior. It was the hybrid nature of Christ that made all the difference.
Similarly, the hybrid nature of Barack Obama directly impacts the issue of his presidential eligibility. We are not speaking of the racial element of his hybrid nature but the political element. With Jesus, if he had had a human father then his parentage would have been uniform and singular; -human parents producing a human child. With Obama, his alien father and American mother produced a hybrid citizen whose parentage was not singular and uniform, but was dual and dissimilar. He also was a hybrid, a political hybrid born of a mother who had nothing in common with the political nature of the father. Just as the union of the Holy Spirit and a human female egg did not produce a natural off-spring, so the union of a father having alien citizenship with a mother having American citizenship did not produce a natural American off-spring because it could only result in producing a hybrid, a child with completely dissimilar political parentage.
Just as a pairing of dissimilar races cannot produce a natural off-spring of either race, so a pairing of parents with dissimilar nationality cannot produce a natural citizen of either nation. Instead it produces a hybrid with dual citizenship and an irresolvable conundrum of competing allegiance.
It was the very real fear of a commander-in-chief of all U.S. military and federal forces having a second allegiance to a foreign power that led to the framers of the Constitution forbidding anyone except a natural citizen from serving as the President, (although they could serve in Congress and even the Supreme Court). But they were not trusted to hold the reins of Power and command all the forces of the nation in a time of war. Only those born of U.S. citizens were granted that right. But of course they had to exempt their own generation since none of them were born to American citizens.
That was not much of a limitation on the field of candidates since 99% of Americans were born to citizen parents. The few that were barred were those born to unnaturalized immigrants, foreigners who were diplomats, visitors, businessmen, ministers, and students, as well as Native Americans, slaves, women, and children born to alien fathers, i.e. hybrids. [While it is a fact that American women were natural born citizens, it is also a fact that they had a societal-political status more like that of children and property, as is seen in strict Islamic societies today.]
To the Constitution’s framers, the importance of allegiance solely to the United States was paramount, -indicated by the oaths that they required.
The U.S. “Oath of Allegiance” (8 C.F.R. Part 337 (2008) is an oath that must be taken by all immigrants who wish to become United States citizens. The first officially recorded Oaths of Allegiance were made on May 30th, 1778 at Valley Forge, during the Revolutionary War.
The current oath is as follows:
“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law;…”
Only citizens born of citizens would bring no competing allegiance to the office of President since a singular citizenship ruled out any possibility of competing loyalty. Hence, no person born of an alien would be fully trustable as Commander-In-Chief. All candidates for the office must be 100% American, having only American parentage. Their citizenship must be singular, not dual, inheriting U.S. citizenship from both parents.
Any deviation from the normal, typical, (almost universal) pattern results in a citizenship that is not natural, but is statutory, and therefore ineligible for the office of the President. Such persons are citizens due to U.S. law, while natural citizens are not, and have never been citizens via any law, regulation, or court ruling. The principle of their citizenship is more fundamental than all human law since it’s based on natural law, just like the right to marry, or own property, or have custody of one’s own children. Such rights are not codified in the Constitution because they were universally accepted as basic rights of man.
Citizenship is one of those rights when it’s based on natural inheritance. Such natural citizenship is the only type of citizenship that the founding fathers deemed acceptable for the office of President, but they didn’t mandate such a strict requirement for any other federal office.
Such citizens cannot be artificially created via naturalization nor by birth to parents of dissimilar nationality, especially when the father is not even a legal immigrant but is a mere guest of the government. Obama Sr. was such a person and it is because of that fact that his son cannot under any sane understanding of natural citizenship be considered to be a natural citizen.
That means that everyone was fooled, the electorate, the media, the Congress, and the courts. Or, alternatively, many of them knew the truth but didn’t care, or even willfully violated their legal or moral responsibility to the Constitution. And even worse, they are going to do it again in the 2012 election. They not only will continue to pretend that the issue of Obama’s eligibility is non-existent, they will challenge, belittle, mock, insult, and reject any assertion that the issue is real and being covered-up by the likes of them due to either their ignorance, stupidity, or willful deceit.
by A.R. Nash http://obama–nation.com