Sheriff Arpaio’s 2nd Obama Presentation

WND EXCLUSIVE
Arpaio’s Obama probe finds ‘national security threat’
Hawaii found to be bogus birth-certificate factory

PHOENIX – Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent.

The Obama campaign declined to comment on Arpaio’s allegations.

Arpaio told WND he intends to move the investigation and the new information to a higher authority within the federal government because of what he calls an imminent threat to national security and U.S. immigration laws. The threat is posed by a flaw in Hawaii’s law discovered by his investigators that allows a foreigner to obtain a Hawaii birth certificate.

Zullo explained that along with new information discovered regarding the birth certificate since the posse’s March 1 press conference, his team has discovered Hawaii provides easy access to a birth certificate, even if the child wasn’t born in the state.
Under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8, a person only has to be an established resident of Hawaii, not necessarily a U.S. citizen, and pay taxes there for one year to be able to register an out-of-state or foreign-born person with an official Hawaii birth certificate.

“If a nation’s security is only as strong as its weakest link, then America may be in serious trouble,” Arpaio said in a statement. “Hawaii may be our weakest link and could have a serious impact on our nation’s immigration policy.”
Arpaio and his investigators said they have deep concerns that the Hawaii Revised Statute is a loophole that makes it possible for foreign born children to illegally establish U.S. citizenship.  Zullo noted that, normally, when it’s necessary to prove a person is a U.S. Citizen, the main form of documentation is a state certificate of birth.

“It appears that in the case of Hawaiian law, any person can obtain a birth certificate if any adult or their parents can prove that they resided in Hawaii for one year and paid taxes,” he said. “There is no requirement to show that the child itself was actually born in Hawaii or on U.S. soil.”

Among the new findings presented by lead Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo:  The sheriff’s investigators have learned of a birth certificate coding system that indicates the White House document has been altered.

An interview with the Hawaii official who allegedly signed the Obama document in 1961, Verna K.L. Lee, provided further confirmation of the coding anomalies.  Investigators were troubled to find key information missing on the verification document Hawaii provided to Arizona’s secretary of state in May.
Hawaii’s deputy attorney general, Jill T. Nagamine, confirm the state has a birth document on file for Obama. But she would not confirm on the record that the White House document matched what was on file with the Hawaii Department of Health.
continued at WND  http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/arpaio-obama-probe-finds-national-security-threat/?cat_orig=us

The Thief-in-Chief Who Stole the Presidency

A One-Leg President and his naturalized citizenship

“There are two sources of citizenship:  birth or naturalization”

That conclusion reveals Justice Waite’s cluelessness about the nature and origin of citizenship.  In 1875 he was the Chief Justice who issued the court’s opinion in one of the few cases that touched on U.S. citizenship.  But he was ignorant of the truth because the truth was something so overlooked and obscure that it was never taught nor learned in the legal profession.  The roots of citizenship went so far back that they were forgotten, and all that existed were foggy concepts, impressions, judicial presumptions, and recorded opinions of earlier “authorities” who were educated in a similar environment in an earlier time.
But the truth of the matter is that there are five types of citizenship, -not just two, -four of which existed when he wrote his opinion,  The five types of citizenship are:  1. natural, 2. “native-born”, 3. naturalized, 4. derivative, and 5. provisional.

  1.   Natural citizens are born being citizens via natural inheritance of the political status of parents with same nationality.  They are Americans organically, -not merely legally.
  2. “Native-born” citizens are not born being citizens by nature, but are born with citizenship (beginning at birth) thanks to the permission of the American people.  It was granted via their ratification of the 14th Amendment, -and its erroneous but practical and ethically justified reinterpretation by the Supreme Court three decades later.  Those that the government has labeled “native-born” are not natural citizens but are instead legal (or constitutional) citizens only.  Their citizenship is due to birth within the United States to legal immigrants.
  3. Naturalized citizens are those foreigners who have chosen the United States as their permanent new homeland and have completed the process meant to strip them of their former allegiance and obedience to their abandoned homeland, and to baptize them into a new life as new natural(-ized) Americans.
  4. Derivative citizens are those who derive(d) their citizenship from a naturalized father or an American husband (marriage no longer confers U.S. citizenship on foreign brides).  It’s also the type of citizenship ascribed to the children of American women who marry foreign men.  In one epoch they had to first divorce him before their children could derive U.S. citizenship from their mother.
  5.    Provisional citizens are children born abroad with one parent being a foreigner.  Their citizenship is provided permanently only if they live in the United States fulfilling the prescribed conditions of the law.

There may have been a cases in lower courts that have touched on the issue of natural citizenship and presidential eligibility, and a few supreme court cases that have included and discussed descriptions of the parameters of citizenship – e.g. Minor v. Happersett and Wong Kim Ark – but the supreme court has never directly addressed the specific question of a presidential or vice-presidential candidate’s eligibility based on one being, -or not being, a natural-born citizen.
[That is a fact, and Obama's eligibility is the perfect case for finally recognizing in law what natural citizenship really means.  But it won't happen since they can't accept such a challenge to Obama because they would be seen as complicit in the conspiracy of silence that worked to allow the first person of color to be President, which was made finally possible when the Chief Judas failed to refuse to swear him into office.
Instead he traded the Constitution for stability, he took the low road instead of the high road.  He took the easy way instead of the hard way.  He took the coward's way out in place of being true to his oath of office by which he swore to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, which is every patriot's duty.  He took a billy-club to the Constitution and smashed one of its knee-caps.  He became via his authority the enforcer and enabler to the Thief-in-Chief.

He, in effect, performed plastic surgery on the Constitution, altering its natural form by the tip of his hat, the up-turned thumb of the caesarian overlord of the ultimate court.  He gave his Barackness the big OK sign for all the world to see.  And then flubbed the wording of the presidential oath just to add to the ineptitude and illegitimacy of the moment.

He in effect, placed the breast implants of natural citizenship into Barack's flat, half-foreign chest, making him appear, via the supreme authority's imprimatur, as if he was perfectly natural in every way and therefore eligible to win the role of Miss President of the United States.  He made a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
It is as if the founding father's had placed into the Constitution a requirement that the President have two legs.  The right leg representing an American father, and the left an American mother, and here on inauguration day stands one with only one leg, and it's a left leg.  Everyone is fooled by the artificial leg that he wears, the one built out of the false impression that birth within the United States qualifies one to be the supreme leader of the nation, and commander of all of its thousands of nuclear bombs and millions of military and federal personnel.  But the innocent patriotic children of the nation point to the peg-leg tip protruding from the end of his right trouser leg and declare, like the child that observed that the Emperor had no cloths, that the man doesn't have a right leg.
What is the crowds response?  To tell the child to shut the heck up.  Their glorious new champion must not suffer his reputation and honor being besmirched by such an accusation.  And so no one's eyes shifted their focus to a point that is not in accordance with their desires, politics, and philosophy.  They, Congress and those they benefit, absolutely do not support fidelity to the Constitution because it's whole focus is not on legitimizing and expanding their authority but on greatly restricting it via the plainest language possible.  And the supreme political court is populated by "progressives" that hold that treasonous attitude also.  Its most recent expression was in the 5-4 support for the multiply unconstitutional "Affordable" Health Care Act.

How could he then turn around and adjudicate honestly a suit brought against the one on whom he had placed the crown of supreme authority?  No human being in history has ever faced such a conundrum, much less dealt with it properly.  He would view the medicine as worse than the disease.  And since the Court has no obligation to even state a reason for not accepting a case submitted to it, it certainly would give none.  The Travesty would and will continue uncorrected and unaddressed.  But I digress.]

No one other than those born to citizens are “natural” citizens.  Only American parents produce natural American children, just as only Indian parents produce natural Indian children.  Obama absolutely required naturalization because his father was a non-immigrant foreigner.
No non-immigrant foreigner can beget an American citizen, and the 14th Amendment is inapplicable because such a father is not subject to the full federal jurisdiction which citizens and legal immigrants fall under (military conscription, military training, military assignment, military deployment, military combat, and military death in battle).  They are exempt due to not being a member of American society, and remaining subject to U.S.-recognized foreign jurisdiction in accordance with the Law of Nations, -as well as the laws of their foreign homeland.

Without the automatic at-birth naturalization of the 14th Amendment, children of immigrants would not be granted U.S. citizenship since they are born to foreigners and have no natural right to American citizenship.
A natural right is not the same as a traditional right.  One state or colony might have had the tradition of bestowing its citizenship on the children of their foreign immigrants if those children happened to be born within their territory (“sons of the soil”), while other states and colonies had the legal tradition of requiring that the father first become a citizen of the state or colony before recognizing his U.S.-born alien children as Americans.

But natural citizenship requires no legal recognition, and is the result of no law whatsoever.  There is no provision in the United States Constitution wherein natural citizenship is even mentioned, much less made subject to Congressional authority.   It’s an unalienable right of natural inheritance because citizens give birth to citizen children by the natural transmission of not just the parents’ the biological nature, but also their political nature as well (“sons of the father’s blood”).

The first hint of the nature of citizenship is found in the first naturalization act of the first Congress, 1790.  After addressing the uniform minimal requirements that all the new states must adhere to, it next addressed the tangential subject of American children born abroad.  It declared that they were to “be considered as natural born citizens” (protecting them not just from pencil-pushing bureaucrats controlling immigration and naturalization (who might stupidly treat them as foreigners), thereby also making it clear that it would be the policy of the United States government that they were just as eligible to be the Presidential as their domestically born brethren).
No doubt strong protest from one Thomas Jefferson, -living abroad as the United States Ambassador to France, along with one John Adams, -living abroad as the United States Ambassador to England, made the Congress aware of the short-coming of the Constitution due to over-looking the matter of children born to Americans on foreign soil.

But the hint of which I speak is found in the clause that dealt with children born abroad to American parents who were also born abroad.  It declared that “the right of citizenship shall not pass” to children of an American father who has never lived in the United States.
What is remarkable about that statement is something so mundane and unremarkable that it doesn’t even register in the conscious mind.  In our ignorant age we have lost sight of the meaning of what that statement states when it used the phrase “the right of citizenship”.
Our modern ignorant minds think that it is referring to a right granted by the government to members of American society, a right guaranteed by some law, when in fact it is just the opposite.
Our nation is founded on the concept that certain rights are unalienable, and among them is the natural right of membership in the society and nation to which one’s parents belong.  That is not a privilege granted by the permission of the government.  It is nothing less than an absolute natural right of every natural member of the nation.
Only those who do not possess that natural right need the government to grant them permission to be members of the nation.  They need laws to be written which bestow membership upon them if they fulfill its requirements.  The 14th Amendment is the greatest of those laws.  But understand that no citizenship that is obtained by any law is natural citizenship.  It is not natural.  It is legal citizenship instead, and no legal citizen is eligible to be the President.
Natural born citizens are not “legal citizens” because their citizenship is not derived from, obtained by, resultant of, nor dependent on any American law.  It is outside of the realm of American law.  That’s because Congress has no authority to legislate regarding natural citizenship, and never has.
The 14th Amendment, written four generations after the Constitution, while being part of the constitution of our government, does not state anything new regarding natural citizens.  It merely affirmed the facts that already existed regarding domestically born Americans, for the purpose of applying them to those who had been denied their place in American society, namely the former American slaves.

Any form of citizenship that is dependent on any law is a form of naturalization.  That makes Barack Obama a naturalized citizen.  I believe that the facts of his citizenship are as follows:

 

  • Obama was naturalized by a statute of naturalization law that granted citizenship to children of American women after they divorced their foreign husband who was the father of their child, and whose citizenship was their primary citizenship.
  • But the U.S. citizenship granted at that point was provisional,  -dependent on the child living a minimum number of years in the United States.  Obama completed that number of years thanks to being returned to Hawaii at age 10 and not going back to Indonesia.  If he had returned to Indonesia with his mother, he would not have retained his U.S. citizenship.
  • The U.S. naturalization law that grants U.S. citizenship to children of American women at birth only covers births outside of the United States, but if Obama was born outside of the United States he would not have been covered by such statute because by one of its provisions his mother was too young by several months for it to apply to her off-spring.  She had not lived in the United States for the required five years beyond the age of 14 since she was only 18 when he was born.
  • Obama was born a provisional British subject, and naturalized by his mother as Indonesian. Obama was returned to Hawaii at age 10 to live with his grandparents. At age 14, Obama began fulfilling the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act’s (INA) 301(a)(7) and 301(b)’s five-year continuous residency requirement to become a U.S. citizen, See 8 U.S.C. 1409(c) and http://www.theodora.com/ina_96_title_3.html
  • Consequently, the conclusion is inescapable that Barack Jr. was born without American citizenship no matter where he was born.  But with, or without U.S. citizenship, what he is lacking is natural citizenship.  The difference is that he is constitutionally eligible to serve as President of the Senate, but not as President of the United States.  He is constitutionally eligible to serve as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, but not eligible to serve as Chief Commander of the United States Military.

He is occupying the one office which he is constitutionally barred from occupying.  He is therefore an unconstitutional President and a usurper of the power center of the nation. He is the Thief-in-Chief who stole the role of President firstly from Hillary Clinton, and secondly from John McCain.
Unlike President Richard Nixon who rightfully asserted “I am not a crook!” (his criminality wasn’t described by that term) Barack Hussein Obama Jr. actually is a crook who lied and misrepresented his way into the White House, in effect stealing the election under false pretenses.  Everything he has done since has been under false color of authority.

by a.r. nash july 2012  http://obama–nation.com

The Sandusky-izing of America

The Progressive Agenda:

The Sandusky-izing of America

The hard-core Liberal-Left is possessed by an idealistic religiology.  A religiology is a quasi-spiritual ideology, the adherents of which aim to propagate themselves via their own children, in addition to serving in a life-long effort to infiltrate, indoctrinate, proselytize,  and compromise the membership of American institutions, beginning with the education establishment and its unions, and ending with all branches of the American government and, if possible, all levels of state and national martial forces.

To accomplish their take-over they have engaged in a century long process to bastardize the thinking process of the American people by offering an alternate version of reality, -an alternate version of science, genetics, American history, government, fundamental law, and most importantly; religion.  Religion (faith) is in an eternal tango with science since science both supports and counters the assumed divine perfection of Holy Scripture.
Much of their effort has been effortless since all they had to do was point out the truth about the flaws in American society, government, and workplace.  With truth as their background, they could couch their ideology in intellectual terms based on social justice versus social injustice.
It clocked itself in the trappings of spiritual values co-mingled with the intellectualism of science, a la Christian Science, and Scientology, both of which put up a front of being a religion when in fact they have nothing to do with theism nor the beliefs that spring from sacred writings underpinning actual religions.
The Great Kick-off began with the publication of The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin.  It was like an infusion of adrenaline into the heart of the anti-theist, anti-free enterprise, anti-individual liberty-&- unalienable rights of religiologists led by Karl Marx, who found it perfectly supported his seminal work Das Capital, thereby kicking-off the advent of international Marxism, otherwise known as Social-ism.  It was in diametric opposition to the foundation of western civilization which is Individual-ism (based on individual worth, individual responsibility, individual merit, and individual reward or eternal punishment.

The Collectivist ideology overthrew the spiritual and scriptural basis of American society and law and in its place offered a Statist religiology that didn’t depend on the unifying force of having one God, one Hope, one Savior, one Holy Book, and one Spiritual Law, as well as one political view regarding the source of government legitimacy & the supremacy of individual freedom.
Instead, it put in place an anti-religion counter-cultural world-view rooted in a quasi-religious collective idealism which saw humankind as one universal spiritual family comprised of inferior and superior specimens which were genetically determined (giving rise to a firm belief in, and government participation in programs of eugenics, {principally involving forced sterilization of women} -the last of which continued into the 1970′s) with little distinction made based on the merit of individual effort and superior accomplishment, -with the exception of the well-educated socially-conscious ruling elites who might (would) be forced to employ strong, (harsh) measures in order to bring a perfect world into being, -measures needed to neutralized (crush) all religious and political resistance.

Those who resisted the transformation to the perfect system of perfect equality, perfect acceptance and obedience, and conversion to a selfless altruistic social attitude toward collective work and reward were necessarily an unacceptable road-block to a perfect world, and therefore would have to be either re-”educated” or eliminated (imprisoned or killed) in order that progress continue.
The human tendency to laud and embrace secular idealism spread far and wide in the western world beginning with the turn of a new century in 1900.  It was spurred by the rapacious greed of the monopolists of industry and commerce and their general disregard for the plight of the working poor.  Their pathetic working conditions gave rise to unions which pushed back and stood-up for the human dignity and value of the working class.
It was also manifested in the political realm as a collectivist-socialist system of government, as well as its enemy brother, a  fascist system of national capitalistic socialism.  They both attracted many people to the Communist Party of America, -and the American Nazi Party as well.
Both systems formed new religiologies that the country and the world hadn’t seen since ancient times when, as acolytes of a cult of personality,  people worshipped their King or Emperor or Pharaoh or Caesar as a demi-god and fully accepted his laws and governance.  The religious leader played by James Earl Jones in Conan the Barbarian comes to mind.
There were two types of embracers of the anti-God, anti-religion, pro-secular humanism religiology.  The overt, public activist, group-member types, and the covert, private, individual types who worked silently for the advancement of their idealistic (but ultimately authoritarian) aims.  The former types lost all favor in the 1950′s with the advent of the Cold War against world-wide communist aggression, -beginning with the acquisition of nuclear bombs by the Russians (thanks to communist-sympathizing spies in the American nuclear weapons programs) followed by the Korean War of communist aggression.

But the socialism sympathizers and communist party adherents did not abandon their idealistic dreams, -instead they simply stayed underground, -working silently, pervasively, as they multiplied in numbers thanks to generational indoctrination by Marxist/ Humanist professors, and gradually entered every sector of American life.
With time, and good behavior, they would rise to ever greater heights of authority, hiring and promoting along the way others who thought and felt as they did, thereby amplifying their presence within American institutions.
The most egregious example of which was the stealth infiltration of American churches and their hierarchies by socialists and homosexuals, -to the point that they enjoyed so much support from their brethren underlings that they could issue decrees that were in total violation of church and scriptural law and tradition, -or they had infiltrated and proselytized to such a degree that they were able to win the changes they sought via democratic votes.
They weren’t cognizant of how in sync they were with the goals and methods of the Marxists; Infiltrate, propagate, indoctrinate, etc.  But they were operating on parallel tracks.  Marxist authorities can tolerate the existence of religion as long as it is not anti-collectivist in its attitude and is totally submissive to human overlords.  That is the nature of Black Liberation Theology (reverend Jeremiah Wright); -Marxist in orientation, collectivist in its view of salvation & social injustice, racist in its view of blame placing, and top-down authoritarian in its governance.

The evidence that Marxism, -and its lesser form of Socialism, are more than a mere ideology is the fact that in spite of the overwhelming proof of its failure to improve human life and society, as seen in the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the dire straits of places like Cuba and North Korea, it didn’t die-out in America but became even more wide-spread.  How can that be?  “Hope springs eternal…” and the purist, most concentrated form of secular idealism is a flame that simply won’t go out because it offers hope and meaning to those who have none.
Its flame, instead of the flame of American values and respect for American law based on those values, still burns strongly in the hearts of constitutional traitor in government at all levels, all the way up to the Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court.
We have been deeply co-opted because Leftist Presidents have appointed, and Congress has accepted, liberal (socialist leaning) members to the Supreme Court, and Progressive Republicans have appointed crypto-socialist members whose true stripes were not known when appointed because they kept their socialist, authoritarian leanings to themselves, -being, in effect, wolves in shepherd’s clothing.  Wolves who would ravage the individual liberty and state’s rights that are at the heart of the American experiment.

On June 28, 2012, the Chief Judas of the Supreme Court revealed himself to be the latest progressive traitor to the Constitution and the American tradition of law and self-governance.  With one stroke he essentially decapitated the Constitutional foundation of individual liberty and thereby rendered America as being not the land of the free and the self-governed, but the land of the servants who must serve their masters in the government without disobedience or suffer the consequences.  The conquest of a free people is being accomplished via the simple redefining of words without changing any laws.
A penalty, meaning a punishment, is now all of a sudden, a tax, and the Quislings of the Supreme Court have decided that a tax does not even have to be what the Constitution defines as being a tax.  Instead, the government can make up its own meaning.
Now a “Green job” can be anything the Obama bureaucrats decide to call a Green job, including driving a bus or fixing bicycles.  Now the welfare czar can define “work”, which is required in order to continue receiving benefits, as quitting smoke, -taking music lessons, or any number of self-benefitting activities.
Therefore their head overlord, Sir Barry Obama, through his ministers, has declared in effect that they don’t have to work anymore.  The gravy will keep coming anyway, in violation of the clear, explicit mandate of the law.  Well, hell, who cares about the law anyway?  A President who committed treason against the Constitution by taking the Oath of Allegiance to the Constitution by which he is explicitly forbidden to serve as President?  [No foreigner nor his children can be described as a "natural born citizen" anymore than the off-spring of a dog and a cat can be called a natural puppy or natural kitten, (similarly the off-spring of a donkey and a zebra)].
In fact the ideological orientation of both houses of Congress is firmly in the traitor’s camp and has been for nearly a century.  The Constitution is not something to abide by but something to side-step, to ignore, -to avoid.  And avoid it they do, with nearly every law they pass, evidenced by the most unconstitutional piece of garbage ever passed by any Congress, namely the health care travesty and monstrosity.
But for the sake of argument, let’s pretend that it is the greatest thing ever passed by any Congress since the abolition of slavery.  Well how is it different from that legislation?  Simple, nothing that becomes the law of the land (via the will and vote of the American public by the process of ratifying an amendment to the Constitution) is remotely equivalent to something rammed through Congress by one single vote and lots of back-room bribery, arm-twisting, and lying.  It could just as easily be repealed by one single vote, but not a single one of the amendments to the Constitution can be so easily canceled because they require the direct approval of the American people.
That is a process that we will never see again in our lifetimes because the entire legislation process has been bastardized by the deliberate abandonment of the amendment process.  The American people will never again be asked to ratify any fundamental change by either party because both are traitors to the Constitution.
We aren’t likely to see that situation change in our lifetime because the kind of leaders needed to lead a revival of fidelity to the Constitution are relegated to near obscurity by a national media that is equally treasonous to the Constitution and the values of its own profession.  It has been super co-opted by the ignorant, un-questioning lemming sycophants of the socialist left.   When it comes to their crypto-socialist leaders, they are “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil”, -just the opposite of the press during the Watergate scandal.
Where did that Press Corps go?  It was replaced in time by children of Sesame Street instead of the hard-nosed pros who had lived through WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, though Marxist-leaning progressives lived and worked as journalists even in those eras, but they kept their leanings to themselves and sought to appear to be entirely objective.  The American public would never have accepted their true ideological leanings and so they were kept under wraps.

But no more.  The progressive ideology of the Press is now on full display.  They serve as a branch of the liberal propaganda ministry.  Their universal failure and unwillingness to report on the issue of the fraudulence of Obama’s fabricated birth certificate image is the clearest evidence that they are co-conspirators or cowards.
Their rejection by the American public at large is seen in the collapse of the ratings numbers for CNN and the meteoric rise of the numbers for Fox News, which also will not report the truth that could bring payback from the federal bureaucracy at Obama’s orders.  Just as was inflicted on Arizona when Holder and Obama failed to win a total ban on the Arizona anti-illegal migrant invasion law.  Within hours the hammer came down as the federal incarceration and deportation cooperation was canceled.
The coastal liberal media elites hold most of the reins to what is seen on the tube but what they dispense doesn’t reflect the political views of over half of the nation.  The other almost-half either has no political views or are dyed-in-the-wool leftists who will willingly take the ship of state to the bottom rather than correct its course in a way that disadvantages them.

What does our nation’s present political situation have to do with one Jerry Sandusky?  Everything.  We got here that same way that he got his victims.  He targeted them, courted them, groomed them to accept his adult supervision over them, he seduced them with gifts and smiles and hugs, and then he finally revealed his true nature when he stripped them of their dignity, autonomy, and their freedom from oppressive violation and unwilling subjugation.
That is a very similar course as that which the progressives have followed for about a century.  They just haven’t yet reached the end goal and end action against the disarmed, sedated, distracted, ignorant and submissive American public.

But as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, if they continue on the accelerated path they’ve been on for the last generation, and especially since Obama took office, one must speculate that they may reach their full authoritarian power within our lifetime, accomplishing the de facto overthrow of the Constitution as it is written, and its replacement with a Constitution as they have redefined.

Will American be a better place to live when that era is finally is achieved?  It depends on who you are.  If you are among the meritorious, you may or may not be happy with your lot, depending on how much of the reward of your efforts and hours of labor are donated to the unmeritorious.  Will you be a good little child of the USSA, or will you be a trouble-making rebel who goes around quoting traitors like Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and James Madison?  Will you be Loyal to your “rightfully constituted government” or will you wish to over-throw it and replace it with a government based on the consent of the governed?

I believe it was Thomas Jefferson who observed that the normal societal progression is one in which government power grows and individual freedom shrinks.  As each generation grows farther from their heroic roots, they become softer and lazier and more juvenile.  They therefore value security, stability, and privilege (along with a prosperous status quo supported by the government) to the insecurity of greater freedom.  Fear and need are the deciding influences, and the cultural elites in government are right there to facilitate their dependency because that is how they remain in power in a democratic republic.

Thanks to the treason of Justice Roberts and his ilk, government power is now at its peacetime zenith.  The question is; “is there such a thing as reversing the direction the nation has been on for over a century?”  Well, forget that question, how about asking if there is even any hope of simply stopping or just slowing the progression, much less reversing it.
Fortunately, there is hope of slowing it on November 6, 2012.  If that hope doesn’t come to  fruition, then there won’t be much hope left by which to sleep peacefully in the land of the formerly free, -in the home of the not-so-brave.

Then it will be time to start locating the life-rafts and life-jackets, because there won’t be much hope that our ship of state will stop taking on water (debt) at an unsustainable rate, and everyone except the religiologists and the somnambulant will be able to recognize what comes next.  (water-logged ships sink!)

by a.r. nash  july 2012

http://obama–nation.com

http://americansod.com

Dark Forebodings and Pseudo-Intellectual Obots

Shadowman

I am a computer engineer with 35 years experience with a lot experience with document management, structure, and graphics.  Within 45 minutes of the White House’s posting of the Obama birth certificate I told my wife it was a fraud. In fact I said it was such a bad fraud that I thought it had to be one of three things, either a joke and the White House was soon to call out “April Fools”, or the person that put the document together intentionally tried to let us know it was a fraud, or last, the person that put it together was completely inept at using a computer. There simply were no other options for me.

What followed caused me great concern. This was a huge story; the press was ignoring what was likely to be the biggest story since Watergate. The continued disregard by the mainstream press, whose job it is to look out for and report matters of importance was a clear sign something is terribly wrong in America.  Besides the fact his policies are in complete opposition to his stated goals and that he is systematically disassembling our system of checks and balances and assaulting the Constitution daily, it is now evident this man has no business being in that office. To me, as an American who loves this country and its impetus for freedom for the rest of the world, the entire world should be in an uproar so loud it should awaken nearby galaxies.

It should be of supreme importance to every man, woman, and child on the planet, regardless of your politics, that Obama be held up to the light so we can determine exactly what the situation is. Anything short of this is extreme madness and we would deserve whatever fate he has planned for us.

Americans are in such denial as they continue to imbibe on the propaganda of an apparently enslaved press and are continually stimulated with RaRaRa chants for the troops, patriotic sound bytes, passionate anthems, and mostly the constant clamoring to exalt the U.S.A. as the greatest country in the world. We once were the greatest country in the world, and I hope to be again. Something is smelling really rotten in Washington people, don’t let this situation get whitewashed by the press again

James Brock

Who am I?

My father was born in another country.
I was not his only child. He fathered several children with numerous women.
I became very close to my mother, as my father showed no interest in me.
My mother died at an early age from cancer.
Although my father deserted me and my mother raised me, I later wrote a book idolizing my father, not my mother.
Later in life, questions arose over my real name.
My birth records were sketchy. No one was able to produce a legitimate, reliable birth certificate.
I grew up practicing one faith but converted to Christianity, as it was widely accepted in my new country, but I practiced non-traditional beliefs and didn’t follow Christianity, except in the public eye under scrutiny.
I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult, disguising myself as someone who really cared about them.
That was before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and embarked on a new career.
I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirs that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child.
I became active in local politics in my 30′s; then, with help behind the scenes, I literally burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office in my 40s.
They said I had a golden tongue and could talk anyone into anything.
I had a virtually non-existent resume, little work history, and no experience in leading a single organization.
Yet I was a powerful speaker and citizens were drawn to me, as though I were a magnet and they were small roofing tacks.
I drew incredibly large crowds during my public appearances. This bolstered my ego.
At first, my political campaign focused on my country’s foreign policy… I was very critical of my country in the last war, and seized every opportunity to bash my country.
But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country’s economy.
I pretended to have a really good plan on how we could do better, and every poor person would be fed and housed for free.
I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess.
It was the free market, banks and corporations.
I decided to start making citizens hate them and, if they became envious of others who did well, the plan was clinched tight.
I called mine “A People’s Campaign”.
That sounded good to all people.
I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain widespread popular support.
I knew that, if I merely offered the people ‘hope’, together we could change our country and the world.
So, I started to make my speeches sound like they were on behalf of the downtrodden, poor, ignorant to include “persecuted minorities”.
My true views were not widely known, and I kept them unknown, until after I became my nation’s leader.
I had to carefully guard reality, as anybody could have easily found out what I really believed, if they had simply read my writings and examined those people associated with. I’m glad they didn’t.
Then I became the most powerful man in the world.
And then world learned the truth.
Who am I?

Adolph Hitler!

If you were thinking of SOMEONE ELSE,You should be scared, very scared!

matt7531 (reply to missing comment)

Yeah, I’m a computer engineer too, and you’re a fraud. You don’t have a clue how government records work. The record of your birth is in database tables, not in dusty old documents, you fraud.
[EXCUSE ME, BUT YOU ARE THE IGNORANT FRAUD!  EVEN IDIOTS KNOW THAT VITAL RECORDS ARE PHYSICAL DOCUMENTS AND HAVE DIGITAL BACK-UPs IN DATA-BASES WHICH ALLOW THE PRINTING OF ABSTRACT VERSIONS AS CERTIFIED BIRTH CERTIFICATES.  THE LATEST HOSPITAL SYSTEMS MAY BE ENTIRELY DIGITAL, BUT THEY HAVE PRODUCED ONLY A TINY FRACTION OF THE BIRTH RECORDS OF ANY GIVEN JURISDICTION.]
If you knew anything, you’d know that you can get a copy of your birth record printed any time by your state’s Vital Records Office, and that they will print it with new software on whatever their current document template is.  Some “engineer”, you, like most of these BS swallowers, don’t even understand that the real record of your birth is the Vital Statistics record BC’s are printed from (i.e., the original birth hospital records).
The State of Hawaii has stated over and over again it has these records, and the BC’s they have produced are true to these records.
[ HAWAII HAS NEVER, EVER CLAIMED THAT THE CERTIFICATIONS AND CERTIFICATES THAT THEY PRODUCE ARE "TRUE AND CORRECT" COPIES OF ANYTHING!  THAT IS BECAUSE THEY AREN'T.  THEY ARE INSTEAD DIGITAL "ABSTRACTS" OF IMAGES THAT ONLY EXIST IN CYBERSPACE.  EVERYONE IS NOW DENIED THE RIGHT TO SEE AND OBTAIN A TRUE COPY OF THEIR BIRTH DOCUMENT.

HAWAII, AND PROBABLY MOST STATE GOVERNMENTS, ONLY "CERTIFY" THAT THE INFORMATION IS THE SAME AS IN THE ORIGINAL, SO YOUR CLAIM IN AMBIGUOUSLY TRUE THAT THEY ARE CERTIFIED TO BE "TRUE TO THE RECORDS" BUT NO ONE CAN CONFIRM THAT WITH THEIR OWN EYES AND MIND BECAUSE WE NOW HAVE TO TAKE THEIR WORD FOR IT.  THAT'S FINE EXCEPT WHEN IT COMES TO THE OFFICE OF A PRESIDENT WHO WAS BORN OUTSIDE OF THE U.S. AND IS STRONGLY BACKED BY HIS SYCOPHANTS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF HAWAII, -EMPLOYEES WHO DON'T WANT TO BE FIRED, LOOSE THEIR RETIREMENT, OR SEE THEIR KNIGHT IN SHINING ARMOR DEFEATED.]
Don’t you feel stupid to say that something is “forged” when those who produced it say it is genuine?
[STUPID LIAR!  NO ONE HAS EVER SAID THAT ONE OR BOTH OF OBAMA'S BCs WERE "GENUINE".  THEY RESORT TO FINELY TUNED LEGAL LANGUAGE THAT MAKES IT SEEM LIKE THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE SAYING WHEN AN EXAMINATION OF THE WORDS THEY USE PROVES OTHERWISE.  THEY HAVE RELEASED ONLY WELL CRAFTED FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATIONS OF THE "FACTS" THEY SEEM TO BE ASSERTING BUT REALLY AREN'T.]
It’s like you telling me my own check is forged. If you worked for my I/T Dept, I’d fire you for being unable to comprehend simple logic.  [FOOL! IT NOT LIKE THAT AT ALL.  IT'S LIKE YOU BEING TOLD THAT THE CHECK CASHED IN YOUR NAME BY YOUR CROOKED BROTHER-IN-LAW WAS FORGED, WHEN IN FACT IT WAS ACTUALLY FORGED.]

arnash reacts to what  Bob Munck (the prestigious self-appointed expert) wrote:
Download the BC and play around with it..then print and scan any similar document 100 ways to Sunday.  I have. [AND MY RESULTS ARE......] Just as background, I’ve been in computer systems…[blah, blah, blah since I chose to not reveal the results of my experimenting with B.Os pdf image but instead choose to deflect and obfuscate by talking up my esteemed self.]

In any case, the online version is irrelevant.[IRRELEVANT???  WHERE'S YOUR RESULTS?  YOU CAN'T REVEAL THEM?  IS THAT BECAUSE YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN THEM?  GEE, I WONDER WHY.]

I don’t even know [CLEARLY YOU DON'T KNOW] what it means to call the online computer file a “forgery;”
PERHAPS IF YOU CONSULTED A DICTIONARY THEN YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND!

it’s not physical,  It’s just a picture of the birth certificate.
[EXACTLY!!!  IT IS OF ZERO EVIDENTIARY VALUE.  IT'S MERELY AN IMAGE. IT'S NOT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE.  TO SAY THAT OBUMA HAS RELEASED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE IF A FRAUDULENT STATEMENT]

Would you say that an image of a dollar bill on your
computer screen is a counterfeit?  [CERTAINLY NOT.  BUT I WOULD SAY THAT AN IMAGE OF A COUNTERFEIT DOLLAR BILL IS A COUNTERFEIT REPRESENTATION OF A REAL DOLLAR BILL, JUST AS OBUMA'S PDF IS A COUNTERFEIT REPRESENTATION OF A REAL HAWAIIAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE, -ONE THAT THEY NEVER ISSUED, NOR EVEN CLAIMED THAT THEY ISSUED.]

What matters is the paper copy, with the raised state seal and certification by the state of Hawaii, and the information in the
Hawaiian official records.
[EXACTLY!  BUT NO ONE HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO INSPECT SUCH A PAPER DOCUMENT BECAUSE ONE DOES NOT EXIST.  THE PDF PRINTOUT THAT SUSAN GUTHRIE WAS SHOWN DID NOT CONSTITUTE AN INSPECTION AND VERIFICATION OF IT'S CREATION HAVING BEEN BY THE HAWAIIAN DOH.  TO JUSTIFY OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT ON HER INEXPERT UNSUSPECTING CURSORY LOOK AT A FAKE PRINTOUT IS THE HEIGHT OF STUPIDITY.]

Are you willing to  assume that the entire
state government of Hawaii, including the former Republican governor,
are part of a conspiracy?
[SOME ARE, SOME ARE JUST IN DENIAL, LIKE THE OBAMA-SUPPORTING RINO EX-GOVENOR WHO "FELL UNDER HIS SPELL" AND DIDN'T WANT TO SEE HAWAII'S GOLDEN SON BE DISSED AND HUMILIATED NATIONWIDE.]

Accepting the many birther scenarios requires a
huge suspension of belief and logic.
[WHAT SCENARIOS?  NO ONE HAS TO ACCEPT ANY SCENARIO TO KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT THE PDF IMAGE IS A COMPUTER CREATED FABRICATION.  IT TAKES AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF DENIAL TO REJECT WHAT YOUR OWN EYES TELL YOU.  BUT CONGRATULATIONS!  YOU'VE MANAGED TO ACCOMPLISH IT!  I DON'T REALLY BELIEVE THAT.  I KNOW THAT YOU KNOW THAT IT IS A FAKE, BUT YOU ARE JUST ANOTHER LYING, EVIL, PROTECTOR OF A LYING UNCONSTITUTIONAL COUNTERFEITER-IN-CHIEF.

Dr.
You're another person that does not understand very much about your own country's qualifications for highest office.  Only one parent need be a citizen at time of birth and the child does not have to be born on US soil.  This is why this entire argument is spurious.  Even IF he had been born in Kenya, so long as one parent was a citizen, then he is as well, and is eligible for elected office.

This is why  most people with working brain realize and call the birthers idiots and ignorant.  Most completely ignorant to the actual policy regarding birth right for office.

arnash
Dear Dr. Are you a Dr. of stupidity?  "Even IF he had been born in Kenya, so long as one parent was a citizen, then he is as well, and is eligible for elected office."

[SO TRUE!  He is a US citizen and is eligible for every elected office in the nation, except one,...the one that specifically requires candidates to be natural born citizens (you dumb socialist dolt!)]

His mother’s American citizenship was not conveyed to him by any American law if he was born in America.  But it was conveyed to him if he was born outside of America, making him a provisional statutory citizen at birth since he had a foreign father.  Statutory citizens are not natural citizens, and are therefore ineligible to be President.

AR Nash:
Seriously?  How can a professional birth certificate defender such as yourself actually think that others are as ignorant as you pretend to be?  The brain-dead Hawaiian newspapers printed whatever arrived from the Bureau of Vital Statistics.  They did not have to verify anything.  Neither deaths nor births nor divorces nor marriages.  Whatever was registered with the government and sent to them was printed.  But I believe you will find that the birth announcements do not/did not include any mention of where the births took place, -whether in Hawaii or elsewhere.

Reconmarine7

I really don’t care if Obama was born in Hawaii or not.  If you support him, YOU are my enemy.

NOBO4ME
OHHHH AMEN!!!!! I just said in my post how it is so disheartening that his cult followers do not care WHAT he does, no matter how corrupt; they still love him.  And you are so right. Those who support this destroyer of America are my enemy as well.

foramerica

Doesn’t matter what Arpaio has found out. Who is going to do anything about it? Eric Holder? Yeah right. Congress? Doubtful. There isn’t any government authority that will do anything at all about it. It doesn’t matter how guilty Obama is (and it seems he is very much so), no one is going to do anything about it to remove him. Most people do not care how bad he might be, because if he will promise them the moon, they will believe it.

ataribaby

I couldn’t agree more…
I would only add this: and its a sad thought…but maybe America is done. Seriously. Maybe our time is just ‘up’ and we, like other great nations and ideas are done with. When you watch the news it sure looks that way!  I don’t want that to be true, but I am in such a deep depression over the state of the whole country.  I can’t honestly see any way its going to get better. I’ll vote for Romney, but honestly he’s said nothing new and doesn’t have any great ideas.
Congress sucks, kind has for almost 50 years. The debt, crime, race issues, I mean what’s the plan to fix it all? Sure, you gotta stop drilling holes in the bottom of the boat before you start bailing it out…but it’s not gonna make a huge difference. What the world needs is a ‘reset’ a great war, plague, disaster…That’s horrible to say isn’t it?

Yes  I  Know… but I can’t see anything other than sorta starting fresh with a clean slate that’s going to make any real affective difference.  This imposter Obama sucks, really REALLY sucks, I agree with that notion…but really all he is is a faster way of getting no where good…we’re headed as a nation without morals, values and work ethics, reasonable laws and good policy, in his direction anyway aren’t we?

There is no real hope. Nothing is going to change or get substantially better. Imagine what would happen when and if they ever expose and charge/remove this guy from office…or worse if he gets re-elected and he will…you know its so close but in our guts we have to separate our hopes from reality…no one really is goo goo gaga about Romney are they? Not like they are for Obama…Most people that work hard, have jobs, run businesses (like me) can’t even afford to take off and vote against this clown…and the Ron Paul folks are just gonna take enough of the vote while sticking to their morals…good for them, But bad for everyone… Its not going to change for the better…someone tell me how and I will listen.
I see no hope what so ever…and that blows! I hate that…but It’s true and I have the gumption to admit it…to myself at the least…that’s so pathetic really… wow.

drewynp

I hear your pain brother.  Let’s give it one more shot…get everyone you know personally energized to vote against the commie in chief.  Don’t give up brother!  We can do it.  And if we can’t, we have to stay here and fight.  My wife and I go back and forth: should we move to Thailand or Belize, or stay here and fight the fascists?  I don’t want to leave.  I have land here.  My parent are old.  I’m expecting my first child in December.  What do I do?
Let’s encourage all of our acquaintances to vote Romney in November.  If he doesn’t serve us well, at least we tried, and then we rebel.  But for now we are a semi free country where votes count, except the ones counted by a firm in Spain, and we can deal with this.  Don’t give up hope yet brother.  There are SO MANY of us just like you.  You have to remember this when the usurper in chief interrupts our emails…we outnumber them 2 to 1!  We just have to be well connected.

ataribaby
I own a few small cafes and a bar…And I’m not a whacko or nut job (maybe a little over worked) but I started about 5 years ago making plans to move…thought Canada or maybe southern Mexico really liked the Dominican Republic (and its affordable)…I setup all my assets so I could maximize my cash flow, transferred assets around, never bought when I can afford to and it SHOULD be the smart choice- instead I rent all my cafes and my home, keep bank accounts in the UK and CA, not to avoid taxes which I pay allot of, but to make my money (some of it) easy to get at…invested in gold, silver and jewels instead of stocks, became a ‘prepper’ of sorts…all because I see it getting worse, much much worse every day: beyond the point of no return, at least for a while.

I’m 38, well financially off now (self made teen run away), educated and healthy enough…and I did try to just ignore the news too..and that helped for a little while…the moral is that my real motivation for getting slightly rich was to able to escape MY country…that’s freaking insane isn’t it?! But it’s true. I don’t buy fancy or nice things like I always thought I would (and now can) as a child. I ‘invest’ my money and time into making it so I can survive long term. That’s so pathetic…maybe it’s smart, we shall see, but I shouldn’t feel like I have to live this way. Hell, I saw a therapist just in case I was loosing it…she now is doing the same thing! Seriously! i asked her questions she couldn’t answer…like how is it going to get better and would it be right to have kids and bring them into this world right now, etc. I made HER depressed because I was so logical!

Joe Kuehler

Moot points. Just like Eric Holder can orchestrate crimes to further the agenda, just like the senate can forgo it’s constitutional responsibility of drafting budgets, Obama will not be touched for what, at first seemed unreasonable, but is now starting to appear somewhat plausible. Read history. Read it and understand it. We are not the first society to experience this sort of thing. You liberals and your absolute refusal to look at anything objectively is the plague. Your blind faith in an awful awful person that you elected and your willingness to approve the destruction of a great country that stronger men than you built and more capable men among you now strive to keep viable is shameful.
You who believe that his ends justify your means will suffer more than the rest of us. Maybe not yourself, but certainly the generation you help to create. Your indignation will increase with each passing day as you witness your children struggling more than you do without the same rewards you yourself would demand from such struggle. Will it be at that point when you determine that it is the statist policies of the left that created that world? Or will you at that point continue to find anything else to blame in an attempt to hide the truth from yourself? Read history. Read it and understand it. This article, along with countless others that describe the blatant corruption of this administration, are nothing more than the tree in the forest that falls with no one around to hear it. And that is unfortunate.

Cooky642 Nobama! Noromney! Ron Paul!!!

Joe, there are plenty of us who heard that tree fall.  The problem is that no one seems inclined to bestir themselves to DO something about it.  So, the nation will sit in front of the mind-manipulation machine, beer in hand, and watch the United States of America go to he ll on a greased skid.  THAT is unfortunate!

Jerry

The glaring danger staring Americans right in the face is that at every turn the government officials stonewall any honest investigation concerning Obama’s citizenship.  The press ignores the concerns that Obama has not revealed any of his documents concerning his education, place of birth, written papers and on and on.  I’ve had to produce more documentation to acquire a damn passport. Get in the fight ladies and gentlemen. It took only 3% of the colonies population to stand up to the British Crown and send his handiness to the wood shed.

Diego Roswell

The American people do not care. Obama could (and no doubt has) commit first degree murder in front of thousands of witnesses and the American voters would stare paralyzed at the voting choices and still pick Obama. Why is that? It is because Obama and the progressives have been building up a top down society for decades. The financial crisis was all that was needed to put enough people on the welfare roles to cripple the economy for the foreseeable future.
Obama will be reelected and gain full control of the Supreme Court, thus ending over 200 years of the once great United States. If the people of the United States cared about their country, their freedom, their liberties, their history, their democracy, they would have spoken up when the democrats started chiseling away at our Constitution decades ago. It is too late now that 48% of Americans are on some form of government assistance and the democrats take credit openly for this. Obama could be from another galaxy for all anyone cares, as long as they get their “fair share” of government hand outs.

james street

when i enlisted in the US navy in 1986 my desired NEC was cryptology which required a top secret clearance. it took me 2 years to to get my clearance because my mother was German. during our course of crypto- training we learned that NOTHING regardless of the sensitivity of the material can be withheld from the president. access to such sensitive material was granted on a “need to know basis.” in other words you couldn’t just walk in and read or view anything you want. that is NOT the case with the president. he has access to EVERYTHING. whether he needs to know or not. top secret information is defined as, information, that if compromised, could have “extremely grave” consequences to the security of the nation. consider this and think about who we have as president and it will chill you to the bone.

FUBO

Uh, I worked for the government, you would be surprised how screwed up it is. The government is made up of people, people make mistakes. Investigators make mistakes or just don’t care. The fact is the government is the most inefficient organization out there, understand what I am saying.

NOBO4ME

As wonderful as it all sounds, for the past 3 1/2 years there has been too much talk and not enough action.  That’s my disappointing side coming out.

I see the polls where he is always ahead; I hear the LOVE for Obama continually, and it’s so disheartening.  I hear those who say they have so much on Obama that “this time” it means impeachment for him, yet nothing is ever done.  I hear all the talk about treason (and by golly this man is guilty of that IMHO — he has betrayed the American people and broken his oath to protect and defend the Constitution), yet no one seems to care how corrupt he is.

It doesn’t seem to matter what he does, how he bashes capitalism (even though he makes his money that way); he bashes the rich (yet he’s rich); he has divided this country poor against rich (the job creators), black against white (when whites have done more for the blacks than any other race), thinks the government built America, when free enterprise and personal businesses built America; he thinks government made us what we are, when it’s THE TAXPAYER who makes HIM WHAT HE IS. Without US, he’d have NOTHING!
He thinks without government, small business wouldn’t exist.  How about without small business and their taxes, GOVERNMENT wouldn’t exist! He accuses Romney of outsourcing, when he has OUTSOURCED OUR MONEY to other countries: Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Finland,Denmark, China — USING TAXPAYER DOLLARS — Fisker, GE, Solar panels in Mexico — the list goes on and on. The stimulus went every other country, but NOT to US!  He is “spreading OUR wealth” to the other countries, pushing us over the precipice into the third-world-country abyss!! Obama has received $2.7 million dollars in foreign gross income.  WHO IS THE REAL OUTSOURCER HERE? OBAMA! With our money! Obama accuses Bush of being unpatriotic and irresponsible when he raised the deficit, but Obama doubled it in less than 1/2 the time, so THAT isn’t unpatriotic and irresponsible?

I’m so sick of his two-faced rhetoric, and more sick of his cult followers who love everything he says and does.
It’s endless the damage Obama has done to America, to our morale, to our livelihood, to our families.  But his cult followers haven’t a clue of the possibly irreparable damage, because all they care about is his color and the freebies he “promises” with his lies, BUT they haven’t received them YET.  They’re still waiting for “Obama’s stash.”

The STUPIDS in America will be the cause of America’s demise.

Very sad, very frustrating, very disheartening.  The direction America is headed makes me cry. The lives that have been sacrificed and LOST for our freedom will have been for naught — makes my heart break. 236 years of the most wonderful country on the planet, and ONE MAN comes along and destroys it all!

When Obama gets another 4 years, who is he going to blame for the mess he inherited — the past administration? HIMSELF???

Independent115

Can you please elaborate?  What treason is Obama guilty of – I am not defending, but what is\are the treasonable offenses?  How do feel he bashes capitalism?

One point – Obama didn’t personally double the deficit nor did his policies.  The doubling of the deficit was a simple result of a dramatic drop in tax revenue that was brought on by a recession that contrary to popular belief was not caused by Obama.  Also, congress sets national spending – not the president – for the record there is a republican majority in the congress through Obammas term in office.  Again, I want to be clear, Obama is not the great hope or savior of our nation, but he is neither the devil incarnate and the destroyer of our nation.  I am not his follower.  To be clear as crystal – I am an independent.  I make decisions based on facts and not party bias or party appeals.  I do not love everything Obama says or does.  I do not care about his color.  I want no freebies and personally feel the sense of entitlement out of control in the USA at this time.  I just don’t think it is an accurate statement to say Obama is destroying the country.

I do not feel Obama has personally done damage to this country, let alone irreparable damage.  I do think that for many reason he is divisive, as is republican rhetoric.  I too feel the direction America is headed in is scary, however it is not due to Obama alone.  It is due to myriad of complex reasons.  I despise the simpleton mindset to blame one person or entity for incredibly complex sets of circumstances and their outcomes.  Did you think America was at its apex 3 to 4 years ago? Did you think the only direction America would go is up over the span of eternity?

I feel very confident that this nation will be booming again 5 years from now.  I don’t think the 5 year reference has much to do with Obama not being president for 4 of the 5 years but rather the bad debt from the housing bubble (deregulation passed by Clinton and propagated by Bush) and the Euro crisis will have had time to be absorbed\overcome\washed away.

Regarding you last few points, are you drunk or just incredibly melodramatic?  America isn’t ruined.  It can’t be ruined by 1 or 2 presidential terms regardless of who the president is.  Yes, Obama has blamed the prior administration for leaving a economy that was nosediving towards a depression.  Can you deny the economy was in a complete freefall and collapse as Obama took office?  Did the economy collapse simply because people were afraid he would become president?

Thorn Inside

PleaseNNomore2 you are right but then no one will care. There will be a day when all of this stuff will be confirmed. Sadly our investigative reporters today do not have the gut to dig into the story. What ever happened to unbiased reporting? It is dead. We now have no one with the guts to stand up and report the truth.

ataribaby

Things we didn’t know about past presidents but eventually came out:
JKF liked the ladies. FDR couldn’t walk. The entire Clinton administration. Jefferson has kids with a black slave woman, etc etc

One day this will come to light. I honestly think that in a way (Don’t hate me here) it might be for the best if it doesn’t right now and he just looses the election nice and simple… (Assuming he does) We’ll have a civil war on our hands if the MSM actually dig into this and follow it.

hell, I didn’t believe it. Didn’t want to, I am a indy voter…but I did the WH PDF download and Illustrator experiments myself, just to prove you guys all wrong…but ya know what? Your not wrong. That’s what blows my mind that people just don’t try it themselves, those in the MSM have graphics experts…just try it and see if Joe and Zullo are telling the truth.

Each Obama ‘fact’, in and of itself sometimes is trivial… but you have to look at ALL these odd coincidences together…its just insane to think that all these factoids together don’t lead to at the least a congressional investigation. The SS#, the 8 diff BCs out there, the Communist things, the mailman, the Bill Ayers issues, the school loans, lost records, no Columbia witnesses or records, the Indonesian school records, the photos, the passport names being different, all the long for and selective service document issues, the voter frauds, the Frank Davis issues, it goes on and on…C’mon folks.. Is ALL that stuff BS>? Really ALL of it is? Sure, individually yeah, one thing here or there is trivial…but not all of this together… and yes, its the right winger nut jobs pointing this stuff out…but honestly whom else would? Not the far left Obama cult like fans, not the DNC…so who else would even look at his documents but the right? Just because allot of them are oddballs (you know you are ;-)) doesn’t mean that facts they discover, because they are the only ones looking, aren’t worth investigating !

Thorn Inside

We are going to know one day that this man is a fake. That type of secret will not be kept for ever. Someone knows who faked what ever document will make a fortune on the story. They are afraid right now to come forward (I certainly would since Obama is from Chicago after all).

Thorn Inside
Is anyone old enough to remember Deep Throat? The man was 90 years old before he was identified.

Chimes

So how is Sheriff Joe going to get anyone in the justice department to listen? Remember, the justice department is run by Holder, the most corrupt AG in U.S. history and totally beholden to Odumbo, the most corrupt president in U.S. history. Sheriff Joe better keep looking over his shoulder and don’t sit with his back to the door.

“I voted for Obama to prove I was not a racist. Now I wonder who I can vote for to prove I am not an idiot.”…unknown

“To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist Professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.”…Marxist Obamba

“When classmates in college asked me just what a community organizer did, I couldn’t answer them directly. Instead ,I’d pronounce the need for change.”…Obamba

“I blew a few smoke rings, remembering those years. Pot had helped,and booze;maybe a little blow when you could afford it.”…Obamba

James Brock Collapse

EMAIL FROM UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII (SEE BELOW)
Atlas reader Rudy emailed both the University of Washington and the University of Hawaii, and they sent him back dates of enrollment.  It didn’t match the dates Wikipedia had for Stanley Ann Dunham. Bob tried to update Wikipedia and his updates got deleted within minutes.  The big question is how was Ann having Barack in Honolulu in Aug 1961 AND enrolled at the U of Washington the same month?
When public record information from the University of Washington was added to Wikipedia’s biography of Stanley Ann Dunham (Barack Hussein Obama Jr’s mother), it was removed in 35 minutes the first time and 34 minutes the second time.  Read what Obama’s team of internet thugs doesn’t want you to know.
See official emails from U of Hawaii and U (see below)

I’m concerned with the unlikely dates:
Sept 26 1960  First day at U of Hawaii for Ann (Why did she start 6 weeks late?)
One month later – conception
Two months later – drops out of University of Hawaii
Three months later – married
10 months later – back in Washington attending classes at University of Washington
These are implausible dates, and may imply that Ann got pregnant in Seattle and THAT is why her family moved to Hawaii. University of Washington records place Stanley Ann Dunham in Washington State in Aug 1961 so how could she be in Honolulu 2680 miles away birthing Barack the same month.

EMAIL:
“The University of Hawaii at Manoa is only able to provide the following information for Stanley Ann Dunham:Dates of attendance: Fall 1960 (First day of instruction 9/26/1960)Spring 1963 – Summer 1966 Fall 1972 – Fall 1974 Summer 1976 Spring 1978 Fall 1984 – Summer 1992 Degrees awarded: BA – Mathematics, Summer 1967 (August 6, 1967) MA – Anthropology, Fall 1983 (December 18, 1983) PhD – Anthropology, Summer 1992 (August 9, 1992) Sincerely,Stuart Lau”**************************************** Stuart Lau University Registrar Office of Admissions and Records University of Hawaii at Manoa Ph: (808) 956-8010 ****************************************
And this:
Ms. Stanley Ann Dunham was enrolled at the University of Washington for:
Autumn 1961
Winter 1962
Spring 1962The records responsive to your request from the University of Washington are above as provided by the Public Disclosure Laws of Washington State.  This concludes the University’s response to your Public Records request.  Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns.Madolyne LawsonOffice of Public Records206-543-9180

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers