Obama: An Adopted Citizen & Illegitimate President Pt.1

    Most children are born as natural members of their family.
Some are not, but become members by legal adoption.
Most citizens are born as natural members of their nation.
Some are not, but become members by legal adoption.

   Their adoption is via naturalization law, and effected by the procedures required by that law.  Some alien-conceived members of the nation, by being born within the nation, are legally recognized as members immediately upon birth.  But they are not natural members of the nation because they were not born of its members but of outsiders.  They must not be conflated with the other 96%+/- of children born in America to members of the American family. They were not adopted.  They are known as “natural born citizens” and labeled such by the U.S. government.

If foreign parents are legal members of American society then children born to them obtain that which they do not possess and have no natural right to possess.  Thanks to the naturalizing authority of the 14th Amendment, they obtain membership via automatic national adoption, -being naturalized at birth rather than later in life (as their parents may seek).

The two forms of membership from the beginning of life are essentially identical, but with one infinitesimal difference.  Like children born of surrogates, the children of immigrants aren’t natural members of the American national family  but are automatically adopted from the day they are born.
They are labeled by the government as the “native-born” citizens because it is unacceptable to label then as they were labeled in England, which was “alien-born subjects”.  Calling new American citizens  “alien-born citizens” would carry a negative connotation that would be undesirable.

The “native-born” are the ones granted citizenship via the 14th Amendment because their parents are legal, State Department-sanctioned permanent-resident immigrants and they themselves were born in the United States.  They are not natural born citizens but they are naturalized constitutional citizens and equal to natural citizens in every way under the sun,…except one.
It involves an office held by only one in 315 million people.  That office is the office of President of the United States and wields the power of the Commander-in-Chief.  Only a “natural born citizen” may hold that office and position.  Constitutional native-born citizens may not because they are Americans by adoption, and not by nature.  They are not full-blood members of the American family.  They are half-blood brothers whose foreign father, with a foreign nationality, render them ineligible to be the American President.

Bar´ack Hussein Soetoro-Obama Jr. is neither a natural American nor one of those adopted constitutional citizens because his citizenship was not bestowed by the 14th Amendment   He does not qualify for citizenship by it since it was not written to apply to children through their mother, but only through their father (as it had been since the founding of the nation).
But due to the 19th Amendment, by which women gained the right to vote, they also eventually gained the right to have their children inherit their American citizenship if their father happened to be a foreigner.  That had never been previously allowed in American history.

Citizenship was always conveyed by patrilineal descent.  The children were born with the father’s citizenship and his name, not the mother’s, since he had always been the head of the family, and represented it socially and politically.  Then, due to changes in nationality law occurring in the mid-20th century, children of mixed nationality marriages began inheriting from both parents, and dual-citizenship became possible from birth.
Obama Jr. obtained his citizenship not by being born in the U.S. under the 14th Amendment but on a provisional basis by a statute that was never written, -at least not in a form that directly applied to his birth circumstance (foreign father, American mother, U.S. birth).  Instead it was written for birth to an American mother and foreign father outside of the U.S.
It was never written because it was incorrectly assumed that all native-born children with a foreign parent were automatically deemed to be U.S. citizens due merely to the fact of being born within U.S. Jurisdiction.  But that assumption, made by an Attorney General, was false from the very beginning over 110 years ago.

It was false because children of non-immigrants do not fulfill the second requirement of the 14th Amendment, which is that in addition to being born in the U.S., one must be born to a father who is fully subject to the authority of the federal government, as only citizens and immigrants are.  Foreign fathers who are not permanent members of American society are still fully members of their own society and nation, and under its political jurisdiction exclusively.  Their relationship to the U.S. Government is via treaties, State Department policies, and the Law of Nations, -not via naturalization law nor immigration law.  *

So lacking an immigrant father, Obama Jr. was born without 14th Amendment citizenship.  But the government still has not figured that out.  It’s not their job to do so.  Their job is to simply apply “the law” as they received it from those who preceded them, and not question the validity of what they’ve received.  Their job is “to do or die, and not question why”.  “The Law”, as they received it, has continued the error made at the end of the 19th century following a Supreme Court opinion that American-born children of immigrants are made U.S. citizens via the 14th Amendment.  But what the court did not declare was that the children of non-immigrants are also U.S. citizens.

The subtle but enormous import of the error of assuming that that court opinion also applied to children born of non-immigrants was never recognized by anyone in a position to fix it, and so it has been perpetuated generation after generation after generation because no one ever questioned it and challenged it.  Instead of being corrected, it became “the law of the land”.  But eventually it became hugely significant thanks to An unforeseen massive invasion of illegal aliens into the country, -migrants and illegal immigrants, who gave birth here.  Those “legal citizen” children, through all the Hispanic voters connected to them, will determine who the next President will be, and thereby determine the fate of our nation.

About these ads

About arnash
“When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect.” - Mark Twain - Politicians and diapers - change 'em often, for the same reason. "Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other." Ronald Reagan "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." William F. Buckley, Jr. “The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell The people are the masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it. Abraham Lincoln “Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell “Satan will use a lake of truth to hide a pint of poison”.

2 Responses to Obama: An Adopted Citizen & Illegitimate President Pt.1

  1. yo says:

    I’m not exactly sure what the meaning of under the jurisdiction is according to the 14 amendment but i do feel that it is more stringing than what they have concluded because if it means nothing more than being born here then there wasn’t really a need to use that language, was there? They could have said something else that more accurately reflected the simple fact that the kid merely needed to be born here.

    • arnash says:

      They were attempting to be as simple and elegant as the wording of the Constitution itself, but over-simplifying the mandating of citizenship for freed slaves resulted in an ambiguous language hole that one could drive a truck through, and one did. The Attorney General in charge of figuring out what the Wong Kim Ark Scotus ruling meant for the executive branch. He, like the Supreme Court, and even the authors of the 14th Amendment did not realize what the language used actually means. It meant the authority to strip men of their freedom, train them in hellish conditions, and send them to their death in battle. No civilian lawyer or legislator in the insulated, and isolated secure environment of civilian Washington DC or academia has/had any clue about such fundamentals of citizenship. The 14th Amendment was not aimed at children of immigrants because they were considered to be subject, like their father who they were under, to the jurisdiction of his foreign government. That policy endured from the founding of the nation until the AG misinterpreted what the Supreme Court ruled in 1898 regarding WKA.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 74 other followers

%d bloggers like this: