Barry’s Buried Past & Counterfeit Birth Certificate
July 9, 2012 27 Comments
White Lies vs Obama Lies
The arc of Barry Obama’s entire adult life has been one of deception. He deceived his progressive benefactors, the parents of terrorist Bill Ayers, by portraying himself as a needy socialist foreign student.
He deceived the universities he attended in ways we are not able to ascertain because he has sealed every academic record that exists. He deceived his minister, irReverend Wright, into believing that he was of the same mind-set, -a mind-set of prejudice against Jews, white America, the American government, and America’s founders, even though Obama was not similarly prejudiced.
He deceived his publicist and would-be publisher that advanced him a whole lot of money in anticipation of a autobiography by a Kenyan born American.
And worse of all, he deceived the American electorate in every way possible when he ran for President. After passing himself off as having been born in Kenya for perhaps two decades, he is all of a sudden a native-born son of Hawaii. He then leveraged that probable lie to deceive every ignorant fellow citizen into thinking that that alone qualified him as being a constitutionally eligible candidate to be President.
When someone of authority in the Hawaiian Democratic Party refused to certify him as constitutionally eligible, he and the DNC leadership altered their party’s candidate-certification form to exclude any mention of being constitutionally eligible, and thus deceived all the gullible state officials in every other state in the union, thereby guaranteeing that his name would not be barred from their state ballots.
He surfed on top of the wave of the electorate’s and the media’s constitutional ignorance and their willingness to believe anything, and thereby left everyone self-deceived by the misconception that native-born citizens are the same as natural born citizens, and therefore fulfill the presidential eligibility requirement of the Constitution.
But the American voters were not the only ones he deceived. He also deceived himself into believing he could accomplish things that were in fact impossible and even preposterous. There’s no deceiver like a self-deceived deceiver.
Then he finally topped off all of his deceptions with a counterfeit image of an official Hawaiian birth certificate. Almost everything about its release is soaked in deception and falsehood, -from the concocted story of how it was acquired, to the story of why it wasn’t previously shared, to it’s non-connection to any actual physical paper original, to its purely digital nature, to its manifestly manipulated multi-layered constitution that no scan would, nor could, ever produce. -To its lack of any certification or authentication, including the absence of the actual signature of the state registrar, and lack of the state seal, along with the truth that it was not an image of an actual birth record but was merely a digital abstract.
Falsehood and deception have been the hallmark characteristic of his entire adult life, centered on the lie that he was born in Kenya, or the lie that he was born in Hawaii. He knows which one is false but he won’t let the American people know because he won’t allow anyone to see the original paper record filed with the Hawaiian Dept. of Health, nor the micro-film image of it. He won’t allow that because it would show something that he does not want anyone to see, something that would ruin the public perception of his presidential eligibility.
If the public thinks that anyone born in the U.S. can be President, but he was born outside of the U.S., then he would be in big trouble. Everyone knows that John McCain was born in Panama and not America, but by being the son of American parents, he is eligible to be President, but if Obama had been born in Panama, who would think that he would also be eligible? No one. He would doubly be a foreigner, -by paternity and birth location. He can’t allow anyone to suspect that that was the actual circumstance of his birth. In his case, the somewhere else wouldn’t have been Panama, but would have been Kenya or Vancouver, Canada, -just a two hour drive from Seattle.
Deception is not accomplished solely by lies that are told, but by truth that is withheld, -truth that is hidden or unavailable, such as a marriage certificate for his parents, some record of testimony as to where his mother was living between February and August of 1961, or photos of his pregnant mother, photos of himself as a newborn in her arms, any photos taken in the hospital or at home after delivery, witnesses to her pregnancy, witnesses to a relationship between her and his father, witnesses to his birth or his mother’s stay in the maternity ward where he was supposedly born, including the other women who delivered babies at the same time in the same hospital named on his birth certificate image, -women who would never have forgotten a negro baby with an African father born to a white teenage. The mother of the twins born on Aug 5th in the hospital where Obama was supposedly delivered the day before never saw him nor his mother there, (and she’s one of his fans).
The chief characteristic of his origin is a total absence of any records or witnesses. If he were just another white baby born to just another white female then who would remember his birth? But he was as different from the mundane as is possible without being fathered by an alien species. Consider; a father from a different country, a different continent, a different nationality, and above all, a different race, (and with a most unusual name).
Human memory is not so pathetic that such a birth would have been forgotten, ever. Yet no witnesses exist. How is that possible if his fake birth certificate’s narrative is true? One or the other of two possibilities has to be true and one has to be false. Either human memory is crap, or his birth certificate “facts” are crap. It can’t possibly be neither.
in response to:
Were Ann Dunham & Barack Obama Really Married? by Nick Chase July 2012 American Thinker (exerpt)
Producing a “birth-certificate” forgery is a big scam to cover up a minor fact — that the Dunham/Obama marriage was not a real marriage. Is it really worth the political risk of having the scam exposed?
Perhaps not to you or me — but we’re normal people. The supposedly storybook nature of the first two years of this marriage was central to the Obama 2008 presidential campaign; it appears in Dreams from My Father; and the president occasionally repeats the myth, as in this speech (excerpted here) to students at Wakefield High School, Arlington, Virginia, on September 8, 2009:
Now, I know it’s not always easy to do well in school. I know a lot of you have challenges in your lives right now that can make it hard to focus on your schoolwork. I get it. I know what it’s like. My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mom who had to work and who struggled at times to pay the bills and wasn’t always able to give us the things that other kids had. There were times when I missed having a father in my life. There were times when I was lonely and I felt like I didn’t fit in.
So I wasn’t always as focused as I should have been on school, and I did some things I’m not proud of, and I got in more trouble than I should have. And my life could have easily taken a turn for the worse. ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So this is how we should learn to think of it? Why protect a grown man capable of standing on his own two feet, Nick? There is evidence of forgery on the certificate he presented. That’s a crime he has committed and even more embarassing and damning than finding out his mother was deceived by his father. Even if he is embarassed, he still had to provide it to government agencies issuing driver’s licenses and passports, as well as Occidental, Harvard, and Columbia, didn’t he? Furthermore, there’s no reason for any local, state, or federal official in America to perjure himself or nullify his oath of office to protect Obama’s pride by covering up the truth when it is required to be transparent by law.
My list of news agencies, journalists, and opinion writers that I will trust let alone bother to read has lost another. The moral of this article and many others: It’s much better to be thought of as stupid rather than admit to being evil, as we know from both Eric Holder and Barack Obama. And it’s much better to get us all to think of his missing birth information as merely embarassing, rather than treasonous, deceptive, fraud, evil, and perhaps even identity theft.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
It was ridiculously easy to get a Hawaii b/c in that era, indeed Hawaii was a new state that fostered a wide-open back door for illegal immigration into the U.S. even into the 1970s. All one needed to do was go into the Hawaii Dept. of Health, fill out forms and a b/c was issued. One did not even need to have a babe in arms. Did Stanley Ann’s mom do this for her while Stanley Ann was in Seattle (or anywhere)? Who knows? (All birth announcements appeared in the local papers as a matter of course as whoever had the local beat for the HNL Advertiser and the HNL Star-Bulletin got the info from the HI Dept. of Health once a week.)
The grandfather took young Ozero to Davis’s house in Hawaii three times a week for indoctrination. Davis is gone but there are witnesses to these visits, Davis’s former next door neighbors. All the people in this bizarre “family,” including the grandparents, were communists or communist sympathizers. And former Weather Undergrounder Bill Ayers very likely ghost wrote Ozero’s two
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
You exposed the truth of the matter. Nick wrote: “Producing a “birth-certificate” forgery is a big scam to cover up a minor fact — that the Dunham/Obama marriage was not a real marriage. Is it really worth the political risk of having the scam exposed?”
How is his claim that the forgery is a “minor fact” to avoid some perfectly legal but embarrassing “fact” any less of an Obama defending apologist stealth-defense than one openly slanted in Obuma’s favor? Everything he wrote (after doing his “research”) points to Obama’s legitimacy under the Constitution and in the eyes of the American people. How is that helping in exposing his illegitimacy? If he is so well informed and insightful about the nature of Obama’s birth certificate (and presumably his citizenship as well), then why was there zero mention of the fact that his election was anti-Constitutional due to his citizenship not being natural citizenship?
His whole approach to the BC image is bogus. He starts and proceeds from the assumption that nearly all of it except maybe one fact is legitimate. Who ever proved the legitimacy of any of it? Who has proven that Ann Dunham was even in the United States when he was born? How is it that Nick conveniently neglected to address the issue of no proof existing that he was born in Hawaii, much less in a Hawaiian hospital? If that information can’t be verified then how can one ignore the possibility that he was not even born in the United States? If no one has been able to prove where Ann Dunham was in late July-early August, then how can one conclude that she was not already living in Seattle, and without finding any adoptive parents there, gave birth in Vancouver, as a last ditch effort, where there may have been a chance that the Canadian Salvation Army might find a couple willing to adopted a mixed-race baby?
No one can know anything important as fact, including just how much of the BC is bogus (one item or many items; hospital, Dr. signature, location, etc.) so to leap to a conclusion that all that was faked was something embarrassing is simple illogical and baseless. It’s like some superficial tea-time idle conversation turned into expressed script without having been submitted to the scrutiny that it deserves and is requisite for a subject of such enormous national importance. If Obuma will lie about the little things, it’s sure as hell that he will lie about the big things. But he would love it if everyone would consume this article’s premise of innocent white-lies as being the basis for the most important forgery since an Allied body washed up on the Normandy coast with top secret plans for the D-Day invasion, -plans that were fakes planted by the disinformation experts working for the Allied Command. AR Nash
We only have his word for anything about his life. Not even his ideological and political opposition wants to expose too much. The new Moraniss bio contradicts many things Obama wrote about himself and his past in both of his autobiographies (imagine his state of mind thinking that he is important enough to write two autobiographies before he either turned 50 or become president).
There’s evidence of a lot of forgery in the BC he presented last year, according to official sources, and then there’s the CT social security number issued to someone apparently born in 1890. His kind of lies need others’ help to perpetuate and spread them. What a tangled web they wove five years ago.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Moraniss Obama bio serves to make the author a tidy sum of cash but not really wound the subject of it when it comes to the election. It’s bottom line is that Obuma has not been perfectly frank with you, American people, -he’s been a little loose with the facts, but there is nothing nefarious here, nothing related to a conspiracy to groom his image for an eventual run for the presidency, -nothing of a fraudulent manufacturing of a history that as written serves to make a whole lot of people sympathize with him and pity the poor lost boy who eventually found his way (thanks to communists, terrorists, and puppet-masters) and became a quintessential American success story. Errors, bad memory, confusion of facts, and white lies can all be forgiven. But we won’t get into deliberate fraudulent ghost-writing, a fraudulent birth certificate, and a fraudulent eligibility that violates the Constitution. ARN
He would . . .(have a reason he’s hiding behind a mountain of lies) if a communist, like FMD, was his father. If a communist was Obama’s father, and that fact was disclosed to the American people, then Obama would know he’d have zero chance of ever becoming POTUS.
Interesting that you admit that Obama is hiding a mountain of lies. He certainly is. I’m curious about why everyone — everyone — is letting him get away with it?
Mr. Chase, your article is well researched and well reasoned. I would like to suggest one additional possibility that would explain Mr. Obama’s failure to provide a valid birth certificate, namely, he cannot provide one with the last name Obama because he was later adopted by Lolo Soetoro. After the adoption, Hawaiian officials would be prohibited from issuing a certified copy of his birth certificate in his birth name. This scenario would explain why Hawaiian officials have claimed they have seen his original birth records, but Obama has only produced an apparently fraudulent copy. Mr. Obama would be understandably reluctant to admit his adoption by an Indonesian citizen because Indonesia did not permit dual citizenship with Americans at the time. In order to be adopted by an Indonesian and become an Indonesian citizen as his Indonesian school records indicate, the child’s American citizenship would have to be renounced. So, even if he was native-born, Mr. Obama would as an adult be at this point either an Indonesian citizen or, if he followed the necessary procedures, possibly a naturalized American citizen.
Children cannot renounce their citizenship, and their parents can’t do it for them. Indonesia couldn’t care less about the foreign nationality of immigrant children, but they would care a whole heap about the nationality of the parents. Having been adopted by an Indonesian father would have conferred provisional Indonesian citizenship upon the boy.
“After the adoption, Hawaiian officials would be prohibited from issuing a certified copy of his birth certificate in his birth name.”
Without quoting an actual Hawaiian statute, that claim can’t be assumed to be true. It would certainly be true is he were adopted from birth and his true parentage was to be kept secret from him and everyone else. Then his original birth record would be under court seal. But a later adoption, following divorce and remarriage, would not be treated the same way since there would be no need for secrecy. Then after divorce from the adoptive father, the adoption may have been expunged from the record. So the reason for the forgery must lie somewhere else. AN
I occasionally wonder why, we know much of past Presidents’ family members. The media especially delighted in exposing the most embarrassing, the skeletons in the closets. Obama gets a pass. (No doubt, at least initially due to fear of charges of racism.) Obama’s grandmother passed before he took office. Seems to me, she passed with no journalistic interest shown prior, no interviews or comments to add to the historical content of Obama’s past. Grandfather is left alone still, no comment. Half brother in China, and his Jewish mother in Africa; another brother living in a shanty in Kenya; the illegal immigrant aunt living here in the US on welfare…isn’t she a White House guest now? None have anything to add to the story? No journalistic interest? Silence bought off? Or have all decided they’d be handily dismissed, deemed mistaken or liars, so why bother?
As far as I am concerned you, Mr. Chase, and a whole lot of others got dazzled by a shiny distraction and have been fumbling and fondling it ever since – while America burns to the ground I might add.
The father Obama acknowledges was not an American citizen, he was a British citizen – The conversation the American people should and been allowed to have is how that fact impacts Obama’s eligibility to be president. All the evidence for that discussion is in the public domain – no need to force it into the open or forge it.
You and others have effectively prevented that conversation. Question is – did you do it on purpose or are you just fascinated by shiny things?
This is the crux of the matter – where Obama was born is a sideshow, a distraction, a red herring. What matters right now is where his parents were born. Barack Obama himself has said that his father was of Kenyan birth; if this is untrue, it means that Obama ran for the presidency and won the White House on a fraudlulent basis. On the other hand, if Obama’s father was really Barack Obama senior who was in 1961 a subject of the British empire, then Mr. Obama is in office in violation of the natural-born citizen clause and is thus an illegal and illegitimate chief executive. No matter how this breaks, it does not end well for Obama. He has been trapped in the web of his own lies.
Re: “I’ve never in my life seen a group of disparate personalities so in lock step, it doesn’t compute.” Yes, my observation exactly. A cone of silence, as one commentator put it, has descended around the issue of Obama’s eligibility and provenance. IMHO, only one thing can explain this near-total blackout; namely someone or something very powerful is leaning very hard on people not to touch the issue. I cannot think of any individual in the private sector powerful-enough to have that kind of clout and raw muscle, not even someone like George Soros or Warren Buffett. That leaves the federal government itself as the entity providing the pressure, probably either Obama himself or via surrogates someplace within the government. Even former president Bill Clinton was muzzled; more than once he has hinted that he and HRC have damning information on Obama. When is the last time you saw anyone intimidate Bill Clinton politically? He is not an easy man to silence. There are rumors going around that the Clinton’s personal safety was threatened if/when they disclosed embarrassing or damaging information on BHO. This would be consistent with how the Chicago gang works – play ball or your body gets found floating face-down in the river. Maybe you’ll be lucky and only get audited by the IRS, on command from the White House. In short, all of those celebrity commentators, journalists, and big-name GOP pols who refuse to touch this are being intimidated into silence. Remember Rick Santorum, who was questioned in a press conference about Obama’s bona fides? Santorum not only stated the std. talking points, i.e., that BHO was born in Hawaii and is a NB citizen, but he actively defended Obama and attacked those who questioned his story. Only someone or something with a whole lotta juice can force a former Senator and major political figure to clam up like that.
As far as Barry’s paternity is concerned, his LEGAL father is whoever is named on his birth certificate – whether that birth certificate was issued by Hawaii, Kenya, Washington State, or Canada. If Lolo Soetoro did indeed [as is indicated by the Indonesian school registration record and by the Dunham/Soetoro 1980 divorce papers] adopt the child Barry, then an amended birth certificate stating Soetoro as the father would have been issued by Hawaii. That would necessitate the present forging of a birth certificate showing Obama, Sr. [replacing Soetoro] as father – in order to promulgate the lies of “Dreams From My Father”.
There is also another possible scenario which would necessitate a forged birth certificate IF Obama, Sr. was on the original [and only] birth certificate.
In the summer of 1971 Barry was shipped from Indonesia to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. In November of 1971 Barry’s mother arrived from Indonesia for an approximate 6-weeks’ visit – but leaving her 15-month old daughter behind in Jakarta. At the same time, the totally absent father Obama landed in Hawaii for a 6-weeks’ visit to the son he’d basically never seen.
A likely explanation for those visits is that the grandparents’ Dunham – having taken on the responsibility for the care of their absent daughter’s child – insisted on being made his legal guardians. That would be a logical and prudent requirement on their part. A mother tromping around in the wilds of various third world countries is hardly going to be immediately available to give written consent for, say, an emergency appendectomy – or for something as mundane as permission to go on a school field trip.
For legal guardianship to be given to the caretaker grandparents, both the mother and the father would have to be physically present in family court for the required proceeding. This legal procedure would not result in a new, or amended, birth certificate. BUT – if the grandparents were actually ADOPTING their daughter’s child, there would be a new birth certificate issued, and it would contain the “amendment” notation.
The indicators are that the grandparents did go the adoption route rather than guardianship. The procedure would have been for the grandparents to file a petition with family court. The court would then send to the mother and father of record [names on birth certificate] a “Notice of Hearing”, with a court/hearing date of appx. 30 days hence. Either parent could waive appearing, which would amount to default: giving up their rights, without dispute or recourse, to the child. Being a “no-show” for the hearing would also constitute “loss” by default.
Considering all the fawning and idolizing of “Senior” in “Dreams” – by Barry, and via Barry by his mother and Grandparents – the circumstances cited of the pending 1971 “fatherly” visit are shocking. The grandparents learn via telegram that “Senior” will be arriving to “visit”, and they are gob-smacked, dumbfounded, stunned – and very unhappy – at this news. Why would they not be thrilled? Because they never dreamed in a 1000 years that the ten-years’ totally absent “father” would actually respond to a Notice of Hearing, let alone decide to travel to the U.S to personally appear. His appearance out of the past, when they’d have assumed he would have simply ignored the Court Notice, likely meant he would not give up his parental rights.
IF that scenario did happen, it is possible that “Senior” allowed the adoption, on condition of the boy retaining the ‘Barack Hussein Obama the Second’ name – and likely for an additional financial consideration as well. Whatever the case – whether a status change from ‘Barry Soetoro’ to ‘Barry Dunham’, or ‘Barry Soetoro’ back to ‘Barack Obama’ – there would have been an AMENDED birth certificate issued/filed, necessitating a forged certificate for Barry’s response to our clammering. Because he was known as ‘Barry Obama” at Punahou School, it’s most likely ‘Senior’ gave up his rights on condition of the boy retaining the name. Clearly, he didn’t care a whit about the boy – but just as clearly cared excessively about his own ego satisfaction – and most probably a greased bank account.
a most illuminating response, thanks. One point, it’s worth remembering that Hawaii, the jewel of the Pacific, was first and foremost a tourist dream vacation spot, so Sr.’s willingness to return can’t be seen as requiring much additional motivation beyond that and the desire for a nostalgic visit -along with meeting a son whose destiny he may have wished to be great. A responsible father can’t simply ignore his son all throughout his entire youth. He was kind of obligated to meet him and show his parental approval to a son who would have wanted and needed it. His father’s motivations can’t be simply written off as purely selfish. That’s not how most parents think and feel. AN
To karen, Countryman, and AuntieMadder – replying to your comments, below…
I don’t profess to know it as fact, but think it could be possible that the fact of an Indonesian adoption might not have been recorded anywhere but within Indonesia. Lolo was employed by the government, and Stanley Ann was employed by the US embassy [according to "Dreams", she taught English there]. Who knows what adoption “arrangements” might have been made to accommodate the Indonesian requirement that a child had to be an Indonesian citizen to attend the local government school? The INS Hawaii file [years appx 1964-80] on Lolo notes, without going into detail other than naming the Code, that the legal requirement for Soetoro to be considered Barry’s step-son had been met; Perhaps THAT requirement/status would have been enough for the Indonesian government to consider Barry as having been adopted by Lolo. In “Dreams”, Barry says he had been enrolled in the Indonesian school prior to his 1967 arrival in the country. That would indicate Lolo had produced for the government proof that the boy to be attending was his son Barry Soetoro. As with everything about his life, Obama skirts the issue – all hints, nothing of substance, HUGE omissions.
Stanley Ann was a resident of Hawaii when she divorced Lolo, in 1980. Those divorce papers make reference to there being TWO children of the marriage: one over age 18, but a student, so needing support; one under 18, so a dependent child. The two children aren’t named in the papers, but obviously are Barry, age 19 and in college, and Maya, age 10. That Barry was considered a “child of the marriage” surely indicated he had been adopted by Lolo. BUT – indicators are that upon his 1971 move to live with his grandparents in Hawaii, he ceased being known as “Barry Soetoro”…
There definitely are many confirming sources that all through his schooling at Punahou he was “Barry Obama”. ‘Googling’ “Revealed: Obama thanked Drug Dealer, not Mother, in High School Yearbook”, and then clicking to the listing at freerepublic (dot) com, will take you to an article which includes a photo of a page from the 1979 Punahou yearbook. The photo is of our boy Obie, the high school senior: “Barry Obama”. In David Maraniss’ new book about Obama there are several photos which include Barry. Nothing within the photos id’s Barry – just Maraniss’ captions. However, there are so many others in the photos it seems impossible that if he wasn’t really there [ie, was photoshopped in] SOMEONE would have hollered about it.
As to the NBC status: it’s my understanding that any amendment to a birth certificate, such as adoption, is an automatic disqualification for a claim to natural born status. So adoption by the grandparents would not give him that status. The punch behind this is the Constitution itself, and the meaning of natural born. Any adoption is an ACTION OF LAW; it is a status APPLIED TO a person. An ACTION OF THE LAW and an APPLIED STATUS are contrived and carried out by men – they are NOT NATURAL OCCURRANCES. That which is not “natural” cannot be made natural by an action of law.
This is the difference between Article II Section 1 of the Constitution and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The 14th amendment provides for persons to become citizens as a result of an action of law. Citizenship status is applied to them as the result of the legal action of men: the 14th MAKES a citizen out of words. an existing person is made into something they previously weren’t.
The “natural born” citizen of Article II, Section 1 exists in only one circumstance – literally, at the moment of a conception brought about by a man and woman who are United States citizens.
To Auntie Madder – He was registered in Indonesian schools as ‘Barry Soetoro/Indonesian citizen/Muslim’. That info is documented. He was apparently known as Barry Obama from the time of his 1971 Punahou enrollment through his 1979 graduation. There’s no official documentation of that as far as I know; there are a few photos professed to be from Punahou yearbooks which show Barry, and identify him as “Barry Obama”. There is a classmate’s photo of himself with Barry [3rd grade]. The problem with that is the photo is Barry and the classmate [boy], at a school [unidentified] – but IN HAWAII. Supposedly, Barry was living in and attending school in Indonesia when a 3rd grader.
There is Occidental College documentation about the student Barry Obama, however, it’s an article about the alum Barry Obama being elected U.S. president ["Remembering Barry Obama..."]; it’s not from the time he was a student there. There also have been anecdotal evidences that he was “Barry Obama” while at Occidental. I’ve not seen anything but rumors and/or unverified statements that he was enrolled/known as “Barry Soetoro” while at Occidental.
So there is a lot of confusion – and unknowns – about what his name was, and when, but it does seem that from his 1971 start at Punahou School [age 10, in fifth grade] he was “Barry Obama”, and continued to be known by that name until approximately the time of his sophomore year Christmas visit home in Hawaii – the end of that school year, which would have been late spring of 1981. He apparently was settled in as Barack Obama by the time he moved to New York City in the summer of 1981. That move was ostensibly for him to attend Columbia starting that fall semester. However, there is a document which shows his enrollment at Columbia was for the 1982-83 school year only. That leaves blank his whereabouts from the summer of 1981 through the summer of 1982. A full year. All that is known of that year is what he accidentlly let slip during an April 2008 small-group fund-raiser in California: that he had made a trip to Pakistan in 1981. I say “accidentally” because there had been no previous mention ANYWHERE, or at ANY TIME of that trip. The secrecy of it raises red flags galore, because at Occidental he had been close – “very close” – friends with some, and one in particular, Pakistani students, and his departure for the Pakistan trip came immediately after his arrival in New York, about which time he professes to have been penniless. The red flag flutters all the more because in New York City – just 4 blocks from Obama’s apartment lived none other than Bill Ayers. It was in October 1981 that Ayers’ Weather Underground committed one of their most horrific acts – the Brinks’ attack – just a WEE bit to the north of New York city proper.
So many things to ponder…
The question of whether his parents were married or not never entered Barry’s mind as far as running for the presidency only in that it might make his book seem more like a fairy tale. As far as the bogus Hawaiian birth certificate, that was merely for the republicans’ benefit. Obama knew they would require that he, at least, be born in this country. Being an “African American”, they were not going to push the “natural born” citizen angle because to do so would have been considered racist. Since Obama’s constituency could care less whether he was born in the United States or Timbucktoo, this was all that was required.
Mr. Chase, your detective work is indeed fascinating and even thought-provoking, but changes nothing in the sense that Obama’s birth and life story are still a fraud. We the people cannot allow candidates to seek – and possibly win – the highest office in the land based upon intentionally misleading, false ot fraudulent bases. Too much is at stake to forgive such deception, regardless of its cause. The American people will forgive much, but they do not appreciate being told lies when they deserve and want the truth. After almost four years of listening to every rationalization under the sun for Obama’s dishonesty, I have come to wonder whether or not I ought not to “invent” a more-compelling life story in service of advancing my agenda and life goals. Obama’s biographies were ghost-written and are full of fabrications. His personal documents are bogus. Almost nothing about Obama’s contrived and invented life story holds up under scrutiny – yet this grifter is praised and rewarded for his deception at every turn. I honestly don’t get it – but then again I was born with that peculiar handicap of having a functioning moral compass and a conscience.
0bama’s life story, at least the one we are supposed to believe is like an onion. When you start peeling it away, there is yet another layer and another layer and another layer. In between is NOTHING THERE. 0bama is a MASTER CRIMINAL in every rite. He and his Liberal Socialist (Democrat) Thugs, Hacks and Stooges have perpetrated the ultimate CRIME against the people of this nation. The bottom line is that NOTHING the Kenyan Usurper says, writes, initiates or supports is legitimate in any sense of the word. 0bama and FRAUD are synonymous. That he is as phony as a “57 State Atlas of the USA” is as obvious as his EARS!
NatanElias: The Devil is in the details. I’m a pragmatist, we only have four months before elections, so even if we found out that his father was Josef Stalin and his mother was Karl Marx, there would be no time to correct the mistake of Obama before the public referendum. It is not Obama alone that is the problem; the problem is this whole administration. You may have a few people who could hold down a job in post secondary education at Marxist U. But hardly any that could manage a soda jerk at a fountain in a pharmacy. Worse than that, the two biggest jerks are the CEO’s – Obama and Biden. We also have a population so fixated on toys that reality comes in short sound bytes that traverse the space between the ears in nano seconds, none of which is retained long enough to be assimilated. Let’s examine the real problem – for three summers in row the recovery was shifted from Obama to Biden. The only decision Biden ever got right in his life was to go into politics and hang on (by the fingertips) long enough to get party seniority. Of course that was not hard if you picked Delaware to get elected. Biden is more than gaff machine, he is a total moron. What is worse, for most of the worst suggestions Biden has made, they seemed to be the ones Obama (or Axelrod, or Jarett) seemed to agree with. If we can’t appeal to the commonsense of the American citizens, none of this matters. They will build a monument to Barack Obama for the same good reason that after 11 days in office Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and what’s more, with the same results. With the exception of WW2 there has not been this level of turmoil in the world and it is directly attributable to Obama. This may not be the role the U.S. should play but, it is American exceptionalism that created the U.S. to be the economic and military power it is, and consequentially, POTUS the world leader. I gave up long ago wishing for an American president who understood the primary role of POTUS is to represent the American people; but, I had hope that a president would at least put Americans first and foremost as their concern. America is a capitalist country, it has served us well for 240 years. The next best system has yet to be developed. Well, except in the mind of Obama. Is he a socialist? A Communist? Merely a crony capitalist? Or is he a mere narcissist with a dictatorial psychosis? Does he have another agenda altogether based on Ummah? Rickj27 asks the right question the answer is that children base their life around security, even if that security come at a price too hard to severe to contemplate. America grew up and took our destiny into our own hands and the experiment worked. In November we shall see if it lasts.
Sorry Stillthinking, to not have looked earlier. Obama, on his “Fightthesmears (dot) com” website, told us “I am a native-born citizen of the US.” While it takes a bit of reading, and the term “native-born” is confusingly close to “natural-born”, native-born citizens are those, like the slaves for whose status as non-citizens, the 14th Amendment was intended to correct. A native-born citizen is a 14th Amendment Citizen, which is, by definition, a naturalized citizen. The 14th Amendment was an exercise of Article 1 Section 8, creating “and Uniform Rule for Naturalization”. The author of the 14th Amendment, congressman John Bingham of Ohio, an ardent abolitionist and judge, carefully repeated the Marshall definition, albeit using terms to emphasize the intent: ” I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen….” Those words are in the Congressional record for 1866.
The Justice who wrote the Wong Kim Ark decision, making the native-born Wong Kim, a citizen, and not a natural born citizen, though he was born and raised in San Francisco, cited the precedent, confirming the Marshall citation of common law, in Minor v. Happersett. The facts are clear but inconvenient to too many whose behavior, including Roberts, demonstrate complicity with in the coverup. There is no document in which Obama has claimed to be a natural born citizen. He knows better. He does not accept the validity of Article II Section 1. He was elected and sworn in by Roberts. Only one Congressman contested his eligibility, Nathan Deal of Georgia. Deal was immediately faced with ethics violations from income tax records of a decade earlier, and his published letter to the White House ignored. Deal resigned and is now Governor of Georgia.
The facts are incontestible. The ruling class has overruled the Constitution. Four years ago they cited Minor v. Happersett, which confirmed the definition, mentioned as dictum in dozens of Supreme Court cases. The Marshall, John Jay, G. Washington, A. Madison, Ben Franklin definition was not unique to the Swiss legal philosopher Vattel, but Vattel’s was our first law book, at our first Law School created by Thomas Jefferson at William and Mary in 1779, and Jefferson specified Washington and Hamilton’s most trusted source of natural law, the foundation for the authority of our Constitution, Vattel’s Law of Nations. Marshall and Munroe were students at that law school. There is no doubt.
The accomplices are fascinating Schmutzli. They have helped to bury whatever documented truth there is, bringing suit to quiet Edu. Testing Service Employees who might have seen Obama/Soetoro’s applications and records, “cauterizing” (according to Sec. of State Rice) Obama’s passport file in main State Dept. Archives and then assassinating the man who executed the deed, and who happened to be working at the time for John Brennan, Obama’s Counterespionage expert, fluent Arab speaker, and former Deputy CIA Director.
The most fascinating accomplices are Obama’s Campaign Chair in 2008 who, with Obama, submitted Senate Bill 2678 in Feb. 2008, the ‘‘Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act’’. It did not pass so McCaskill, Obama, Leahy, Menendez, Webb, and several other senators submitted a Senate Resolution, an opinion of the Senate, since most senators knew they couldn’t amend the Constitution with a “Bill”, a law. April 2008 Resolution 511 contained a statement which they all agreed to: “My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied. “That is mine, too,” said Leahy.”
Both parties were accomplices to permitting Obama, born to an Alien father, to run because the Senate is a family that protects its own, lives by rules for which ordinary citizens would be prosecuted (read Peter Schweiker’s “Throw Them All Out” to see where much of their real income is derived). Who were they protecting? Had anyone paid attention, and there was little reason to do so, to John McCain’s 2000 run for the presidency he would have read of two law suits a half dozen congressional hearings, and dozens of law professors opining upon natural born citizenship. There were also eight attempts to amend Article II Section 1 by various congressmen, including two by John Conyers. The lawyer defending McCain was a senior partner, Christopher Landau, from Kirkland and Ellis, a large Chicago firm. Landau’s Junior Associate, Sarah Herilihy published “AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE”, in the Kent law Review in 2006. Obama/McCain probably began long ago.
No legal action succeeded in amending the Constitution so clever progressives appear to have executed a brilliant strategy – make the ineligible former prisoner of war, their partner in McCain Feingold, the man they protected from the “Keating Five” Savings and Loan scandal, Obama’s opponent. This writer agrees with the principle of the Obama/McCaskill SB2678, but Obama and McCaskill didn’t proposed it as an amendment. Democrat law professor, Smith Chair at U. of Arizona, Gabriel Chin wrote the clearest legal essay about why McCain was not eligible in Spring 2008, published with approval in WaPo and NYT. Then the media went silent.
John Roberts, for whom Chief Justice John Marshall was a model, knowing that definitions are not included in the Constitution by design, chose to ignore Marshall’s crystalline clarification of the US common-law upon which the Constitution is based when administering the oath of office to Obama. “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenous are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”
Both parties conspired with the press to suppress the unquestioned fact that Barack Obama declared himself to be a naturalized citizen. He told the truth. We must hold him to account for the unquestioned truth that the Constitution does not permit naturalized citizens to be our president. Every Senator knew. Orrin Hatcth submitted an amendment to change that so that Scharzenegger might run for president. It failed badly. Obama’s is a history of the complicity of both parties and now, a weak chief justice concerned more about perceptions than our Constitution.