Dark Suspicions 2

The first part of the paragraph from the White House website reads:

“In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet.”

This date stamp issue [it's barely visible but is stained through the paper background from the backside, -thus it's backwards appearing] was raised before in the past but Factcheck claimed this:
“We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and “all the records we could get our hands on” according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008,…” -Source.
Now that the White House admits they ordered the short-form in 2008 how could the short-form COLB be issued by the state of Hawaii in 2008 when the actual date stamp on the short-form COLB is date stamped June 6th, 2007?

Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=308277#ixzz1UDkX5wdA
GVA.
I just wanted to chime in here to point out something that I haven’t seen anywhere else yet. I found this out today while drafting a letter to a conservative writer. I had the URL for FightTheSmears.com’s birth-certificate article in my archive, and I went to it before pasting the link into my letter, and boy, was I surprised! I was redirected to a totally scrubbed webpage!

http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html NOW REDIRECTS TO:

http://my.democrats.org/page/content/president-obama-birth-certificate

The new, redirected webpage has a very similar title, but it is COMPLETELY SCRUBBED of all relevant information and links. The new webpage just shows the alleged long-form birth certificate, states some garbage about “conspiracy theorists” trying to make people think that Obama “isn’t an American citizen”, and provides a means to donate to Obama’s 2012 campaign!

This is EXTREMELY SIGNIFICANT because the original FightTheSmears.com article was the official connection of Obama’s 2008 campaign to the FactCheck.org article stating that Obama had dual citizenship from birth to the age of twenty-one (21) years, later “corrected” to twenty-three (23) years! The original webpage quoted FactCheck.org under the headline “FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship”.
Here is the FactCheck.org article:

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html

FightTheSmears.com is still active without redirection in general, in fact, the original URL is STILL EMBEDDED in FightTheSmears.com’s list of articles!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More from GVA:

What I do know is that it appears that Obama is cutting all connections with FactCheck.org. I talked about this with a friend after I noticed that the White House was providing a PDF of the alleged COLB, but not one of the “official” pictures from FightTheSmears.com or FactCheck.org. It is a low-quality black-and-white raster of a printout of a COLB image from Snopes!!

This is the Snopes image used by the White House: http://msgboard.snopes.com/politics/graphics/birth.jpg
[Note: Don't ask me which COLB image this is. I'm sure that ch22240 or someone else would know or could figure it out. I'm not an expert on the different COLB images.]

This is the White House PDF of the Snopes mage: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate.pdf

That struck me as very weird, and it didn’t take long for me to figure that they seemed to be cutting away from FactCheck.org and even the Obama campaign’s 2008 website, which would be important for disassociating from all previous claims, as if rewriting history.

When I was struck by what I found about the scrubbing and redirection of the FightTheSmears.com birth-certificate article, I was really becoming convinced about my earlier impression.

Obama is cutting ties with FactCheck.org.

While they once held up FactCheck as clarifying Obama’s citizenship history, they will drop them like a hot potato and everything that was claimed about Obama’s former British and Kenyan citizenship when the time comes.

WND Exclusive A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate?
Doug Vogt’s criminal complaint filed with FBI outlines inconsistencies
Posted: June 07, 2011 By Jerome R. Corsi  © 2011 WND

Scanner expert Doug Vogt filed this article with the FBI.

NEW YORK – The White House’s release of an electronic copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate instead of a certified paper copy raises questions in a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI filed by an international expert in scanners and document-imaging software.

Doug Vogt’s complaint charges that individuals within the Hawaii Department of Health, Obama political operatives and an unidentified graphic artist worked in a multi-state conspiracy to create a fraudulent long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama.

He claims the long-form birth certificate the White House released April 27 as an electronic document in PDF format was forged from a composite of legitimate birth certificates obtained from the Hawaii DOH archives and manipulated to replace the original information with a fraudulent Obama birth record.

The White House has not explained how the copy of the Obama birth certificate released to the press in the White House press room was produced without the green hash-mark background [no background at all, without it no one can accuse the WH of producing a legal forgery since, being black&white without a security background, it is obviously not an official document, -but his point is that it is imossible to remove the page appearance from a scanned document].

Read more: Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=308277#ixzz1UDnjo0CZ

DARK SECRETS
Saul Alinsky
Rachael Maddow — Saul Alinsky has gotten his message transmuted into millions and millions of American citizens — most especially those from the ’60s on — We all remember the successful withholding of Hillary Clinton’s thesis — her subject was her slobbering paean to Alinsky — she was offered a job working with/for Alinsky — she saw a bigger opportunity when she decided to marry Bill Clinton — it was years before We The People found out what her subject matter was — even then, the average American had never heard of Alinsky; nor did they understand the depth of subversion this man had inspired — to this day, whenever I am engaged in a conversation with anybody — liberal or conservative — most still have not researched nor have they heard a good commenter teach them about Alinsky — If you have read this far — I would ask — have you done your due diligence and read Alinsky’s screed — the one he dedicated to Lucifer — yep, Hillary and Bill and — now — even more important — our current sitting President is an devotee and dedicated adherent of Alinsky’s evil lessons — Alinsky was one of the original Community Organizers — read his book: Rules for Radicals — you will easily be able to recognize the Clintons and the Obamas — Rachael Maddow, too — is a person whose goals are to be a facilitator — of leftist means and methods — can’t say whether or not she knows who Alinsky is — but she sure has had many, many teachers of the Alinsky doctrines and methods — Jim.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read about the cover-up of a letter on White House stationary to the Kapi’olani Medical Center signed by Obama stating it was his place of birth, but the letter has been destroyed or hidden in a safe where no one is allowed to view it, including a Hawaiian state senator.  Rather than proudly publicly display it, the hospital will not share it with the world by allowing it to be seen.  Why?  Because it is a forgery on White House stationary with the Presidential seal.  http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=278689

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jack Cashill on the Maraniss Obama biography “The Story”

Maraniss concedes, these two young people shared very close to nothing. “In the college life of Barack Obama in 1961 and 1962,” writes Maraniss, “as recounted by his friends and acquaintances in Honolulu, there was no Ann; there was no baby.”

Although Maraniss talked to many of Obama Sr.’s friends, none of the credible ones ever so much as saw him with Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham.

One Obama friend, a Cambodian named Kiri Tith, knew the senior Obama “very well.” He had also met Ann through a different channel. “But he had no idea,” writes Maraniss, “that Ann knew Obama, let alone got hapai (pregnant) by him, married him, and had a son with him.”

Only Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie claims to have seen the pair together during the presumed courtship stage, but he is not close to credible.

“Maybe I’m the only one in the country,” Abercrombie told the Los Angeles Times in December 2010, “that could look you right in the eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born.’” This was pure lie, no other word for it.

A few days later, Abercrombie clarified to Mark Niesse of the Associated Press that he didn’t exactly see Obama’s parents with their newborn son at the hospital, but that he “remembers seeing Obama as a child with his parents at social events.” Another lie.

Maraniss should have quoted Abercrombie with the stated qualifier that he has proved unreliable on all things Obama, but he did not. Abercrombie was too important. Without Abercrombie, there is no contemporary witness to any kind of relationship. Maraniss, however, knew enough not to quote Abercrombie on his claim to having seen the baby with his parents.

One Response to Dark Suspicions 2

  1. arnash says:

    Jake Martinez
    When will Americans wake up? On or about October 20, 2011, Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court published a report that revealed that 25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions that defined “Natural Born Citizen” were sabotaged in the run up to the ’08 Presidential Election.

    Source:
    25 U.S. Supreme Court Opinions That Defined “Natural Born Citizen” Were Sabotaged In The Run Up To The ’08 Presidential Election!-Posted on Natural Born Citizen-By Leo Donofrio, Esq.-On October 20, 2011:http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

    On or about October 20, 2011, the following article and/or blog post revealed that someone had been incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public by searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com, which cite the only case in American history – Minor v. Happersett (1875) – to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were both citizens, a definition that excludes President Obama from eligibility:

    JustiaGate!-Posted on Examiner-By Dianna Cotter, Portland Civil Rights Examiner-On October 20, 2011:http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate

    On or about October 23, 2011, the following WND article and/or blog post revealed that Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court had published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of “natural-born citizen” were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents:
    Eligibility rulings vanish from Net!-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On October 23, 2011:
    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645
    http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-perpetrated-in-american-history/

    inspectorudy 12/14/2011 10:47 AM
    This says a lot about the state of our nation. For a legal reference web site to DELIBERATELY erase information that may be used by site PAYING visitors is a total violation of trust. How can anyone in the future trust a web site that they know has lied or cheated in the past? This is on a par with Wikipedia and there totally unreliable definitions. Who at this point in time would ever pay to use their service again? I am thankful that someone has gone to the trouble to ferret out this deliberate lie and I can only hope that you are able to entice the networks to make an issue of it. Good work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 66 other followers

%d bloggers like this: