400 Years of Bastardized Ideas about Citizenship -pt. 4 -Fuddy’s Death

[in PDF format, 18 pages, two-column: 400 Years of Bastardized Ideas about Citizenship
https://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/400-years-of-bastardized-ideas-about-citizenship2.pdf ]

Should we be pessimistic about the future of America? A better question is “can we be reasonably optimistic about the future?” The answer is that unless the power structure that rules our nation is overthrown, there will be no future that we would want to see (aside from assorted advances of various sorts).

It is corrupt to the core and both parties are party to it, with one simply pushing harder on the accelerator than the other.
Has history ever recorded any corrupted government and morally vacuous and ignorant population that ever reversed the course they were on toward a destiny of decay, collapse and/or conquest?

Are we destined to repeat history because we are ignorant of it? Well, being ignorant is a natural status of human nature it seems. There is no one who is superior in this world, but compared to those who are simply normal, there are a heck of a lot of people who are in many ways sub-normal. And their numbers are growing by leaps and bounds.
So what will come is unknown and unknowable without taking a God’s-eye view of the human race, and the American people in particular. That is probably a frightful view to take, and I, for one, hesitate to take it since I’ve been there, done that, and found you can’t live life in the knowledge of what you see.

But sometimes in the history of man, (like in the Matrix trilogy) something changes everything and this time it’s different from what went before. That happened in a very good way with the life and legacy of Jesus. It took centuries and lots of corrupt detours along the way, but eventually the vision of God and Man that sprang from his existence produced the natural rights and liberties of Western Civilization, not to mention hope eternal.

The problem is that liberty can become license to live ignorant, spoiled and self-indulgent lives, -and that is where a great proportion of the population is today. Just consider one aspect of American life; drug usage. Could it be more pervasive? Could laws against it be much more impotent at stopping it? -Or could any law prevent a “government hand-out” mentality?

Entire segments of American society are rotten to the core, personally and publicly. Just consider Detroit and what a nightmare it has degenerated into compared to what it was.
There is a cancer and rot spreading in America and it is connected to many negative factors that render the role and duty and privilege of citizenship almost irrelevant in the lives of millions of almost unfixable people. Maybe they can be fixed, but probably not in this life, -not with the resources available to government and the powers it is limited to.

I once read the response of a law enforcement officer or social worker who said that the only way to fix or change the attitude of hard-core criminally inclined teenagers would require measures that would put them in a hospital.

A lot of people need to suffer those measures, including many in government who have a different kind of corrupt attitude.
The communists tried a form of reform with their “re-education camps” that threw the academic and government and financial elites down into the mud of real life in labor camps in the countryside, -perhaps cruelly and unjustly in most cases and without distinction based on real attitudes and character.
American patriots would rejoice and thank heaven to see our corrupt and isolated and insulated government elite overlord class find itself figuratively face-down in the mud that the rest of the population has to live in because of their damn awful and self-serving governance.

And many of them deserve worse; deserve many years in a cell where they, like Jack Abramoff, can come to realize the magnitude of their betrayal of the American people.
And others still, who pull the extortion levers behind the curtains, -who know the secrets of the hidden lives of public officials and servants, -who intimate harm might come to their children if their agendas suffer because of the choices of those officials, -who weigh threats to the status quo of those in power as well as those who benefit from their largess, and thus arrive at decisions about who must conveniently be silenced via a “natural death” or an “accidental death” that no one can explain.

The people behind those untimely life-ending occurrences deserve nothing less than a bullet to the brain. They are the ones who keep the secrets hidden that need to see the light of day in order for a new revolution to take place in America.
They are the Luciferians of the power complexes that pull whatever strings they can accomplish pulling, -either by bribe or by bullet. And God forbid if you are ever viewed as a liability, -unless you are someone truly not expendable or too high profile and popular to terminate.  Were the Kennedys such victims and yet not immune even though of the highest profile?
The most recent example of their handiwork is the murder of Loretta Fuddy, -the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health.

She was a kindly, lonely, gentle soul who never married or had children, -in excellent health but emotionally vulnerable to persuasion exerted by a powerful and charismatic President of the United States who needed the birth certificate that the department had not given to his mother in response to her affidavit claiming she gave birth to her half-Kenyan son in her home but with no medical witnesses present.
The Registrar at that time (1961) was required to see some proof of one year residency. Such proof didn’t exist, so with no eye-witness affidavits supporting her claim, they simply filed her half hand-written, half typed affidavit, and that piece of paper became the only vital record in their archive. It was microfilmed, and later digitized when all microfilm records were digitized.
All Barack needed was for her to just allow access to that record so it could be used in conjunction with the record of a deceased child who was born but died at the same time, and he would then be able to acquire a simulated “genuine” certificate like the one that his mother was never able to acquire for him.

It was important for the nation to get its attention off of such a “distracting” and divisive issue. After all, what good was served by not allowing the nation to be convinced of his birth in Hawaii? He was convinced, but he needed her help in order that others could also “know” the truth.

She loyally and dutifully agreed with his request and went along with it, even allowing the release of the lie that she watched the copying of a birth certificate (an implied real Hawaiian hospital Certificate of Live Birth) in order to make it all seem official and not some mystery like his short-form supposed certification of live birth that appeared three years earlier out of nowhere with no attribution from anyone as to its origin.

The Leftist media bought into its legitimacy and the issue was “put behind us”, …until, that is, Doug Vogt submitted a legal brief to a federal court in Washington State which contained a sealed affidavit which named her as a co-conspirator in the fabrication of a counterfeit birth certificate for Barack Obama, and revealed financial details showing that she happened to have somehow acquired $50-70,000 that could not be accounted for, -money used to make substantial payments on a home mortgage.

Did that secret affidavit stay sealed as Vogt had requested, or did it, like private IRS information and forbidden NSA information get dropped into the lap of a White House operative who knew someone who knew someone… and voila! -within a month she is suddenly and mysteriously dead?
Could anything be more convenient for Barack Obama and his wealthy puppet-masters than derailing any possible investigation into Ms Fuddy’s Lois Lerner-like role in the production of a counterfeit birth certificate for the “Hawaiian born” President?

That alone would raise anyone’s suspicions if they had a brain (which no one in the media does anymore) but what followed absolutely demonstrated that nefarious machinations were transpiring behind the scenes in order to make Fuddy’s murder appear perfectly natural.

What happened exactly? Did the medical examiner who did the autopsy (which “required” mysteriously waiting a month -perhaps for toxicology results) come out and present a clinical evaluation of the medical factors that precipitated the failure of her heart to keep beating?

That is what anyone and everyone would expect to happen, and yet nothing like that happened, -not even remotely like that. Instead the police department released “details” of the supposed autopsy which the public was not allowed to see, -including those who sued under the Freedom on Information Act to acquire, since major portions came completely blacked out “for privacy law concerns”. So they were protecting the privacy of the dead? Or protecting the family that she didn’t have?

The reason it was done like that was because what the autopsy actually said could not be the story that was released to the public because it made it clear that either she died by an unknown cause or by a highly suspicious cause (which was reported to the public as “accidental”.
How do you accidentally die while floating placidly in a warm ocean with a flotation vest on without any rescue concerns at all? No person in history ever died from the terror of such non-excitement.
The explanation supposedly from the Medical Examiner’s autopsy report was a string of subjective claims about her mental and emotional state, -things that are NEVER part of an autopsy, including something that is impossible to conclude; that she died from an irregular and inadequate heartbeat, (aka; cardiac arrhythmia). Well, anyone from a Nurse’s Assistant to everyone who has watched medical investigation programs over the last decade knows that you cannot determine the heart rhythm of a heart that is not beating. That would be like reporting on the pulse rate of a corpse. How can a claim of an irregular heart beat be substantiated when it leaves no evidence whatsoever?

A heart that goes out of rhythm is not like a train that leaves the tracks and can clearly be seen to not be on the tracks where it belongs. It would be more like a train that disappeared. -Or like a plane that disappeared. How can you say it crashed if you don’t know where it even went?

Same with Fuddy’s death. Reminds me of a movie titled: “Murder by Death”, -by unexplainable death, as is shared in clear terms in this…
http://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/turning-a-blind-eye-to-death-of-loretta-fuddy.pdf
(a formated version of the web post: http://networkedblogs.com/Vr4M7 )

Is anyone going to question the police department that was the facade for the most fraudulent autopsy in American history? Is anyone going to go all Woodward & Bernstein and follow the money (or the extortion-intimidation)?

As a federal agent reportedly said to a witness in Roswell, N.M. following the reported crash and capture of a UFO “its a big desert out there and no one would ever find someone’s bones.” (Same with the Pacific ocean.) -Or ever trace the cash used to buy a condo on Maui.
Either by a bribe or a bullet, they get the job done, and none of the submissive, brain-dead, juvenile children that pass themselves off as journalists ever ask the logical questions, -nor perhaps, even think of them.

We’re so screwed.

The bottom line is this: Loretta Fuddy was under subpoena to testify regarding her role in the release of what passed as Obama’s hidden, seal-less, unsigned, uncertified, hard-copy Certificate of Live Birth (which no impartial witness has ever been allowed to examine and analyze) but the court had not yet ruled whether or not it would accept the suit.

The situation that the naked-emperor’s line-backers faced was the fact that if she was allowed to testify, a good attorney would reveal her to be the liar that she was, -and that could not be allowed to happen.  But also, if she was taken out of the picture after the court had decided to proceed with the case and had compelled her to testify, then her death would have appeared exceedingly suspicious.  But if it happened before the public even knew of the lawsuit, and before she was under orders to appear, then everyone would yawn about her unfortunate and non-suspicious death which appeared to be not related to anything in her life, -or Obama’s.

Figure, that if there are men who wouldn’t hesitate to kill her one way or another, then such men would greatly prefer that no one in the main-stream be questioning the circumstances which caused her heart to stop beating, and the needed lack of interest could only be assured if she died before the controversy of her compelled testimony became publicly known.  So she had to die before that corner was turned, -0therwise, reasonable people in the main-stream would also be unable to escape noticing how convenient and suspicious was a death with no revealed medical cause, -whose cause was all hot air intended to appeal to emotions and not intellects what demand concrete answers, -not a lot of invented lies that contradict known facts and eye-witness testimony.

 by Adrien Nash April 2014 obama–nation.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read this March 31, 2014 analysis by Linda Jordan which exposes the incredible stupidity of the so-called “autopsy”: http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/03/report-evidence-hawaii-medical-examiner.html

quote: “She was markedly afraid, it was a traumatic ordeal, she was a poor swimmer, she  never swam in the ocean, water occasionally splashed over her face while awaiting rescue, ocean conditions included relatively calm five-foot waves. This is an autopsy report? Does this sound like a systematic external and internal examination of a dead body to determine if any abnormalities are present and cause of death?

The AP did not share a copy of the report which was said to be heavily redacted. It is important to note that attorney Orly Taitz made a public records request for the autopsy report on December 18, 2013  and has never received a copy.
Why did the AP get a copy but not Taitz? It is a public record subject to Hawaii’s Unified Information Practices Act Statue 92F. I requested one myself.  Is it only released to people who will beat the drum that Loretta’s death was caused by fear & hyperventilation?

A final point. One headline announcing the Maui Police Department’s release of autopsy details (January 13, 2014) said that Loretta’s death had been ruled “accidental”.

As of March 29, 2014 no one knows why the plane’s engine failed. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has yet to determine the cause of the crash so how can the Medical Examiner or the Maui Police Department rule Fuddy’s death “accidental”? “

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And then there is this:

BREITBART DEATH SUSPICIOUS
Submitted by: Nancy Battle and Sandra  Was Andrew Breitbart murdered by the Obama Regime?
Mr. Breitbart has caused quite a stir among the Leftist in the past few years. The 2009 Acorn Undercover Video Scandal, the resignation of Shirley Sherrod for racist remarks at an NAACP fundraising dinner in March 2010, and just recently at the CPAC convention in Washington DC.
It was at the CPAC convention where Breitbart said he will release video’s on Barack Obama because Obama was never properly vetted in the 2008 election. “The videos will greatly affect the 2012 election and I will release them just before November” stated Breitbart.
Andrew Breitbart’s “natural causes” death…was it?
Reply by American 1st on April 5, 2014

Brietbart “supposedly” had a heart attack after walking out of a restaurant after dinner, hours before he was to release the bombshell video on Obama.

The only witness, a man named Lassiter, said Breitbart turned bright red.  But if it was a heart attack he should have turned blue.   Later, this witness couldn’t be found….disappeared.

26-year-old Christopher Lasseter saw Breitbart drop dead “like a sack of potatoes” on March 1, hours before Breitbart was set to release a damning video that showed Barack Obama fraternizing with Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers.

Lasseter reported that Breitbart’s skin was a bizarre bright red color when he collapsed, a symptom not associated with heart attacks and one which was not explained in Los Angeles County Chief Coroner Craig Harvey’s autopsy report, which lists the cause of death as heart failure.

“I asked Lassiter specifically about Breitbart’s skin color and he said it was “bright red.” That bothered me because as an Army medical corpsman I knew that most heart attack victims turned blue,” wrote Paul Huebl, adding that Breitbart had drunk little alcohol and, “Poisons like cyanide, or carbon monoxide are known for turning skin red…The reality is they cannot be detected by normal toxicology testing.”

After World Net Daily hired a private investigator in an effort to locate Lassiter, it appears as though he has completely vanished.

THEN THERE WAS CORMIER’S DEATH… a lab technician at the coroner’s office 

Is it possible that Lassiter decided to flee after hearing about the suspicious death of Michael Cormier, a forensic technician who worked as a photographer in the Los Angeles County coroner’s office and could easily have known damning information about Breitbart’s death?

Cormier died suddenly from suspected arsenic poisoning on the same day Andrew Breitbart’s autopsy report was made public, with police considering foul play as one of the motives. Was Cormier targeted because he knew something about the strange red color of Breitbart’s skin which contradicted the autopsy report?

Despite the fact that Breitbart made it clear both publicly during a CPAC speech and privately to World Net Daily that he was set to release bombshell video on March 1 which showed President Barack Obama alongside Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, when  footage eventually was released it only showed Obama embracing radical Marxist Prof. Derrick Bell.

Breitbart News Network’s Steve Bannon now denies there was any footage featuring Obama with Ayers and has slammed World Net Daily for asking questions about the bizarre circumstances surrounding Breitbart’s death.

“He died of natural causes,” Bannon said. “The family wants the matter put to rest, and WND is beginning to irritate me suspecting foul play.”

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 8, 2012   ~~~~

Reply by Macon s on April 5, 2014

Or one of any of the other issues. The point is that he was likely disgusted and either threatened to blow a whistle or quit. The point is that is that they saw him as a lose end that needed to be taken care of. I am daily amazed when these things happen that there are actually people out there that believe what is reported on it.

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 72 other followers