Six Smoking Guns
Over the last few months, careful examination of the White House PDF Certificate of Live Birth has led to almost every anomaly being found to have a logical explanation. Kevin Davidson debunked the biggest suspicion by scanning his own birth certificate and saving it as a PDF. It turned out to have the same dual layers as the Obama PDF (text, & background, -with some text saved as gray-scale imagery on the background layer) . The problem with his debunking result was that those two layers were the only ones produced containing text information, whereas the Obama PDF is divided into 7 text layers (including background) , two of which are similar to Davidson’s, but the other 5 are individually created movable layers combined together to create a document with multiple components. No scanning nor PDF software will do that to a scanned document.
It is instead the result of building a document from multiple layers.
Along with the multiple added layers, the other smoking guns are; 1.) Gray text on separate layers 2.) Alignment inconsistencies 3.) Spacing inconsistencies 4.) The gray & black word “None”, and 5.) The smiling face of the Alvin signature.
Each date stamp in the body of the form is a separate moveable layer, as are the Registrar’s stamp and his certification date stamp. They appear as gray, (along with the letters “non” of the word “none” from the box stating the occupation during pregnancy). All of the rest of the text layer elements are solid black, so how did the other text end up as gray? I believe I know how.
While editing photos for 8-12 hours ‘til late at night, eventually your eyes become stressed by a monitor set to full brightness, so to reduce the stress/burn felt in the eyes, you turn down the brightness of the monitor. When dimmer, all gray elements appear black, and you think they are until you print them or upload them to a web-site and see them on another monitor set to full brightness. I’ve been shocked by that mistake more than once and immediately reset my monitor to normal. The gray elements of the PDF were created as individual layers on a monitor whose brightness was turned down, and elements that seemed to be pure black (the date/ signature stamps) were actually gray instead of black because they didn’t have their contrast boosted. They were probably grayish to begin with because they were produced with stamps that were inked with a pad low in ink. But the word “none” was not, indicating that all of those layers were not pure black for the reason I’ve stated. I know of no other possible explanation for gray text that has one or more pure black characters/digits other than that the black ones were original and the gray were added by someone.
The PDF format splits off some of the original text characters and preserves them in their original gray-scale format on the background layer. I suspect that that phenomenon is something that the FBI or NSA worked with Adobe to make standard for the purposeof making each document unique and not alterable in such a way that it could not be detected. That way the creator’s version would be different from a forger’s version.
The original birth certificate image is the result of an extraction process which takes the original mico-film image, greatly increases its contrast to make the paper appear pure white, then deletes the white, leaving only the black text as a transparent layer that can be placed on an image of green security paper. That text can be altered with a photo editing program by simply erasing elements and adding new ones.
The word “none” in the box stating the “mother’s occupation outside the home” is split also, but with the “e” being part of the main text lay, and most notably, being pure black in appearance, while the letters “n-o-n” are greenish-gray and are a separate added layer.
That indicates that they were part of the editing process and were added where a word like “housewife” once appeared. Since his mother wasn’t a housewife, it would have to be changed. It was done by erasing something like “housewif”, leaving the “e”.This postulates that the replacement text of the PDF was taken from one or more birth certificates. That was necessary in order to retain the appearance of original typewriter text and avoid the appearance of text from computer word processing fonts.
The original PDF version was the result of opening and saving the Hawaiian abstract file in a program that allows for editing files and saving them as PDF files after any altera- tions were done to the original micro-film image which was probably in a different image format, possibly TIFF or several other possibilities. Whatever format was used was prob- ably one that only used pure black or gray-scale, no color since that increases the amount of memory needed unnecessarily.
That new PDF file contained only two layers, the text layer and the background layer.All the others were the result of editing, meaning adding new layers of altered dates, or replacement text. That is in addition to any alteration done to the original micro-film im- age.
What was missing from the original PDF was the images that only appear on printed hard-copies, namely the Registrar’s signature stamp and his date stamp which are manual- ly stamped on the copies to certify them before sending to the requestor. They should not be visible on any PDF or TIFF original made by Hawaii, or else Hawaiian birth certificates would be nothing more than photo-copies that could not be accepted as being certified. Even using a rubber stamp signature is a bastardization of true certification.
Just as a so-called “Certificate of Authenticity”, included with a manufacturer’s product,is not a a certificate because it does not certify anything because it doesn’t contain the signature of the creator. It’s just a stupid printed piece of paper. Hawaii’s certification stamp is similar. That demonstrates how far they have drifted from allegiance to actual authentication. I should also mention that if the PDF were really a scan of a physical document then an embossed/ raised image of the State Seal would be visible.
The significance of the smiling face
The appearance of an alteration to the cursive letter “A” in the stamped signature of Alvin Onaka -the Hawaiian State Registrar, seems to be something more than an odd co- incidence. The alteration happens to have the appearance of a smiling face. It’s isn’t some stretch of the imagination to see it. When people see “the Virgin Mary” in a stain on a wall, it’s because it is a clearly visible image. But it isn’t a miracle, it is pure natural coincidence. But the smiling face appearance is not a natural phenomenon, and since it looks like it is the result of a very carefully placed alteration, (like the number “3″ upside-
down), one must suspect that it was deliberately caused. Any shift left or right, up or down, of the “squiggle” that forms the face would not create a smiling face. The odds against it being the result of something like dirt are astronomical. Therefore it is justified to speculate on what was behind its formation. Allow me to speculate.
Putting on my Sherlockian forensic profiler’s hat, I have a theory that might not be the truth, but makes perfect sense. It begins with the presumption that it was deliberately made. Accepting that proposition, leads to imagining a reason to do that. It can be as-
sumed that it would only have been done by someone who had responsibility over the PDF image, not a child or an interloper. The only reason for putting such a thing on an important document must be that the person who did it a). had unlimited access to it, b). had a reason to do so, and c). thought it would not be noticed.
B. ~A reason to do so~. There is only one logical reason to do it, and that is that it was meant to be a secret fact that could be pointed to someday to prove that the handler had a hand in working on a very significant document, one with historical significance. Like a painter who, after working for hours or days or weeks on a work of art, finally adds his personal signature -written small in an unnoticeable spot down in a corner. That provides
the artist with proof that it was their own creation, -no unrewarding anonymity.
For someone to be similarly motivated in putting such an effect onto the PDF would require that they had a connection to it similar to that which an artist has to his painting. That would mean that he worked on it. What would that imply? It would imply that he made changes to it, working “digital magic” to change something of great significance. He was responsible for the result for which he could never claim credit, -never exercise bragging rights. No one would ever know that he was the master of the greatest forensic
coup/counterfeit successfully perpetrated since some pre-teen sisters created photos of themselves interacting with fairies in their backyard back near the beginning of the last century. Millions of people believed in them, a movie was made about it (John Good- man), and they didn’t admit the truth for 60 years.
But who would want to have to wait that long to get credit for their handiwork? No one. He wanted, sometime sooner than that, to be able to share his accomplishment with some present or future significant other, but any claim couldn’t be believed unless some- thing that no one else knew could be pointed to as proof.
How did he come up with the smiley face idea? Only one logical answer. His name begins with the letter “A” and he picked up the trick while in a graphics class, or while doodling during endless hours of boredom while sitting in classes all day, -a perfect touch to serve as a unique covert signature.
C. ~it would not be noticed~ If you check the Adobe “Properties” of the opened PDF file, you’ll see that it’s “Created”, and “Modified” date/time says 12:09 PM on the day it was posted to the Internet. * “Created” translates to the first time that it was saved on the computer that it was opened and saved on, (“Modified” refers to the last time it was saved after being altered).
That time is UTC time (Universal Coordinated Time) based in Europe, translating to 8:09 AM Washington time if it was “Saved” in the Eastern time zone, or 4:09AM Pacific Time. If it was Saved in the West, like in Seattle where Obama’s personal lawyer lives, -the one that is said to have flown to Honolulu to get the certified copies and then to Washington so the charade could be completed, it would have been 4:09 AM Pacific time. If the forgery conspiracy included the lawyer, (in addition to the Hawaiian officials), then Obama would have been protected by attorney-client confidentiality, very ideal, not including anyone in the White House beside the White House attorney. The “alterer” probably worked on it until the wee hours of the morning, and by then was like I get at that hour when editing photos for 8 hours. One’s mind isn’t too sharp and one forgets things, like turning off lights, and locking doors.
The alterer forgot to convert the document image to a flat JPG (by choosing to “Export” it, instead of “Save”ing it). He picked “Save”, and the program being used was set as default to Save in the PDF format, so it would have been saved, and then uploaded to the White House web-site, as we see it, in PDF format.
Once it was already posted and downloaded by a significant number of people, it was too late to change it. Then when they clicked on it to open it, and it opened with Adobe Reader as a multi-layer PDF image with numerous peculiarities, the “cat was out of the bag” and the speculation and suspicions began as people were inspired to examine it very closely, greatly enlarged. Eventually someone noticed that which was expected to never be noticed.
But even if everything I’ve guess about is true, it doesn’t amount to a hill of beans since there is no way to prove any of it.
“Fertile imagination” you say? For sure. But here’s my challenge; before rejecting it, come up with another reasonable explanation. I doubt that there is any.
The PDF format splits off some off the original text characters and preserves them in their original gray-scale format on the background layer. The gray-scale characters, when enormously enlarged, appear to be composed of squares of varying shades of gray -256 variations. The random retention of some elements of the original micro-film text image in the gray-scale format rather than in the converted form of pure black, and then placing them on the background layer, (while those converted to pure black appear together as a single transparent layer on top of the background,) may be something that a national security/law enforcement agency worked with Adobe to make standard for the purpose of making each document unique and not counterfeitable in such a way that it could not be detected.
The White House PDF (Portable Document Format) is an altered image of a digitized document. The smoking guns I’ve shown do not directly related to changing the place of birth, but any evidence of falsification/alteration can only be assumed to be rare instances where the manipulator made small mistakes that were detectable with very close examination. Since most, or all, of the text was originally in a single layer with an invisible back- ground, like text on celluloid, any entry could be easily erased and something substituted in its place with out disturbing any of the image of the original paper page since it had been deleted (in the Records Department’s digitization process) in order to save on memory and reduce the file size considerably. When that digitization took place RAM and hard drive capacity was much smaller and much more expensive, and also, computers were much slower.
The image used to create the PDF was the product of the digitizing of the Hawaiian birth records so they could have digital backups, which could be shared with authorized Federal agencies, (and could be printed on an official-looking background in place of the whitepaper of the original form.
The statements of the Hawaiian officials reveal one of two possibilities. Either the original unaltered birth document states Hawaii as the birth location, as they claim, or it has been altered in its digitally form to state that. That would either have been done in Hawaii or by someone connected to the White House. Assuming that their statements that
Obama was born in Hawaii are false, then it would follow that if they were willing to lie for him, then they would also be willing to to facilitate the falsification of their “digital abstract” record/image, (but not the original hard copy). The PDF would not be possible without access to images of original Hawaiian birth certificates. Since he has never shown
any Hawaiian hard copies to the public, (or even the one he would have inherited from his mother), one must assume they show something different from his PDF, OR… they never existed and the whole story of producing and obtaining them is a complete lie.
Quote: “The HI Dept of Health…has consistently stood behind the document.”What document? The PDF (a digital file), is not a document and they have not, in any legal sense, stood behind it. So you must be referring to the two certified copies that they claim they produced, but which the public has not been allowed to see. I too will stand behind them, now please show them to me.
My current guess is that the Hawaiian officials shared their image file with the White House, (-the one which they supposedly used to print the two never-shown certified copies), along with image copies of other birth certificates.
“ALL real evidence that has turned up all supports every bit of data that we already were exposed to when his campaign released his COLB and all matches what he wrote about in his autobiographies.” Don’t confuse statements with “data”. Statements need corroboration, data is generally assumed to be cold hard facts. I’m unaware of any cold hard facts that exist and prove anything relevant to the suspicions that exist.
“NOTHING points to ANY other origin for his birth other than Honolulu, HI.” That is
absolutely.. True. But also, nothing concrete points to Hawaii as his birth place either since nothing released so far is unaltered, and no hard-copy has yet been shown.
This is http://obama–nation.com
by a.r. nash