Why most citizens of “The United States” can’t be President -pt.2

Which government’s nationality is sovereign over the native-born children of immigrants in America; -the one of their foreign father who is still subject to his own government, or the one of the nation of the State republic in which his children were born?

The new national government, facing a Europe with which it might find itself at war at any time being as it was still ruled by despots, chose to not recognize the children of foreigners as being American citizens nor American nationals. They were foreign nationals born of foreign nationals even though born in America. They were alien-born. A child could not have a nationality that was different from that of the father who produced him.

So the States had one citizenship recognition process while the central government had another, and it was in relationship to something beyond the purview of any State government; namely foreign relations, -along with the conduct of war.
Suppose that a European Prince & pregnant wife had a baby while visiting an American State which by law bestowed its citizenship to all born within its borders, (-without regard to whether or not they were immigrants or merely visitors). Suppose they all traveled back to their European kingdom where the young Prince would grow up. Suppose that he was murdered.

Would it be an issue involving the American government because it involved the murder of an American?
No, because he would not have been viewed as being an American by the American government even though he was a citizen of one of the States.
Suppose he was murdered by his American illegitimate half-brother? Would the nation of the deceased prince view the murder as merely one American killing another, or as an American killing one of their own subjects, -a royal one at that? The question hardly needs to be asked since the answer is so obvious.

His true nationality was determined by blood, not his birth place. They would not care if his half-brother killer was viewed in his home State or home nation as a fully recognized citizen or as a mere American national. “Citizenship” would not be even considered; only nationality. American? or not? It would not be couched as “U.S. CITIZEN, or not?”.
They would view the murderer as a national of The UNITED STATES of AMERICA, -without regard to which State republic he was born in and a member of.

Suppose the “American” half-brother had been born in Europe and not America; what would determine his nationality? Answer: Within marriage, the nationality of the head of the family; i.e., the boss and master of the house; the father.
Everyone in the family had one nationality and it was his. They were a single unit within the greater units of county, State and nation. His one vote was the vote of the family unit. A wife, per the wedding vow to obey her husband, yielded to the authority of her husband and his decisions, whether family decisions or political decisions, and she took his name and nationality.

But an out-of-wedlock half-American son might be seen as an American through his mother, -unless the foreign father acknowledged paternity.
The government of the Prince would not be required to recognize such a son as a citizen of the nation because he was illegitimate, perhaps might be a fraud, and perhaps might have been born anywhere, or at least not in his kingdom. Thus, in the founders’ era, the child would probably be stateless, -having no nationality whatsoever, -an international conundrum due to infidelity and illegitimacy.

There are four ways such a child could be deemed to be an American, but only one existed before the 1920’s. One would be if he had been born within one of the State republics that gave the gift of citizenship to those born within its borders, -with illegitimacy not addressed, pro nor con.
Another would be possible if the District of Columbia had a similar allowance thanks to the choice of Congress. But it did not recognize such a child as an American having dual citizenship because dual citizenship was not recognized.

It would have been different if born of a European Princess and an American man. Then he would be a freak because he would be a cross between an non-royal American father and a royal heir to a European throne. In such a case, the father might acknowledge paternity and thus provide U.S. citizenship to his bastard son.
But understand that the American laws for a long time did not acknowledge the situation of children without married parents, nor the situation of dual nationality within marriage.
A bride, though foreign, became an American by marrying an American, thus one single nationality for them and their children.

Now let’s move forward in time to when a foreign woman who married an American was viewed as retaining her foreign nationality. The nationality of the child was still determined by the American father from the viewpoint of the American government, regardless of how the government of the mother viewed their child.

The child, through a blood connection to the man who fathered it, was seen as an American by blood, and the law recognized such children as Americans. But what if the American parent was the mother?
That changed the situation significantly since by accepted policy, it inherited the nationality of the foreign father, and thus was not an American, -but in time, -with women’s rights and women’s suffrage being recognized by law and constitutional amendment, the nationality of the American mother was deemed to be passed to her child if born abroad via a foreign father. Her child was a statutory citizen by congressional statute.

What did such citizenship have to do with any of the States of the union? Nothing. It was purely federal, by federal statute. The laws of her State did not make her child an American via making it a citizen of her State because by then the State’s were out of that business following the federal government totally taking over the administration of immigration and naturalization.

That later switched to American volunteers who were forced to take on the chore after the federal government and the federal INS were stopped in their tracks when the Supreme Court ruled their take-over unconstitutional.
Then there was no entity left with any organization to take on the task other than volunteer organizations. But with massive immigration, they were overwhelmed and finally convinced Congress to act and make the job a federal chore by law, -not merely executive policy.

So a child of an American mother and foreign father could not be deemed to be American by a State statute since State governments were out of the naturalization business. Then such a child would not be a citizen of any State, but purely and solely a citizen of the nation as a whole via the federal government’s law; -a national citizen only (at least until the mother returned to live in one of the States).

Such a citizen would have to be labeled as a citizen of “The United States”, or “The UNITED STATES of AMERICA”. It could not be labeled a citizen of “the united States”, -or a citizen of a State republic because its “citizenship” was strictly federal until it became domiciled as an adult within an individual State.

Another way to become such a citizen would be via birth within the boundaries of federal land in the eras following that in which dual citizenship was not acknowledged. If born in D.C. or on federal land within a State, -or within no State, one also would not be a State citizen but a federal citizen only.

Men who work on such lands for Washington are not officers of “the united States”, because they do not work for any State, but are instead officers of “The United States”, -the entity and name of the national government.
As officers of the United States Government, they do not represent the authority nor interests of the States. They only represent the authority and laws of the national government, and it is quite separate and apart from those of the States.

Keeping the difference straight in one’s mind requires recognizing the difference between the use of the word “united” as an adjective and its use as a part of a title. A national title calls for the capitalization of the major words included in the title, while a word used as merely an adjective should not be capitalized even though it makes a label seem more weighty and authoritative.

Let’s look as the name of the nation that has the same initials as our own; the Union of South Africa. One must not fail to capitalize the word “union” because it is a part of the title of the nation, just as one must not fail to capitalize the word “united” when referring to the American nation.

“Union” is not an adjective but is a noun, whereas “united” is an adjective, and when used in reference to the union of the individual States, it need not be, and should not be capitalized, even though everyone does it out of a habit dating back to when most significant nouns were capitalized in formal writing, -as seen throughout the Constitution.

“The united States” is an unambiguous reference to a union of States, whereas if “united” is capitalized, one cannot tell what the reference is made to except by analyzing the context in which it is ambiguously used. In most cases it does not refer to “the general government” of the nation but the union of States.

[addendum: After posting this exposition, I was trying to find out if the Confederacy required an oath of allegiance for citizenship and came across a website seeking the revival of the Confederacy, and it contained this paragraph which shows that I was not the first to understand the difference that capitalization makes:

Remember, or learn if you didn't already know, our founding fathers created the Confederacy in 1778 when they created the Articles of Confederation under which they, with General George Washington, fought and won a war against the British Empire. The Constitution of 1789 was but a more complete contract of government between the various State republics which they began to call the States of America or the "united" States of America.]

So one can see that in the real and unambiguous world, there is a distinct difference between a citizen of “The United States of America” and a citizen of “the united States”, but that difference is so invisible, undetectable, unacknowledged, unimportant, and insignificant that it is completely meaningless, -except… in one very rare and unusual circumstance. That of seeking and obtaining the office of President of the United States.

The Constitution requires that only “a natural born citizen… shall be eligible to the office of the President;”.
So what sort of citizen is a natural born citizen? It is the sort that created each of the State republics and the union that they formed. It was the natural inhabitants or indigenous population of the American colonies and future sovereign States. It was the children of Americans, -people who had American-ness as their common background via their birth to Americans, -almost all of whom were also born in America.

They were all born as the natural citizens of their colonies and States. They were responsible for their common defense, administration of justice, and the operation of their government and civil societies.
They were citizens even while being subjects of the British Crown. They were born as citizens, and since their citizenship was not via a gift of the government that they created but via their blood connection to citizen parents, they were natural citizens. They were citizen-born natural Americans. Just what the Constitution required.

But those born of outsiders, -of foreign immigrants, were not the natural citizens of the colonies or States but were merely legal citizens, even though made legal from birth in some States.

That which is natural cannot, by definition, be made by government, and that which is made by government cannot, by definition, be natural.
It can only be man-made, including citizenship.

No man-made citizen of “The United States” is eligible to be President because they all acquired citizenship via American law which makes an allowance for those of foreign or mixed nationality & blood connection. Some U.S. government citizens are natural born citizens because they were born of citizens within federal territory.

But in the beginning, nearly all natural born citizens were only State citizens since they were born of State citizens and not born out in the western wilderness claimed by the Americans and ceded to the U.S. by the British after the Peace Treaty of Paris was signed.

In fact one could even assert that only federal “citizens” are truly “citizens” of “The United States” (-as apposed to being merely U.S. Nationals as State citizens could be considered) because all citizenship relationships are State relationships involving civic rights and duties, -with the lone exceptions of paying taxes and serving on federal juries. So in reality, State citizenship is/was the dog, and national “citizenship” is the tail. But guess which one wags which in everyone’s mind?

In another sense it would be accurate to state that we are all, in reality, simply Nationals of “The United States”, and not “citizens” since our rights and duties are still quintessentially State rights & duties, -with each individual being a citizen of one of the united States.

Even the duty of national defense can no longer be considered as a national “citizenship duty” because even non-citizens are obligated to serve when called, and sent to prison for refusing. That leaves only the century-old federal taxes on income, and federal jury service, and not many people ever even experience that. So in what sense are we truly “citizens” of the central government of the nation?  Because we are forced to pay federal taxes?

Historically, Americans never had to pay a “tax” on wages and salary because the meaning of the word “income” did not include compensation for time one surrendered in a mutual exchange of labor for money.  That was considered a barter and not an income.  Income was earnings that one’s money or property earned.  So as established, Americans never had any connection to the central government unless called to sit on a federal jury, -or working in interstate law, commerce, or the new central government.

Plenty has been illegitimately and unconstitutionally altered from the way our nation was founded, but the basic structure has not. We live our lives as local and State citizens, although convenient transportation makes changing one’s State very easy, yet the functions of government, for the most part, have not been ceded to the federal government, so we live and serve as citizens of our home towns, cities, counties, and States and do not serve as “citizens” of the national government, nor the aggregate nation as a whole. And, our governors have the authority to block our extradition to another state because we are not citizens of any State but one.

One can truly assert that we are still essentially nothing more than citizens of our State republic and merely nationals of our nation, yet our programmed thinking tells us just about the opposite.
To say that we are citizens of our nation is at least half as absurd as saying that we are nationals of our State since we have practically no national citizenship duty at all.

This truth is seen in the actual status of children, and, for over half of American history, women as well. No one considers babies and children (minors) to have any duties of citizenship. They are exactly what a National is, and definitely not what a citizen is. Citizens have CIVIC RIGHTS as well as duties. Children have neither, and neither did America women until they were given the right to vote, and the rights that accompanied it.

Foreign permanent-resident immigrants are treated as U.S. Nationals, -under the protection of the government, and bearing certain responsibilities toward the nation that they have joined. That is why they can be drafted into the U.S. military.  They must answer the call of duty or suffer the consequence even though their natural allegiance and subjection is still to their foreign homeland, and yet American women are not subject to the call of duty even though they are citizens.  They are not subject because they are not of the warrior class gender.  They are the main protected class that is defended.

 

The history of Congressional ignorance regarding American citizenship is appalling. Many of the major and long-standing edicts of Congress have been over-turned by the Supreme Court because they failed to adhere to fundamental American principles of equality.

They passed laws treating naturalized citizens differently than natural citizens, and American women differently than American men. [That was eventually brought to a silent stop, but not completely when it comes to foreign birth involving a foreign parent.]

The most egregious violation was the total implementation of male-dominated citizenship determination.
It was one thing to deem an American husband’s foreign bride to now be an American too, but it was quite another to deem an American bride who married a foreign groom to have forfeited her American citizenship by having done so, (in reciprocity with the foreign nation of the husband).

That was the law of the land, passed by Congress, and signed by the President as the Naturalization Act of 1907. Any child born to such a mother was denied American citizenship up until long past its repealed in 1922 by the Cable Act.

So you can see, citizenship has been quite paradoxical throughout periods in American history as the roles of men and women became ever more equal. But through it all, the meaning of what is a natural born citizen has never changed, -except perhaps at the margins where very odd circumstances might be involved.

The birth and nationality of Barack Obama was not such a circumstance. He was not even in the same ballpark as natural born citizens. He was born subject (solely) to the British Nationality Act of 1948, as his own 2008 election website explained, with that Act applying to both Obama Sr. and all of his children.

Obama openly acknowledged that he was born as a subject of the British Commonwealth and as a future citizen of Kenya once it became an independent nation a few years later, and he has never claimed to be a natural born American citizen, calling himself only a native-born citizen.  But he must have been ignorant of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.

It preceded the writing of the 14th Amendment by a few months, and its wording declares that those born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, are citizens of the United States [“United” should not be capitalized because it essentially refers to State citizenship for freed slaves. They were not foreigners, nor born of foreigners since the importation of slaves had been banned a half century earlier.]

So even if assumed to have been born in America, he would still be ineligible to be President because he was born subject to a foreign power, and was not a natural citizen of any State since he was born of an outsider.
So an alien father prevented him from being a natural born citizen, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 bars him from even being a citizen at all since his mother was too young for her citizenship to legally be transmitted to her son by a statute that didn’t exist for another 75 years or so.

Some falsely assume that the 14th Amendment,-by its presumed lower standard only requiring that one be born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,  over-rode the Civil Rights Act of 1866, but in fact, the authors said just the opposite.

One, when asked, proclaimed emphatically that being subject to American jurisdiction meant being subject to no foreign power. So that meant that dual citizenship was not recognized, and one could not be subject to two separate nations, -just as freed slaves were not.
But to avoid that truth, they float the notion that children, (even babies!) are directly subject to national governments. In fact, people on both sides of the Obama eligibility issue assert that falsehood.

First, only adults are subject to governments. Second, in the Christian and patriarchal tradition, wives were always subject directly to their husbands, -not the government. And their children were directly subject to their mother and father, -not the government.

So their doctrine that any child born in America is automatically subject directly to the Federal government is insanely absurd. The family unit was a vertical hierarchy, -not a horizontal one having each element subject to Big Brother, -the hub. Only the head was subject. The relationship of the children to the government of the nation in which they lived was solely through their father. If he was subject, then one day they would also be. They inherited his subjection, (along with his citizenship) -and fully so if male.

If he was alien, then they were viewed as subject to the foreign power that he remained subject to since national borders do not terminate one’s national obligations.  If one’s nation is attacked, one must heed the call of duty even if living abroad.

So, we have a President who is not only not constitutionally qualified to serve since he is not a natural born citizen of Hawaii nor of the federal government, but is disqualified from even being an American citizen since his father was not an immigrant subject to Washington, but merely a temporary foreign guest still subject to the government of Kenya.  But might he be a naturalized American?

We have no way to know because all records related to him have either been “lost” removed & hidden, classified, closed to inspection, or destroyed. Nothing yet released by his or the Hawaiian government has been legitimate, but what has been released is an attempt to benefit from the ignorance of the American people who do not understand that it does not matter where he was born, -only to whom he was born; -an American father? Or an alien?

Regardless, he is an American National, but that does not make him an American CITIZEN.
He logically can be viewed as being an American, -just as can children brought illegally into the country at a young age, and then raised and schooled as Americans. But being the equivalent to an American National does not make one eligible to be the Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military.

So Barack Obama, being an alien-born child of a non-subject foreign student, is not a natural citizen of any State, -nor of any nation, and regardless of native-birth, all such persons are constitutionally barred from being the President of the United States.
So why is he President?

Because America has become a reflection of the O.J. Simpson jury.

Why most citizens of The United States can’t be President  1 & 2;  pdf -11 pages  revised

by Adrien Nash April 2014 obama–nation.com

Why No Visa-card Alien’s Child Can Be President

or How Foreign Women Prove Obama Is Not An American Citizen

Do you believe that you understand what citizenship is? You probably do. But do you understand what the nature of American citizenship is? You definitely do not.
It is knowledge that has been entirely lost, and can’t be found in anything written in the last century. Even worse, it can hardly be found in anything written in the century before. But it is easily regained and understood simply by connecting dissimilar facts which together create a puzzle picture which reveals the truth. Let’s exam the picture that emerges when those pieces are assembled together.

For two centuries, American women, like indentured servants, were not citizens of the colonies nor the states nor the nation.
Whenever the subject of citizenship might have been raised in mixed American company, no man would have said so but they all would have thought that their womenfolk were not really citizens. They would not have said so because they felt the need to be polite, diplomatic, and avoid the ire of womenfolk whose good graces they desired to be in.

What man who desired his his mother’s approval, or his wife’s good cooking, obedience, and good sex would have uttered the truth in front of her; “women aren’t really citizens at all; they’re merely American subjects.”?
That’s the reality of the situation that couldn’t be spoken. It reminds me of something Greg Guttfeld said about marriage. He said that no one has ever written an honest book about what marriage actually turns out to be and is like by comparison to the notions in single people’s head before they’ve ever been married, -and… that no one ever will have the audacity to write one.

So there it is; the citizenship of American women, as well as children, was strictly a pretense of politeness maintained so as to not ruffle their feathers by making them seem unequal to men.
American principles rejected the existence of more than one class of citizens because they rejected one class being superior over others, and the rest being inferior -as was not the case in Europe with its despicable noble and aristocrat classes.
That fundamental American fact tells you that the women of America were not a lesser class of CITIZEN but were not actually citizens at all.
They were not inferior nor second-class because they were not in the class described by the title “CITIZEN”.
They were in a protected and subservient class apart from citizens, -leaving only the label “American National” to accurately and respectfully describe them.
The inhabitants of Puerto Rico and Guam, -as well as Native Americans, were once American Nationals. That status did not give them the rights of citizenship but gave them membership in the nation.
Now they, like women, are citizens also, but American Samoans and Virgin Islanders are not, -as is stated on their passports. They are American Nationals only.
That historical reality sheds strong indirect light on the very nature of citizenship itself. The direct light is that shed on citizenship via naturalization.
Only when you understand the reality of the mind-set of the past will you understand the truth about naturalization. It is this; since in reality, American women were not real American citizens, foreign women could not be American citizens either, -meaning they could not volunteer for the process of naturalization because it was restricted solely to those who could become CITIZENS, -not merely American nationals, -and only men could become citizens. Consequently only European men could submit to naturalization.

What did and does naturalization still require? Besides the renunciation of all foreign allegiance, it requires that one solemnly swear to BEAR ARMS, to BEAR TRUE FAITH & ALLEGIANCE to America and her Constitution.
How does one “bear true faith” towards a country? Only one way; by being true to the orders that one is given, -showing that true faith to one’s allegiance by showing full obedience in battle as the bullets are ripping into one’s companions and fellow CITIZENS (all of whom are male only). That is the obedience that is requisite to citizenship.

That oath is a living reminder of what naturalization actually entailed. In today’s bastardized devolved version of the system of the past, foreign women ridiculously swear to the very same thing by the very same words, with the words now meaning absolutely nothing.
If they actually meant something in any way, then one would have to assert that the United States government asserts the right to conscript women into the combat forces and to send them into battle.

Is there any man alive who is willing to make that assertion on behalf of Congress? Could anyone elected to Congress ever even think about making such subjection of women national law?
That will never happen because it is unthinkable even if the nation “allows” strong, aggressive and ambitious women to serve as combat or medic soldiers and Marines. They will never be made subject to that authority involuntarily because the men of the nation are the guardians of the women and children of the nation. Women are the protected class, not members of the protector class.

So foreign men were the only Europeans who underwent the naturalization process, and through them, as heads of their family unit, their wives and children became Americans automatically; -not by authorization of law, but by operation of American principles, one of which was that nationality was attached and flowed through the family head, the father, unless he were dead.

If the head became something new, then those under him became the same thing because they were of him and by him and possessed the same family blood as one living cohesive unit. Law was not needed to make that so because that was basic American Natural Law philosophy and attitude. But lawmakers felt obligated for the sake of openly protecting those who were not directly naturalized to state on the record that natural fact, -that those attached to him, his children, were also Americans, -although they did fail to include mention of the foreigner’s wife.

Divorce was allowed in America under Biblical law although it was rarely allowed in Britain under the National Anglican Church. Perhaps if a naturalized foreigner’s wife committed adultery, she could not only lose her husband and children, but also her right to be considered an American.

It no doubt was so because her only proof of being an American was through her husband, -by showing her marriage certificate and his naturalization certificate, connecting herself to him and his new citizenship procured her her membership in the American nation. Without those documents, she became a foreigner once again.

But how would that have actually changed anything about her life being lived in America? It would have changed nothing because her fellow American women had no citizenship rights either. They all were subject to the status quo of the patriarchal male-dominated society, -like subjects and not CITIZENS.  In fact you could label them as American subjects, like the Native Americans were a sort of subject, in a way, but not the real common law way because they were not subject to the full sovereign authority of the American government since they retained their own sovereignty.

Their relationship was described as “unknown to the common law”. But the relationship of women was known to the common law since it was one of subjection to the authority of the head of the family, -her father or her husband.
But like American women, like American Indians, like migrant Canadians & Frenchmen, and like American Negroes, foreign women were not subject to the requirement and natural duty of CITIZENSHIP which included the obligation to bear arms for the nation with true faith, and allegiance in battle if ordered.

There was, and is, two other classes of people who also are exempt from that obligation, and they are all foreign ambassadors & representatives, and all foreign guests of the U.S. government.  They cannot be drafted into the American military because they are not subject to American authority over its own. Since 1898 and a Supreme Court opinion in the case of Wong Kim Ark, “its own” includes not only its citizens but also its domiciled immigrants who’ve joined themselves to American society and are under American laws and protection.

Such foreign men, even though not naturalized into citizenship, are subject to the full requirement of the male duty to defend one’s own country even though it is not the nation of one’s subjectship or citizenship. But being as it is in reality one’s actual home, one has an actual duty to defend it.

That was not the view before that court opinion, -the one that declared that by the 14th Amendment, children of immigrants are born with American citizenship. Before that opinion, there was no settled national rule that anyone could point to that determined whether or not alien-born children were citizens of the nation, even though they were accepted as citizens within and by some of the individual states.

So today, foreign men and their foreign-born sons can be drafted, and thus are required to register with the Selective Service System between 18 and 25 even though they are not Americans.
That is because they are Americans in the sense that they are members of American society, even though not citizens, just as American women were also members of their own society but were not citizens in any real sense.

Another group are also not Americans in any real sense and they are foreign guests. They are those visiting America or serving their government in America on a temporary basis. Such foreign guests bear a Visa Card or diplomatic credentials while foreign immigrants bear a Green Card and are permanent-resident members of the country without being citizens.

A Visa-bearing foreign man might produce a child while within American borders but through the child’s head, its father, it is not subject to the duty that he is not subject to either, which is American military service. His child is exempt because it is subject to its father’s nation, -the one where he lives and has his home. He belongs for his father’s society and may be raised there as soon as his visit to America ends.

Such a foreign father was one Barack Obama from Kenya; foreign student. He fathered a son who was subject to the British Nationality Act of 1948 but who was not subject to American sovereign authority over American citizens and immigrants.
Neither the father nor the son at birth were under any obligation to serve a nation that was not theirs and was not their home. In time the son became obligated because Kenya did not become his home, -Hawaii did and it was an American state when he was born.

Did he register with Selective Service at 18 years of age? No, he did not. He did not feel obligated to do so since he was only partly American, -but also Kenyan, and Indonesian by adoption.

But when he was born, by the 14th Amendment and its true meaning of what being subject to the United States was when the amendment was written, -or even by what it meant under the illegitimate expansion of its meaning to include immigrants by the Supreme Court in 1898, Barack Jr. was not born possessing 14th Amendment citizenship because his father was not an American nor an immigrant but merely a foreign guest.

And as far as anyone knows, his status has never changed, although he may have gone through the naturalization process, -unbeknown to everyone since it would remove all ignorant doubt that he was not born as an American citizen, and as such could not possibly be considered to be a “natural born citizen” as the Constitution requires of all Presidents and Vice-Presidents.

Why No Visa-card Alien’s Child Can Be President  pdf 3 page

by Adrien Nash March 2014 obama–nation.com

Obama and Hawaiian DoH Director Fuddy’s Convenient Death

All cold-blooded killers like to leave no loose ends that point back to them. Consequently, witnesses or hired underlings end up being dispatched to the next life so that they can never give testimony against secret criminals that could put those criminals on death row.
That danger to them is why the witness protection program was created. There are plenty of people who will kill other people for reasons of hate or profit. They have to be kept away from their would-be targets or they will end up dead.
But people in the public eye cannot just enter the witness protection program and disappear into a new identity in a new unknown location. They have to continue living their lives in the public eye and hope that secrets that they know, -which it would be better to not know, won’t eventually cause wheels to be put in motion that will figuratively drop a meteor on their head. The sword of Damocles hangs over their head, which they have to live under everyday. Until it drops.
Sometimes it drops in very suspicious ways, like a “suicide” by shooting oneself in the back or some such unbelievable circumstances. But more often it drops in very, very subtle and believable ways. Bullets are no longer a credible way to eliminate the cognoscenti; they raise too many eyebrows. So other methods must be employed.

As everyone has been made aware via fiction and fact depicted in films and novels, the security agencies of powerful governments know dozens of covert means to make people dead, with the worse being thorium injected with a fine tip needle. But that is too revealing since it’s highly radioactive. Something much more subtle would be something that would simply stop one’s heart.
An autopsy might show death by an air embolism, or some form of poison but will not show something that causes a “natural death” by blocking the electrical signal to the heart muscle. That could work by stopping the heart outright like they do in open-heart surgery, or by causing the muscles to not receive a consistent pulse of electricity but an inconsistence pulse which causes the muscles to contract separately instead of in unison. Such an effect would result in a death that a coroner would assume was caused by cardiac arrhythmia, even though it can’t be detected in a non-beating heart. One can’t detect an irregular heart-beat if the heart is not even beating. One has to draw assumptions in the absence of detectible fact.

The coroner who did the autopsy of Loretta Fuddy, -the deceased Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health, chose to ascribe her unexplained and unexpected death as being due to cardiac arrhythmia. Well, for that to be believable a few things would have to be true; she would have to have had a prior detection of cardiac irregularity via some experience that made her feel “ill”, or was detected during a routine heart exam. Being 65 years of age, and head of the department of Health, it would be certain that her health was not overlooked or ignored.

She would have had a stress text or two over the years because women have been known for some time now to have as many deaths due to heart disease and heart attacks as men.
According to her own brother, she was in excellent health, and there were no known heart problems. If she had been my grandmother’s age when she died from cardiac arrhythmia due to forgetting to take her digitalis with her during a few days away from home, then it would be understandable, but then my grandmother was 88 years old, while Fuddy was still a relatively young 65, very active and fully functioning as a department director, -which, he brother pointed out, requires strong nerves and not a ‘fraidy-cat spirit.

On the other hand, there are many things about her which we do not fully know. Including how she got the job in the first place. She was appointed to replace the sitting head of the department who had just been installed into office just three weeks prior. When asked by a reporter why he had resigned, that was the first he had heard of it, and answered that it was news to him.
So everything about her “appointment” was suspicious, including the fact that unlike a doctor, which all previous heads had been, she had no experience in life that would have produced those nerves of steel one would expect for a department head. In fact, she was an emotional, vulnerable, needy, gentle, single, childless soul who was a church member and a cult member, -being a leader (or the leader) of the branch of the Subuh cult in Hawaii.
Obama’s mother had also been a member. Obama and Fuddy were connected through his mother, -at least in a tangential way, but even more so in a political way.

We all know that spy agencies and the military, both of which must keep very classified secrets, are always concerned about an agent being susceptible to being emotionally compromised; charmed, wined-&-dined, hopelessly involved with a person of the opposite sex (or a person of the same sex, -even more worrisome).
But influence does not have to be so involved. All that’s really needed is for a vulnerable person to be placed in a position of being charmed by a very, very powerful and charming person, like say…. oh, maybe the debonair President of the entire United States! The one who makes a personal call to ask for one’s help to solve a problem.

“Her most important events in life were the confirmation of hearing the birth of her nieces, nephews, grandnieces and grandnephews. Some of her hobbies were the collections of various cat and angel figurines and taking care of her pet cat.”

-Gee, I wonder if her life could have been a made a little richer by a personal call from the President of the United States with a little request for a little favor so he could end the “silliness” surrounding his non-existent birth certificate?

Let’s be honest, when it comes to the female gender, Obama, more than any President ever, is able to come across as very charming. That is why we was elected, -and reelected. It sure wasn’t due to masses of men-folk being charmed by him personally while disdaining his policies, actions, and non-actions. That was the wide-eyed infatuated low-information, The Bachelor-watching members of the gentler sex.

Does anyone dare so say that Loretta Fuddy would been immune to the Obama charm when he applied it full force? It would have been emotionally impossible for her to say no to him. That’s how charm works. That’s how people get bamboozled everyday by smooth-takers who are so sincere, it seems, and so friendly. Who wouldn’t enjoy knowing them better, and being liked by them? (and buying a great bridge from them at a steal!)

What am I getting at? I’m suggesting that Barack Obama personally called Fuddy on her private line and shmoozed with her about his lamentable problem of having been born in Hawaii but his mother not having been able to get a birth certificate for him because of date and timing factors which didn’t allow it at the time. He needed her personal help to help get him past the doubters who suggested he was foreign born.

They were a big distraction and the issue “needed to be put to bed”, (quoting god-knows who) especially with that big-mouth Donald Trump raising a fuss for god-only-knows what reason. Maybe racism?

Well, she got aboard and was determined to help her knight in shining socialist armor, and she could do that by making certain old records available for others to use to put together an official-looking long-form birth certificate. It wasn’t like it was criminal, even though it wasn’t legal. Everyone commits a crime or three every time they drive a car. She would be doing a good deed, -good for Obama, -good for the Democrat Party, good for Hawaii, and good for the nation.

Bending the rules a little would not hurt anyone, but would benefit millions by keeping Lord Obama in office for another four years, -protecting the Affordable Health Care Act from being repealed. Why it was almost obligatory to help provide him with a birth certificate before the issue got out of hand and people started thinking that he was not even eligible to be President. That kind of thinking could be dangerous and completely uncalled for. For the sake of the country, that needed to be nipped in the bud, -and so it was.

She opened the computer data-base which stores all of the digitized records going back to before Hawaii even became a state. She located the computer-stored microfilm image of his mother’s original affidavit applying for recognition of birth for her newborn son. That affidavit was accompanied by a typed version of Barack Jr.’s vital facts regarding parentage and such, and the text of those facts was added to the form of an archive page for someone else, such as Virginia Sunahara who was born the day before and died the day after Obama was born, -after deleting its digitized text imagery and replacing it with Obama’s. Presto! a very passable birth certificate, -if one does not examine it with a microscope.

Well, it has been examined with a microscope, so to speak, and it has been discovered that the layout of the lines, the spacing of the words and some letters would have been impossible under any ordinary circumstance of a clerk putting a blank form into a typewriter and typing away, word by word, line by line.
Placing text onto a digital form cannot replicate the precision of the mechanism that is a typewriter. And so the imprecision of the fake Certificate of Live Birth gave it away as being fabricated on a computer, and not produced by a typewriting clerk.
-That’s old school investigation. Nothing digital in nature, just an old fashion grid matrix laid on top of Obama’s bc and on top of a control bc from someone else. Obama can’t say; “Who ya gonna believe? Me? or yer lyin’ eyes?”

So compliant Fuddy did her democratic duty for her party and her charming champion and it turned out to be a very profitable compliance it seems. Doug Vogt, who filed a legal petition in Seattle, [http://obamaforgerybook.com/ ] named her in a sealed affidavit which accompanied his open brief detailing all of the accumulated evidence of forgery of the long form birth certificate and the Selective Service registration card. In that sealed affidavit he detailed his investigation into Fuddy’s finances. He found that she came up with between 50-70 thousand dollars that could not be accounted for, -which went to pay down her mortgage and such.

That is a lot of money to come from nowhere. Many people have been killed for far less. And many people who knew about such inexplicable manna from heaven when it fell on some gangster, mob boss, or powerful executive ended up in a pine box before they made it to the witness stand in a criminal case against the criminal.

So does one dare speculate as to whether or not Loretta Fuddy might have been seen as a potential witness for the prosecution, -a witness that could blow Obama and his overlords’ world to kingdom come? What the heck, why not. Nothing can hurt her now. So since just about every court in the land that has been presented with a suit against Obama has caved before even hearing it, one might be tempted to suspect that his socialist ilk are embedded in all of the institutions of the land, including law offices and court offices.

If one of Obama’s lying, atheist, socialist acolytes read what Vogt revealed about Fuddy, why would she or he fail to make herself a hero to her hero by giving him a heads-up? No good reason not to. After all, who the heck would ever know? Answer: no one. And what happened after that sealed affidavit was submitted to that court?

Fuddy is soon dead after the highly reliable plane she was in dies in midair just after take-off following a report muffled bang sound.
Now I don’t know about you, but I know that when a bullet hits an insulated car or plane or train, it makes a thump instead of a loud clang or bang. I also know that snipers can take out a target from over a mile away. Also, a small explosive next to the magneto would kill the engine dead. Kind of just like what happened.

So, you have a highly suspicious and inexplicable death preceded by a highly unexpected and inexplicable engine shut-off, and this all happens after the dead person has been personally named in a court filing which implicates her in a financial circumstance that is inexplicable and may be tied to a conspiracy to produce a badly needed birth certificate to silence critics who were hounding the President of the United States with irritating and suspicion-raising questions about where he was really born and whether or not he was really eligible to be President, -and was even a United States citizen.

Well, I, as Obama’s personally appointed judge, and cop, rule that there is nothing suspicious here, so just move along to your own homes, folks. There’s nothing to see. And by the way, that large, moving, maneuvering object you and thousands witnessed in the sky, that was just an odd cloud. Trust the government. It would never lie to you.

Edward Snowdon taught us that the government is completely above-board and we can trust its minions with our safety and liberty, -and let’s not forget; privacy as well.
Just because the Congress passed, and the President signed, the National Defense Authorization Act which includes the authority for the executive branch and military to arrest and imprison American citizens without charges, attorneys, trials, or judges, does not mean that government thinks it is your boss. So stop being worried, -stop being overly concerned.

And speaking of being overly worried, did you know that hyper-stress can kill you by causing cardiac arrhythmia? And what causes hyper-stress? Why fear of course; -terror of something very malevolent or threatening.
I’ve heard that it’s been found that a pilot of a fighter plane died in the cockpit before his nose-diving plane even hit the ground. I assume he was attached to telemetry which showed that he flat-lined out of stark fear.

Now put yourself in Loretta Fuddy’s shoes; you are the only loose end in a conspiracy that goes to the very top of the American government, and you are the only person in that conspiracy who is not a lawyer and thus can’t claim attorney-client privilege, -with the client being one Barack H. Obama, POTUS.

-And your perfectly working plane engine, checked-out just before flight, -no history of problems, a reliable work-horse of aviation, suddenly dies while you are high in the air with no second engine to take over.
You “know where the bodies are buried” and maybe no one has your back, expect perhaps with cross-hairs on it, and that those included behind the scenes as faceless enforcers are aware of what you know, just as they may have been regarding what Breitbart knew about something or other. You just might have a panic attack if you thought about your situation, and that of the coroner who did Breitbart’s autopsy and the next day turned up dead.

But panic attacks don’t kill, and neither does “hyperventilation” kill a director of a Health Department, especially not when there is no reason to be hyperventilating while peacefully floating among many others in the warm waters of the Hawaiian coast (just a half mile away). Why would such a placid setting inspire the kind of shear panic that could derange normal heart rhythm?
Either it didn’t, but something else did, or else her heart stoppage was caused by an injected neurro-toxin that attacks the heart.
I learned, I believe in boot camp some forty years ago, that there is a chemical agent so powerful that just a drop on your thigh will kill you in about 10 seconds by stopping your heart. It might have been a man-made chemical, no doubt, but there are super-powerful nerve agents produced by living creatures, such as the box jellyfish (which just happens to inhabit the ocean). But its sting of the skin is very painful. But if injected below the skin, then what would happen? Probably just what
happened to Loretta Fuddy, -whatever that was.

That seems like plenty of questions surrounding her death, but the public is left with one more huge one; and that is; “what were the results of the NTSB investigation of the cause of the engine failure?”
If you do a search for answers you’ll find absolutely nothing after the January autopsy results. At least on the first few pages. It’s all regurgitation of the crash and autopsy news. End of story. Now it’s over three months later. What the heck happened?

They would have found an answer within a week of getting the engine, but just try to use the NTSB website search engine to find anything. You’ll find zip. Nada. Wouldn’t you think there was some data-base of plane crashes and investigation results? Is the NTSB in the stone age or are they just under the domination of Obama’s enforcers and hiding the results.
What kind of results would Obama need to hide? A bullet hole for one, -a bomb explosion for another. Something caused that muffled bang.

On Apollo 13, it was an explosion of an oxygen tank. So we are left with what we are always left with; no answers and more questions.  When does it become politically okay to say that silence has become suspicious? Well it doesn’t matter what is okay because Americans with brains in their heads instead of pudding, want to know a heck of a lot of answers that are being deliberate kept secret.

“Lois Lerner, what did you know and when did you know it regarding the IRS scandal?”

“Eric Holder, what did you know and when did you know it regarding the Fast & Furious scandal?”

“Hilary Clinton, what did you know and when did you know it regarding the Benghazi scandal?”

Answers? They can’t handle answers. So you aren’t going to get any, not now, not ever, especially about the counterfeit birth certificates and their production. I can’t say “their production and investigation” because there will never be any investigation unless the sky falls.

Why won’t anyone investigate or ask questions? Because no one is partial to implied threats against their loved ones. That’s the consequence of not having people like yours truly where they are most needed. I speak of people who have no loved ones.

Anyone who doubts that that is the way the truly hard-core behind-the-scenes agents of merciless power operate, then just try to explain the unexplainable flip-flop of chief justice roberts, who stabbed the Constitution and the America people in the back with his treasonous opinion on Obama-care.

Did he just wake-up one morning and decide to flush his values and integrity down the toilet? If he did, we are in as much trouble as if he did it out of primal fear.
So far, you can count on the fingers of one hand, with fingers left over, the number of people in positions of authority or influence who have had the courage and intellectual honesty and integrity to dare to broach the subject of Obama’s unconstitutional and counterfeit-secured presidency.

We are on our own on this one. No one will stand with us, no politician, no news anchor, no pundit, no commentator, no belt-way analyst, no bureaucrat, and no official of any branch of government. No one will stand up and exclaim that the emperor has no constitutional clothes.

This is what we’ve devolved to. Or at least those who are on the inside. If you are not, you should be glad that you are not, because you could not have any self-respect or intellectual curiosity and patriotic protectiveness of the Constitution and rule of law if you were. They are all compromised from East to West. This is the picture of what the corruption and / or intimidation of the entire establishment looks like.

But hey, why complain, just pour another pina colada, put on some reggae music and kick back to “Don’t worry,…be happy.” (for tomorrow you perish.)
As for me, I’m not worried or looking over my shoulder, after all, I don’t know any secrets. I just draw conclusions from stuff I’ve read. And does anyone pay attention? Nope. I’m as invisible as the cosmic background radiation.

But I raise a glass to the hope that some judge, somewhere, sometime just might have a spine and a brain and bring the whole damn house of cards crashing down. That’s the dream, (-a pipe dream it would seem). A dream of Justice.

FIAT JUSTITIA RUAT CAELUM;
“Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall”

by Adrien Nash March 2014 obama–nation.com

Loretta%2BFuddy 28199fuddy_r  Fuddy

Fuddy’s Convenient Death  pdf 5 pages

 

 

 

 

The Secret Obama’s Mother Couldn’t Tell Him

When Barack Obama was born, he wasn’t really there.  Not there in the sense that an observer would be said to have been there because like all infants, he would have no memory of the event nor the place where it took place.  Thus he learned of it second-hand, -only by being told by his mother or a grandparent on some particular occasion when it was brought up.
Or he may have over-heard that he was home-born in Hawaii when his mother was speaking to a clerk in the Indonesian Consulate in Hawaii while she was in the process of applying with her new Indonesian husband (Lolo Soetoro) for formal Indonesian adoption of her son.

Either way, he learned first-hand, -probably  from his mother’s own mouth, that he was born in Hawaii.  If she told him that personally and directly, then she was lying to him face to face.  But he does not know that to this day.
If she lied to him it was because she had to.  Any good and compassionate mother would have done the same because the truth was something that no child should ever hear or be told.  The truth was that he was very much unwanted, and she did everything that she could to unload him onto some willing adoptive couple who would forever take him off of her hands and out of her life.

What do the two things have connecting them?  That question is at the heart of the issue of where he was born and why he was born there.
If he was born in Hawaii, then he was not seriously unwanted, because if he was seriously unwanted, then she would have left Hawaii and returned to her “hometown” of Seattle to find what she could not find in Hawaii; namely a middle-aged, middle-class, childless Black couple looking to adopt a Black or Mulatto baby.
No such couple, she would have discovered, existed in Hawaii because its Black married population was almost entirely a limited number of couples who had moved from the mainland to Hawaii following the husband’s service in the Pacific during World War II.

There were very few of them and none of them were looking to adopt.  So what was Barry’s mother forced to do?  To go fish in a bigger pond, -the pond of Seattle.  Why would anyone suspect that she did that?  The reasons are well laid out in my exposition titled: “Why baby Obama Was Born in Vancouver”.  Now I’ve spilled the beans of where I’m headed by the mention of Vancouver, B.C.

Here’s how the need for the lie is tied in with where he must have been born.  If he was born in Hawaii as his mother told him, then he would certainly have been born in a hospital, or rushed to one immediately following birth enroute.
His mother would have been housed in the maternity ward with other new mothers, and mothers-to-be, but none who were there at that time have any recollection of an unmarried white  teenager who gave birth to a black child.  No one would have ever forgotten such a thing since it would have been maximumly scandalous in 1961.  And… a birth certificate would have resulted.
But the point is that were he born or cared for immediately post-partum in Kapiolani Hospital, then they would have created a Certificate of Live Birth for him, and he would have been registered with the Hawaiian Dept. of Health.

But did that actually happen?  He doesn’t believe it did because he was told only that he was born in Hawaii, -not that we was born in a Hawaiian hospital.  He assumes that for some reason he was born at home, and that fact wrecked his chance to obtain a birth certificate.
The fact that he had no birth certificate because he fell through the legal cracks in the system has been his understanding all of his life, and his mother fostered that misrepresentation because the truth was too ugly to tell.
The truth was that she was the most liberated free young female spirit on the island; -willing to cross lines that no normal, church raised, or morally raised young woman would have even conceived of.
Everything about her was unconventional, beginning with her first name: “Stanley”.  No other girl on Earth was named Stanley.  That says volumes about the maverick nature of her father and mother.

Who were they and what were they?  We only know what has been learned from research which uncovered two things; their membership in a “church” (the United Church of Christ if I remember correctly) which was known as “the little red church” with “red” referring to red as in Red Communist.  And secondly, the fact that they were associates of Frank Marshall Davis, a registered member of the Communist Party of America, and publisher of an occasional communist news periodical” (along with being the future mentor to Barry when he returned to live in Hawaii at age 10).
That’s not all he was.  He was also a nudie-girl soft-porn and S&M photographer who sold what he was able to produce to men’s magazines.  He was so close to the Dunham’s that they had no prohibition against their only daughter spending quality time with him under his political tutelage.  But his secret side-vocation was also something he “mentored” her in.

She, at 17, took to it like a duck to water, posing in whatever he enticed her to try on, including sooner or later, nothing at all.  Their connection went beyond a mere teacher – student relationship because she went beyond all inhibition and shyness.  If there was anything that she was not, shy was it.
The result was that she shed her virginity via a moment of passion that he later wrote about in his semi-autobiographical erotic novel in which he identified his young teenage white female partner as “Ann”.  Gee, pure coincidence.
Perhaps he had a fertile imagination that went to where they did not go together.  But were that true, then why did she do that very same thing just a month or two later with he new fellow Black student in a Russian (!) language class named Barack Obama (-that’s BAIR-ek  o-BAM-a according to his, his brother’s and family’s pronunciation of the two names).

They probably coupled between 11:PM and 1:AM the night of Halloween in 1960 following plenty of drinking, (-or it may have been a month later on her 18th birthday, Nov.29th, but that would have made the resulting child’s birth one month premature).

Either way, she was a very independent spirit looking forward to exciting things in her future and the last person who would be accepting of being saddled with a newborn putting the brakes on her life and lifestyle.
She wanted her freedom, not maternal serfdom.  She felt exactly the same as the hundreds of millions of women who have had abortions to spare themselves from the unwanted drudgery of parenting a newborn-and-up for twenty years.

But she had a problem, and it was that abortion was not yet readily and legally available since the women’s liberation movement had not yet happened.  So she was forced to have the baby and then divorce herself from it via legal adoption from birth.  Of course she was stuck with the big problem that nearly all adoptive couples were white, and none of them were looking to adopt a Negro baby.

There certainly were none in Hawaii, and after her parents’ funded her return to Seattle to seek a couple there, (and that proved to be a dry hole also) she was forced to seek a last-ditch rescue by turning to the big city across the border and just a two hour drive away.
That might have been her mother’s idea, since she was probably with Ann, -her only child, during the final couple weeks of pregnancy.  They could have made the trip to Vancouver, given birth, been rejected by a waiting adoptive couple when they saw what she had failed to inform them of, namely the non-white race of the baby, and so she was stuck with keeping it since there were no takers.

Now how do you tell your only child such a story about how “wanted” he was?  Well, you don’t.  No child needs nor wants to hear how his mother did everything in her power to avoid being stuck with him or her.  So she certainly never told him, especially since she was highly inclined toward sociological awareness, -becoming a PhD in anthropology, -which can be entirely focused on the study of human culture and human relationships.
She intuitively knew that if she told him the truth about where he was born, then he would wonder and ask what she was doing in Vancouver at the time, and where was Vancouver anyway?   One answer would lead to another, ending at having to reveal why he was born there.

That was something a mother cannot tell her vulnerable child. And so she never did.  And that is why Barry still thinks he was born in Hawaii.  His belief is bolstered by something tangible, and that is the written record and attestation of his mother under legal oath in writing when she wrote-out an affidavit in an office of the Dept of Health in Honolulu where she attempted to register her child as having been home-born.

That was the story that she told her son one day in order to explain why he had no birth certificate, and it would have worked with the Hawaiian Dept of Health since they could legally register out-of-state births to residents (not just “citizens” only) who could show that they had lived as Hawaiian residents for one year or been registered as residents of Hawaii for a year.

But Ann could not show proof of that because she had not lived in Hawaii for a year (having left in the Spring to return to Seattle to find an adoptive couple there) and her legal residence could only be attested to by an adult (which she was) but perhaps only one who had been registered for one full year, -which she could not have been since she turned 18 on November 29, 1960, making her an adult for only 8 months when her baby was born (assuming legal age in Hawaii in 1961 was 18).

So her hand-written affidavit under penalty of perjury (containing all of the vital facts of the child and parents, -minus the true birth location) was received and typed and stamped and filed just like all other such affidavits, but she could not return later with the residency proof required in order to qualify for the issuance of a certified copy of a produced birth certificate, -and her parents didn’t feel compelled to sign a perjurous affidavit on Barry’s behalf, and saw no real need for a birth certificate since it is assumed (erroneously) that everyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen anyway.

So little Barry’s nationality and proof of citizenship were left dangling in the wind, so to speak, as far as any hard-copy proof of identify and citizenship were concerned.
Although an INS officer who handled the Obama Sr. Visa extension case, wrote in his notes that Sr. had an American citizen wife and child, he did so under the assumption that what Sr. told him was accurate, and also that native-birth alone provides citizenship (which it does not).  But between what that agent of the government believed to be true, and what was actually real,  there was a wide gap.  A proof gap.

It appeared in stark terms when Ann attempted to have her son added to her new U.S. passport when preparing to leave Hawaii for Indonesia and life with her foreign husband there.  Following her marriage to Lolo Soetoro, they made a trip to the Indonesian Consulate to register her son for adoption by his new father.  They secured that adoption before Lolo was ordered by his government to return to Indonesia, which left his wife still in Honolulu with another half year of school to finish.

When she was finally preparing to leave, she sought a U.S. passport for herself and her son, but was told that without proof of maternity or custody, nothing could be issued for the child.  She could prove neither since she lacked any official documents. (formal U.S. custody was only acquired through her divorce from Obama Sr.)

So in order to have official traveling papers, she had to apply with the Indonesia Consulate for a passport for her adopted son, and she got it since he was Indonesian by adoption, and it became his sole official identification for at least the next two decades (other than his U.S. Green Card issued on the basis of it)

It would not have been difficult to tell the story of how her son fell threw the cracks of the system’s rules (while excluding the truth about a Canadian birth) since she would not have been the only women to give birth at home or someplace other than in a hospital setting with doctors and nurses.  She may have told the story of his home-birth more than once, but just having heard it once, her son believed it, for life.

What difference does that make?  It gives him self-confidence in his own birth narrative, and made it easy for him to convey his plight to others, -to others who could make a difference on his behalf.
Make a difference how?  By massaging the system, rounding the corners, fudging the facts a little, but “innocently” so.  That is exactly what he convinced Loretta Fuddy to do on his behalf.  She was elevated by governor Abercrombi (Obama’s biggest fan in Hawaii) to the position of Director of the Department of Health, (with supervisory authority over the department and its records) just three weeks after a new director had been appointed.
Why replace a new director?  That’s what he would have liked to know.  He heard from a reporter that he had resigned, and responded “that’s news to me.”

So what kind of power-play was transpiring behind the scene?  The removal of someone who was not an Obama sycophant and devotee and would not have been onboard for doing what Obama, the President of the United States in Spring of 2011, needed in order to silence Donald Trump and Jerome Corsi’s impending book titled: “Where’s the Birth Certificate”.
They were both gaining too much traction since the brief and unvetted short-form Certification of Live Birth was viewed as untrustworthy and even fraudulent.  A long-form version was needed, but since one did not exist, (as the sentimental governor discovered after announcing he would locate the original Hawaiian hospital birth certificate and show the doubters that Obama absolutely was born in Hawaii) one needed to be fabricated from what did exist.  And that was the old affidavit and its typed version.

They were in the paper archives and the microfilm records, -digitized and stored in the dept. data-base.  It’s text could be used to concoct an acceptable imitation of a real hospital birth certificate.  But that couldn’t happen without the accommodation of the the head of the dept who could supply access to those digital records.
Loretta Fuddy was just the person to be the director who would facilitate that access.  As it happens, she was a leader of the Subuh Indonesian religious cult, of which Obama’s mother had been a member, and which inspired her to name him with the a singular unique name as was traditional among many Indonesians; namely: Soebarkha (it combined Soetoro, Barack, and maybe “h” for Hussein).

No one can accuse her of committing an “evil” act since she had no reason to believe (like Obama himself) that he was not born in Hawaii but he had simply fallen through the technical cracks of the law.
So he was able to charm and convince his loyal and adoring Hawaiian single-women fan with no intimate friends or children of her own that she would be doing the country a big favor and earning his undying appreciation if she would help to put the controversy to rest so that he could “focus on more important things” than that “silliness” about the birth certificate.

She complied.  The data-base was open to someone who then used the needed files to fabricate the counterfeit using real text from the typed affidavit and the signature from the hand-written version, -along with the doctor’s signature and the registration number from another birth certificate (Virginia Sunahara, died August 5th).

A program like Photoshop made it all possible since the text is stored not as digital text but as microfilm imagery, i.e., photographed text-imagery on a blank background with the original paper background deleted.  The new background was the security paper pattern of green hash marks.

That new version is known as an abstract, since it is an abstraction of an original which contains the imagery of the paper it was typed and written on.
It may be that the only thing that could convince Obama that he was not born in Hawaii would be a real birth certificate from a hospital in Vancouver.  But one does not exist, although a record of the birth probably does.
A Certificate of Live Birth would not have been written up and signed for a few days after delivery, since in that era a new mother stayed in the maternity ward for five days or more, but that didn’t happen because mother Ann, probably along with her own mother, left Vancouver within days of birth, -perhaps on August 6th, and flew back to Hawaii, thus saving the cost of a longer hospital and hotel room stay, assuming he was not delivered by a midwife of the long-established social welfare & adoption agency of Vancouver.

But that may have been too soon because a Hawaiian hospital witness recalls seeing a black baby at that time, and a hospital doctor told of hearing that “a Stanley had a baby”.
Very likely Ann & child checked into Kapiolani hospital for a few days for needed monitored  recovery.
Does the place of Obama’s birth really matter?

Yes and no.  It does not matter constitutionally but does matter publicly because the public, and many in the government and media are under the life-long brain-washing that native-birth is what determines U.S. citizenship when in fact that is only true for the 3-4% of the population born of immigrants, i.e., foreigners.   The rest are born of Americans, and are citizens of America regardless of where they are born, -taking after and inheriting their parents’ nationality.  They are the natural born citizens of the nation, and they are exactly what the Constitution allows as its only exception to its universal ban on anyone serving as President.

No person, except a natural born citizen,… shall be eligible to the office of the President;”.
The first time that Barry read those words, he realized that his ambitions of power (“Prince Obama”, “King Obama” etc.) could not be fulfilled because whatever a natural born citizen is, it wasn’t something that included him.  He knew he was half alien, and did not even have proof of being a citizen of the United States, although he easily could pass himself off as being one, and probably assumed that he was, regardless of lack of proof of birth location and citizenship.

So his crime against the nation is double.  He had a counterfeit birth certificate produced under false pretenses, and then passed himself off as being constitutionally eligible to serve as President, knowing full well that he was not a natural born citizen of any nation on Earth since he was an unnatural hybrid of two different nations and peoples and countries.  Everything about him was aberrant, from his conception to his election, and lies were the wind beneath his mendacious wings.  He could not have risen without them, and he will crash to Earth as soon as they are all exposed.

When will that happen?  Not while he is in office.  But what happened to Clinton when he left office?  Nothing.  Corrupt pardons at the last hour facilitated by Eric Holder?  Eh, just look the other way.  Don’t raise a stink or make waves  in the cess pool by the Potomac.  Like Zombies, the entirety of the Washington elite establishment never turns on its own.  It only attacks those who dare expose its corruption and / or nonfeasance.  It’s powerful overlords won’t tolerate the legitimacy of their system being questioned.  And so no one ever questions it, or questions it in public anyway.

Will that change after the November 2014 elections?  Nope.  Too many people are too contented and distracted to make a big enough wave to cause the kinds of changes that could sweep out the garbage and let in some actual sunlight of responsibility and accountability.  Those two things cannot be tolerated by the privileged elite, because otherwise they would not be able to rob us blind with impunity and force their unjust and unjustifiable agendas on us.

by Adrien Nash  March 2014  obama–nation.com

The Secret Obama’s Mother Couldn’t Tell Him  pdf, 5 pages

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers