Pushing a Travesty into the Spotlight
How Obama Jr. Makes Hitler Jr. Eligible
Obama defenders have always claimed that the unvetted, unsigned, unsealed image of a birth certificate posted online is definite, incontestable, confirmed proof that Barack Obama was really born in Hawaii, and… that his supposed native-birth makes him a natural born citizen, and… thus a legitimate President. But those positions have always been accompanied in my mind with the unspoken presence of his American mother being a part of the equation.
Well, after all of this long period of debunking their position, I’ve seen something in a different light than in the past. I’ve seen their position without the presence of his American mother. I’ve seen his political nature not attached to an American but to a Kenyan mother, -or a Nazi mother.
That is not something I’ve ever considered before in an up-front way, although I’ve shined a flashlight on the possibility as it lurched in a corner, but never dragged it out onto center stage into the spot light.
Well. it’s about time that that was done. It has to be done because the Obamunists are getting away with a position that nobody in their right mind could support, -and which no nation on Earth does support. It’s the position that total aliens can produce and deliver a child on domestic soil and, regardless of where and how it was raised, it will be fully eligible to command all of the military power of the nation one day.
Note that we aren’t talking about loyal, obedient law-abiding legal immigrants. We are talking about any aliens except ambassadors, whether legal, illegal, friendly, hostile, domiciled or transient.
I’ve often given an example of General Custer, (-sent to crush the Sioux Nation) whose pregnant wife (accompanying his army) delivers George Jr. on Sioux land, making him a member of the Sioux tribe by native-birth, and therefore eligible to one day be Chief of the nation and lead it in battle.
That absurdity is on the tribal level, but it’s time to focus on an example on the national level. How absurd is the doctrine that native-birth alone makes one eligible to command all of the federal, military, and nuclear forces of the United States?
Before spelling out a Nazi hypothetical, first consider a typical, everyday hypothetical.
If Obama Sr. and his Kenyan wife were flying from Africa to Canada, and their plane made a refueling stop-over in Chicago, and she gave birth there, then by the insane position promulgated by the Left, her Chicago-born son, who might never set foot on U.S. soil, would be considered to be a natural born American because of a logic-perverting ancient English common court ruling in 1608 which violated national English law by linguistically subverting it. (the Calvin case)
Now here’s one of the most gigantic absurdities in U.S. legislative-political history. From the founding of the nation until the Attorney General in 1898 reinterpreted the Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause, alien-born minors in America were not considered to carry the latent responsibilities of CITIZENS because they, through their foreign father, were not subject to the political authority of the United States even when they reached adulthood, (since they were still aliens). And that was why they remained aliens (although not in all states since some granted their citizenship to native-born children of immigrants.)
Being subject to a foreign power meant that one was not wholly and solely subject to the political, civic, and military authority of the United States government. But… being subject was one of two requirements in order for the alien-born to be citizens. First of course was native-birth, but subjection, -full subjection, was the other, and they were not at all subject as citizens are subject.
But the Supreme Court ruled (6-2) that alien-fathered native-born children are citizens, -thereby settling an unsettled issued that Congress had failed to address for over a century since it was a State matter under the U.S. 9th and 10th Amendments. The Court, in effect, wrote law instead of interpreting it, and it did that by reinterpreting what subjection entailed, -down-grading it to mere civil authority from full authority which included national defense (military service), -doing so without any constitutional authority.
That was both good and bad. Bad from the stand-point of the rule of law, -good from the social stand-point that native-born children needed to be not treated as aliens, -as inferiors or outsiders in the only society of which they were members.
That was a breach of constitutional fidelity perhaps akin to the Louisiana Purchase, -for which the President had no constitutional authority either.
But where the train went off the tracks was when that Attorney General (John Griggs) took their ruling (Wong Kim Ark, 1898) which only applied to native-born children of immigrants, and applied it to all babies delivered on U.S. soil, -not just legal immigrants but also illegal immigrants, and temporary transients (migrants, tourists, visitors, guests).
By that massive expansion and perversion of the 14th Amendment and the high court’s ruling, only children of ambassadors are not, by his institutionalized national policy, considered to be U.S. citizens, -even if the mother is only on U.S. soil long enough to push out a baby and secure a birth certificate.
Okay, that is bad enough, -every foreign but U.S.-born Tom, Dick, & Harry is illegitimately considered to be a citizen of the United States, but the perversion does not stop there. It gets worse!
The Obamacrats go even one step beyond the perversion of the Attorney General. They claim that George Custer Jr. is eligible to be Chief of the Sioux Nation! They claim that the U.S. born nephew of King George III or Adolph Hitler can be eligible to be President after reaching 35 years of age and living in the U.S. for 14 years!
I challenge anyone to come up with anything more absurd. And yet, without ever admitting to it publicly, without ever promoting it openly, that is exactly what they do and must endorse in order for their golden son of Hawaii and Chicago to be eligible to be the American President.
Anybody born in the U.S. whose father is not a foreign ambassador, -even children of foreign Consul Generals, is an AMERICAN! And even worse, every such American can be PRESIDENT! (no matter how alien, evil, primitive, totalitarian, or even hostile the culture and society and religion and government is where one is raised and indoctrinated.
The Founding Fathers DIDN’T CARE!! Obviously. Let ANYONE be President! -as long as they are not some untrustworthy foreigner who has come half-way around the world, labored to learn English, -to learn and understand American history and culture and values, be a part of American society, after shedding their blood in America’s military, -after swearing ALLEGIANCE, to Bear Arms to defend the nation, -renouncing all loyalty to any and every foreign power.
Those people can’t be trusted, but the alien-born, foreign-raised, foreign-indoctrinated children of fuel-stop-delivered “anchor-baby” mothers are perfectly acceptable candidates to lead the American nation and Armed Services. Ability to speak English? Not required. Knowledge of American history and principles? Completely optional.
And what’s really disturbing is that the insane Obama defenders cannot even acknowledge that their promotion of such a national policy is straight out of the Twilight Zone! -not the U.S. Constitution.
Okay, so that’s the basis of an average hypothetical situation. Now let’s consider the just-as-possible extraordinary situation, -one involving Adolph Hitler’s hypothetical wife and child.
In the 1930s depression, the American Nazi Party formed and drew a lot of people to its themes of staunch nationalism and racial superiority. Suppose that a married Hitler sent his pregnant wife to the U.S. in the mid-1930s, to address a rally of the burgeoning party that drew all of its inspiration from him and his movement.
Suppose that she stayed long enough to give birth in America, before returning to Nazi Germany. Suppose her first-born son would grow up to be tall, handsome, smart, charming and charismatic.
Suppose that Hitler had not made the 10 strategic mistakes (enumerated in a cable-channel history program that I watched) which cost him the war. Suppose he made none of them, and left the conduct of the German control of Europe in the hands of his capable German military high command, -and had never stabbed Stalin in the back by invading Russia.
Everything would have been different. Europe would have been impregnable. The German Air Force would not have been almost destroyed over Britain by British stealth manufacturing of large numbers of new and faster planes. In other words, his military could have and would have stopped the D-Day invasion in its tracks.
The Third Reich would have seemed to maybe be capable of enduring for “a thousand years”. What would have been the upbringing of his son? What son on Earth would have been more proud of his father’s accomplishments, especially when raised in his shadow, and awash in the adulation he received. He would have been well groomed all through his youth to one day replace his father, like a royal heir to the German throne of power.
Suppose that he was raised among German-American expatriates and learned to speak like an American. Suppose that Nazi collaborators in the American Nazi Party created and maintained a cover identity for him in the U.S. by using one of their own sons who, when the time was right, when Adolph Jr. was grown, would step aside so that he could adopt that identity after being smuggled into the U.S.
Suppose the war reached a stalemate and equilibrium, and fear of German infiltraters subsided. Suppose Adolph Jr. one day ran for the State Senate in his State, and later for the U.S. Senate, followed quickly by a run for the White House, -as did one certain unvetted son of a non-immigrant alien named Barack Obama.
Suppose he won the presidency and all of the American media loved him and served to protect whatever the heck his actual background was, -as co-conspirators, or as sycophantic Kool-Aid drinkers. With enough people not asking any questions, and enough people ignoring any questions asked, he was able to skip down the primrose path right into the Oval Office, primed to assume the power of the Commander in Chief.
That would be a travesty of gigantic proportions against the American people, nation, and sovereignty. Now here’s where it gets even worse. Suppose that he never hid his identity. Suppose that he skated on the path paved by his father’s infamous notoriety in order to gain attention, -which he could then leverage via enormous charm and speaking ability to secure a popular following and loyalty, while keeping his upbringing and actual allegiance totally secret.
What is scary about that scenario is that the obamatrons totally support the eligibility of such a man. His loyalty to America, in their eyes, must be presumed to exist even in the absence of any evidence whatsoever. His mere birth within U.S. borders alone must, as in absolutely MUST! be accepted as completely constitutionally legitimate, -regardless of whatever the Constitution means by requiring that the President & Chief Commander be “no person except a natural born citizen”.
By their demented assertion, ALL native-born persons who aren’t ambassadors’ children are all natural born Americans regardless of whether or not their father and mother were Native Americans (pre-citizenship) aliens, transients, Gypsies, sons of foreign military commanders with whom we are at war, or Martians.
By their pathological reasoning, EVERYBODY CAN BE PRESIDENT! (almost) The Founding Fathers didn’t care!
They suffered enormously for Liberty, but were unwilling to protect it with even a simple little precaution that would have excluded less than one percent of the population.
Why not accept both the citizen-born and the alien-born? Let’s just open the doors of the White House wide to every son of every foreigner as long as their father isn’t an ambassador or an invader.
Is your father the brother or first cousin of King George III? No problem! You qualify! Just be a presumed American citizen by exiting your mother’s womb on U.S. soil.
Can’t you grasp that that is a perfectly rational measure to determine who should be allowed to take the reins of America’s Armed Forces and all of her nuclear weapons? What could go wrong?
Would you be a panty-waist who wouldn’t put equal access for all U.S. born persons ahead of national security? What right do you or the founding fathers have to worry about a slim possibility that disloyalty might threaten it?
[Alexander Hamilton’s writing in Federalist No. 68:
“Nothing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.
How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?”
- Alexander Hamilton.]
Who made you the national nanny to be concerned that “natural” actually means natural and not native-born?
You need to just butt out, you big butt-insky. Why shouldn’t the alien-born be welcomed with open arms into the wide-open doors of presidential eligibility? After all, it’s not like the founders and framers were deliberately trying to exclude a whole class of American citizens (albeit a tiny one).
Just look at the language they used; -it embraces just about everyone as long as their birth, like a natural bowel movement, occurred on U.S. soil. Let’s see what the Constitution says and then you’ll be shut-up for good. It says,… hmmm… What? “NO PERSON except a natural born citizen”???
Is this some kind of a joke? Did someone switch the words of the presidential eligibility clause on me? It’s supposed to be inclusive!
What’s this “No person” crap? What gave them the right to discriminate? Oh, I know! They meant no person who was a foreigner by birth on foreign soil. Yeah, that’s it!
No son of a President (who was also a son of a President) but who was born just across the Canadian border in a nearby hospital, can be assumed to not be a traitor and disloyal to a country that he wasn’t even born in. Yeah, I’ll salute that. Run it up the flag pole!
If you aren’t a citizen by soil, then you have little attachment to a land that’s not where your mother’s womb was when you exited it. Right?
All talk about being a citizen by blood is just hooey. Borders trump blood any day.
You know full well that if you were not born on your parents’ property, then you are not their natural off-spring. You are just an adopted child thanks to the generous permission of the law.
Only if THE LAW says that you are their “natural” child can you be viewed as being that.
Born in a hospital? Tough luck. You are an alien to your family cause the hospital was not on your parents’ sovereign property. It was foreign territory, so you are a foreigner. That’s life, chump. Get used to it. You’re adopted.
by adrien nash march 2014 obama–nation.com