Behind the Fuddy Autopsy Fraud; a Bullet or a Bribe?

revised Friday, 4-4-14

How the Calvin Case Dooms Your Future; pt. 4

Should we be pessimistic about the future of America? A better question is “can we be reasonably optimistic about the future?” The answer is that if the power structure that rules our nation is not overthrown, there will be no future that we would want to see (aside from advances of various sorts).

It is corrupt to the core and both parties are party to it, with one simply pushing harder on the accelerator than the other.
Has history ever recorded any corrupted government and morally vacuous and ignorant population that ever reversed the course they were on toward a destination of decay, collapse and/or conquest? Are we destined to repeat history because we are ignorant of it?

Well, being ignorant is a natural status of human nature it seems. There is no one who is superior in this world, but compared to those who are simply normal, there are a heck of a lot of people who are in many ways sub-normal. And their numbers are growing by leaps and bounds.

So what will come is unknown and unknowable without taking a God’s-eye view of the human race, and the American people in particular. That is probably a frightful view to take, and I, for one, hesitate to take it since I’ve been there, done that, and found you can’t live life in the knowledge of what you see.

But sometimes in the history of man, (like in the Matrix trilogy) something changes everything and this times it’s different from what went before.  That happened in a very good way with the life and legacy of Jesus. It took centuries and lots of corrupt detours along the way, but eventually the vision of God and Man that sprang from his existence produced the natural rights and liberties of Western Civilization, not to mention hope eternal.

The problem is that liberty can become license to live ignorant and self-indulgent spoiled lives, -and that is where a great proportion of the population is today. Just consider one aspect of American life; drug usage. Could it be more pervasive? Could laws against it be more impotent at stopping it? Or a government hand-out mentality.

Entire segments of American society are rotten to the core, personally and publicly. Just consider Detroit and what a nightmare it has degenerated into compared to what it was. There is a cancer and rot spreading in America and it is connected to many negative factors that render the role and duty and privilege of citizenship almost irrelevant in the lives of millions of almost unfixable people. Maybe they can be fixed, but probably not in this life, -not with the resources available to government and the powers it is limited to.

I once read the response of a law enforcement officer or social worker who said that the only way to fix or change the attitude of hard-core criminally inclined teenagers would require measures that would put them in a hospital. A lot of people need to suffer those measures, including many in government who have a different kind of corrupt attitude.

The communists tried a form of reform with their “re-education camps” that threw the academic and government elites down into the mud of real life in labor camps in the countryside, -perhaps cruelly and unjustly in most cases and without discrimination based on real attitudes and character.  But that succeeded at one thing; it changed their view of how important they were in relationship to others who were “nobodies”.

American patriots would rejoice and thank heaven to see our corrupt and isolated and insulated government elite overlord class find themselves face-down in the figurative mud that the rest of the population has to live in because of their damn awful and self-serving governance.

And many of them deserve worse; deserve many years in a cell where they, like Jack Abramoff, can come to realize the magnitude of their betrayal of the American people.

And others still, who pull the extortion levers behind the curtains, -who know the secrets of the hidden lives of public officials and servants, -who intimate harm might come to their children if their agendas suffer because of the choices of those officials, -who weigh threats to the status quo of those in power as well as those who benefit from their largess, and thus arrive at decisions about who must conveniently be silenced via a “natural death” or an “accidental death” that no one can explain.

The people behind those untimely life-ending occurrences deserve nothing less than a bullet to the brain. They are the ones who keep the secrets hidden that need to see the light of day in order for a new revolution to take place in America.

They are the Luciferians of the power complexes that pull whatever strings they can accomplish pulling, -either by bribe or by bullet.

And God forbid if you are ever viewed as a liability, unless you are someone truly not expendable or too high profile and popular to terminate.  Were the Kennedys such victims and yet not immune even though of the highest profile?

The most recent example of their handiwork is the murder of Loretta Fuddy, -the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health. She was a healthy, kindly, lonely, gentle soul who never married or had children, and in excellent health, but was emotionally vulnerable to persuasion exerted by a powerful and charismatic President of the United States who needed the birth certificate that the department had not given to his mother in response to her affidavit claiming she gave birth to her half-Kenyan son in her Hawaiian home but with no medical witnesses present.

The Registrar at that time (1961) was required to see some proof of one year residency. Such proof didn’t exist, so with no eye-witness affidavits supporting her claim, they simply filed her half hand-written, half typed affidavit and that piece of paper became the only vital record in their archive. It was microfilmed, and later digitized when all microfilm records were digitized.

All Barack needed was for her to just allow access to that record so it could be used in conjunction with the record of a deceased child who was born but died at the same time, and he would then be able to acquire a simulated genuine certificate like the one that his mother was never able to acquire for him.

It was important for the nation to get its attention off of such a “distracting” and divisive issue. After all, what good was served by not allowing the nation to be convinced of his birth in Hawaii? He was convinced, but he needed her help in order that others could also “know” the truth.

She loyally and dutifully agreed with his request and went along with it, even allowing the release of the lie that she watched the copying of his “original” birth certificate (as if a real Hawaiian hospital Certificate of Live Birth) in order to make it all seem official and not some mystery like his supposed short-form certification of live birth that appeared three years earlier out of nowhere with no attribution from anyone as to its origin.

The Leftist media bought into its legitimacy and the issue was “put behind us”, …until, that is, Doug Vogt submitted a legal brief to a federal court in Washington State which contained a sealed affidavit which named her as a co-conspirator in the fabrication of a counterfeit birth certificate for Barack Obama, and revealed financial details showing that she happened to have somehow acquired $50-70,000 that could not be accounted for, -money used to make substantial payments on a home mortgage.

Did that secret affidavit stay sealed as Vogt had requested, or did it, like IRS information and NSA information get dropped into the lap of a White House operative who knew someone who knew someone… and voila! -within a month she is suddenly and mysteriously dead?

Could anything be more convenient for Barack Obama and his wealthy puppet-masters than derailing any possible investigation into Ms Fuddy’s Lois Lerner-like role in the production of a counterfeit birth certificate for the “Hawaiian born” President?
That alone would raise anyone’s suspicions if they had a brain (which no one in the media does anymore) but what followed absolutely demonstrated that nefarious machinations were transpiring behind the scenes in order to make Fuddy’s murder appear perfectly natural.

What happened exactly? Did the medical examiner who did the autopsy (which required mysteriously waiting a month -perhaps for toxicology results) come out and present a clinical evaluation of the medical factors that precipitated the failure of her heart to keep beating?

That is what anyone and everyone would expect to happen, and yet nothing like that happened, -not even remotely like that. Instead the police department released “details” of the supposed autopsy which the public was not allowed to see, -including those who sued under the Freedom on Information Act to acquire, since major portions came completely blacked out “for privacy law concerns”. So they were protecting the privacy of the dead? Or protecting the family that she didn’t have?

The reason it was done like that was because what the autopsy actually said could not be the story that was released to the public because it made it clear that either she died by an unknown cause or by a highly suspicious cause (which was reported to the public as “accidental”.

How do you accidentally die while floating placidly in a warm ocean with a flotation vest on without any rescue concerns at all?  No person in history ever died from the terror of such non-excitement.  The only stress from such a situation is the stress of boredom.  And I’m pretty sure that boredom never killed anyone.

The explanation supposedly from the Medical Examiner’s autopsy report was a string of subjective psychological claims about her mental and emotional state, (-things that are NEVER part of an autopsy) including something that is impossible to conclude; that she died from an irregular and inadequate heartbeat, (aka; cardiac arrhythmia).

Well, anyone from a Nurse’s Assistant to everyone who has watched medical investigation programs over the last decade knows that you cannot determine the heart rhythm of a heart that is not beating. That would be like reporting on the pulse rate of a corpse.

How can a claim of an irregular heart beat be substantiated when it leaves no evidence whatsoever?

A heart that goes out of rhythm is not like a train that leaves the tracks and can clearly be seen to not be on the tracks where it belongs. It would be more like a train that disappeared. -Or like a plane that disappeared.

How can you say it crashed if you don’t know where it even went?
If investigators of the Malaysian airliner that vanished  claimed that it crashed, everyone would want to know how they knew that since there was no evidence of any kind.

Same with Fuddy’s death. Reminds me of a book & movie title: “Murder by Death”, -by unexplainable death, as is shared in clear terms in:

Obama. and Hawaiian DoH Director Fuddy’s Convenient Death

( http://h2ooflife.wordpress.com/2014/03/27/fuddys-convenient-death/)

and… http://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/turning-a-blind-eye-to-death-of-loretta-fuddy.pdf

(a re-formated and condensed version of the web post: http://networkedblogs.com/Vr4M7 )

Is anyone going to question the police department that was the facade for the most fraudulent autopsy in American history? Is anyone going to go all Woodward & Bernstein and follow the money (or the extortion-intimidation)?

As was reportedly said to a witness in Roswell, N.M. “its a big desert out there and no one would ever find someone’s bones.” (Same with the Pacific ocean.) -Or ever trace the cash used to buy a condo on Maui.

Either by a bribe or a bullet, or both, they get the job done, and none of the submissive, brain-dead, juvenile children that pass themselves off as journalists ever ask the logical questions, -nor perhaps, even think of them.  We’re so screwed.

by Adrien Nash April 2014 obama–nation.com

 

Obama and Hawaiian DoH Director Fuddy’s Convenient Death

All cold-blooded killers like to leave no loose ends that point back to them. Consequently, witnesses or hired underlings end up being dispatched to the next life so that they can never give testimony against secret criminals that could put those criminals on death row.
That danger to them is why the witness protection program was created. There are plenty of people who will kill other people for reasons of hate or profit. They have to be kept away from their would-be targets or they will end up dead.
But people in the public eye cannot just enter the witness protection program and disappear into a new identity in a new unknown location. They have to continue living their lives in the public eye and hope that secrets that they know, -which it would be better to not know, won’t eventually cause wheels to be put in motion that will figuratively drop a meteor on their head. The sword of Damocles hangs over their head, which they have to live under everyday. Until it drops.
Sometimes it drops in very suspicious ways, like a “suicide” by shooting oneself in the back or some such unbelievable circumstances. But more often it drops in very, very subtle and believable ways. Bullets are no longer a credible way to eliminate the cognoscenti; they raise too many eyebrows. So other methods must be employed.

As everyone has been made aware via fiction and fact depicted in films and novels, the security agencies of powerful governments know dozens of covert means to make people dead, with the worse being thorium injected with a fine tip needle. But that is too revealing since it’s highly radioactive. Something much more subtle would be something that would simply stop one’s heart.
An autopsy might show death by an air embolism, or some form of poison but will not show something that causes a “natural death” by blocking the electrical signal to the heart muscle. That could work by stopping the heart outright like they do in open-heart surgery, or by causing the muscles to not receive a consistent pulse of electricity but an inconsistence pulse which causes the muscles to contract separately instead of in unison. Such an effect would result in a death that a coroner would assume was caused by cardiac arrhythmia, even though it can’t be detected in a non-beating heart. One can’t detect an irregular heart-beat if the heart is not even beating. One has to draw assumptions in the absence of detectible fact.

The coroner who did the autopsy of Loretta Fuddy, -the deceased Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health, chose to ascribe her unexplained and unexpected death as being due to cardiac arrhythmia. Well, for that to be believable a few things would have to be true; she would have to have had a prior detection of cardiac irregularity via some experience that made her feel “ill”, or was detected during a routine heart exam. Being 65 years of age, and head of the department of Health, it would be certain that her health was not overlooked or ignored.

She would have had a stress text or two over the years because women have been known for some time now to have as many deaths due to heart disease and heart attacks as men.
According to her own brother, she was in excellent health, and there were no known heart problems. If she had been my grandmother’s age when she died from cardiac arrhythmia due to forgetting to take her digitalis with her during a few days away from home, then it would be understandable, but then my grandmother was 88 years old, while Fuddy was still a relatively young 65, very active and fully functioning as a department director, -which, he brother pointed out, requires strong nerves and not a ‘fraidy-cat spirit.

On the other hand, there are many things about her which we do not fully know. Including how she got the job in the first place. She was appointed to replace the sitting head of the department who had just been installed into office just three weeks prior. When asked by a reporter why he had resigned, that was the first he had heard of it, and answered that it was news to him.
So everything about her “appointment” was suspicious, including the fact that unlike a doctor, which all previous heads had been, she had no experience in life that would have produced those nerves of steel one would expect for a department head. In fact, she was an emotional, vulnerable, needy, gentle, single, childless soul who was a church member and a cult member, -being a leader (or the leader) of the branch of the Subuh cult in Hawaii.
Obama’s mother had also been a member. Obama and Fuddy were connected through his mother, -at least in a tangential way, but even more so in a political way.

We all know that spy agencies and the military, both of which must keep very classified secrets, are always concerned about an agent being susceptible to being emotionally compromised; charmed, wined-&-dined, hopelessly involved with a person of the opposite sex (or a person of the same sex, -even more worrisome).
But influence does not have to be so involved. All that’s really needed is for a vulnerable person to be placed in a position of being charmed by a very, very powerful and charming person, like say…. oh, maybe the debonair President of the entire United States! The one who makes a personal call to ask for one’s help to solve a problem.

“Her most important events in life were the confirmation of hearing the birth of her nieces, nephews, grandnieces and grandnephews. Some of her hobbies were the collections of various cat and angel figurines and taking care of her pet cat.”

-Gee, I wonder if her life could have been a made a little richer by a personal call from the President of the United States with a little request for a little favor so he could end the “silliness” surrounding his non-existent birth certificate?

Let’s be honest, when it comes to the female gender, Obama, more than any President ever, is able to come across as very charming. That is why we was elected, -and reelected. It sure wasn’t due to masses of men-folk being charmed by him personally while disdaining his policies, actions, and non-actions. That was the wide-eyed infatuated low-information, The Bachelor-watching members of the gentler sex.

Does anyone dare so say that Loretta Fuddy would been immune to the Obama charm when he applied it full force? It would have been emotionally impossible for her to say no to him. That’s how charm works. That’s how people get bamboozled everyday by smooth-takers who are so sincere, it seems, and so friendly. Who wouldn’t enjoy knowing them better, and being liked by them? (and buying a great bridge from them at a steal!)

What am I getting at? I’m suggesting that Barack Obama personally called Fuddy on her private line and shmoozed with her about his lamentable problem of having been born in Hawaii but his mother not having been able to get a birth certificate for him because of date and timing factors which didn’t allow it at the time. He needed her personal help to help get him past the doubters who suggested he was foreign born.

They were a big distraction and the issue “needed to be put to bed”, (quoting god-knows who) especially with that big-mouth Donald Trump raising a fuss for god-only-knows what reason. Maybe racism?

Well, she got aboard and was determined to help her knight in shining socialist armor, and she could do that by making certain old records available for others to use to put together an official-looking long-form birth certificate. It wasn’t like it was criminal, even though it wasn’t legal. Everyone commits a crime or three every time they drive a car. She would be doing a good deed, -good for Obama, -good for the Democrat Party, good for Hawaii, and good for the nation.

Bending the rules a little would not hurt anyone, but would benefit millions by keeping Lord Obama in office for another four years, -protecting the Affordable Health Care Act from being repealed. Why it was almost obligatory to help provide him with a birth certificate before the issue got out of hand and people started thinking that he was not even eligible to be President. That kind of thinking could be dangerous and completely uncalled for. For the sake of the country, that needed to be nipped in the bud, -and so it was.

She opened the computer data-base which stores all of the digitized records going back to before Hawaii even became a state. She located the computer-stored microfilm image of his mother’s original affidavit applying for recognition of birth for her newborn son. That affidavit was accompanied by a typed version of Barack Jr.’s vital facts regarding parentage and such, and the text of those facts was added to the form of an archive page for someone else, such as Virginia Sunahara who was born the day before and died the day after Obama was born, -after deleting its digitized text imagery and replacing it with Obama’s. Presto! a very passable birth certificate, -if one does not examine it with a microscope.

Well, it has been examined with a microscope, so to speak, and it has been discovered that the layout of the lines, the spacing of the words and some letters would have been impossible under any ordinary circumstance of a clerk putting a blank form into a typewriter and typing away, word by word, line by line.
Placing text onto a digital form cannot replicate the precision of the mechanism that is a typewriter. And so the imprecision of the fake Certificate of Live Birth gave it away as being fabricated on a computer, and not produced by a typewriting clerk.
-That’s old school investigation. Nothing digital in nature, just an old fashion grid matrix laid on top of Obama’s bc and on top of a control bc from someone else. Obama can’t say; “Who ya gonna believe? Me? or yer lyin’ eyes?”

So compliant Fuddy did her democratic duty for her party and her charming champion and it turned out to be a very profitable compliance it seems. Doug Vogt, who filed a legal petition in Seattle, [http://obamaforgerybook.com/ ] named her in a sealed affidavit which accompanied his open brief detailing all of the accumulated evidence of forgery of the long form birth certificate and the Selective Service registration card. In that sealed affidavit he detailed his investigation into Fuddy’s finances. He found that she came up with between 50-70 thousand dollars that could not be accounted for, -which went to pay down her mortgage and such.

That is a lot of money to come from nowhere. Many people have been killed for far less. And many people who knew about such inexplicable manna from heaven when it fell on some gangster, mob boss, or powerful executive ended up in a pine box before they made it to the witness stand in a criminal case against the criminal.

So does one dare speculate as to whether or not Loretta Fuddy might have been seen as a potential witness for the prosecution, -a witness that could blow Obama and his overlords’ world to kingdom come? What the heck, why not. Nothing can hurt her now. So since just about every court in the land that has been presented with a suit against Obama has caved before even hearing it, one might be tempted to suspect that his socialist ilk are embedded in all of the institutions of the land, including law offices and court offices.

If one of Obama’s lying, atheist, socialist acolytes read what Vogt revealed about Fuddy, why would she or he fail to make herself a hero to her hero by giving him a heads-up? No good reason not to. After all, who the heck would ever know? Answer: no one. And what happened after that sealed affidavit was submitted to that court?

Fuddy is soon dead after the highly reliable plane she was in dies in midair just after take-off following a report muffled bang sound.
Now I don’t know about you, but I know that when a bullet hits an insulated car or plane or train, it makes a thump instead of a loud clang or bang. I also know that snipers can take out a target from over a mile away. Also, a small explosive next to the magneto would kill the engine dead. Kind of just like what happened.

So, you have a highly suspicious and inexplicable death preceded by a highly unexpected and inexplicable engine shut-off, and this all happens after the dead person has been personally named in a court filing which implicates her in a financial circumstance that is inexplicable and may be tied to a conspiracy to produce a badly needed birth certificate to silence critics who were hounding the President of the United States with irritating and suspicion-raising questions about where he was really born and whether or not he was really eligible to be President, -and was even a United States citizen.

Well, I, as Obama’s personally appointed judge, and cop, rule that there is nothing suspicious here, so just move along to your own homes, folks. There’s nothing to see. And by the way, that large, moving, maneuvering object you and thousands witnessed in the sky, that was just an odd cloud. Trust the government. It would never lie to you.

Edward Snowdon taught us that the government is completely above-board and we can trust its minions with our safety and liberty, -and let’s not forget; privacy as well.
Just because the Congress passed, and the President signed, the National Defense Authorization Act which includes the authority for the executive branch and military to arrest and imprison American citizens without charges, attorneys, trials, or judges, does not mean that government thinks it is your boss. So stop being worried, -stop being overly concerned.

And speaking of being overly worried, did you know that hyper-stress can kill you by causing cardiac arrhythmia? And what causes hyper-stress? Why fear of course; -terror of something very malevolent or threatening.
I’ve heard that it’s been found that a pilot of a fighter plane died in the cockpit before his nose-diving plane even hit the ground. I assume he was attached to telemetry which showed that he flat-lined out of stark fear.

Now put yourself in Loretta Fuddy’s shoes; you are the only loose end in a conspiracy that goes to the very top of the American government, and you are the only person in that conspiracy who is not a lawyer and thus can’t claim attorney-client privilege, -with the client being one Barack H. Obama, POTUS.

-And your perfectly working plane engine, checked-out just before flight, -no history of problems, a reliable work-horse of aviation, suddenly dies while you are high in the air with no second engine to take over.
You “know where the bodies are buried” and maybe no one has your back, expect perhaps with cross-hairs on it, and that those included behind the scenes as faceless enforcers are aware of what you know, just as they may have been regarding what Breitbart knew about something or other. You just might have a panic attack if you thought about your situation, and that of the coroner who did Breitbart’s autopsy and the next day turned up dead.

But panic attacks don’t kill, and neither does “hyperventilation” kill a director of a Health Department, especially not when there is no reason to be hyperventilating while peacefully floating among many others in the warm waters of the Hawaiian coast (just a half mile away). Why would such a placid setting inspire the kind of shear panic that could derange normal heart rhythm?
Either it didn’t, but something else did, or else her heart stoppage was caused by an injected neurro-toxin that attacks the heart.
I learned, I believe in boot camp some forty years ago, that there is a chemical agent so powerful that just a drop on your thigh will kill you in about 10 seconds by stopping your heart. It might have been a man-made chemical, no doubt, but there are super-powerful nerve agents produced by living creatures, such as the box jellyfish (which just happens to inhabit the ocean). But its sting of the skin is very painful. But if injected below the skin, then what would happen? Probably just what
happened to Loretta Fuddy, -whatever that was.

That seems like plenty of questions surrounding her death, but the public is left with one more huge one; and that is; “what were the results of the NTSB investigation of the cause of the engine failure?”
If you do a search for answers you’ll find absolutely nothing after the January autopsy results. At least on the first few pages. It’s all regurgitation of the crash and autopsy news. End of story. Now it’s over three months later. What the heck happened?

They would have found an answer within a week of getting the engine, but just try to use the NTSB website search engine to find anything. You’ll find zip. Nada. Wouldn’t you think there was some data-base of plane crashes and investigation results? Is the NTSB in the stone age or are they just under the domination of Obama’s enforcers and hiding the results.
What kind of results would Obama need to hide? A bullet hole for one, -a bomb explosion for another. Something caused that muffled bang.

On Apollo 13, it was an explosion of an oxygen tank. So we are left with what we are always left with; no answers and more questions.  When does it become politically okay to say that silence has become suspicious? Well it doesn’t matter what is okay because Americans with brains in their heads instead of pudding, want to know a heck of a lot of answers that are being deliberate kept secret.

“Lois Lerner, what did you know and when did you know it regarding the IRS scandal?”

“Eric Holder, what did you know and when did you know it regarding the Fast & Furious scandal?”

“Hilary Clinton, what did you know and when did you know it regarding the Benghazi scandal?”

Answers? They can’t handle answers. So you aren’t going to get any, not now, not ever, especially about the counterfeit birth certificates and their production. I can’t say “their production and investigation” because there will never be any investigation unless the sky falls.

Why won’t anyone investigate or ask questions? Because no one is partial to implied threats against their loved ones. That’s the consequence of not having people like yours truly where they are most needed. I speak of people who have no loved ones.

Anyone who doubts that that is the way the truly hard-core behind-the-scenes agents of merciless power operate, then just try to explain the unexplainable flip-flop of chief justice roberts, who stabbed the Constitution and the America people in the back with his treasonous opinion on Obama-care.

Did he just wake-up one morning and decide to flush his values and integrity down the toilet? If he did, we are in as much trouble as if he did it out of primal fear.
So far, you can count on the fingers of one hand, with fingers left over, the number of people in positions of authority or influence who have had the courage and intellectual honesty and integrity to dare to broach the subject of Obama’s unconstitutional and counterfeit-secured presidency.

We are on our own on this one. No one will stand with us, no politician, no news anchor, no pundit, no commentator, no belt-way analyst, no bureaucrat, and no official of any branch of government. No one will stand up and exclaim that the emperor has no constitutional clothes.

This is what we’ve devolved to. Or at least those who are on the inside. If you are not, you should be glad that you are not, because you could not have any self-respect or intellectual curiosity and patriotic protectiveness of the Constitution and rule of law if you were. They are all compromised from East to West. This is the picture of what the corruption and / or intimidation of the entire establishment looks like.

But hey, why complain, just pour another pina colada, put on some reggae music and kick back to “Don’t worry,…be happy.” (for tomorrow you perish.)
As for me, I’m not worried or looking over my shoulder, after all, I don’t know any secrets. I just draw conclusions from stuff I’ve read. And does anyone pay attention? Nope. I’m as invisible as the cosmic background radiation.

But I raise a glass to the hope that some judge, somewhere, sometime just might have a spine and a brain and bring the whole damn house of cards crashing down. That’s the dream, (-a pipe dream it would seem). A dream of Justice.

FIAT JUSTITIA RUAT CAELUM;
“Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall”

by Adrien Nash March 2014 obama–nation.com

Loretta%2BFuddy 28199fuddy_r  Fuddy

Fuddy’s Convenient Death  pdf 5 pages

 

 

 

 

The Secret Obama’s Mother Couldn’t Tell Him

When Barack Obama was born, he wasn’t really there.  Not there in the sense that an observer would be said to have been there because like all infants, he would have no memory of the event nor the place where it took place.  Thus he learned of it second-hand, -only by being told by his mother or a grandparent on some particular occasion when it was brought up.
Or he may have over-heard that he was home-born in Hawaii when his mother was speaking to a clerk in the Indonesian Consulate in Hawaii while she was in the process of applying with her new Indonesian husband (Lolo Soetoro) for formal Indonesian adoption of her son.

Either way, he learned first-hand, -probably  from his mother’s own mouth, that he was born in Hawaii.  If she told him that personally and directly, then she was lying to him face to face.  But he does not know that to this day.
If she lied to him it was because she had to.  Any good and compassionate mother would have done the same because the truth was something that no child should ever hear or be told.  The truth was that he was very much unwanted, and she did everything that she could to unload him onto some willing adoptive couple who would forever take him off of her hands and out of her life.

What do the two things have connecting them?  That question is at the heart of the issue of where he was born and why he was born there.
If he was born in Hawaii, then he was not seriously unwanted, because if he was seriously unwanted, then she would have left Hawaii and returned to her “hometown” of Seattle to find what she could not find in Hawaii; namely a middle-aged, middle-class, childless Black couple looking to adopt a Black or Mulatto baby.
No such couple, she would have discovered, existed in Hawaii because its Black married population was almost entirely a limited number of couples who had moved from the mainland to Hawaii following the husband’s service in the Pacific during World War II.

There were very few of them and none of them were looking to adopt.  So what was Barry’s mother forced to do?  To go fish in a bigger pond, -the pond of Seattle.  Why would anyone suspect that she did that?  The reasons are well laid out in my exposition titled: “Why baby Obama Was Born in Vancouver”.  Now I’ve spilled the beans of where I’m headed by the mention of Vancouver, B.C.

Here’s how the need for the lie is tied in with where he must have been born.  If he was born in Hawaii as his mother told him, then he would certainly have been born in a hospital, or rushed to one immediately following birth enroute.
His mother would have been housed in the maternity ward with other new mothers, and mothers-to-be, but none who were there at that time have any recollection of an unmarried white  teenager who gave birth to a black child.  No one would have ever forgotten such a thing since it would have been maximumly scandalous in 1961.  And… a birth certificate would have resulted.
But the point is that were he born or cared for immediately post-partum in Kapiolani Hospital, then they would have created a Certificate of Live Birth for him, and he would have been registered with the Hawaiian Dept. of Health.

But did that actually happen?  He doesn’t believe it did because he was told only that he was born in Hawaii, -not that we was born in a Hawaiian hospital.  He assumes that for some reason he was born at home, and that fact wrecked his chance to obtain a birth certificate.
The fact that he had no birth certificate because he fell through the legal cracks in the system has been his understanding all of his life, and his mother fostered that misrepresentation because the truth was too ugly to tell.
The truth was that she was the most liberated free young female spirit on the island; -willing to cross lines that no normal, church raised, or morally raised young woman would have even conceived of.
Everything about her was unconventional, beginning with her first name: “Stanley”.  No other girl on Earth was named Stanley.  That says volumes about the maverick nature of her father and mother.

Who were they and what were they?  We only know what has been learned from research which uncovered two things; their membership in a “church” (the United Church of Christ if I remember correctly) which was known as “the little red church” with “red” referring to red as in Red Communist.  And secondly, the fact that they were associates of Frank Marshall Davis, a registered member of the Communist Party of America, and publisher of an occasional communist news periodical” (along with being the future mentor to Barry when he returned to live in Hawaii at age 10).
That’s not all he was.  He was also a nudie-girl soft-porn and S&M photographer who sold what he was able to produce to men’s magazines.  He was so close to the Dunham’s that they had no prohibition against their only daughter spending quality time with him under his political tutelage.  But his secret side-vocation was also something he “mentored” her in.

She, at 17, took to it like a duck to water, posing in whatever he enticed her to try on, including sooner or later, nothing at all.  Their connection went beyond a mere teacher – student relationship because she went beyond all inhibition and shyness.  If there was anything that she was not, shy was it.
The result was that she shed her virginity via a moment of passion that he later wrote about in his semi-autobiographical erotic novel in which he identified his young teenage white female partner as “Ann”.  Gee, pure coincidence.
Perhaps he had a fertile imagination that went to where they did not go together.  But were that true, then why did she do that very same thing just a month or two later with he new fellow Black student in a Russian (!) language class named Barack Obama (-that’s BAIR-ek  o-BAM-a according to his, his brother’s and family’s pronunciation of the two names).

They probably coupled between 11:PM and 1:AM the night of Halloween in 1960 following plenty of drinking, (-or it may have been a month later on her 18th birthday, Nov.29th, but that would have made the resulting child’s birth one month premature).

Either way, she was a very independent spirit looking forward to exciting things in her future and the last person who would be accepting of being saddled with a newborn putting the brakes on her life and lifestyle.
She wanted her freedom, not maternal serfdom.  She felt exactly the same as the hundreds of millions of women who have had abortions to spare themselves from the unwanted drudgery of parenting a newborn-and-up for twenty years.

But she had a problem, and it was that abortion was not yet readily and legally available since the women’s liberation movement had not yet happened.  So she was forced to have the baby and then divorce herself from it via legal adoption from birth.  Of course she was stuck with the big problem that nearly all adoptive couples were white, and none of them were looking to adopt a Negro baby.

There certainly were none in Hawaii, and after her parents’ funded her return to Seattle to seek a couple there, (and that proved to be a dry hole also) she was forced to seek a last-ditch rescue by turning to the big city across the border and just a two hour drive away.
That might have been her mother’s idea, since she was probably with Ann, -her only child, during the final couple weeks of pregnancy.  They could have made the trip to Vancouver, given birth, been rejected by a waiting adoptive couple when they saw what she had failed to inform them of, namely the non-white race of the baby, and so she was stuck with keeping it since there were no takers.

Now how do you tell your only child such a story about how “wanted” he was?  Well, you don’t.  No child needs nor wants to hear how his mother did everything in her power to avoid being stuck with him or her.  So she certainly never told him, especially since she was highly inclined toward sociological awareness, -becoming a PhD in anthropology, -which can be entirely focused on the study of human culture and human relationships.
She intuitively knew that if she told him the truth about where he was born, then he would wonder and ask what she was doing in Vancouver at the time, and where was Vancouver anyway?   One answer would lead to another, ending at having to reveal why he was born there.

That was something a mother cannot tell her vulnerable child. And so she never did.  And that is why Barry still thinks he was born in Hawaii.  His belief is bolstered by something tangible, and that is the written record and attestation of his mother under legal oath in writing when she wrote-out an affidavit in an office of the Dept of Health in Honolulu where she attempted to register her child as having been home-born.

That was the story that she told her son one day in order to explain why he had no birth certificate, and it would have worked with the Hawaiian Dept of Health since they could legally register out-of-state births to residents (not just “citizens” only) who could show that they had lived as Hawaiian residents for one year or been registered as residents of Hawaii for a year.

But Ann could not show proof of that because she had not lived in Hawaii for a year (having left in the Spring to return to Seattle to find an adoptive couple there) and her legal residence could only be attested to by an adult (which she was) but perhaps only one who had been registered for one full year, -which she could not have been since she turned 18 on November 29, 1960, making her an adult for only 8 months when her baby was born (assuming legal age in Hawaii in 1961 was 18).

So her hand-written affidavit under penalty of perjury (containing all of the vital facts of the child and parents, -minus the true birth location) was received and typed and stamped and filed just like all other such affidavits, but she could not return later with the residency proof required in order to qualify for the issuance of a certified copy of a produced birth certificate, -and her parents didn’t feel compelled to sign a perjurous affidavit on Barry’s behalf, and saw no real need for a birth certificate since it is assumed (erroneously) that everyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen anyway.

So little Barry’s nationality and proof of citizenship were left dangling in the wind, so to speak, as far as any hard-copy proof of identify and citizenship were concerned.
Although an INS officer who handled the Obama Sr. Visa extension case, wrote in his notes that Sr. had an American citizen wife and child, he did so under the assumption that what Sr. told him was accurate, and also that native-birth alone provides citizenship (which it does not).  But between what that agent of the government believed to be true, and what was actually real,  there was a wide gap.  A proof gap.

It appeared in stark terms when Ann attempted to have her son added to her new U.S. passport when preparing to leave Hawaii for Indonesia and life with her foreign husband there.  Following her marriage to Lolo Soetoro, they made a trip to the Indonesian Consulate to register her son for adoption by his new father.  They secured that adoption before Lolo was ordered by his government to return to Indonesia, which left his wife still in Honolulu with another half year of school to finish.

When she was finally preparing to leave, she sought a U.S. passport for herself and her son, but was told that without proof of maternity or custody, nothing could be issued for the child.  She could prove neither since she lacked any official documents. (formal U.S. custody was only acquired through her divorce from Obama Sr.)

So in order to have official traveling papers, she had to apply with the Indonesia Consulate for a passport for her adopted son, and she got it since he was Indonesian by adoption, and it became his sole official identification for at least the next two decades (other than his U.S. Green Card issued on the basis of it)

It would not have been difficult to tell the story of how her son fell threw the cracks of the system’s rules (while excluding the truth about a Canadian birth) since she would not have been the only women to give birth at home or someplace other than in a hospital setting with doctors and nurses.  She may have told the story of his home-birth more than once, but just having heard it once, her son believed it, for life.

What difference does that make?  It gives him self-confidence in his own birth narrative, and made it easy for him to convey his plight to others, -to others who could make a difference on his behalf.
Make a difference how?  By massaging the system, rounding the corners, fudging the facts a little, but “innocently” so.  That is exactly what he convinced Loretta Fuddy to do on his behalf.  She was elevated by governor Abercrombi (Obama’s biggest fan in Hawaii) to the position of Director of the Department of Health, (with supervisory authority over the department and its records) just three weeks after a new director had been appointed.
Why replace a new director?  That’s what he would have liked to know.  He heard from a reporter that he had resigned, and responded “that’s news to me.”

So what kind of power-play was transpiring behind the scene?  The removal of someone who was not an Obama sycophant and devotee and would not have been onboard for doing what Obama, the President of the United States in Spring of 2011, needed in order to silence Donald Trump and Jerome Corsi’s impending book titled: “Where’s the Birth Certificate”.
They were both gaining too much traction since the brief and unvetted short-form Certification of Live Birth was viewed as untrustworthy and even fraudulent.  A long-form version was needed, but since one did not exist, (as the sentimental governor discovered after announcing he would locate the original Hawaiian hospital birth certificate and show the doubters that Obama absolutely was born in Hawaii) one needed to be fabricated from what did exist.  And that was the old affidavit and its typed version.

They were in the paper archives and the microfilm records, -digitized and stored in the dept. data-base.  It’s text could be used to concoct an acceptable imitation of a real hospital birth certificate.  But that couldn’t happen without the accommodation of the the head of the dept who could supply access to those digital records.
Loretta Fuddy was just the person to be the director who would facilitate that access.  As it happens, she was a leader of the Subuh Indonesian religious cult, of which Obama’s mother had been a member, and which inspired her to name him with the a singular unique name as was traditional among many Indonesians; namely: Soebarkha (it combined Soetoro, Barack, and maybe “h” for Hussein).

No one can accuse her of committing an “evil” act since she had no reason to believe (like Obama himself) that he was not born in Hawaii but he had simply fallen through the technical cracks of the law.
So he was able to charm and convince his loyal and adoring Hawaiian single-women fan with no intimate friends or children of her own that she would be doing the country a big favor and earning his undying appreciation if she would help to put the controversy to rest so that he could “focus on more important things” than that “silliness” about the birth certificate.

She complied.  The data-base was open to someone who then used the needed files to fabricate the counterfeit using real text from the typed affidavit and the signature from the hand-written version, -along with the doctor’s signature and the registration number from another birth certificate (Virginia Sunahara, died August 5th).

A program like Photoshop made it all possible since the text is stored not as digital text but as microfilm imagery, i.e., photographed text-imagery on a blank background with the original paper background deleted.  The new background was the security paper pattern of green hash marks.

That new version is known as an abstract, since it is an abstraction of an original which contains the imagery of the paper it was typed and written on.
It may be that the only thing that could convince Obama that he was not born in Hawaii would be a real birth certificate from a hospital in Vancouver.  But one does not exist, although a record of the birth probably does.
A Certificate of Live Birth would not have been written up and signed for a few days after delivery, since in that era a new mother stayed in the maternity ward for five days or more, but that didn’t happen because mother Ann, probably along with her own mother, left Vancouver within days of birth, -perhaps on August 6th, and flew back to Hawaii, thus saving the cost of a longer hospital and hotel room stay, assuming he was not delivered by a midwife of the long-established social welfare & adoption agency of Vancouver.

But that may have been too soon because a Hawaiian hospital witness recalls seeing a black baby at that time, and a hospital doctor told of hearing that “a Stanley had a baby”.
Very likely Ann & child checked into Kapiolani hospital for a few days for needed monitored  recovery.
Does the place of Obama’s birth really matter?

Yes and no.  It does not matter constitutionally but does matter publicly because the public, and many in the government and media are under the life-long brain-washing that native-birth is what determines U.S. citizenship when in fact that is only true for the 3-4% of the population born of immigrants, i.e., foreigners.   The rest are born of Americans, and are citizens of America regardless of where they are born, -taking after and inheriting their parents’ nationality.  They are the natural born citizens of the nation, and they are exactly what the Constitution allows as its only exception to its universal ban on anyone serving as President.

No person, except a natural born citizen,… shall be eligible to the office of the President;”.
The first time that Barry read those words, he realized that his ambitions of power (“Prince Obama”, “King Obama” etc.) could not be fulfilled because whatever a natural born citizen is, it wasn’t something that included him.  He knew he was half alien, and did not even have proof of being a citizen of the United States, although he easily could pass himself off as being one, and probably assumed that he was, regardless of lack of proof of birth location and citizenship.

So his crime against the nation is double.  He had a counterfeit birth certificate produced under false pretenses, and then passed himself off as being constitutionally eligible to serve as President, knowing full well that he was not a natural born citizen of any nation on Earth since he was an unnatural hybrid of two different nations and peoples and countries.  Everything about him was aberrant, from his conception to his election, and lies were the wind beneath his mendacious wings.  He could not have risen without them, and he will crash to Earth as soon as they are all exposed.

When will that happen?  Not while he is in office.  But what happened to Clinton when he left office?  Nothing.  Corrupt pardons at the last hour facilitated by Eric Holder?  Eh, just look the other way.  Don’t raise a stink or make waves  in the cess pool by the Potomac.  Like Zombies, the entirety of the Washington elite establishment never turns on its own.  It only attacks those who dare expose its corruption and / or nonfeasance.  It’s powerful overlords won’t tolerate the legitimacy of their system being questioned.  And so no one ever questions it, or questions it in public anyway.

Will that change after the November 2014 elections?  Nope.  Too many people are too contented and distracted to make a big enough wave to cause the kinds of changes that could sweep out the garbage and let in some actual sunlight of responsibility and accountability.  Those two things cannot be tolerated by the privileged elite, because otherwise they would not be able to rob us blind with impunity and force their unjust and unjustifiable agendas on us.

by Adrien Nash  March 2014  obama–nation.com

The Secret Obama’s Mother Couldn’t Tell Him  pdf, 5 pages

Why Obama’s Mother Needed A Fake Divorce

A Fake Marriage for a Fake Divorce

Most of the “facts” about Obama’s life are in fact fiction.  The first lie is that his parents were in love and happily married for two years, when in fact there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to believe that they had anything more than a sexual encounter that produced the unwanted result of a pregnancy.  That pregnancy was dealt with in the way I describe in “WHY BABY OBAMA WAS BORN IN VANCOUVER”.

That pregnancy did not result from a love affair nor a marriage since neither occurred.  Ann Dunham was a rebel and an experimenter in “the forbidden” -as was learned when photos of her posing nude and semi-nude for the Dunham’s Black Communist Party friend and soft-porn photographer Frank Davis.  If she was a virgin prior to meeting him, she no doubt was not after exposing herself to him completely.

So she was not afraid to “walk on the wild side” of life as an atheist rebel who informed her high school friend that she didn’t needed to have a boyfriend or be married in order to have a baby.

Such an attitude was indicative of one who had no reverence for the sanctity of marriage but was sexually and socially liberated from conventional mores.
When she got to know the worldly wise Obama Sr. in college, he appeared as intriguing as Frank Davis had seemed previously, and even more self-confident as a younger man with a very strong and self-gratifying sense of himself.

They were two independent narcissistic peas in a pod.  It is not likely at all that they “loved” each other like lovers do, nor wanted to marry each other, -something potential  bigamists prefer to avoid (Obama Sr. already being married with two children in Africa).

So with their personalities being what they were, and neither of them wanting to be saddled with a newborn, keeping and raising a child was out of the question.  As was marriage.  Adoption was the solution.
Marriage would not have been a choice that either of them would have made, and so they didn’t.  There is no proof that they did, -so that is very easy to conclude.
But that conclusion has been countered by the fact that they got a divorce.  Do unmarried people ever get a divorce?  That would be crazy.  And that is exactly what every legislature in the land would have thought when they passed their State’s divorce laws.  The law in Hawaii was no different
When two people come to a divorce court and seek a divorce, it is automatically assumed that they are married, and thus no proof need be supplied to show that they were.  With both parties together seeking a divorce, and stipulating that they are married, all that would be needed was the usual accounting of the property mutually owned.  If there was none then a divorce might be quick and easy if allowed by law.
But why would two people who were never married want to get a divorce?  Not because of property ownership but because of custody of their child.  It had to be legally determined and officially acknowledged.  That would be true whether or not the parents were ever married.

Ann Dunham needed to acquire legal custody of her child since she was marrying a foreigner and was intending to move to his country in time.  To take her son with her, she would need documents for him, but she had none.

She had no birth certificate for the reasons detailed in “WHY BABY OBAMA WAS BORN IN VANCOUVER” and without that she had no proof that she was his mother, and his father was his father.  So… in order to acquire proof of his relationship to them she needed an official acknowledgement of their relationship.  That was not and could not have been an element of a marriage but absolutely is and must be an element of any divorce.

If she could have it legally established that she was his mother and his father was his father, then the issue of her legal custody of Jr. could be settled once and for all.
Well, with both parents agreeing in a divorce pleading that they were the parents, and with the father surrendering all parental rights to the mother, the issue of her son being a mystery person without any official papers would be settled by the official divorce decree.  Proof of who he was did not need to be supplied because no one would lie about such a thing, -anymore than people would lie about being married.  It was all just taken on good faith and by the legality of the papers they would sign, -under penalty of perjury.
With the divorce papers in hand, Ann could go to the Indonesian Embassy or Consulate in Honolulu and her new husband could applied for Indonesian adoption of her son who had no nationality since he had no birth certificate.  They did just that and Jr. finally acquired a nationality besides the provisional nationality of his father (which went unregistered with the British Embassy).

By his mother’s fake divorce from a non-existent marriage, she secured for him a way to obtain identification as an Indonesian citizen thanks to an adoptive father who loved her and wanted to be united with her and be a father to her young child.

Thus Barry Dunham became Barry Soetoro, -the person and name he used for the next two decades.  He maintained that identity outside of Indonesia by renewing his Indonesian passport every two years.  With it he was able to secure benefits as a foreign student while attending college.
Do the records in fact prove that?  What records?  He won’t allow anyone to see any of his records from any time of his life since running for office (with most of those also off-limits, including who paid what for what influence and benefit).

But are you any different?  Aren’t all of your records secret also?  Aren’t you a closed book just like Barry?  What could possibly seem suspicious about that?
Wasn’t your family narrative a complete fabrication for election considerations?  When you recounted how your white grandmother was a typical white person who was born with some innate fear of black people, didn’t you have to read that tale word for word from a teleprompter instead of simply speaking from memory like any person would who was telling the actual truth and not a story?

Obama is like a black hole when it comes to the truth.  Like light as it approaches a black hole, the closer one gets to Obama, the more the truth disappears into the black hole of lies, fabrications and falsehood.  From beyond the “event horizon” there exists only the darkness of total falsehood.

The man and everything about him except the obvious is fake.  But “what does it matter”, “what difference does it make” at this point since he was reelected as foolish potential republican voters stayed home.  It they are stupid enough to do that just one for time, we are doomed.  What are the odds of that happening again?  What were the odds of it happening the last time?  About the same it seems, but maybe not, thanks to a national calamity known as Obumer Care which the fools who stayed home couldn’t bother to care to see repealed by their party’s candidate.

Apathy can sink a republic just as surely as all other nefarious forces alone or combined.  If one side’s warriors don’t show up to the battle, then the battle is surely lost.  Let’s pray they aren’t so indifferent next time because the enemy is not at the gates, -he is inside the gates.

It time to wake the hell up, sound the alarm, put on one’s armor and go out to oppose him with all the strength one can muster.  Anything less will result in defeat ‘cause he ain’t foolin’ around.  He’s out for blood.  And he get it if we let him.

by adrien nash  march 2014, obama–nation.com

A Fake Marriage for a Fake Divorce  -pdf

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers