April 2, 2014 1 Comment
revised Friday, 4-4-14
How the Calvin Case Dooms Your Future; pt. 4
Should we be pessimistic about the future of America? A better question is “can we be reasonably optimistic about the future?” The answer is that if the power structure that rules our nation is not overthrown, there will be no future that we would want to see (aside from advances of various sorts).
It is corrupt to the core and both parties are party to it, with one simply pushing harder on the accelerator than the other.
Has history ever recorded any corrupted government and morally vacuous and ignorant population that ever reversed the course they were on toward a destination of decay, collapse and/or conquest? Are we destined to repeat history because we are ignorant of it?
Well, being ignorant is a natural status of human nature it seems. There is no one who is superior in this world, but compared to those who are simply normal, there are a heck of a lot of people who are in many ways sub-normal. And their numbers are growing by leaps and bounds.
So what will come is unknown and unknowable without taking a God’s-eye view of the human race, and the American people in particular. That is probably a frightful view to take, and I, for one, hesitate to take it since I’ve been there, done that, and found you can’t live life in the knowledge of what you see.
But sometimes in the history of man, (like in the Matrix trilogy) something changes everything and this times it’s different from what went before. That happened in a very good way with the life and legacy of Jesus. It took centuries and lots of corrupt detours along the way, but eventually the vision of God and Man that sprang from his existence produced the natural rights and liberties of Western Civilization, not to mention hope eternal.
The problem is that liberty can become license to live ignorant and self-indulgent spoiled lives, -and that is where a great proportion of the population is today. Just consider one aspect of American life; drug usage. Could it be more pervasive? Could laws against it be more impotent at stopping it? Or a government hand-out mentality.
Entire segments of American society are rotten to the core, personally and publicly. Just consider Detroit and what a nightmare it has degenerated into compared to what it was. There is a cancer and rot spreading in America and it is connected to many negative factors that render the role and duty and privilege of citizenship almost irrelevant in the lives of millions of almost unfixable people. Maybe they can be fixed, but probably not in this life, -not with the resources available to government and the powers it is limited to.
I once read the response of a law enforcement officer or social worker who said that the only way to fix or change the attitude of hard-core criminally inclined teenagers would require measures that would put them in a hospital. A lot of people need to suffer those measures, including many in government who have a different kind of corrupt attitude.
The communists tried a form of reform with their “re-education camps” that threw the academic and government elites down into the mud of real life in labor camps in the countryside, -perhaps cruelly and unjustly in most cases and without discrimination based on real attitudes and character. But that succeeded at one thing; it changed their view of how important they were in relationship to others who were “nobodies”.
American patriots would rejoice and thank heaven to see our corrupt and isolated and insulated government elite overlord class find themselves face-down in the figurative mud that the rest of the population has to live in because of their damn awful and self-serving governance.
And many of them deserve worse; deserve many years in a cell where they, like Jack Abramoff, can come to realize the magnitude of their betrayal of the American people.
And others still, who pull the extortion levers behind the curtains, -who know the secrets of the hidden lives of public officials and servants, -who intimate harm might come to their children if their agendas suffer because of the choices of those officials, -who weigh threats to the status quo of those in power as well as those who benefit from their largess, and thus arrive at decisions about who must conveniently be silenced via a “natural death” or an “accidental death” that no one can explain.
The people behind those untimely life-ending occurrences deserve nothing less than a bullet to the brain. They are the ones who keep the secrets hidden that need to see the light of day in order for a new revolution to take place in America.
They are the Luciferians of the power complexes that pull whatever strings they can accomplish pulling, -either by bribe or by bullet.
And God forbid if you are ever viewed as a liability, unless you are someone truly not expendable or too high profile and popular to terminate. Were the Kennedys such victims and yet not immune even though of the highest profile?
The most recent example of their handiwork is the murder of Loretta Fuddy, -the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health. She was a healthy, kindly, lonely, gentle soul who never married or had children, and in excellent health, but was emotionally vulnerable to persuasion exerted by a powerful and charismatic President of the United States who needed the birth certificate that the department had not given to his mother in response to her affidavit claiming she gave birth to her half-Kenyan son in her Hawaiian home but with no medical witnesses present.
The Registrar at that time (1961) was required to see some proof of one year residency. Such proof didn’t exist, so with no eye-witness affidavits supporting her claim, they simply filed her half hand-written, half typed affidavit and that piece of paper became the only vital record in their archive. It was microfilmed, and later digitized when all microfilm records were digitized.
All Barack needed was for her to just allow access to that record so it could be used in conjunction with the record of a deceased child who was born but died at the same time, and he would then be able to acquire a simulated genuine certificate like the one that his mother was never able to acquire for him.
It was important for the nation to get its attention off of such a “distracting” and divisive issue. After all, what good was served by not allowing the nation to be convinced of his birth in Hawaii? He was convinced, but he needed her help in order that others could also “know” the truth.
She loyally and dutifully agreed with his request and went along with it, even allowing the release of the lie that she watched the copying of his “original” birth certificate (as if a real Hawaiian hospital Certificate of Live Birth) in order to make it all seem official and not some mystery like his supposed short-form certification of live birth that appeared three years earlier out of nowhere with no attribution from anyone as to its origin.
The Leftist media bought into its legitimacy and the issue was “put behind us”, …until, that is, Doug Vogt submitted a legal brief to a federal court in Washington State which contained a sealed affidavit which named her as a co-conspirator in the fabrication of a counterfeit birth certificate for Barack Obama, and revealed financial details showing that she happened to have somehow acquired $50-70,000 that could not be accounted for, -money used to make substantial payments on a home mortgage.
Did that secret affidavit stay sealed as Vogt had requested, or did it, like IRS information and NSA information get dropped into the lap of a White House operative who knew someone who knew someone… and voila! -within a month she is suddenly and mysteriously dead?
Could anything be more convenient for Barack Obama and his wealthy puppet-masters than derailing any possible investigation into Ms Fuddy’s Lois Lerner-like role in the production of a counterfeit birth certificate for the “Hawaiian born” President?
That alone would raise anyone’s suspicions if they had a brain (which no one in the media does anymore) but what followed absolutely demonstrated that nefarious machinations were transpiring behind the scenes in order to make Fuddy’s murder appear perfectly natural.
What happened exactly? Did the medical examiner who did the autopsy (which required mysteriously waiting a month -perhaps for toxicology results) come out and present a clinical evaluation of the medical factors that precipitated the failure of her heart to keep beating?
That is what anyone and everyone would expect to happen, and yet nothing like that happened, -not even remotely like that. Instead the police department released “details” of the supposed autopsy which the public was not allowed to see, -including those who sued under the Freedom on Information Act to acquire, since major portions came completely blacked out “for privacy law concerns”. So they were protecting the privacy of the dead? Or protecting the family that she didn’t have?
The reason it was done like that was because what the autopsy actually said could not be the story that was released to the public because it made it clear that either she died by an unknown cause or by a highly suspicious cause (which was reported to the public as “accidental”.
How do you accidentally die while floating placidly in a warm ocean with a flotation vest on without any rescue concerns at all? No person in history ever died from the terror of such non-excitement. The only stress from such a situation is the stress of boredom. And I’m pretty sure that boredom never killed anyone.
The explanation supposedly from the Medical Examiner’s autopsy report was a string of subjective psychological claims about her mental and emotional state, (-things that are NEVER part of an autopsy) including something that is impossible to conclude; that she died from an irregular and inadequate heartbeat, (aka; cardiac arrhythmia).
Well, anyone from a Nurse’s Assistant to everyone who has watched medical investigation programs over the last decade knows that you cannot determine the heart rhythm of a heart that is not beating. That would be like reporting on the pulse rate of a corpse.
How can a claim of an irregular heart beat be substantiated when it leaves no evidence whatsoever?
A heart that goes out of rhythm is not like a train that leaves the tracks and can clearly be seen to not be on the tracks where it belongs. It would be more like a train that disappeared. -Or like a plane that disappeared.
How can you say it crashed if you don’t know where it even went?
If investigators of the Malaysian airliner that vanished claimed that it crashed, everyone would want to know how they knew that since there was no evidence of any kind.
Same with Fuddy’s death. Reminds me of a book & movie title: “Murder by Death”, -by unexplainable death, as is shared in clear terms in:
(a re-formated and condensed version of the web post: http://networkedblogs.com/Vr4M7 )
Is anyone going to question the police department that was the facade for the most fraudulent autopsy in American history? Is anyone going to go all Woodward & Bernstein and follow the money (or the extortion-intimidation)?
As was reportedly said to a witness in Roswell, N.M. “its a big desert out there and no one would ever find someone’s bones.” (Same with the Pacific ocean.) -Or ever trace the cash used to buy a condo on Maui.
Either by a bribe or a bullet, or both, they get the job done, and none of the submissive, brain-dead, juvenile children that pass themselves off as journalists ever ask the logical questions, -nor perhaps, even think of them. We’re so screwed.
by Adrien Nash April 2014 obama–nation.com