The Obama Vital Record simulation

Dunham_affidavit_simulation-b

Duham_affidavit_simulationPrint size:
http://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/dunham_affidavit_simulation-b.pdf  70 Kb
http://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/duham_affidavit_simulation-b.jpg   864 Kb

AKRNC

Why are you overlooking the fact that IF Ann Dunham had a passport in 1961 and IF she had done something so ridiculously foolish as to travel halfway around the world to have her first child without her husband, on her return trip she would have flown from London to New York and would be listed among NY immigration records, NOT Hawaii’s? [records are missing only for Hawaii international arrivals]

Ann Dunham Obama received her first passport in 1965 after she married Lolo Soetoro, in anticipation of her traveling to Indonesia. This is clearly seen in all her passport records. There is also the fact that there are witnesses that remember seeing Ann Obama in Kapi’olani Hospital, one of them is the mother of Stig Waidelich, who was born a day or two after Barack Obama and she clearly remembers a black baby in the nursery and realized it had to have been Obama. She also mentioned seeing his parents together, an unusual sight in 1961.

There is nothing that indicates that President Obama was born outside the U.S., only the delusions in the minds of birthers.  ~~~
A. Nash replies:
~There are a few major holes in your assumptions, and they are all explained by the Vancouver Scenario which I wrote a while back. (found at obama–nation. com

It goes like this: Ann D. was living back in her old stomping grounds where she felt at home, Seattle, Washington, during her third trimester. She couldn’t find any adoptive parents in the state so she arranged with the Family Services of Greater Vancouver to try to find adoptive parents in Canada.  [from their website:  Our services range from prevention to intervention. We provide: abuse prevention & trauma treatment; addictions treatment; adoption services; community education & development; counselling; employee assistance; employment services; immigrant services; intensive family & parenting services; support for youth with special needs; victim support; and youth services for homeless youth and youth living in at-risk situations.

83 years after we started out, our 525 staff, together with 295 volunteers and 38 students, continue to provide crucial social services in over 30 languages at 20 locations throughout the lower mainland (Vancouver, Richmond, Burnaby, New Westminster, and Surrey), and other areas of the province. Last year, our annual agency revenue was $22,276,296.]

Striking out there also after traveling to Vancouver and giving birth there, she flew to Hawaii three days later, checked her baby into the hospital, and attempted to register his birth the next day with the Dept. of Health.  She didn’t need a passport for travel between U.S. and Canada at that time but INS cards were required to be filled out regardless.
The affidavit she filled-out for the DoH was insufficient for issuing a Hawaiian birth certificate since she provided no evidence of having lived in Hawaii for a year, nor sworn statements from any witnesses.

Thus, Obama has no birth certificate from either Canada or any U.S. State.  He only form of ID all of his life has been his Indonesian passport.  That was why he had to “request” a birth certificate from Hawaii in 2008 since he never had one, and never will.  That’s why his “request” produced two counterfeits.

How did that come about?  Axelrod: Hey Barry, we need to scan your birth certificate and show the public that you were born in Hawaii.

Barry:   uhhhhh, that might be a problem since I don’t have one.  And brace yourself; I never have had one.  So if we’re going to release a scan of one, we first have to make one.

Axelrod: No problem, the useful idiots in the Hawaiian DoH would be willing to provide us with whatever materials we need.  We’ll just have to release it surreptitiously so that it isn’t traced back to anyone in particular.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Here’s something on the seriousness with which the government takes affidavits and sworn testimony or oaths.

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Handbook Volume 7  –  Consular Affairs

7 FAM 851 SUMMARY
(CT:CON-110; 09-13-2005)
a.
The purpose of the notarial act of taking an affidavit is to have an individual make a statement under penalty of perjury by personally swearing to or affirming the statement.
b.
Personal Appearance Required
: The notarizing officer must require that the signer personally appear, verbally swear the oath or affirm the truth (or provide other indication of assent if the person is unable to speak), and sign before the notarizing officer. An oath cannot be taken on behalf of someone else, including a corporation. Oaths cannot be given over the telephone. The oath-taker must be in the physical presence of the notarizing officer.
c.
Penalty of Perjury: By taking an oath or affirmation with respect to an affidavit or other statement to be used in an official proceeding, a person may be subject to criminal penalties for perjury, should he or she fail to be truthful. Oaths and affirmations should therefore be conducted in an official setting, with the U.S. flag on display.
The solemnity of the taking of the oath or making of the affirmation should be indicated.
If possible, the affiant should stand and raise his or her right hand. The notarizing officer should also stand if possible.
7 FAM 853  AFFIDAVITS
a. A jurat is the written statement attesting to the administration of an oath or affirmation.
The usual form of a jurat is: Subscribed and sworn before me this day.
b.
The jurat must reflect the venue and must be signed and sealed by the notarizing officer in accordance with general procedures for signing and sealing notarial certificates (see 7 FAM 830).

7 FAM 856 UNSWORN DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

When affidavits are to be used in U.S. federal court proceedings, notarizing officers should encourage use of u declarations under penalty of perjury” provided for by federal statute, 28 U.S.C. 1746 in lieu of administering an oath or affirmation. Such a statement should include the following language:
“I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on (date)
(Signature)
(Name)”
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 73 other followers