The Betrayal of America

McCain was an active part of the usurpation of the Constitution in 2008 and an active part of the cover up since then – By CDR Kerchner 

Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff , Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Posted on February 25th, 2010 by David-Crockett

Both political parties put up questionable candidates in 2008 with issues as to their birth citizenship status.  A 3rd party, the Socialist Party, even put a person name Calero on the ballot for President in 2008 in half dozen states and he only had a “green card” and was not even a Citizen, let alone a “natural born Citizen”.  And the system and media let Calero do it and didn’t challenge him in order to keep the lid on the cover-up of the constitutional eligibility issues of the respective presidential candidates of the two major parties. The fix and cover-up was in. Obama was born as a British Subject of a non-U.S. citizen father and McCain was born on the sovereign soil of Panama, not on the military base in the Canal Zone as was touted to the public.  Both having issues with their candidates they proceeded to cover up for each other and helped shut down the media and talk radio totally via their respective high contacts in the media industry and elected officials within the sitting Bush administration and in Congress as well as within their own respective presidential campaign organizations. No one in either political party wanted a free and open debate in the media as to the true historical, constitutional, and Supreme Court common law cases mentioning Vattel and his words on the meaning of “natural born Citizen”. No one in either political party wanted a full Congressional hearing about the true meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution concerning who is constitutionally eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of the military, especially in the case of Obama whose father was not even an immigrant to this country, let alone not being a citizen of the USA. We are a nation of immigrants. But Obama’s father was never one. The political parties and powers in DC wanted to hide this issue from the American people for the political ambition and power of both political parties to run the candidate of their choice irrespective of Constitutional issues. They did not want to hear from the People about this. So the cover up began to squelch all discussion of it to keep as many people in the dark as possible. “Thou shalt not talk about the presidential constitutional Article II eligibility issues” was the word put out by all the powers to be in Washington DC and the U.S. media. Their favorite modus operandi for the cover up was was either ignore the questioners or ridicule them if not able to ignore them.  Two favorite tools of Saul Alinsky from his book, Rules for Radicals.  And further, it was reported that even outright threats were made to certain conservative talk show radio hosts in the last quarter of 2008 to never broach the subject of constitutional eligibility issues on their shows or to allow on the air people who wish to talk about that issue.

In our two party system the political forces of nature of the RNC and DNC are normally natural enemies of each other and served as a check and balance in our election system. But in 2008 because of the citizenship “issues” of their respective Presidential candidates, both parties were instead complicit in ignoring, undermining, and usurping the Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 eligibility standards for the Office of President of our U.S. Constitution and thus have created “The Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis” of historic proportions. There is now an epic struggle underway pitting the political parties and their party controlled elected and appointed officials with powerful inside the belt way Washington DC opinion shaping forces in the Main Stream Media all combined and aligned against “We the People” and the survival our Constitution, the sovereign and fundamental law of our Republic. George Washington warned us 200+ years ago that a day may come when the political parties put party power and their political goals ahead of the Constitution which is designed to limit the power of government and usurp powers not granted by the Constitution. That day has come. We the People must now stand to defend our Constitution or it will no longer be the fundamental law of our Republic. If simple majority rule can trump the Constitution then there is no more protection left for the political minority and the rule of law. Our government will deteriorate into mob rule. Our nation and the inalienable rights guaranteed in our Constitution will be in great jeopardy and at the whims of the Washington DC power brokers.

And the cover up continues to this day and is most obvious with the stone silence and “cone of silence” and occasional mocking comments made by the talk show hosts about the eligibility issue questions if mentioned briefly by a guest now and then on Fox News. The approach on Fox News is to ban the topic. Other networks such as MSNBC simply mock the movement continually using Saul Alinsky’s tactics from Rules for Radicals rule number 5, ridicule, to stifle all open, serious, and public debate on the issue and to scare off any one in political power from broaching the subject. Anyone even just mentioning this issue is pounced on for the ridicule treatment by the press. This shut down a free and full “on air” debate of the Obama eligibility issue with serious scholars and legal experts representing each side (such as my attorney, Mario Apuzzo) being allowed on the air together with someone from the Obot side to debate this issue openly is being orchestrated at the highest levels of the RNC and DNC and their elected official type contacts in various powerful positions both today and back in Dec 2008 and early Jan 2009. Whispers in the hallways allude to grave consequences if one breaches this subject seriously on the air ways. The RNC silenced opposition in the conservative talk show radio and elsewhere in late 2008 which has enabled Obama to take power virtually unopposed as to addressing his constitutional eligibility in any serious manner in public debate via the national media. The leadership of the RNC at the highest levels, imo, shut down members of their own political party in Congress and via using their contacts in the highest levels of government, they helped shut down conservative talk radio and TV hosts with innuendos and and whispers of the consequences if this subject surfaced for discussion in a major way on their shows. They were told to keep the eligibility issue and the so called “Birthers” banned on their callers list with special instructions to the call screeners to keep them off the air. The RNC powers to be and their political connections used their power to do this to cover up their own subverting of Article II of the Constitution via putting up a candidate of their own with questionable natural born Citizenship status as their candidate for President. The big liberal media anointed Obama (a hard core progressive and Socialist) and then anointed McCain (a progressive light) because they knew McCain had a citizenship issue of his own and thus would keep him silent about Obama’s. And it worked. A “cone of silence” was dropped on the eligibility issue in the DC media and Congress and elsewhere in American to cover up for what both parties were doing, subverting Article II of the U.S. Constitution in the 2008 election. Listen to this radio show interview for more details.

Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Andrea Shea King Radio Show hosted by Andrea Shea King – Friday, 22 Jan 2010, 9 p.m. EST: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/askshow/2010/01/23/the-andrea-shea-king-show

Copied in part from The Betrayal

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Corrupt Georgia Superior Court Dismisses Legal Appeal Of Obama Eligibility Ruling
March 6, 2012 By Doug Book http://www.westernjournalism.com/corrupt-georgia-superior-court-dismisses-legal-appeal-of-obama-eligibility-ruling/
Obama Eligibility Corrupt Georgia Superior Court Dismisses legal Appeal of Obama eligibility ruling

The Georgia Superior Court Clerk’s office did everything in its power to thwart the very filing of a legal appeal in  Weldon v Obama, the case in which Judge Michael Malihi ruled that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore eligible for the Georgia ballot.
And the Superior Court itself has just dismissed plaintiff David Weldon’s appeal of that ruling.
The numerous questions surrounding Malihi’s February 3rd decision and the clear errors of law and procedure upon which it was based have been discussed by countless members of the new media.

And now Van Irion, head counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) and the attorney who represented David Weldon in his lawsuit questioning Obama’s eligibilty before Judge Malihi, relates what has happened since the decision.

The story he tells of improper and illegal conduct on the part of the Superior Court arguably reveals a more blatant and callous disregard for the law and the rights of the American people than was displayed in the ruling itself.
Irion relates that:
Malihi’s Georgia Court refuses to forward LLF’s Motion for Contempt against Obama to the Georgia Superior Court despite state law providing the Court no such discretion.
The Superior Court refused to respond to LLF’s letters on the matter, or demand the Malihi court forward the Motion.
The Superior Court Clerk initially refused to file LLF’s Appeal of Malihi’s ruling, relenting only after 48 solid hours of legal and procedural “education” on the part of Irion.
The Superior Court Clerk refused to file LLF’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction because a $1 filing fee had not been included. After HAND DELIVERY of $1, the Clerk then SAT ON the Motion for 10 days, finally claiming the $1 fee had been hand delivered to the “wrong staffer.” The Motion had to be completely re-filed. The Court itself refused to admonish the clerk.
And here is the clincher:

Obama filed a Motion to Dismiss LLF’s Appeal of the Malihi ruling and the Motion was FILED IMMEDIATELY by the Superior Court Clerk. Obviously no problem in the Clerk’s office with Mr. Obama’s paper work.
THREE DAYS after Obama’s Motion to Dismiss was filed, the Court informed Attorney Van Irion that he had LESS THAN 1 DAY to file an Opposition to that Motion; thoroughly improper behavior on the part of the Court.
Late that SAME DAY, the Chief Judge of the Superior Court denied Irion’s motion to be admitted as a visiting attorney (Irion practices in Tennessee) in spite of his impeccable reputation and the fact that his Georgia sponsor is a member of the Georgia State Legislature who has practiced before the Court! The Court had deliberately held up this particular decision for 2 weeks, effectively preventing LLF from filing the Opposition the Court had RULED only 6 hours earlier that LLF must file on that day! All of this represents unheard of behavior on the part of a court.
Finally, just 90 minutes after plaintiff David Weldon personally filed the Opposition–as the Court had prevented Irion and LLF from doing so–the Chief Judge issued a 3 page Opinion granting Obama’s Motion to Dismiss the LLF Appeal!

Incredibly, neither Judge Malihi nor the Secretary of State sent the Weldon v Obama case record to the Superior Court for review until AFTER the Court had ruled in Obama’s favor!  That means the Chief Judge agreed to Obama’s Motion to Dismiss an Appeal of a case the Judge NEVER READ!! This is the extent to which judicial corruption has replaced judicial review in the State of Georgia.

Moreover, given the Judge’s Opinion was produced just 90 minutes after the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss was filed,  it is obvious that the Court had decided to grant Obama’s Motion and probably had its Opinion prepared before ever considering the Opposition argument. LLF’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the Opposition AND the Contempt Motion against Obama for failure to appear at the Malihi hearing, ALL were completely ignored by the Georgia “legal” system.

In short, the FIX WAS IN as the Superior Court of Fulton County had undoubtedly decided there would be clear sailing for the White House Manchurian Candidate immediately after Michael Malihi made his ruling one month earlier. And the legal rights of plaintiff David Weldon, the people of Georgia and of the United States are casualties of the corrupt behavior exhibited by members of the Georgia judicial system.

Van Irion writes, “The Founding Fathers understood that when dishonorable people begin to take high office, the system of government they set into motion would begin to fail. Unfortunately America’s judicial system is proving this principle.”

Liberty Legal is preparing an Appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court. Will it matter? We can only hope that, for the sake of the American legal system and the American people,  Mr. Irion will find at least ONE honest judge in the State of Georgia. Time will tell.

4 Responses to The Betrayal of America

  1. arnash says:

    JMHPATRIOT says:
    March 3, 2012 at 11:12 pm

    Yes, this problem of not vetting the Lier-In-Chief Obama has been going on for too long; and it seems that they are all in on it ——– the Democrats, the Republicans, the judges, the Mainstream Media, even Fox. I was happy to see that at least one law enforcement official —— Sheriff Arpaio —— showed some real guts and was willing to put his face forward on this matter. However, what did he get from the media —–ridicule for doing his job. They did not care about the probable crimes being committed by our highest level government officials. If Obama literally had horns sticking out of his head, they would still spit on the truth and follow him straight into Hell —- and that’s where most of them will probably end up! What I see here is actually the beginning of tyranny —- what is supposed to be a government of the people, by the people and for the people through representatives; and a country were we have rule of law, IS NO LONGER. I never would have dreamed that this would happen in my lifetime but our founding fathers saw it coming ——– a time when the people had no where to turn because of the pervasive corruption through all branches of our government. So they gave us recourse in our Bill of Rights —– the second amendment —— and it is for this reason that many in government have been working feverishly to take that away from us.

  2. arnash says:

    jimbo999 says:
    March 3, 2012 at

    I and a million other Americans knew all of this a year ago when we checked the alledged BC and found it to be a forgery. Any 12 year old kid with a computer could have figured it out. The only new information was the forgery of the Draft registration, which didn’t even need a computer to figure it out, just a set of eyes with better than 20:200 vision, and the fact that they have a person-of-interest as the forger, and that over 200 people have signed depositions and have agreed to testify (all of those people are now at risk for IRS audits or worse), and the person who met Obama as a “foreign exchange student”.
    Why is this usurper still in office?

  3. arnash says:

    “Indeed, federal judges engage in wrongdoing because they are held by their peers, Congress, and the media unaccountable. As a result, their wrongdoing is riskless. This makes it irresistible for them to grab wrongfully personal material and judicial class benefits. The analysis of the official statistics shows it: In the 223 years since the creation of the
    Federal Judiciary in 1789, only 8 federal judges have been impeached and removed. The Judiciary has allowed its chief circuit judges to dismiss systematically 99.82% of the complaints filed against judges in the 1 oct 96-30 sep 08 12-year period. In that period, its judicial councils –the circuits all judge disciplinary bodies– denied up to 100% of the petitions to review those dismissals, as did the 2nd Circuit’s council, of which then Judge Sotomayor was a member. Up to 9 of every 10 appeals are disposed of ad-hoc through no-reason summary orders or opinions so “perfunctory” that they are neither published nor precedential, mere fiats of raw judicial power.”

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: TAX EVASION, PERJURY – WHAT DID OBAMA KNOW & WHEN?

    By: Devvy
    April 23, 2012NewsWithViews.com
    Back in early July 2009, political prostitutes on the Senate Judiciary Committee began confirmation hearings for a politically correct socialist, Sonia Sotomayor, to the U.S. Supreme Court. Having the correct female parts and ethnicity (Hispanic), she was a shoe-in regardless of how unqualified for the job. At that time, Dr. Richard Cordero contacted me. Dr. Cordero is an attorney who practices law in New York and was not only very familiar with Sotomayor, his research proves little Sonia concealed her assets and is guilty of tax evasion and perjury. I immediately began reading his evidence; it took a couple of days. Not speculation, but hundreds of pages of documents.
    Gutless Republicans like Sen. Jeff Sessions refused to even contact Dr. Cordero. It’s not as if he didn’t know about Dr. Cordero’s evidence, many of us made sure he did. Sessions and his colleagues brushed it off and proceeded with the sham confirmation hearings.
    Back then I wrote two columns exposing this [1], [2], yet strangely, few people seemed interested or concerned. Certainly not the liars for hire in the “mainstream” media or even the mis-named “fair and balanced” FOX News. Not even some of the news web sites one would think would have jumped on this scandal. Nothing. Here is an individual who could have not only derailed Sotomayor’s nomination, but force a criminal investigation into her activities as well as other judges in New York. Well, there was a bit of sniffing going on, but just like their refusal to fully investigate the impostor president back in 2007 & 2008, the NY Times, Washington Post and Politico, did not follow through on Sotomayor. Heaven forbid they would actually investigate such a politically correct nominee! Why, it might bring backlash from minority groups and we can’t have that in America. Better to let the mobs take control.

  4. arnash says:

    4 Indiana Dems charged with election fraud in 2008
    By Eric Shawn @ Fox News

    “Felony charges related to election fraud have touched the 2008 race for the highest office
    in the land.

    Prosecutors in South Bend, Ind., filed charges Monday against four St. Joseph County Democratic officials and deputies as part of a multiple-felony case involving the alleged forging of Democratic presidential primary petitions in the 2008 election, which put then-candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the Indiana ballot.

    The officials are accused of taking part in a scheme to fake signatures and names on the primary petitions needed to run for president. Court papers say the plan was hatched by local Democratic Party officials inside the local party headquarters.”

    “According to affidavits, Burkett told investigators it was his job to “forge petitions for candidate Barack Obama,” Shelton “was assigned to forge petitions for candidate Hillary Clinton” and Blythe “was assigned to forge petitions for candidate John Edwards.” When Edwards dropped out of the race at the end of January 2008 and Burkett refused to continue the forgeries, Morgan allegedly ordered Blythe to then forge petitions for Barack Obama.

    Indiana State Police investigators identified a total of 22 petitions that appeared to be faked, yet sailed through the Voter Registration Board as legitimate documents. The signature of the board’s Republican supervisor, Linda Silcott, which is required for legal certification, appeared to be rubber stamped on the documents. She told investigators that she did not remember signing or authorizing her rubber stamp to be used.

    Silcott also told investigators that she recognized the handwriting on the alleged forged Obama petitions as that of Blythe’s.

    The South Bend Tribune and independent political newsletter Howey Politics Indiana have reported that a handwriting analyst concluded last fall that Blythe’s handwriting matched some of the alleged Obama fakes. When Fox News caught up to Blythe as he left the Voter Registration Board last November and asked him if he forged any signatures or faked any petitions, he repeatedly replied, “I don’t have anything to say.””

    CONTINUED HERE: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/02/4-indiana-dems-charged-with-election-fraud-in-2008

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers

%d bloggers like this: