Obama’s Half-American, Half-Alien Citizenship

~a tale of three brothers

(with three different types of citizenship)

    A foreigner who loves America applies for entry permission.  While awaiting it, his wife gives birth to a son.  Then they receive permission and emigrate to the U.S.   There the wife conceives and delivers another son.  Then later they successfully complete the naturalization process and become American citizens.

Then they have another son born in America.  He’s different from his brothers.  He can grow-up to be the President of the United States.  His brothers can’t.  Why?  They don’t have the correct type of citizenship.  Does it matter?  Absolutely not, anymore than that a girl “can grow up to become Miss America” but won’t.  It ain’t gonna happen. The odds are one in 315 million.

The first son, a natural citizen of his native land, came to the U.S. as a foreigner and remained as such until the parents were naturalized.  Then he was automatically naturalized also and obtained derivative citizenship through them via his blood connection to them.  But if they never did naturalized then he would remain a foreigner even if he came to the U.S. as a baby and grew up here as an American.

The second son was born as a native American citizen per the 14th Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court’s Wong Kim Ark decision in 1898, but not as a natural born citizen since his parents were foreigners and not Americans when he was born.
Their naturalization was not necessary to make him a U.S. citizen, unlike his older brother.  His citizenship is above the authority of Congress to regulate because it is not bestowed by Congress but by the Constitution (in the form of an amendment).  He possesses constitutional citizenship.

He needed to be naturalized via U.S. law because he was not born of American citizen parents.  His naturalization took effect immediately upon birth.  He is a “native-born citizen” in the language of the Citizenship & Immigration Service.  He had to be born within the United States in order to qualify for constitutional citizenship, and his father had to be a legal immigrant subject to the full authority of Washington.

His younger brother is not a citizen via the 14th Amendment but via natural law.  His citizenship is not granted by any law ever passed, nor by any judicial decision, constitutional amendment, or the body of the Constitution itself.  His citizenship is natural citizenship because he was born to citizens.  Whatever nationality they were when he was born, he was the same.  It was his birthright by the law of natural inheritance.  Group members produce children who are members, citizens produce children who are citizens.  Same principle,  whether in nature or tribe or nation.

It doesn’t require the permission of any monarch, nor  bureaucrat, nor legislation, nor judicial decree.  It’s the automatic unavoidable result of one’s inheritance of their parents’ political status, just as one inherits their nature and social status.  It’s been the pattern of life for all social creatures since time immemorial.  One is the same as one’s parents.  Whatever group they belong to, so does their off-spring because he/she is what they are, deriving all from them.
As a minor, a child is under the parents’ jurisdiction and  belongs to them, not the government.  Whatever jurisdiction the father is under, the entire family is under also since he is the titular head of the family.  It’s been that way from time immemorial.

The citizenship of Barry Obama is different from the three types of citizenship of the three brothers because he’s supposedly not foreign born, (though he labeled himself as Kenyan born for nearly two decades) nor the child of a naturalized citizen father, nor even a non-naturalized immigrant father.
Instead he was  the son of a “non-immigrant alien” and as such the 14th Amendment does not apply to him because he, through his father and like his father, was born subject to the United Kingdom & Commonwealth (UKC) via the British Nationality Act of 1948, and was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States as required by the amendment.

He was exempt by the Law of Nations.  Only a legal immigrant can father a child with constitutional citizenship, but Obama’s father was a mere foreign student in the United State on a temporary basis via a student Visa, after which he would have to leave.  He was not subject to the draft and military service as were citizens and immigrants.

Consequently, Obama Jr. had no basis for U.S. citizenship other than the naturalization statutes that, within the lifetime of many Americans, were passed to allow U.S. citizenship to be conveyed to an American mother’s child even though fathered by a foreigner.  But those statutes were written for children born outside of the United States, while Obama claims that he was born inside the U.S.
Those statutes don’t apply to him, so without a foreign birth Barack Obama would not be a United States citizen at birth.  But even with a foreign birth, his mother was too young by  some months for her citizenship to be transferable to her son.  But the issue is not what his citizenship is based on, but what it is not based on.
And it’s not based on natural inheritance of U.S. citizenship from both American parents.  That means he is not a natural citizen of the United States, even if he was born in the United States.  He, like the U.S.-born off-spring of Martians, is not a native of the country nor the nation because of his foreign alienage.  His roots (directly through his father) are in a foreign land, nation, culture, history, and people, -none of which are American.

If half of one’s inherited  political nature is foreign, then one is not a natural citizen of either nation but is a 50-50 man-made citizen, -a person made a citizen by practical positive law, -not nature, not birthright inheritance, not blood connection.

Just as the off-spring of a mixed-race couple is not a natural member of either race, so no man-made half-American is a natural American and eligible to be the President & Commander-in-Chief because the Constitution requires that he be something that he is not and can never be.
“No person, except a natural born citizen,..shall be eligible to the office of the President”      Article II, Section I, Clause V.
No other type is constitutionally qualified nor natural.

Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally unqualified to be the President of the United States.  But that fact is an unspeakable truth within the Federal District of Columbia and the entire American news media. Among those who have a clue, no one will speak of it and none want to even think about it within the marbled corridors of power, because he is the most powerful man on the planet and has lots of money and lots of friends supporting him, -some of whom operate outside of the law.

He seems to be bullet-proof. But no one is truth-proof and the truth has a nasty habit of just hanging around forever. It has no statute of limitation.  But a day of reckoning is coming.

And it can’t come too soon.  Though it can come too late.

by a.r. nash sept 2011/june 2012


About arnash
“When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect.” - Mark Twain - Politicians and diapers - change 'em often, for the same reason. "Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other." Ronald Reagan "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." William F. Buckley, Jr. “The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell The people are the masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it. Abraham Lincoln “Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell “Satan will use a lake of truth to hide a pint of poison”.

One Response to Obama’s Half-American, Half-Alien Citizenship

  1. arnash says:

    comments posted to the publication of this exposition at the patriotpost.us

    Abu Nudnik in Canada
    Saturday, June 9, 2012

    PS: How can it be that no one saw this?

    Mac in Phoenix
    Saturday, June 9, 2012

    Plenty of people saw this, and complained about it. There was also millions spent in covering up, omitting and muddying the waters that is Barry Soetoro’s history.

    What the hell, progressives have gotten away with bigger hoaxes before…

    David Farrar in United States
    Saturday, June 9, 2012

    “Judge James Duane in his ruling, in the Rutgers v. Waddington case, described the importance of the new republic abiding by the Law of Nations, and explained that the standard for the court would be Vattel. He ruled that the Statues passed under the color of English Common Law, must be interpreted from the standpoint of its consistency with the law of nations. This concept of Vattel lead to the creation of the Judiciary branch of our government to insure that Congress could never legislate away the provisions of the Constitution.”


    By natural law, an Article ll ‘natural born’ Citizen is a person born a US citizen under the cloak of allegiance of the father. This is what de Vattel calls: the Natural Political Right Of Inheritance.

    Allowing the courts to decide who is or who isn’t a ‘natural born’ Citizen allows the government to create the ‘ruling class’ rather than the “consent of the governed.”

    One thing is known for certain: if we allow Congress to create the ruling class, they will do so to their own advantage and we will soon lose yet another one of our most cherished, self-evident, unalienable truths: that all men are created equal.

    ex animo


    dcocheran in Chickasha, Ok
    Wednesday, June 13, 2012

    Calling poeple birthers is a bit derogatory in itself. When all they ask for is for Obam to prove who he is purported ot be. All anyone in Obama’s position would do is reveal the facts. An old Chinese proverb states pure gold does not fear the furnace. What has Obama to fear by releasing his records. If in fact he is above the board then he has nothing to lose by doing so
    Reply | Permalink

    David Farrar in Cedartown
    Saturday, June 9, 2012 at 9:10 PM

    I, too, have seen many references to a 1934 statute allowing the mother to transmit citizenship to the child being born within the jurisdiction of an alien father, under her allegiance, but could not find the actual statute. The closest I was able to find is below dealing with children being born aboard.

    Secondly, the statute would be unnecessary due to the 14th Amendment bestowing naturalized citizenship at birth.

    ex animo davidfarrar

    1934 THE “CITIZENSHIP ACT OF 1934”: On 24 May, Congress makes a major change to the “citizenship law” to now enable U.S. citizen mothers to also transmit U.S. citizenship at birth abroad. But for the first time the law now also creates a new burden by imposing a mandatory “subsequent five year residence requirement” in the United States, prior to reaching age eighteen, and an “oath of allegiance requirement” within six months of the child’s twenty-first birthday, for any child born abroad to parents, one of whom is an alien. The new law states: • “Any child hereafter born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose father or mother or both at the time of birth of such child is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States: but the rights of citizenship shall not descend to any such child unless the citizen father or citizen mother, as the case may be, has resided in the United States previous to the birth of such child. In cases where one of the parents is an alien, the right of citizenship shall not descend unless the child comes to the United States and resides therein for at least five years continuously immediately previous to his eighteenth birthday, and unless, within six months after the child’s twenty-first birthday, he or she shall take an oath of allegiance to the United States of America.
    Reply | Permalink

    Mac in Phoenix
    Sunday, June 10, 2012

    Thanks David,

    There’s still the SSN #, now, how the hell is that explained?

    Let’s face it, this charlatan doesn’t have what it takes to lead this nation, let alone actually being legally viable.

    I believe that he traveled under a foreign student visa and is so listed in his college days. So much has been either expunged completely or whitewashed from his record, what else can any cogent person supposed to think?

    I also believe he was hand picked (Shadow Party?) to implement a damaging progressive agenda.

    Personal note to George Soros – So glad you’re old, you evil prick. You’ll soon meet someone you can’t buy and I don’t think he’ll be too happy with you. I wouldn’t want to be you for 100 times your money. Rot in hell.
    Reply | Permalink

    Jsmith in Fredericksburg
    Sunday, June 10, 2012

    Interesting. I’d heard a lot about how Obama wasn’t a citizen regardless of where he was born, but have not seen it explained so coherently. I thought the 14th Amendment was the end of the story. Thank you for explaining it so clearly.
    Reply | Permalink

    Adrien Nash in Crescent City, CA
    Sunday, June 10, 2012

    “the statute (granting citizenship through his mother) would be unnecessary due to the 14th Amendment bestowing naturalized citizenship at birth.” ex animo david farrar

    It seems you didn’t grasp the fact that the 14th Amendment is constitutionally inapplicable to one who was not born subject to the authority of Washington, which includes all children born of foreign “non-immigrant” fathers. Such fathers, and their sons and daughters through them, are not subject to the most fundamental responsibility of citizens and immigrants, which is national defense in time of threat. Hence there was no intent by the authors of the 14th Amendment that such off-spring should be deemed to be U.S. citizens because they remained subject to the authority and protection of their own nation and the Law of Nations, and not the political authority of the U.S. government.

    But your assumption that the 14th Amendment was applicable to Obama merely by virtue of a U.S. birth may shed light on the issue in a surprising manner. It would seem that such a view is not only held by those in the public but also by those in the government, and indeed I have a quote from a State Dept. official in 1901 that one born in the U.S. is a citizen by the decree of the Supreme Court (Wong Kim Ark) without any acknowledgement of the accompanying requirement of subjection to the full authority of Washington.

    So….if that was the view all the way back in 1901, why would Congress every fashion a naturalization statute to include the situation of a child domestically born to a foreign visitor/guest? It Congress since then has erroneously assumed that the second requirement of the 14th Amendment didn’t mean anything real, then there very likely is NO statute by which Obama is a citizen of the United States. Can I say Wow! What a possibility!

    GregInOregon in Salem, Oregon
    Monday, June 11, 2012

    I like what you are saying here. It isn’t as if this information hasn’t been in circulation for a couple of years now, at least. But the more it is discussed, the more clarity and new information surfaces. … I can’t understand why Alexander of the Patriot Post doesn’t get this, and I’m still surprised he allows this kind of discussion to continue, so good for him. … Clearly, a lot of people dropped the ball all along the line over our history as to what constitutes a natural-born citizen. I wasn’t disappointed when I didn’t become president, but it turned out I was ineligible. My mother was born a Mexican citizen, and didn’t naturalize here till after I was born. … I think the same goes for Marco Rubio, both of whose parents didn’t naturalize till after he was born. And I would love for him to be VP, but he too is ineligible. … Ironic, isn’t it, that Obama broke the law when he became a Senator, then President. Good chance he isn’t even a citizen at all. … And I do not like him at all: Arrogance = Ego + Ignorance. … Somebody’s got to make this case go widespread.

    billy396 in ohio
    Tuesday, June 12, 2012

    I’ve studied this matter for a very long time. There can be NO question regarding Obama’s citizenship vis-a-vis the presidency. The founders made it crystal clear that, in order to be eligible for the Presidency, you had to be a “natural born citizen”. That phrase has a very particular and very carefully worded definition. It is not enough that one parent was a US citizen, or even that the baby was born on US soil, which is still unproven. In order to be considered a “natural born citizen”, BOTH of your parents MUST BE U.S. CITIZENS at the time of your birth. It really is that simple. That’s the law under our Constitution. There were and are many people on both sides of the aisle who knew that Barry Soetero could NEVER legally qualify for the position, so they simply made the decision to obfuscate the issue and make it a matter of race-baiting and propaganda by our leftist “Mainstream” news media. Obama isn’t a natural born citizen and there’s no way that he could ever become one. He’s a fraud, a charlatan, and even worse, he’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing, very clearly making it his mission to destroy freedom and liberty within this country. When he was giving his sworn oath to our Constitution he was lying, and he knew that he was lying, as he had absolutely NO intention of being bound by ANY document that would interfere with his goal of turning America into another Socialist state. It’s beyond sad that, even if he’s not reelected, this nation will take generations to recover from the damage that’s been done by Obama in his 1st term. IF he is reelected, America will cease to exist as a Constitutional Republic, little by little. His little and not so little side deals with Putin and Sarah Brady will destroy great parts of our natural rights as American citizens under our Constitution. Our Constitution was never intended to be a “living document” as Obama sees it. It has the amendment process bult in because the founders knew that, somewhere along the way, something would have to be added or changed in this document. Obama, on the other hand, has NO interest in lawfully changing our Constitution. He needs to destroy it from within, by passing executive orders amd appointing judges who will do his bidding whenever the subject arises. It’s his Chicago thug roots that prevent him from even contemplating changing things in the legal and correct way. Al Capone would have made a better President. At least the MOB makes a profit.

    Texas Voter in Texas
    Wednesday, June 13, 2012
    Obama, Founding Birther ~

    For 17 years, Barack Obama claimed he was born in Kenya ~ until a few weeks after he announced his candidacy for President in 2007.

    see here: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/05/barack-obamas-biographical-brief-was.html

    The biography Obama provided to his literary agent specified his birthplace as “Kenya.” Over the course of 17 years, despite multiple revisions by Obama, the Kenyan birthplace remained a fundamental part of the bio on the agent’s website.

    Later, Army Flight Surgeon and Bronze Star recipient, Terry Lakin, served time in Leavenworth and was dishonorably discharged for daring to question Obama’s background.

    see here: http://www.terrylakinactionfund.com/terry/timeline.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: