Why Obama’s birth certificate can’t be believed
August 1, 2013 12 Comments
The reasons to doubt that Honolulu was the location of Obama’s birth are all tied to what is missing.
It begins with the absence of any eyewitness, even the women who gave birth at the supposed same time and place. No one who remembers has ever stepped forward and claimed to remember him or his mother even though new mothers in that era stayed in the hospital for many days after giving birth. They could not have gone unnoticed and noted since she was a white teenager and her baby was a Negro, and the father was a pure-blooded African. Did he not visit her even once during her fictional stay at the Honolulu hospital? If he had, it would have been quite remarkable, and memorable, and yet no one has any such memory. Why would that be other than that it never happened?
No photos of proud mother with newborn. Wouldn’t someone have taken one of an only child with her firstborn? Not even one photo of pregnancy, -the most dramatic event of Ann’s young life. No hospital claiming bragging rights as the place that a unique President, a Hawaiian supposedly, was born. No public hospital admissions log that the public is allowed to examine. No commemorative plaque on any wall in the whole place. Only an anonymous statement on a website that is connected to no human verifier.
There’s no “half hand-written and half typed” affidavit “vital record” in possession of the H.DoH that anyone has been allowed to examine even though a supposedly real birth certificate image is fully public, nullifying privacy concerns.
No Hawaiian official has ever referred to an “original Hawaiian hospital birth certificate” for Obama.
No Hawaiian official has ever testified under oath or signed a sworn statement as to anything about Obama’s birth record.
No Hawaiian official has released a statement about “the birth certificate” (short form) that wasn’t couched in carefully written, legally ambiguous language.
No Hawaiian official statement (made public as a “News Release”) is legally attached to the person (the Director) who supposedly issued it since its few paragraphs (in the first release) and single paragraph (in the second) are enclosed in quotation marks with no attribution as to who the quoter was, when the so-called statement was made (which reads like a schizophrenic fabrication that is part written and part verbal) nor is a single word of it validated or certified by any human signature. Nothing printed that is unsigned is considered to be legally identifiable and no one can be held responsible for its falseness since it is not an official public statement by a government official.
No statement made by any Hawaiian official can be taken as true because of a state and party and ideological bias toward supporting their favorite Hawaiian son, -son of one of the most socialistic, welfare-dependent states of all.
The long-form birth certificate image is cloaked in mystery, with nothing provable about its origin and legitimacy, but everything is cloaked in attorney-client privilege, and deliberately so. Even Obama himself was careful to never once mention the long-form bc that he appeared before reporters to present. It was not even to be allowed in Obama’s presence as his own WH attorney told a reporter during the pre-appearance of a President who only showed up to dump a guilt-trip on anyone who dared to doubt its authenticity and ask questions, (plausible deniability).
Not a single unbiased, questioning person was allowed to exam what was supposedly created by the Hawaiian DoH. No one can testify that it was not merely a color photocopy of a digital file that was fabricated on a computer using original Obama and non-Obama sources supplied by an insider in the Hawaiian DOH.
No one can explain why only Savannah Guthrie, an NBC reported, (and no doubt loyal Democrat like all NBC reporters) was allowed to handle it, feel some sort of raised impression, and take what is farcically called a photograph which was deliberately degraded to the maximum by stripping away the color and the detail by down-sizing it to a size and quality so small and bad that if it were even a little bit worse everyone would have exclaimed: “What the hell is going on here? Some sort of cover-up?” It was no more useful than a photo the size of a playing card. Would it have to be the size of a postage stamp before someone with a brain would start asking questions about why?
And the supposed “close-up” image cropped out of the fuller image was virtually worthless as well since it avoids showing the two areas of fraudulence; the lack of a Hawaiian Dept of Health Seal, and the smiling face squiggly added to the letter “A” in Alvin Onaka’s name stamp, -which is also an abdication of certification since a rubber stamp cannot authenticate anything in the real world.
If you wanted to hide the truth in plain sight, that is how you would do it; too dark; too small with no access to full size acceptable quality images. “See, we provided you with photographic proof, -what more do you want?” Such an approach to validating something screams of a deliberate attempt to hide incrimination details. And no one defending Obama can explain why such an approach was taken, and has never been corrected to include high-resolution images that reveal a Hawaiian Health Dept. Seal.
The paper original from which the images were made reveals a ring of some sort was pressed against the paper, but nothing more. A mere ring pressed against a document does not authenticate it since a ring, a circle, is not an official State Seal, as was seen on the short-form fake.
It’s true that often embossed seals that are not deeply impressing into the paper become almost invisible in a scan because scanners do not have any angled light source that could cast a shadow that would reveal the detail of a real embossed seal image. That was a big problem with the short-form certification of birth but a high-resolution photo in angled window light revealed it in clear detail. (Unless it was added later when it was starkly invisible in the scanned version.)
But why can’t we simply exam a similar photo or photos of the long-form birth certificate? Because none have been allowed, -no exist and will never exist because they will never be allowed since they would reveal the absence of an official Dept. of Health seal. One that would and should look like this:
No one can explain why the birth certificate of Virginia Sunahara, born within a day of Obama, was missing from the database, (and presumably the archive) when inquiry was first made. Nor why her brother was barred by the DoH and a judge from obtaining a copy of her long-form even though she died just days after her birth, nor why her registration number, seen on her short-form, is enormously out of sequence when that would have been impossible under the strict administration of Verna Lee, -the registrar at that time.
No one can explain how ink came to be located in the exact perfect position in relation to the letter “a” of the stamped signature of the Registrar, Alvin Onaka, to result in an unmistakable appearance of a smiling face. If moved the slightest amount in any direction the effect would not exist. How great does one’s gullibility have to be to believe in such an unbelievable coincidence when it can reasonably be suspected of being a forger’s covert signature?
How can a document be certified by any legitimate authority when it is not signed nor embossed, and remains uninspected and unevaluated, and is nothing more than an abstract digital creation from an unknown and unprovable source which has never been photographed, -especially by anyone outside of the suspected ring of conspirators?
By the public release of a pdf image of what is purported to be an original Hawaiian long-form Certificate of Live Birth, and by seeking and winning election to the Presidency, Barack Obama has no further claim to privacy, and yet will not give Hawaii permission to reveal his original “vital record” supposedly typed on a plain white paper form. That record does not exist, and never has, and that is why he must refuse to make it public, and instead rely on a digital creation fabricated on a computer using the text of his mother’s application for a late birth certificate (for home births unverified by an attending medical professional) and text from another’s birth certificate.
What business or organization in the world would accept a document or contract of major importance without a signature when every legal document created requires one? Who would buy a million dollar bridge offered by a Nigerian “businessman” based on trusting in a contract stamped with a facsimile of a signature?
Why does an unauthenticated “Letter of Verification” from Hawaii to a state Attorney General regarding Obama not bear the actual signature of a human being? How can anyone have confidence that the clerk that wields the registrar’s rubber signature stamp ever even consults with the registrar? Without the signature from his hand, how does anyone know that he is even alive?
Why is the US Customs microfilm record of the identification cards filled-out by persons entering Hawaii from outside the U.S. in the first week or 10 days of August 1961 missing from the archive reel on which it belongs?
Why is there no evidence of a husband & wife marriage between Obama’s parents, no witness testimony, no photos of the engaged couple, nor honeymoon, nor place of cohabitation? Why did Obama, or his ghost writer, claim that they lived together for two years when they didn’t live together ever? If that can be a lie, what can’t?
Where was Ann Dunham between February and August of 1961? Who can prove or show that she was not living in her familiar preferred home-environment of Seattle during many of the later months of her pregnancy?
Who can show that she did not want to have her child adopted when that is what a note by a federal official in Hawaii states the she was considering? Who can show that she didn’t resort to seeking adoptive parents in Canada (Vancouver) because no qualified parents in Hawaii or Washington volunteered to adopt her mulatto baby at birth?
Who can show that the Hawaiian witness (and future adoring teacher of Obama) who recounted hearing the statement: “Stanley had a baby” did not hear; “A Stanley had a baby”, with the letter “a” not remembered or spoken loud enough to hear or remember, which struck them both as very odd since Stanley was a man’s name. Or that either statement indicates the place of birth? Otherwise, why would anyone make such a statement to someone who didn’t even know the person being mentioned?
Why has Obama steadfastly refused to present one of his “two certified copies” to any court under any circumstances? Why has every court folded and caved to Obama even when, in one glaring instance, his lawyer failed to even show up in court?
What naïve fool would assume that Obama-appointed functionaries in the government, including the NSA, IRS, and FBI did not and do not feed his political operatives private information?
If one cannot assume that they don’t, then what else can’t one assume?
What naïve fool would assume that the revelations of Edward Snowden do not reveal anything about how secrets are uncovered and covered-up by operatives hired by the government? What naïve fool would assume that key Obama supporters in the Hawaiian Dept. of Health would not justify “the means” used to provide him a way to present the appearance of having a Hawaiian birth certificate for “the ends” of not seeing his presidential legitimacy crack apart and crumble?
Even if none of these possibilities reflect reality, they definitely could, -and you can’t tell the difference between what’s true and what’s false because none of them have been answered.
By Adrien Nash july 2013 obama–nation.com
[ Jack Cashill wrote: Birthers have known for years that there was no Obama family, that the couple never lived together, that Obama campaigned on a lie, and that the major media covered for him every step of the way. This, ironically, Maraniss confirms in Barack Obama: The Story,..
“In the college life of Barack Obama [Senior] in 1961 and 1962,” writes Maraniss, “as recounted by his friends and acquaintances in Honolulu, there was no Ann; there was no baby.”
Although Maraniss talked to many of Obama Sr.’s friends, none of the credible ones ever so much as saw him with Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham. One Obama friend, a Cambodian named Kiri Tith, knew the senior Obama “very well.” He had also met Ann through a different channel. “But he had no idea,” writes Maraniss, “that Ann knew Obama, let alone got hapai (pregnant) by him, married him, and had a son with him.” Jack Cashill
Having established the facts, Maraniss turns protective. He refuses to explore the implications of his own reporting. The most consequential is that Obama grounded his 2008 campaign — his very persona, for that matter — on a family story that was pure fraud.