Proof Obama’s Birth Certificate Can’t Possibly Be Real

FEDERAL LAW dictates that Obama is a counterfeiter.

When was the seal of the Hawaiian Dept. of Health (as seen on Obama’s birth certificate) verified as authentic?  Never, -it can’t be since it does not appear on Obama’s fake certificate of Live Birth.  But if it did, it still could not be authenticated since the document has never been submitted to anyone for analysis nor examination.  It is unvetted as having been produced by the Hawaiian Dept of Health as an official Certificate.  That is why I refer to it as a document and not a certificate.  It is not CERTIFIED!

It lacks an official seal, it lacks an official signature, and it lacks corroboration under oath that it was the official production of the government from a real, untampered, unaltered original Hawaiian hospital Certificate, -or an equally unaltered micro-film image of the original.

INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT OF 2004
PUBLIC LAW 108–458—DEC. 17, 2004 (p.189)

SEC. 7211. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR BIRTH CERTIFICATES.
(b) STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY FEDERAL AGENCIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.
Beginning 2 years after the promulgation of minimum standards under paragraph (3), no Federal agency may accept a birth certificate for any official purpose unless the certificate conforms to such standards.

(A) at a minimum, shall require certification of the birth certificate by the State or local government custodian of record that issued the certificate, and shall require the use of safety paper or an alternative, equally secure medium, the seal of the issuing custodian of record, and other features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or otherwise duplicating the birth certificate for fraudulent purposes. [that should included by law an actual signature, -something that Hawaii fails to supply, thus adding to the risk of counterfeiting.]

~     ~     ~

Federal Law requires that no birth certificates be issued which are not abstracts.  [“Safety paper” is in actuality “security paper” since safety implies physical safety (as if it might otherwise spontaneously combustion] .

The usage of safety paper requires the abandonment of the issuance of TRUE COPIES since they contain no security pattern.  That means that the imagery of the original paper that the original certificate was filled-out on must not be retained, -it must be deleted via the process that was used when the micro-filmed records were all digitized.   That process retained the text alone, and eliminated the background paper it was typed and written on.  In its place appeared the safely paper imagery which became its new background.

So by United States federal law, no original birth certificate image will ever again see the light of day in the form of a certified Certificate of Live Birth.  They are all ABSTRACTS of the originals, -saved in the digital realm as text only, and thus highly susceptible to digital alteration by anyone with access to the records data-base.

The traitors in the White House and the Hawaiian Dept. of Health claimed that the copying of Obama’s “original birth certificate” was witnessed by Fuddy (the dept. head) and thus doubly certified by an official government department director, and… that the result of that scan & print was the image seen in the pdf.

If that were actually true, then we would see the paper that the supposed original was typed on, but we don’t since IT IS MISSING!  Instead we we safety paper.  Where did the original paper go?  It never existed.

Instead, what did exist was a digitized image of a micro-film record of an affidavit written out and signed by Ann Dunham, and then typed-up by a clerk using the information she related about herself and the child’s father.  The former Director of the Dept. of Health, Dr. Fukino, related that all that was found in their archive for Obama was “something half-written and half-typed”.

That original record was the source in their digital data-base for text that could be used in the creation of a counterfeit.  It’s creation implicates the mysteriously killed Loretta Fuddy, who was not a medical professional nor a doctor, but replaced Fukino’s replacement just a few weeks after his appointment with the lying story that he had suddenly “resigned”, to which he responded that that was news to him.

Fuddy, as a loyal Obama supporter who was willing to commit a clandestine, unprovable felony for him, was needed in order to allow the production of the counterfeit.  Hence the man she replaced had to go since he couldn’t be trusted to be “a team player”.
As recently discovered, both Fuddy and Obama’s mother were members of the Subuh cult which originated in Indonesia and came to Hawaii in the 1960s as its founder spread its “gospel”.  Fuddy, in fact was one of its leaders in Hawaii.
So what some consider to be an imaginary conspiracy was in fact a real conspiracy.  It didn’t stop there; it included replacing the micro-film reels of the Hawaiian newspapers that showed no Obama birth during the week he was born.  Replacing the “records” of those papers was also an element of the conspiracy, and it worked like a charm, -deceiving everyone unwilling to look just one step further.  They also secretly stole his registration number from a baby that died the day he was born.  All bases covered.  Operation Obama Fraud a success.  Everyone deceived…. almost.

by adrien nash,  march 2014  obama–nation.com

Why Obama’s Birth Certificate Can’t Possibly Be Real  PDF

Advertisements

About arnash
“When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect.” - Mark Twain - Politicians and diapers - change 'em often, for the same reason. "Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other." Ronald Reagan "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." William F. Buckley, Jr. “The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell The people are the masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it. Abraham Lincoln “Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell “Satan will use a lake of truth to hide a pint of poison”.

11 Responses to Proof Obama’s Birth Certificate Can’t Possibly Be Real

  1. smrstrauss says:

    Re Fuddy:

    smrstraussJanuary 16, 2014 at 11:09 AM

    Fuddy was just one of FOUR officials who confirmed Obama’s birth certificate…
    [NO ONE FROM HAWAII HAS CONFIRMED ANYTHING. ALL THEY’VE DONE IS ISSUE NON-BINDING, ALMOST ALWAYS UNSIGNED STATEMENTS, ALL OF WHICH I’VE THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED AND EXPOSED.]

    So, if she were murdered (which is unlikely and the police in Hawaii say that She died from an irregular heartbeat, but say that she had been murdered) then the motive for the murder could have been that she was about to cut someone out of her will or a jilted lover did it, or she was about to investigate a major drug company. All of those motives are just as strong as the notion that Obama killed one of four officials who confirmed his birth certificate—-when there isn’t even a shred of a hint that she was going to change her story and NOT confirm it.

  2. p frana says:

    I was born in Hawaii a year after Obama, and my official birth certificate from the state of Hawaii looks NOTHING like the thing he shows as his official certificate. My father was stationed in Oahu when I was born. The whole format and color is totally off, mine is black background with white print, and has the raised seal from theState of Hawaii in the center. Totally different!!!!!!!!!

    • arnash says:

      Mine is similar. They are a “True Copy” because they are an exact reproduction in negative of the original micro-film image which was also in negative like all negatives. Such certificates are now no longer allowed since they lack the security paper background.

    • smrstrauss says:

      Re: “I was born in Hawaii a year after Obama, and my official birth certificate from the state of Hawaii looks NOTHING like…”

      Answer: Neither Obama’s short form birth certificate nor his long form birth certificate were made in 1961.

      The short form birth certificate is a computer-generated copy—-because it is SUPPOSED to be a computer-generated copy, that is how the short-form system works—made in 2007 when Obama asked for that copy to be sent to him.
      [WHY DIDN’T HE SIMPLY RELEASE A SCAN OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE THAT HE USED ALL OF HIS ADULT LIFE? DID HE NOT NEED ONE TO BECOME A LICENSED ATTORNEY OR TO OBTAIN DRIVERS LICENSES? WHERE IS THAT BC? ANSWER: IT NEVER EXISTED! HE USED HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT AS HIS OFFICIAL IDENTIFICATION, AND NEVER TOOK THE ILLINOIS STATE BAR EXAM. HE GOT MEMBERSHIP TO THE BAR THROUGH THE BACK DOOR SINCE THE TEST IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THOSE WHO ONLY GO INTO INSTRUCTION. IF YOU NEEDED YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR RENEWING YOUR LICENSE OR WHATEVER, WOULD YOU HAVE TO ORDER A NEW ONE AS IF YOU NEVER HAD ONE BEFORE?]

      His long-form birth certificate is a modern photocopy (using modern black on white technology, not the white on black of the 1960s) of the original in the file onto modern security paper with the modern seal and signature of the current registrar attached, sent to Obama in 2011. So, neither of them are supposed to look like the original.

      [IDIOT! A PHOTOCOPY? THEN WHERE IS THE IMAGERY OF THE PAPER THAT THE ORIGINAL WAS TYPED ON? IT’S GONE BECAUSE THERE NEVER WAS AN ORIGINAL HOSPITAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE. READ WHAT I WROTE AND YOU WON’T THEN EXPOSE YOUR IGNORANCE AND STUPIDITY.]

      So, why doesn’t Obama show the original that was sent to him? Because, like millions of people, he lost the original that was sent to his family, so he had to get copies.
      [WHEN DID OBAMA EVER STATE THAT HE LOST ANYTHING? WHERE IS HIS EXPLANATION FOR WHY HE “REQUESTED A COPY”? ALL HE REQUESTED WAS A COUNTERFEIT, AND THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT HE GOT AND RELEASED.]

      So why doesn’t Obama show the copy that is in the files? Because the copy in the files does not belong to him; it belongs to Hawaii—which does not show the file copies but only sends out official copies on security paper. So, why doesn’t Hawaii allow outsiders into its files to see the originals. Because, like other states, it restricts access to the DOH file because someone might steal or alter documents.

      [THAT MAKES SO MUCH SENSE. WHO CAN ARGUE WITH IT. AND WHO CAN PROVE THAT ANYTHING OTHER THAN HIS MOTHER’S FAILED AFFIDAVIT EVER EXISTED, -OTHER THAN THE TYPED VERSION OF IT? PROOF PLEASE. TOO BAD THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE AND THAT WAS WHY THE ATTORNEY FOR DUNHAM DURING HER DIVORCE, AND WHO WAS ALSO THE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OF HAWAII IN 2008 REFUSED TO CERTIFY OBAMA AS THE OFFICIAL CANDIDATE OF THE HAWAIIAN PARTY. HE KNEW OBAMA WAS NOT BORN OF AN AMERICAN FATHER NOR EVEN BORN IN AMERICA.]

      So, both Obama’s short form and long form are MODERN documents and are supposed to be. The issue is whether the facts on them are exactly the same as the copy in the files.
      [NO, THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE. THE ISSUE IS THAT THE COPY IN THE FILES (MEANING THE COMPUTER DATA-BASE), IS A PLANTED COUNTERFEIT WHICH MAKES IT A LEGALLY CORRECT STATEMENT TO SAY THAT THE INFO OF THE PDF MATCHES WHAT IS IN THEIR CORRUPTED DATA-BASE. LO AND BEHOLD! THEY MATCH! HOW CONVENIENT THAT THEY WERE BOTH PRODUCED BY THE SAME COUNTERFEITER. I’M SO NOT SHOCKED!]

      And that is what the officials in Hawaii have repeatedly said is true. [AND THEN BONNIE ASKED CLYDE; DID YOU ROB THAT BANK CLYDE? TO WHICH HE REPLIED; OF COURSE NOT BONNIE? TO WHICH SHE ANSWERED; I BELIEVE YOU. WHY WOULD YOU LIE?]
      The facts on the short form and the long form are both exactly the same as on the copies in the [DIGITAL DATA-BASE] files and on the copies that they sent to Obama.

      So, I expect the next question from skeptics will be—“so, if he really was born in Hawaii, so hoW come his PDF is so obviously forged?” And the answer to that is very very simple. It isn’t forged. IT ISN’T FORGED. Birther sites simply have found people who CLAIM to be experts who claim that it is forged, and they have NOT showN their readers all the real experts who said that the PDF isn’t forged, and they have not explained the Xerox WorkCenter research:

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/
      [IF YOU WERE NOT FULL TIME BUSY SPREADING YOUR DELUSIONS AND LIES ANYWHERE THEY CAN BE PUBLISHED, YOU MIGHT HAVE READ WHAT I’VE WRITTEN AND STATED EVEN ON MY HOME PAGE, WHICH IS THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORKCENTER BEING THE PRODUCER OF MOST OR ALL OF THE PDF ANOMALIES (EXCEPT THE SMILEY FACT ADDED BY THE COUNTERFEITER) BUT THAT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE IMPOSSIBILITIES SEEN IN THE TEXT ITSELF.

      I’M SPEAKING OF THE RESULTS OF THE GRID ANALYSIS WHICH IS IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS PASTED TOGETHER FROM PIECES OF TEXT IMAGERY USING A PHOTO-EDITING PROGRAM. I COULD DO THE SAME THING IN A LONG AFTERNOON. THE TYPE SIMPLY DOES NOT ALIGN AS WOULD EVERY TYPED CERTIFICATE EVER MADE.
      SO THE ANOMALIES OF THE PDF ARE IRRELEVANT TO WHETHER OR NOT THE ORIGINAL COUNTERFEIT DOCUMENT THAT WAS SCANNED TO PRODUCE IT IS LEGITIMATE. THE SCANNED FAKE IS WHAT IS FAKE. FORGET ABOUT THE PDF AND ITS STRANGE CONSTRUCTION. THAT ISSUE DOESN’T SAVE OBAMA FROM THE GUILT OF HAVING A COUNTERFEIT PRODUCED WHICH WAS SCANNED TO PRODUCE THE WEIRD WORKSTATION PDF. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW?]

      So, not only can Obama’s birth certificate POSSIBLY be real, it IS real. And the officials of both parties in Hawaii have confirmed that they SENT IT TO HIM and that all the facts on the copy the White House put online are exactly the same as on what they sent to him.
      [YADY, YADY, YADY. TRUTH MIXED WITH LIES. KOOL-AID FLAVORED WITH FALSEHOODS. YUM! DRINK IT ALL DOWN YOU GULLIBLE DUMB SUCKERS!]

  3. smrstrauss says:

    Re: “WHY DIDN’T HE SIMPLY RELEASE A SCAN OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE THAT HE USED ALL OF HIS ADULT LIFE? DID HE NOT NEED ONE TO BECOME A LICENSED ATTORNEY OR TO OBTAIN DRIVERS LICENSES? WHERE IS THAT BC? ANSWER: IT NEVER EXISTED! HE USED HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT AS HIS OFFICIAL IDENTIFICATION, AND NEVER TOOK THE ILLINOIS STATE BAR EXAM.]”

    Answer: We KNOW that he asked Hawaii to send him a new copy in 2007. That means that he had a copy of his original birth certificate in the Hawaii files. If he did not have a BC in the Hawaii files, asking for a copy would be useless.

    [YOU ARE FACTUALLY CHALLENGED AND LOGIC-DEFICIENT. BUT WORSE THAN THAT, YOU ARE A LIAR. WHAT WE “KNOW” IS NOTHING. DO YOU EVEN GRASP WHAT “KNOW” EVEN MEANS?

    THE KOOL-AID DRINKERS “KNOW” THAT IT IS BEST FOR THEM BECAUSE THEIR LEADERS TELL THEM SO. PEOPLE LIKE THAT, WHICH INCLUDES YOU, CAN’T BE FIXED BECAUSE YOU ARE TERMINALLY GULLIBLE AND OBEDIENT IN YOUR MANNER OF THINKING, -UNLESS OF COURSE YOU ARE SIMPLY BEING PAID TO REENFORCE THE COUNTERFEIT PRESIDENT’S CREDIBILITY.

    HERE’S WHAT WE KNOW; HE NEVER ASKED HAWAII FOR A COPY OF A BIRTH CERTIFICATE WHICH HE KNEW DID NOT EXIST. BUT SOMEBODY ON HIS BEHAVE ARRANGED FOR A FAKE SHORT-FORM BC TO APPEAR ON THE INTERNET, UNVETTED, UNEXPLAINED, UNACCOUNTED FOR. THAT WAY WHEN OR IF IT WAS EXPOSED AS THE FAKE THAT IT IS, IT COULDN’T BE TIED TO THE WHITE HOUSE OR OBAMA. IT SIMPLY APPEARED OUT OF NOWHERE WITH NO ATTRIBUTION AS TO ITS SOURCE. VERY PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.
    AND YOUR DECEIT IS SEEN BY THE FACT THAT YOU CLAIM IT WAS REQUESTED IN 2007 WHEN YOU KNOW FULL WELL THAT IT APPEARED IN JUNE OF 2008. WHERE DID THE JUNE 2007 DATE COME FROM? FROM THE FAINT IMAGE OF A DATE STAMP ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE PAPER, BLEEDING THROUGH TO THE FRONT IN REVERSE, WHICH ONLY SOMEONE’S SHARP EYE DETECTED. THAT DATE WAS AN ENTIRE YEAR EARLIER. I GUESS WE “KNOW” WHAT THAT MEANS. IT WAS “BORROWED” FROM ANOTHER PERSON, AND REUSED VIA PHOTOSHOP.

    The obvious reason for asking for a COPY and no using the one sent to his parents is that he lost any earlier copy that he had. (IF he had had the original, he would have used what he had, of course.) People do lose their birth certificates you know—that is why departments of health send out copies—and they send out millions upon millions of them every year because millions of people lose their originals.
    [MORON! MILLIONS OF HIGHLY COMPETENT GRADUATES OF HARVARD SCHOOL OF LAW DO NOT LOSE THE MOST IMPORTANT DOCUMENT IN THEIR LIFE. HOW WOULD ANY COMPETENT PERSON LOSE THEIR MOST VALUED PAPERS, …OR FAMILY PHOTOS? IT DOESN’T HAPPEN WITH COMPETENT PEOPLE OTHER THAN BY FIRE OR FLOOD OR MASSIVE STORM. SO WHAT ARE YOU SUGGESTING ABOUT OBAMA’S COMPETENCE? IF YOU CAN’T TRUST THE GUY TO HANG ON TO HIS OWN BIRTH CERTIFICATE THEN YOU CAN’T TRUST HIM WITH VERY MUCH.]

  4. smrstrauss says:

    Re: “IF YOU CAN’T TRUST THE GUY TO HANG ON TO HIS OWN BIRTH CERTIFICATE THEN YOU CAN’T TRUST HIM WITH VERY MUCH.]

    Mitt Romney also showed a modern copy of his birth certificate, a short-form that was printed in January 2012, indicating that he also lost the one sent to his parents. (He also is a graduate of Harvard Law School, and in addition, he is a graduate of Harvard Business School.)

  5. smrstrauss says:

    Re: “. I’VE ANALYZED, MICROSCOPED, DISSECTED, AUTOPSIED, EXPOSED AND DEBUNKED ALL OF THEM THOROUGHLY.”

    Answer: Sure you have. Are you trying to sell us a bridge in Brooklyn? (Well, perhaps you can convince a few GULLIBLE people.)

  6. smrstrausss says:

    seven and a half months have passed since this article was posted, and Obama is still the president of the United States, and no member of Congress has even called for an investigation of Obama’s birth certificate. That is in part due to the fact that RATIONAL people know that Obama’s enemies, the birthers, are quite capable of lying about Obama’s birth certificate being forged. That is because they have a strong motive to do so.

    And, BTW, no birther site or anyone who has claimed that Obama’s birth certificate is forged has explained the research on the Xerox WorkCentre:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

  7. arnash says:

    You foolishly err by failing to comprehend what a “lie” actually is. One cannot be accused of “lying” about something which they claim when they believe that their claim is 100% true. One can only lie about that which they know to be false. Those birthers who continue to believe and claim that the pdf is a digital counterfeit, (as I along with all other Obama debunkers believed) are doubtlessly still in the dark and ignorant of the results of the Xerox workstation results because no “establishment” birther website, nor the cold case posse, has openly shared, or even mentioned, those results.

    Those who have taken the time and investigated the reports of the Xerox tests have ceased to claim that the pdf is a counterfeit, but have merely gone silent on the issue unless they have done what I’ve done, -which is to place the spotlight where it belongs, and that is on the thing that all counterfeit birth certificates require, and that is a real, physical paper document that is a fake, and which can be photocopied, -as was the Obama counterfeit paper Certificate of Live Birth.
    I have not yet read a single statement by anyone else who also has pointed out that the counterfeit is a real printed paper “document” and not a pdf internet image.

    The fog of ignorance and confusion is essentially universal. Both birthers and Obamunists believe in falsehoods and misconceptions. Birthers continue to erroneously believe that the pdf is a counterfeit when it is not, while the Obamunists continue to believe that the paper fake is real,…or do they? Are they really able to still delude themselves into thinking that Barry Soetoro ever had a valid Hawaiian hospital certificate of live birth? Even after the dozens of highly questionable circumstances are now known in regard to his unwitnessed and undocumented birth? What circumstances?
    1. His mother had no relationship with his father other than a sexual tryst and common ideological compatibility.
    2. They never lived together.

    3. She wanted to remain as she was prior to having sex with Mr. Obama; single, non-pregnant, and “not punished with having a child”, and that could only mean that her only choice in 1961 was to find an adoptive African-American couple in Hawaii to take the child and raise it as their own. Such a couple did not exist in Hawaii, nor back in her home town of Seattle, nor in Vancouver B.C. across the border, and so she was stuck with keeping her child.

    4. She obtained no birth certificate for him where he was born in Canada, nor anywhere else, meaning Hawaii, since the requirement for authorizing the production of a Dept of Health Certificate of Live Birth included the mother or relatives filling out an affidavit application for a “late” birth registration. His mother filled out that application, and signed it, and it became the basis of the counterfeit which Obama convinced Loretta Fuddy to allow to be made based on it and other documents, which was necessary because no required witnesses existed and no fake witnesses existed who would be willing to commit perjury on paper by signing under oath a false affidavit confirming his mother’s false story of birth at home in Honolulu and then being personally interviewed regarding the details of the birth.

    5. Her affidavit–application was the basis of the announcement of the birth of her son included in the birth announcements printed in the local newspapers from lists supplied by the Dept of Health. There was no doubt that she gave birth and had a son as was reported in that listing, but that is in no way any sort of confirmation as to the truth about exactly where he was born.

    6. With no birth certificate, he was a stateless person on paper even though presumed to be an American and presumed to have been born somewhere in America, such as in Seattle…where his mother was living within a couple of weeks of giving birth, and no doubt, a couple of months before giving birth while seeking an adoptive couple there.

    7. No Obama defender has the faintest hint of a good explanation for why an 18 year old only-child daughter in 1961 would be living 3,000 miles away from her mother and father, with whom she had been still living and under whose roof she gave birth, (or even who gave birth in a Honolulu hospital), when every reason would still exist to be and remain close to them while recovering from birth and caring for a newborn. It can only be explained by the assumption that she was already living there before she gave birth. And if that is the case, then it can only be assumed that she gave birth in Vancouver since no Washington state birth certificate ever existed.
    see: “The Seattle Scenario” and part II: Why Baby Obama Was Born in Vancouver”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: