Why Obama’s Mother Needed A Fake Divorce
March 12, 2014 2 Comments
A Fake Marriage for a Fake Divorce
Most of the “facts” about Obama’s life are in fact fiction. The first lie is that his parents were in love and happily married for two years, when in fact there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to believe that they had anything more than a sexual encounter that produced the unwanted result of a pregnancy. That pregnancy was dealt with in the way I describe in “WHY BABY OBAMA WAS BORN IN VANCOUVER”.
That pregnancy did not result from a love affair nor a marriage since neither occurred. Ann Dunham was a rebel and an experimenter in “the forbidden” -as was learned when photos of her posing nude and semi-nude for the Dunham’s Black Communist Party friend and soft-porn photographer Frank Davis. If she was a virgin prior to meeting him, she no doubt was not after exposing herself to him completely.
So she was not afraid to “walk on the wild side” of life as an atheist rebel who informed her high school friend that she didn’t needed to have a boyfriend or be married in order to have a baby.
Such an attitude was indicative of one who had no reverence for the sanctity of marriage but was sexually and socially liberated from conventional mores.
When she got to know the worldly wise Obama Sr. in college, he appeared as intriguing as Frank Davis had seemed previously, and even more self-confident as a younger man with a very strong and self-gratifying sense of himself.
They were two independent narcissistic peas in a pod. It is not likely at all that they “loved” each other like lovers do, nor wanted to marry each other, -something potential bigamists prefer to avoid (Obama Sr. already being married with two children in Africa).
So with their personalities being what they were, and neither of them wanting to be saddled with a newborn, keeping and raising a child was out of the question. As was marriage. Adoption was the solution.
Marriage would not have been a choice that either of them would have made, and so they didn’t. There is no proof that they did, -so that is very easy to conclude.
But that conclusion has been countered by the fact that they got a divorce. Do unmarried people ever get a divorce? That would be crazy. And that is exactly what every legislature in the land would have thought when they passed their State’s divorce laws. The law in Hawaii was no different
When two people come to a divorce court and seek a divorce, it is automatically assumed that they are married, and thus no proof need be supplied to show that they were. With both parties together seeking a divorce, and stipulating that they are married, all that would be needed was the usual accounting of the property mutually owned. If there was none then a divorce might be quick and easy if allowed by law.
But why would two people who were never married want to get a divorce? Not because of property ownership but because of custody of their child. It had to be legally determined and officially acknowledged. That would be true whether or not the parents were ever married.
Ann Dunham needed to acquire legal custody of her child since she was marrying a foreigner and was intending to move to his country in time. To take her son with her, she would need documents for him, but she had none.
She had no birth certificate for the reasons detailed in “WHY BABY OBAMA WAS BORN IN VANCOUVER” and without that she had no proof that she was his mother, and his father was his father. So… in order to acquire proof of his relationship to them she needed an official acknowledgement of their relationship. That was not and could not have been an element of a marriage but absolutely is and must be an element of any divorce.
If she could have it legally established that she was his mother and his father was his father, then the issue of her legal custody of Jr. could be settled once and for all.
Well, with both parents agreeing in a divorce pleading that they were the parents, and with the father surrendering all parental rights to the mother, the issue of her son being a mystery person without any official papers would be settled by the official divorce decree. Proof of who he was did not need to be supplied because no one would lie about such a thing, -anymore than people would lie about being married. It was all just taken on good faith and by the legality of the papers they would sign, -under penalty of perjury.
With the divorce papers in hand, Ann could go to the Indonesian Embassy or Consulate in Honolulu and her new husband could applied for Indonesian adoption of her son who had no nationality since he had no birth certificate. They did just that and Jr. finally acquired a nationality besides the provisional nationality of his father (which went unregistered with the British Embassy).
By his mother’s fake divorce from a non-existent marriage, she secured for him a way to obtain identification as an Indonesian citizen thanks to an adoptive father who loved her and wanted to be united with her and be a father to her young child.
Thus Barry Dunham became Barry Soetoro, -the person and name he used for the next two decades. He maintained that identity outside of Indonesia by renewing his Indonesian passport every two years. With it he was able to secure benefits as a foreign student while attending college.
Do the records in fact prove that? What records? He won’t allow anyone to see any of his records from any time of his life since running for office (with most of those also off-limits, including who paid what for what influence and benefit).
But are you any different? Aren’t all of your records secret also? Aren’t you a closed book just like Barry? What could possibly seem suspicious about that?
Wasn’t your family narrative a complete fabrication for election considerations? When you recounted how your white grandmother was a typical white person who was born with some innate fear of black people, didn’t you have to read that tale word for word from a teleprompter instead of simply speaking from memory like any person would who was telling the actual truth and not a story?
Obama is like a black hole when it comes to the truth. Like light as it approaches a black hole, the closer one gets to Obama, the more the truth disappears into the black hole of lies, fabrications and falsehood. From beyond the “event horizon” there exists only the darkness of total falsehood.
The man and everything about him except the obvious is fake. But “what does it matter”, “what difference does it make” at this point since he was reelected as foolish potential republican voters stayed home. It they are stupid enough to do that just one for time, we are doomed. What are the odds of that happening again? What were the odds of it happening the last time? About the same it seems, but maybe not, thanks to a national calamity known as Obumer Care which the fools who stayed home couldn’t bother to care to see repealed by their party’s candidate.
Apathy can sink a republic just as surely as all other nefarious forces alone or combined. If one side’s warriors don’t show up to the battle, then the battle is surely lost. Let’s pray they aren’t so indifferent next time because the enemy is not at the gates, -he is inside the gates.
It time to wake the hell up, sound the alarm, put on one’s armor and go out to oppose him with all the strength one can muster. Anything less will result in defeat ‘cause he ain’t foolin’ around. He’s out for blood. And he get it if we let him.
by adrien nash march 2014, obama–nation.com