Lies & Fictions about Obama’s Unwitnessed Birth

http://archive.today/HU7pv

Updated: 01/20/09

Teacher from Kenmore recalls Obama was a focused student

By Paula Voell
NEWS STAFF REPORTER
When Barack Hussein Obama places his hand on the Bible today to take the oath of office as 44th president of the United States, Barbara Nelson of Kenmore will undoubtedly think back to the day he was born. It was Aug. 4, 1961, at Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu.
 [Can you really think back to a day that you have no memory off, a day that she cannot identify by the calendar?  What follows contains no hint as to what day it happened.]
“I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. [How exactly do you remember something that you did not witness??? And what exactly does “specifically” refer to?]
His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98.  [And falsehood # 2 appears: Nelson never said that Dr. West delivered him, so why is there a quotation mark at the end of that sentence but not at the beginning?  Was it supposed to be a quote or not?]
Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls.
His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”
[Nash notes: The Dr. failed to clearly speak the first word of his reply, or she failed to hear it since it was nothing more than the letter “a”.  It is very normal to semi-speak that vowel when it starts a sentence since it is normally pronounced: “uh”, instead of as the long version pronunciation (“A”).  What he said was: “uh Stanley had a baby.”  It’s all too common to truncate the “uh” and not speak it loud enough to be heard.  A similar failure of pronunciation occurred with the most famous words ever spoken: “That’s one small step for (uh) man, -one giant leap for mankind.”  Neil Armstrong, Apollo 11.]
The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.
“I penned the name on a napkin, and I did write home about it,” said Nelson, knowing that her father, Stanley A. Czurles, director of the Art Education Department at Buffalo State College, would be interested in the “Stanley” connection.
[Since neither of them knew the person of Stanley Ann Dunham, it struck them both as very odd that a female would have such a name.  If they both knew her, then it would make sense to say that “Stanley had a baby”, rather than a Stanley.]
She also remembers Dr. West mentioning that the baby’s father was the first black student at the University of Hawaii and how taken he was by the baby’s name.
 Nelson went on to be a high school principal, a harpist, a watercolor artist and poet.
Nelson encountered “Barry” again, when she watched high school basketball games, where her students played.
“The team came alive when he got on the court,” she said. “He was not only quick and graceful, but he could see the pattern and zero in on the opening. Though he wasn’t a starter, he was a graceful, passionate athlete who played back-up forward. He had a definite presence on the court.
[apparently so, at least in her worshipful mind.  He was unskilled, and motivation does not translate into skill, which is either natural or honed into being by a million hours practicing, which didn’t interest a self-admitted lazy person.  At the White House he demonstrated his skill by missing about 19 out of 21 shots at the hoop. And we’ve all seen how great he throws a baseball.]
“I often sat with his grandmother, who was a no-nonsense woman with these very solid Midwestern ways about her,” said Nelson. “She loved that boy and he adored her.”
As a high school teacher of British, Biblical and Middle Eastern literature, Nelson taught Obama.
“He wasn’t usually the first one to speak, but he was an attentive, active listener,” she said. “While the others might be bouncing off the surface, he came straight from the center. He picked up on the patterns of ideas and then he’d make a statement that moved the class to the focal point.
[Translation, the answers by everyone else were boring to me and I couldn’t have cared less about them, but Barry had fascinating answers because he was so different and fascinating and I definitely was not bored with him, he intrigued me deeply with his exotic origins, -so unorthodox! ]
“He also had a lovely, engaging sense of humor,” Nelson said. “He was firm, but he wasn’t aggressive or in your face.” [and what students are ever “aggressive or in your face” in Hawaii??]
During one class the question was posed “of what should we be most afraid,” drawing answers that included “death,” “hell,” “biological warfare,” “fear” and “isolation,” said Nelson.  [clearly, very superficial things all. (???)]
“I recall Barack sitting in the back of the room,” Nelson said, demonstrating a hands-behind-his- head pose and describing his lanky, outstretched legs.  [why in God’s name, would anyone remember clearly exactly what posture one specific student had when he was but one of a couple dozen???  -unless one had a odd fascination with him, and it seems she must have.]
“When he pulled himself upright I thought ‘Bingo. Here we go,’ ” she said, expecting the discussion to move to a new level.  [“A NEW LEVEL”??? What level comes after “DEATH” “WEAPONS OF MASS DEATH, and HELL???  BINGO!  NOTHING!]
“And he said, ‘Words. Words are the power to be feared most. Every individual has an unmonitored arsenal and whether they are directed personally or internationally, words can be weapons of destruction.”
[Well!  If ever I read words that were NOT the words of a dope-smoking, lazy, middle-class kid in an elite academy, it would be those.  “an unmonitored arsenal”, sure… those came out of Barry’s mind and mouth, -when pigs fly.  If he was so insightful, so thoughtful, so wise, then where are the transcripts from any of his schools???  Hidden forever.]
It was such moments that led Nelson to honor Obama at his 1979 graduation with the traditional draping of a lei around his neck.
“I had a yellow plumeria tree and I could get only enough blossoms to make five leis,” she said. “I had taught more than 200 students, but one of those leis went around the shoulders of Barack Obama.”  [So she effectually admits that she had a school-girl crush on him since she singled him out as one in forty to be honor, but honored for what??  Grades??  Why did she deny a student who worked his or her ass off to get stellar grades by singling out a lazy student except that she felt an affinity toward him, -he, the undeserving?]
Years later, the ideas Obama expressed resonated as Nelson wrote “War of the Words,” which includes the lines: “ I fear the powerful pugnacious words, Weapons that miss the flesh and pierce the heart.” (Songs of Honor, 2006).  [more imaginative writing, -the imagination never sleeps.]
In the author’s notes, Nelson describes the classroom discussion with Obama that inspired the poem and she adds this information: “Interestingly, this former student is now a very wise, articulate U. S. senator.”
[that’s “information”?  Since when is an adoring opinion considered information?  Apparently since both women, (interviewer and interviewee) were Obama-lovers.  And why not be, since he was sooooo wise, wise enough to have Bill Ayers ghost-write his “great” autobiography, which is also full of great-reading fictional accounts, including over 30 identical nautical phrases that Ayers used in his own published book.
Gee, how did that happen?  Surely they could not have come from the same mind?  -the mind of someone who was a friend and neighbor, a co-workers at running the Annenberg Chicago Challenge Foundation, and whose home was the site of the launch of Obama’s political career.  That mind?  Oh, that’s just conspiracy talk!  Pay it no mind, … no mind at all.  -and stop looking behind that curtain!
This interview almost reads like an adoring O.J. Simpson fan interviewing an adoring O.J. Simpson juror.]
Copyright 1999 – 2009 – The Buffalo News copyright-protected material.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Into this already incendiary political drama now comes mega-author Jerome Corsi – both of whose two previous No. 1 New York Times bestsellers have profoundly impacted the U.S. presidency – with “Where’s the Birth Certificate?: The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President.” Published by Washington, D.C.-based WND Books, a division of online news giant WND.com, the book launches nationally on May 17.But a month before its debut, it had already rocketed to No. 1 on Amazon’s bestseller list.

In fact, Obama’s release, after years of stonewalling, of what is purported to be his long-form birth certificate, was a preemptive strike against this book. As the Washington Post has documented, it was April 21 that Obama had his team of lawyers contact Hawaii about releasing the document. That would be exactly one day after “The Drudge Report” featured Corsi’s book, propelling it to top bestseller status. Obama’s preemptive move was understandable: Presidents and presidential candidates have been afraid of Corsi ever since “Unfit for Command,” coauthored with John O’Neill, thwarted John Kerry’s presidential ambitions in 2004.

In this controversial new book, going far beyond the issue of birth certificates, Corsi documents conclusively that no legal authority has ever verified Obama’s legal eligibility to be president, that glaring inconsistencies, blackouts and outright fabrications in his life narrative have generated widespread doubts, and that, in fact, a compelling body of evidence says Obama is not a natural-born citizen as is required of all presidents by Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution.

~ Why does Obama have 2 different birth doctors? ~

Buffalo News, Snopes, Hawaii disagree on attending physician

Posted: May 03, 2011

The White House release of a copy of Barack Obama’s long-form Hawaian birth certificate continues to raise more questions – since the name of the president’s attending physician differs from previous published reports.

The name on the purported birth certificate lists Dr. David Sinclair as the obstetrician who delivered Obama in 1961.

But reports by the Buffalo News and supposedly confirmed by the hoax-busting website Snopes.com indicate the name of Obama’s birth physician was Dr. Rodney T. West.

Yet a report that West was the attending physician – and not Sinclair – comes from Snopes.com, the self-described “definitive Internet reference source”:

Snopes reference to Obama birth physician: The name was originally identified in a news story by reporter Paula Voell of the Buffalo News in upstate New York:

The previous reports, which date to Jan. 20, 2009, quote a New York woman, Barbara Nelson, who said she “remembers” the birth of Barack Obama. Her statements later were cited by the Democratic Underground website under the headline “Independent Confirmation of Obama’s Birth.

The references continued to appear online as late as this afternoon. WND could get no on-the-record response from the Buffalo newspaper. The Snopes report appeared to be based on the newspaper report.

In 2009, Obama supporters jumped on the Buffalo paper’s story, which quotes Nelson saying she may be the only person left “who specifically remembers his birth.”

The report continued: “‘I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,’ said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98.”

However, Nelson later told WND that her knowledge of the birth came only from West, with whom she was dining, and the subject was brought up because of the mother’s novel name and the “musical” name of the son, Barack Hussein Obama.

She told WND at the time that the conversation also was memorable because Obama’s mother’s name was Stanley, named after her father, and the son also was named after his father.

However, Nelson told WND, “I don’t know in what capacity [West] knew about this particular birth.”

Nevertheless, the “reports” continue to cite the reference to West as “the obstetrician who had delivered him.” [a lie of the obamunists seeking to fill in a black hole where his background narrative should be.]

Nelson explained that West was a leader in the development of obstetrics services throughout Hawaii before Obama was born, however, she said the assumption that West delivered the baby, or that she said that, were wrong.

“Being one of the leaders in obstetrics in Hawaii, he could have had physical or informational access to all of the obstetrics [on the islands],” she told WND.

The discussion centered on the “peculiarity of a woman named Stanley,” she said.

“I just said tell me something [that has happened],” she said. “And he says Stanley had a baby, and that’s something to write home about.”

[Nash repeats: The Dr. failed to clearly speaking the first word of his reply, or she failed to hear it since it was nothing more than the letter “a”.  It is very normal to semi-speak that vowel when it starts a sentence since it is normally pronounced: “uh”, instead of as the long version pronunciation (“A”).  What he said was: “a Stanley had a baby.”  A similar failure of pronunciation occurred with the most famous words ever spoken: “That’s one small step for (uh) man, -one giant leap for mankind.”  Neil Armstrong, Apollo 11.]

He also told her the father was the first African student at the University of Hawaii, “another interesting local thing,” Nelson told WND.

“[West] never said to me, ‘I delivered a baby,'” Nelson said.

Read more: Why does Obama have 2 different birth doctors?http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=294665#ixzz1LROHPtqb

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OBAMA’S HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER CLAIMS DIFFERENT DOCTOR

by Miki Booth

Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate

(Apr. 27, 2011, Tulsa, OK) —The putative president and his enablers have really gone over the line today, Wednesday April, 27, 2011. It just goes to show there is a culture of fear and desperation in the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

First off today, World Net Daily published a scathing expose of Hawai’i Dept. of Health and their “helter-skelter” handling of requests for long form birth certificates. They have been doing incredible documentary acrobatics changing policy and procedure to fit Obama’s claims.

With the release today of the newly “cooked” copy of his birth record Obama has brought the wrath of every red-blooded American down on his head. His father was a British subject therefore Obama is not an Article II, Section I constitutionally eligible “natural born citizen.” He has illegally taken our government and surrounded himself with enemies of the Constitution and those cronies decided today was the day to release this particular red herring.

Why now? Why not last year when he could have kept an 18-year decorated Army flight surgeon from going to federal prison for asking to see the document that Obama now flaunts with seeming impunity.   Terry Lakin is nearing completion of a 6-month prison term, leaving Leavenworth stripped of his 18-year career, dismissed from the Army and loss of all benefits. The most disgusting aspect of this travesty is the heartless punishment of putting him in prison three days before Christmas, away from his wife and three children. A clear message to anyone that would challenge Obama’s legitimacy.

The unraveling has begun. Today there are big changes in the Intelligence community. New players and musical chairs in the CIA. Create clutter, create confusion, backlog inquiries, and shake everything up to avoid evidence getting shook out.

Read the Vancouver Scenario that I wrote a few years ago, followed by the Seattle scenario, and its part II “Why Baby Obama Was Born in Vancouver.

Adrien Nash  July 2014

Advertisements

About arnash
“When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect.” - Mark Twain - Politicians and diapers - change 'em often, for the same reason. "Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other." Ronald Reagan "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." William F. Buckley, Jr. “The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell The people are the masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it. Abraham Lincoln “Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell “Satan will use a lake of truth to hide a pint of poison”.

6 Responses to Lies & Fictions about Obama’s Unwitnessed Birth

  1. smrstrausss says:

    FIRST READ “WHY BABY OBAMA WAS BORN IN VANCOUVER” AND “THE SEATTLE SCENARIO”, THEN WE CAN TALK.

  2. smrstrauss says:

    First find evidence, any hospital document or official birth certificate showing that Obama was born in Vancouver. They keep excellent records there. When you have evidence, anything at all, then you can post it. I suggest a trip to Vancouver. It is lovely this time of the year. In any case, so far you have not shown ANYTHING from Vancouver.

    In contrast, there is a birth certificate from Hawaii, and it has been confirmed

    In contrast, you have nothing whatever to show from VANCOUVER.

    Reply: I guess I need to create a fake Vancouver birth certificate so that the Kool-Aid drinkers will accept the fact that he was born there.
    Why do you claim that I claim that he was born in a hospital in Vancouver when I never claimed any such thing? What I did claim is that if he was, his mother left after only a day to two, before birth certificate information forms would have been given to her. Even if they were given sooner, she didn’t care because she was leaving quickly, and wasn’t sticking around for obtaining one since she was not interested in her child being Canadian.

    She assumed, incorrectly, that everything would work out if she just explained the facts to the government. But that was not enough since explaining had to be accompanied by proving, and her story was that he was born in Honolulu at home, but she could not prove that, so neither the U.S. State Dept. nor the Hawaii Dept of Health could provide her child with a birth certificate.
    Just because he was presumed to be a citizen since his mother signed a sworn affidavit saying he was born in Hawaii, and the INS was aware of it, did not constitute grounds for providing him a U.S. passport without a State birth certificate, and without such proof, he had no proof of citizenship. He was a stateless person until adopted by Lolo Soetoro, who provided him with Indonesian citizenship and an Indonesian passport.
    It all fits perfectly, and explains his need at later middle-age to concoct something that he never had, -and never really needed, until seeking the highest office in the world.

  3. smrstrausss says:

    Re: “Reply: I guess I need to create a fake Vancouver birth certificate so that the Kool-Aid drinkers will accept the fact that he was born there.”

    There are hundreds of hospital documents that you could look at and hundreds of people who worked in the hospitals in Vancouver. BUT you haven’t even tried to get EVIDENCE. To you the mere possibility that Obama was born in Vancouver (and, BTW, it is possible that he was born in Seattle or Los Angeles or Boise too, but you rule those out because they are US soil. The one thing that makes them ALL like Vancouver is that there isn’t a shred of evidence that Obama was born there). The sensible rule is that when there isn’t any evidence that something happened, then it didn’t happen—and that is ESPECIALLY true when there is evidence that something ELSE happened. And the something else for Obama was birth in HAWAII

    It is YOU who have been having a fantasy. When and IF you get EVIDENCE that Obama was born in Vancouver—not just that he COULD have been born there, not just that you would like for him to have been born there—-let us know.

    [YOU ARE A DYED IN THE WOOL KOOL-AID DRINKING MEMBER OF THE THREE MONKEYS. I DO NOT HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING SINCE THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON THE ONE MAKING THE CLAIM OF LEGITIMACY. OBAMA CAN’T PROVE HIS LEGITIMACY, AND YOU CAN’T HELP HIM.

    THE PROBLEM ISN’T OF THERE BEING NO PROOF THAT HE WAS BORN IN VANCOUVER, BUT THAT THERE IS NO PROOF THAT HE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN BORN IN VANCOUVER, AND ALL OF THE OTHER DETAILS OF THE VANCOUVER SCENARIO.

    YOU HAVE NOT A SINGLE WITNESS WHO REMEMBERS A YOUNG WHITE WOMEN GIVING BIRTH IN HAWAII TO A BLACK BABY OF A PURE BLACK AFRICAN FATHER, THE FIRST ONE AT THE UNIVERSITY. NOT A SINGLE PERSON LIVING CAN CONFIRM THAT SCENARIO, AND THAT IS A HUGE HOLE IN OBAMA’S LYING SCENARIO.

    BUT HIS MOTHER TOLD HIM HE WAS BORN IN HAWAII, SO THAT’S GOOD ENOUGH FOR HIM, AND YOU, AND ALL OF THE ANTI-CONSTITUTION, ANTI-AMERICAN SOCIALIST LEFT IN THIS COUNTRY. LIKE DOROTHY JUST CLOSING HER EYES AND WISHING FOR IT TO BE SO, -OH PLEASE LET IT BE SO…

    BUT IT IS NOT SO OR THERE WOULD BE TALE-TELL EVIDENCE AND THERE IS NOTHING BUT WHAT I’VE DESCRIBED; A HALF HANDWRITTEN AND HALF TYPED AFFIDAVIT COMPLETED BY HIS MOTHER BUT NEVER VERIFIED BY WITNESSES.
    NO WITNESSES? THEN NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE. NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE? THEN NO US PASSPORT. NO US PASSPORT? THEN NO US CITIZENSHIP.

    BIRTH CERTIFICATES HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN LESS THAN MANDATORY BEING AS RICHARD NIXON DID NOT ACQUIRE HIS UNTIL 1942, EVEN THOUGH HE WAS BORN IN 1913. OBAMA GOT BY WITHOUT ONE SINCE HE HAD AN INDONESIAN PASSPORT, AND DRIVER’S LICENSE ACQUIRED WITH THE PASSPORT, AND AN AMERICAN PERSONALITY, ALONG WITH AMERICAN SCHOOL TRANSCRIPTS AND A GREEN CARD FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCY. SO THAT LEAVES THE POSSIBILITY OF THE VANCOUVER SCENARIO FULL INTACT.

    Until then, rational people will accept the EVIDENCE of Obama’s birth certificate and the confirmations of the officials of BOTH parties and the Index Data and the birth notices.

    Yes, Obama’s mother did go to the University of Washington—but that was in SEPTEMBER, which is about a month AFTER Obama was born.

    [BUT SHE WAS ALREADY LIVING THERE AS OF ABOUT THREE MONTHS EARLIER. OTHERWISE THERE WOULD BE NO SANE REASON FOR HER TO LEAVE HER FATHER AND MOTHER WITH A NEWBORN, ALONE AND UNEMPLOYED AND LIVE LIFE ON THE EDGE OF SURVIVAL IN A COUNTRY WITH NO WELFARE NET YET, WHEN SHE COULD HAVE REMAINED LIVING WITH THEM IN HER HAWAIIAN HOME, AND GOING TO THE UNIVERSITY THERE, LIKE BEFORE, AND HAVING A RELATIONSHIP WITH HER “HUSBAND”.

    BUT IF SHE ALREADY HAD A RESIDENCE IN SEATTLE, IT WOULD BE A PLACE THAT SHE COULD EASILY RETURN TO, INSTEAD OF CREATING ONE FROM SCRATCH.

    YES, AS YOU CAN SEE, SHE DIDN’T MOVE TO SEATTLE IN AUGUST OF ’61, SHE RETURNED TO SEATTLE TO CONTINUE THE LIFE SHE HAD GOING THERE BEFORE GIVING BIRTH.
    GOOD LUCK PROVING OTHERWISE.
    WHEN YOU FIND SOME EVIDENCE THAT CAN DISPROVE SOMETHING SO RATIONAL AND HIGHLY LIKELY, LET US KNOW.

  4. smrstrauss says:

    Re: “[BUT SHE WAS ALREADY LIVING THERE AS OF ABOUT THREE MONTHS EARLIER. ”

    No she wasn’t. You have no evidence of that whatever, and she was attending college at the University of Hawaii at the time,
    [REPLY: No she wasn’t. You have no evidence of that whatever]

    and in August of 1961 according to the [FRAUDUALENT] birth certificate AND the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii [BASED ON HER LYING AFFIDAVIT], she gave birth to a child in HAWAII.

    When you have EVIDENCE of her being in Seattle three months before and/or EVIDENCE of her giving birth in Vancouver——-let us know.

    I DON’T NEED TO PROVE ANYTHING. YOU NEED TO PROVE THAT THE VANCOUVER SCENARIO IS IMPOSSIBLE, COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED BECAUSE OF KNOWN FACTS, AND YET THERE ARE NO KNOWN FACTS, WHICH IS WHY THE SCENARIO CANNOT BE DISPROVEN, AND THUS IS THE HIGHLY LIKELY TRUTH.

    When you see bear poop, that is evidence of there having been a bear there. But you have NO evidence of Obama’s mother having been in Seattle three months before or of her having been in Vancouver in August 1961.

    WHEN I SAW THE BEAR POOP, AND IT HADN’T BEEN THERE THE PREVIOUS TIME I WALKED THROUGH THERE, I COULD MAKE A REASONABLE ASSUMPTION THAT IT HAD BEEN THERE MORE THAN 10 MINUTES, OR ONE HOUR, BUT PROBABLY FOR A DAY OR MORE. IT’S THE SAME WITH SAD APPEARING IN SEATTLE. ONE CANNOT ASSUME THAT SHE JUST INSTANTLY ARRIVED AND WAS ALL SETTLED IN, OR EVEN HAD A REASONABLE PURPOSE IN EVEN BEING THERE AT ALL.
    THE ONLY REASONABLE PURPOSE WAS TO CONTINUE THE LIFE SHE ALREADY HAD THERE AS OF A FEW MONTHS EARLIER WHEN SHE MOVED THERE TO SEEK AN ADOPTIVE COUPLE THAT WOULD TAKE HER HALF-BLACK BABY.

    YOU SEE, I’VE GIVEN YOU A VERY CLEAR AND SENSIBLE JUSTIFICATION FOR HER TO BE IN SEATTLE IN AUGUST ’61, (AND BEFORE) BUT YOU HAVE GIVEN ME NO JUSTIFICATION WHATSOEVER FOR HER BEING THERE INSTEAD OF AT HOME WITH HER BABY, HER MOTHER AND FATHER, AND HER HUSBAND. AND YOU WANT TO PRETEND THAT SOME BURDEN TO SHOW JUST CAUSE FOR HER LOCATION IS ON ME? NO, IT’S ON YOU!

  5. sillyhaha71 says:

    So you did make up the quote “a Stanley had a baby.”! The quote is “Stanley had a baby.”.

    But you go to an insane step. You state:
    [Nash notes: The Dr. failed to clearly speak the first word of his reply, or she failed to hear it since it was nothing more than the letter “a”. It is very normal to semi-speak that vowel when it starts a sentence since it is normally pronounced: “uh”, instead of as the long version pronunciation (“A”). What he said was: “uh Stanley had a baby.” It’s all too common to truncate the “uh” and not speak it loud enough to be heard. A similar failure of pronunciation occurred with the most famous words ever spoken: “That’s one small step for (uh) man, -one giant leap for mankind.” Neil Armstrong, Apollo 11.]

    You weren’t at the table listening to this conversation. How can you say that the Doctor said “a” and no one heard it?

    Unbelievable. You’re bizarre, Nash.

    REPLY: WHY DO YOU PRETEND THAT YOU ARE AS STUPID AS A STUMP? WHY DO YOU PRETEND THAT “a STANLEY HAD A BABY” IS NOT THE ONLY POSSIBLE STATEMENT THAT COULD HAVE BEEN MADE?

    WHY DO YOU PRETEND THAT “STANLEY HAD A BABY” DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY BOTH KNEW WHO STANLEY WAS?
    WHY DO YOU PRETEND THAT IF THEY BOTH KNEW STANLEY, THEN THE FACT THAT A STANLEY HAD A BABY WOULD NOT BE A REMARKABLE THING THAT WOULD HAVE PROMPTED THE NOTATION AND THE LETTER TO HER FATHER STANLEY?
    YOU SHOULD NEED A LICENSE TO SHARE YOUR BRAIN-DEAD THOUGHTS IN PUBLIC. WHEN WILL YOU FESS UP AS TO WHAT THE CONVERSATION WAS ALL ABOUT? [A VERY STRANGE CONNECTION BETWEEN A MAN’S NAME AND THE BIRTH OF A BABY]
    GROW A BRAIN, FOR GOD’S SAKE. AND QUITE PRETENDING THAT YOUR DRIVEL IS LOGICAL.

  6. smrstrausss says:

    Re: “I DON’T NEED TO PROVE ANYTHING. YOU NEED TO PROVE THAT THE VANCOUVER SCENARIO IS IMPOSSIBLE,”

    Actually, you do need to prove it since you made the allegation.
    [YOU ARE CONFUSING THE ALLEGATION WITH THE SCENARIO. THE SCENARIO STANDS WHETHER OR NOT I BELIEVE IT AND ALLEGE IT TO BE THE TRUTH. YOU NEED TO PROVE THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE IN ORDER TO MAKE IT UNDENIABLE THAT OBAMA MUST THEREFORE HAD TO HAVE BEEN BORN IN HAWAII, BECAUSE HE CERTAINLY WAS NOT BORN IN KENYA.
    SO HE WAS EITHER BORN IN HAWAII OR BORN IN VANCOUVER. PROVE THAT HE WAS NOT BORN IN VANCOUVER AND YOU WILL HAVE PROVEN THAT HE HAD TO HAVE BEEN BORN IN HAWAII. IT’S THAT SIMPLE.]

    BTW, Obama being born on the nose of George Washington on Mt. Rushmore is POSSIBLE, but no one will believe it unless there is proof of it. Or more simply, his being born in Paris is possible, but again no one will believe it unless there is proof of it. There IS proof of his being born in HAWAII. So, unless you can prove that the officials of BOTH parties are lying AND provide proof of birth in Vancouver, no rational person will believe it.

    YOU ARE CONFUSING RATIONAL PEOPLE WITH KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE. EINSTEIN WAS EXTREMELY RATIONAL BUT WAS UTTER UNKNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE SIZE AND SCOPE OF THE UNIVERSE. HE ASSUMED WRONGLY THAT THE MILKY WAY GALAXY CONSTITUTED THEN ENTIRE UNIVERSE.

    AS YOU ALREADY KNOW, THE WORD OF LYING SYCOPHANT PARTY MEMBERS IN THE HDOH ARE NOT ACTUAL PROOF OF ANYTHING. ONLY A MORON STANDS ON THE LOGIC THAT NIXON OR CLINTON OR OBAMA DID NOT LIE UNLESS THEY COULD BE PROVEN TO HAVE LIED. ABSENCE OF PROOF IS NOT PROOF OF ANYTHING.

    BTW, although Mitt Romney showed a birth certificate that claimed that he was born in Detroit, it is possible that he was born in Toronto Canada. But, since his birth certificate says Detroit and there is no evidence he was born in Toronto, rational people believe he was born in Detroit.

    The teacher by the way did not say “Stanley had a baby.” She said that a doctor at Kapiolani Hospital had told her that a woman named Stanley had had a baby.
    [JUST AS I TOLD YOU; “A STANLEY HAD A BABY!”]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: