Beheading Obama’s Bogus Birth Certificates (Pt.2
July 20, 2014 12 Comments
The big-time LIARS can’t get their stories straight!
That is the direct (abridged) statement from the corrupt Obama White House, still sticking to their lying campaign story that even their co-liars are too embarrassed to peddle. Why? Because of the date stamp that bled-through from the back to the front and is quite legible as being Jun 6 2007.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-usa/ [The contrary-explanation:]
We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and “all the records we could get our hands on” according to spokesperson Shauna Daly.
The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008, after speculation began to appear on the Internet questioning Obama’s citizenship. The campaign then rushed to release the document, and the rush is responsible for the blacked-out certificate number. Says Shauna: “[We] couldn’t get someone on the phone in Hawaii to tell us whether the number represented some secret information, and we erred on the side of blacking it out. Since then we’ve found out it’s pretty irrelevant for the outside world.
They blacked it out out of caution? Then how in hell do they explain this version of the document?
The black box drawn just beyond the “Certificate No.” clearly pre-dated the creation of the finished fake. Since Obama had no original Hawaiian hospital Certificate of Live Birth (having been born in Vancouver, B.C.,) he therefore had no certificate number, so one could not be displayed, hence the cover-story for why it was hidden. It would have stayed hidden forever if his people in the Hawaiian Dept of Health were not able to “borrow” one from a deceased person. Virginia Sunahara, who died Aug. 5, 1961 in a Honolulu hospital, two days after her birth. The powers that be in Hawaii will not grant her brother permission to obtain a copy of her long-form birth certificate even though he is qualified. Guess why.
With no certificate number, the first thing that had to be done on the blank that the forger got his or her hands on was to draw a graphics box around the area where the number should be displayed, and then fill-in the box with a solid color (black), which was done, as apposed to someone placing a piece of black paper over the number of the “real” birth certification number.
The black box is a perfect rectangle with flawless edges, meaning that someone with computer graphics or photo-editing software experience manipulated it’s image in a photo-editing program, -creating it rather than it being physically placed on top of the number, as the lying campaign worker implies. How many political campaign-workers would be experienced at photo-manipulation? Dang few, if any. It is very easy to do (using the shape tool and the fill-in tool) but when the campaign is self-reportedly in a huge hurry, why not just place the document in a scanner with a blank strip of paper over the number? Quick and easy. No skill required. They didn’t do that because there was already a black box in that space in the digital computer scan of the image of the paper blank that would become the final forged document after the forger acquired a certificate number from a deceased baby.
Evidence that there was no year-long acquisition of all of Obama’s records that they could get their hands on (which are still under privacy lock-up in all the schools he attended, -as if he is just some Joe Blow private citizen now and forever) is seen in the absence of any number to put in that spot. But aside from that logical speculation, is the logical presumption that if concern about the significance of the number occurred to them in June of 2008, then, having the same brains and thought processes, they would have been concerned a year earlier, and figuring that they would be expected to release a birth certificate for a candidate born of a transient alien, they would have contacted Hawaii as soon as they “received” “it”.
But “it” merely appeared online at the dailykos out of the blue with no attribution. When liberal-run factcheck.org and snopes and politifact treated it as legitimate, then the campaign was off to the races and had the confidence to link their website to it, and even create a new one (fight the smears) to highlight it. But they never hosted it on their own web server, only displaying it via links. Remaining untouched by it and its fraudulence.
But it gets worse! Their campaign mouthpiece made it seem that once they “learned” that the number was irrelevant, then they uncovered it so the full, unredacted image could be seen, and yet what do you find being shared as the authentic short-form birth certificate issued by Hawaii on the White House website? You see this pdf abomination: (after 6 years!!!)
“We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response.” [BECAUSE IT WAS A LIE! -as shown in Part 1.]
Factcheck continues with their obfuscation: Blowup of certificate number“We think our colleagues at PolitiFact.com, who also dug into some of these loopy theories put it pretty well: “It is possible that Obama conspired his way to the precipice of the world’s biggest job, involving a vast network of people and government agencies over decades of lies. Anything’s possible. But step back and look at the overwhelming evidence to the contrary and your sense of what’s reasonable has to take over.”Of course, it’s distantly possible that Obama’s grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.” ~
The word “DEPARTMENT” can be seen in part beginning at the left-side middle, and “STATE of _ _WAII” at the bottom. One can conclude two things about the Hawaiian Dept. of Health from the quality and appearance of that seal: their standards of quality of certification are pathetic, rinky-dink, amateur, lax, sub-standard and inadequate, -resulting in a flawed, incomplete, and nearly illegible image (probably since the device used to make that impression is much cheaper to make and buy than a qualify, hand-carved, sculpting of real imagery and text, as their own law anticipates) but also that someone in the HDoH allowed it to be used at some point.
“And this oldie; Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president’s online COLBs images released by Obama’s campaign and FactCheck.org…
In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama’s short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org.
Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino’s initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.
FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was different in appearance than the campaign released.
In June 2008, Ben LaBolt, an Obama campaign spokesman, released the initial short-form Obama COLB to various newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times, declaring, “This is Sen. Obama’s birth certificate.”
This short-form Obama COLB was released as a .jpg internet image, displaying no signs of having been folded or of carrying an official State of Hawaii embossed seal. WND. And much more HERE.” [note: I’ve discovered proof that they are in fact the same.]
– by Jess Henig, with Joe Miller
The ultimate document we sought was Obama’s birth certificate. Unlike the other documents, Hawaii birth certificates aren’t public records. Only family members can request copies, so when the campaign declined to give us one, we were stalled. On June 13, 2008, Obama’s campaign finally released a copy, while launching a fact-check Web site of its own, Fightthesmears.com. (shut-down)
[“Stalled”, -that does not mean for minutes or hours, but for days or weeks. But supposedly the campaign had the COLB for a year and simply released it when interest appear, but with the number black-out. But that DID NOT HAPPEN! They did NOT release it as their lie claimed. Everyone was waiting impatiently for quite some time. They’ve been forced to rewrite history.]
When the birth certificate arrived from the Obama campaign it confirmed his name as the other documents already showed it. Still, we took an extra step: We e-mailed it to the Hawaii Department of Health, which maintains such records, to ask if it was real. [“It”??? How the hell could an e-mail image be “real”?]
“It’s a valid Hawaii state birth certificate,” spokesman Janice Okubo told us.
[How in God’s name could anyone look at a digital image of a perfect counterfeit and tell if “it” is real or not??? You have to forensically exam the original paper document, which has never, ever, been allowed. So either Okubo lied, -being a party to the fraud, (which she probably was, as in insider knowing what was missing from their archive) or they lied about what she said.]
When the official documents were questioned, we went looking for more answers. We circled back to the Department of Health, had a newsroom colleague bring in her own Hawaii birth certificate to see if it looks the same (it’s identical). But every answer triggered more questions.
[Idiots! Counterfeit money also looks identical, otherwise it would not be accepted. And what about those “more questions” that every answer triggered? Did they follow the leads until they came to actual answers demonstrably true? Or did they shrink from their duty to find the truth wherever it might be found and whatever it might be? Did they walk in the footsteps of Woodward and Bernstein? Hell no, they didn’t.]
And soon enough, after going to every length possible to confirm the birth certificate’s authenticity, you start asking, what is reasonable here? [“every length possible”??? Translation: “every length convenient and polite and obsequious.”]
Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.
And about the copy we e-mailed her for verification? “When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.” [And…????… That’s it??? -No authentication at all? Silence speaks VOLUMES!!!]
Still, she acknowledges:
“I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.”
“In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama’s short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released two months later on Aug. 21, 2008 by FactCheck.org., (an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation).
Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino’s initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.”
NOTE: There is collateral damage to Obama’s credibility due to the facts about his bogus short-form birth certificate. It is the inescapable conclusion that if he was unqualified for even a short-form certification, then there is no way at all that there was ever a hospital- created long-form certificate in Hawaii for him.
If his short-form isn’t real, then neither is his long form, and since both forms are merely abstracts in this digital age anyway, he can have both! -with a little talented computer manipulation of the imagery of his mother’s affidavit captured from the microfilm which captured an image of the original. Aren’t computer’s just wonderful! -after all, they gave us our first counterfeit unconstitutional alien-born President. [And all the people cheered as they drank down the sweet, cool Kool-Aid of the Obama Nation.]
No one who makes a statement quotes them self as the author, so if Fukino didn’t write the statements, which are ALL in Quotation marks, then who did? Who was supposedly quoting the director? Was the so-called “Statement / News Release” an official statement by Fukino herself or was it merely some unattributed source supposedly quoting Fukino at arms-length, -legally speaking?
Can Fukino be held legally responsible for lies that appear in quotation marks and attributed to her by an unrevealed person? Clearly, if they had been real official statements, then they would have been signed by the maker of the statements, yet neither that person (supposedly Fukino) nor the quoter, have signed anything. That provided legal protection if the dogs of justice were to start barking. They could just throw up their hands and claim (without taking the 5th Amendment) “It wasn’t me! I didn’t write it or release it. If I had, then I would have signed it, so I’m legally off the hook, right?”
Off the hook for what? For claiming that an original birth certificate for Obama was “on record”. Something is on record alright, but it is not an original birth certificate. (It is Ann Dunham’s lying late-birth application affidavit.) What is remarkable is how the statement pulls it punches by deliberately failing to claim that what is “on record” in their digital data-base is a digital copy of an original Hawaiian hospital Certificate of Live Birth.
No one from Hawaii has ever made the claim that such a document exists. It has not been confirmed nor denied, -just never, ever mentioned. Aside from one single, overt lie, all that has been allowed to be said used the weasel words “vital record”. The counterfeit digital short-form template & text which can be printed on safety paper is what the statement refers to as being “on record in accordance with State policies and procedures”, which are digital procedures handling digital files stored on dept. computer servers.
That State policy is a virtually all-digital policy. Everything is or was scanned into the data-base for instant access, with no need to manually find, remove and carry, open and rescan paper documents. That age is over. But their lying, deceitful statement wants you to not realize that fact, -as seen in the statement by Fuddy who claimed to have witnessed the physical copying of an original birth certificate, -something that is never done, and should not have been done, (and need not have been done) according to the first statement which says that Obama’s record was handled no differently than any other record.
That statement was made in order to create a very subtle false impression in the mind of the reader. It implies that since the “vital record” was handled no differently that any other, therefore it had to exist or they could not have handled it. After all, (as they wish you to reason) why make a statement about how it was handled if “it” didn’t even exist? (with “it” implying an actual birth certificate instead of an affidavit)
Who would come up with such a clever rouse? Answer: very clever socialist lawyers who want the Democrats to be in national control for decades to come, and will work to ensure that that happens, by any means necessary. Yes, Virginia, it is a damn conspiracy! But the great socialist Santa of the Democrap party will make it all better.
The Democrap Fukino made a bold and grand and final statement just to shoot-down any remaining media skeptic, by claiming that “the original vital record maintained on file” (note that digital records are “maintained” (temperature & humidity and dusty protection) but paper records are not. They just exist unaffected by anything as long as a tropical typhoon doesn’t destroy the building.) verifies not only that BHO was born in Hawaii (as if a parent’s uncorroborated claim on a piece of paper is equivalent to a certificate signed by the hand of the doctor that delivered the baby) AND therefore also verifies what no court in the nation has every defined, -which is who is and who is not a “natural born citizen”.
So why did she resort to showing her true colors, and assuming an authority that the Supreme Court does not want to touch with a ten foot pole, by OFFICIALLY PROCLAIMING: OBAMA IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN? Because it was not about the truth, or verification, or certification, or reality. It was about getting him fully legitimized in the minds of the lap-dog media-maggots.
Once they all go silent, then it’s game over. And that is just how it played out. The usurpation of the presidency was shored-up and protected on all sides by the silence of the national media, which joined the silence of the entire American government, across the whole federal government and every single State government as well. This surely must be the most successful fraud in world history. Everyone was either silently in on it (like the Supreme Court, and Congress) or taken in by it. And so a disinterested and apathetic public gets taken for the biggest Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride in history. Undoubtedly, this ride will eventually end badly, but no one in America can imagine just how badly.
by Adrien Nash July 2014, obama–nation.com