The 1st Affirmative Action President

The First Affirmative Action President ?

 In the late 20th century, a unique young man with a commanding voice came to the attention of some of the liberal elites in Chicago.  They saw in him an opportunity to have their banner carried forward in an effectual way.  Their cause needed a champion, their struggle needed a hero, and it seemed they may have found one.  So they carried his water, they opened doors for him, they moved mountains and made secret deals to pave the path for him going forward.  Their plan and goal was to have him emerge at the end of their grooming with an impeccable pedigree, praise-worthy credentials, and then let him slowly soar and see where the current of destiny might take him.
Eventually he was mature enough to run to public office.  But there was one problem.  A very popular Senator already occupied the office that he sought, so it appeared that fate was not going to smile one him yet.  Then a fortuitous twist of fate worked strongly in his favor when his opponent’s wife, actress Jeri Ryan, accused her husband of various onerous sexual practices and acts.  Those accusations were pure poison to his re-election chances and so by shear good fortune of having his opponent stumble, he found himself the winner of the election to the number two Senate seat from the state of Illinois.  It appeared that destiny was on his side.  It appeared that his future was the answer to a long and deeply held dream in the community of rebels, radicals, and revolutionaries.  One of their own finally had a shot at the summit.  But there was one problem.  No experience.

After only two years of un-noteworthy service in Washington, it appeared likely that the next President would be a Democrat, and if that Democrat was not him, then his chance might not come again for 16 years.  So a choice had to be made.  It was decided to toss his hat into the ring and see if fate would once again smile on him.  Then the choice of his party was either to be the inexperienced, elite, alternate-ethnicity candidate who would carry the banner for the Democrats or it would be the experienced, elite, alternate-gender candidate.   The candidate with most commanding voice and high-flying rhetoric eventually won both the primary and the general election.
The path had been paved for him, interference had been run for him, exceptions had been made for him and doors had been opened.  He was the golden one, the choice of the unseen forces behind the scenes.  He was not their top choice, rather, he was their only choice since there was no one else like him.  He was not chosen because of his academic achievement, but in spite of it.  His record was not one that he nor they would want to share with the world, and so it has not been shared.  Such secrecy surrounding his record and his life leads one to suspect that he is probably the first Affirmative Action president.

In the headlong rush to get him into the White House he was never vetted, nor practiced, nor experienced in the real world, nor even eligible to be the President since his father was a visiting foreign national, but everyone just closed their minds and listened to the beautiful words about Hope & Change while ignoring the clear mandate of our founding fathers that the President must be a natural born citizen, not merely a native-born citizen.  People felt that they, and the country, needed both hope and change, but what they got instead was a whole lot more of Washington as usual, with the same waste, fraud, and excess, -only on steroids.

Presidents don’t hold sway over the financial markets, nor consumer confidence, and as his and his party’s ideology was applied to the problems, or no action was taken at all, the worse they became.   His inability to grasp the fact that what in the past might have been a solution to our economic problem (but is now exacerbating the problem) is now causing his formerly strong popularity to sink to levels compatible with his competence.

One Response to The 1st Affirmative Action President

  1. arnash says:
    The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false–fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

    According to a special report issued by ‘the Blogging Professor,’ the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a ‘constitutional professor and scholar,’ and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

    The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an ‘instructor’ at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.
    In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

    According to Doug Ross:

    I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

    The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

    Thus, the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a ‘put-up job’ as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position? And why?

    According to the Chicago Sun-Times, “Obama did NOT ‘hold the title’ of a University of Chicago law school professor”. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

    The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
    “He did not hold the title of professor of law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

    apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama’s presence in their institutions.

    Continue reading on Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume – National Conservative |

    Anthony Martin, Conservative Examiner

    As an original foot-soldier in ‘the Reagan Revolution’ that led to the election of Ronald Reagan,

    Until barry soetoro releases his vital records and vets himself…that is all that should matter. Any politician, and i mean ANY, who is seeking to be reelected or is asking for donations should be shunned completely until he or she or it or moron signs a pledge that they will require barry soetoro to release all his vital records. That they will pledge that they will require their secretary of state to vet the next president.

    Until a usurper of president of the united states can either prove himself or be thrown out of office, absolutely nothing else matters. So far the machine has been able to sluff this issue off and alot of people are buying it. (army wants Lt. Col. Lakin to have a brain scan!!!) Who is fooling who? Trying to make people appear crazy because all they want is the release of vital documents??? Man, this is a stalin wet dream. This would be absolutely laughable if it wasn’t so real. Seriously, there is real evil going on.
    Carefully vetted? ROTFLMAO!

    0bamas’ hidden records: Why are these off limits?
    1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
    2 Columbia University transcripts
    3 Columbia thesis paper
    4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
    5 Harvard University transcripts
    11 Occidental College Transcripts
    12 Parent’s marriage Certificate
    17 Scholarly articles
    23 Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham’s divorce decree.

    This story has been blown off since 2004. People have been talking about this since the Democrats first started their Token support for the first black President. They didnt care about his past, they simply wanted the claim to the novelty of having the first Black President be a Democrat. So they, along with their friends and supporters in the media, did everything they could to get this empty suit elected. They ignored his realities and trumpeted his lies. The American people had no idea, most of them anyway, that this man was not who he said he was. I dont believe the claims that he wasnt born here. I do know that he is not the man he says he is, and the people deserve to know who this man is.

    Neill A 2 years ago

    This comment is directed at John Q, who said,

    “The only fraud are the people who constantly write this garbage. He is the president and has more credentials than this bogus writer and all of those who cannot stand a Black Man as the leader of the USA.”

    John, I just stumbled across this page by accident, and haven’t fact checked it yet, and won’t comment on the body of article until I do.

    I will comment on you, though.

    I have found that people who believe strongly in Obama, when challenged, if they can’t come up with an answer, they call the challenger a racist. They do this cover up their own ignorance.

    If this piece isn’t true, rebut it responsibly. Point to some document that proves Obama was a full professor. I must confess, I have never given it any though until now.

    Who is Doug Ross, quoted in this article? Is he a credible source? I don’t know. Do you?

    Rebut it with facts, or ignore it, as you please. But stop with the charges of racism.

    Continue reading on Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume – National Conservative |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: