Islam & Marxism versus the World
A Decade Out, We’re Losing
by Robert Spencer
Ten years after 9/11, the war on terror is far from over, and we are losing it.
We were attacked on Sept. 11, 2001, by Islamic jihadists who explained, in writings they left behind, that they were committing mass murder in the name of Islam, inspired by the teachings of Islam, and in defense, as they saw it, of Islam. They struck the United States in service of their hope of destroying it, and ultimately imposing upon the U.S., the West and the world an Islamic government that would rule according to Islamic law, which denies the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience and equality of rights for all people.
Yet 10 years later, it is not only the height of political incorrectness to speak about the motives and goals of those who attacked the United States on that terrible day. It is explicitly against United States government policy to look into such matters. The Obama administration hardly ever speaks of terrorism at all. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano famously said several years ago that she preferred to refer not to acts of “terrorism” but to “man-caused disasters,” and focused a DHS report on hunting “right-wing extremists” rather than Islamic jihad terrorists.
I believe that Mr. Spencer conflates two entirely different groups, each with a similar mission but with different ends in mind.
First, the Muslim:
The Muslim embraces his faith not just as a religion, but as an economic, social and legal system as well. That, together with a complete intolerance for those outside their faith, makes for an implacable foe. His struggle is not at all new, indeed, history will show that it is a battle he has fought for centuries. He wishes to put a moderate face upon his religion, not getting too visibly close to those who strike out in the name of Islam, but you are hard pressed to find apologists for the wickedness of the Osama Bin Ladens in his midst.
The Muslim finds the concept of individual freedom abhorrent. The Muslim holds that females within his own faith are inferior, an entire gender to be subjugated. To hold opinions or faiths contrary to these beliefs is not an occasion for the Muslim to put a “Coexist” bumper sticker on his car, but to lash out at that which he finds offense. You might just be curious as to why you never see a “Coexist” bumper sticker on an automobile owned by a Muslim.
And since he is commanded by his Prophet to kill the disbeliever where he finds him, well, there you have it. There is no political correctness in Islam. There is only Islam – submission.
Now, the Progressive:
The Progressive, by his nature, abhors the concept of a Superior Being. He does not wish to contemplate the presence of God around him; he is intent upon stamping out any reference to God and substituting himself in God’s place.
The Progressive does not believe in the central principles set forth in the Founding Documents because those very principles rely upon rights that are conveyed to mankind by God, which are inalienable. This is something that the Progressive cannot abide – how can he be god if there is a God already?
It is an irrefutable fact that this nation was founded upon the Judeo-Christian ethic. It is an irrefutable fact that our legal system is largely derived from English Common Law. In drawing upon these two traditions, our founders crafted a nation in which the individual is free to live his life as he sees fit, not beholden to a tyrannical government nor to a religious creed in which he does not embrace.
And since he cannot control those around him without scouring the piers of our Constitutional Republic, he has to slowly and inexorably erode those foundations. There is nothing but political correctness in Progressivism. There is only Progressivism – tyranny.
So, the Muslim hates America because it is not ruled by Sharia. The Progressive hates America because he does not get to play the role of God.
The Progressive finds common cause with the Muslim in his loathing of individual rights and freedom from oppression. The Muslim feigns acceptance, but given the tenants of his faith, will deceive the Progressive – his only goal is the Caliphate. And if that day should ever come, as history teaches, the first victim of the conquering Muslim will be the Progressive.
I rely upon my own faith to know that, in the end, God himself will have the last word.
Our Founding Fathers knew the answer to this conundrum. Any religion which flies in the face of our Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and Constitution is an unholy religion which deserves our rational intolerance. Bigotry is irrational intolerance which is based on lies. Rational intolerance is not bigotry and is based on truth.
Samuel Adams wrote:
“In regard to religion, mutual toleration in the different professions thereof is what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practiced, and, both by precept and example, inculcated on mankind. And it is now generally agreed among Christians that this spirit of toleration, in the fullest extent consistent with the being of civil society, is the chief characteristical mark of the Church. Insomuch that Mr. Locke has asserted and proved, beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground, that such toleration ought to be extended to all whose doctrines are not subversive of society. The only sects which he thinks ought to be, and which by all wise laws are excluded from such toleration, are those who teach doctrines subversive of the civil government under which they live [Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and Constitution].”
Samuel Adams wrote “The Rights of the Colonists” in 1772, in advance of the American Revolution and the American Constitution, but it doesn’t matter when he wrote it because the sacred equal rights of mankind are eternal in time, both in the past and in the future. The sacred equal rights of man preceded the American Revolution and the Constitution, justifying the American Revolution, and providing the reason and underpinning for our Constitution.
“The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old
parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased.” Alexander Hamilton
I believe something has gone horribly wrong in the United States. We are exclusively focused on secular law to the exclusion of the law of nature and nature’s God. Our secular laws must first be in compliance with natural law – our secular laws must defend man’s sacred equal rights to life, liberty and fruit of labor in pursuit of happiness – our secular laws must never violate natural law embedded in our Declaration of Independence. The problem with Islamic Sharia Law is that it is in violation of the law of nature and nature’s God.
“There is a true law, a right reason, conformable to nature, universal, unchangeable, eternal, whose commands urge us to duty, and whose prohibitions restrain us from evil. Whether it enjoins or forbids, the good respect its injunctions, and the wicked treat them with indifference. This law cannot be contradicted by any other law, and is not liable either to derogation or abrogation. Neither the senate nor the people can give us any dispensation for not obeying this universal law of justice. It needs no other expositor and interpreter than our own conscience. It is not one thing at Rome and another at Athens; one thing today and another tomorrow; but in all times and nations this universal law must for ever reign, eternal and imperishable. It is the sovereign master and emperor of all beings. God himself is its author, its promulgator, its enforcer. He who obeys it not, flies from himself, and does violence to the very nature of man.” Cicero
Liberty_Clinger 1 day ago in reply to turfmann
“All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of God.” Thomas Jefferson
Under medieval Christianity the mass of mankind was born with saddles on their backs, with a favored few (Kings, Princes and Bishops), booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately. Under Marxism the mass of mankind (the dreaded middle class) is born with saddles on their backs, with a favored few (Marxist ruling class – and the so-called proletariat class), booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately. Under Fascism the mass of mankind is born with saddles on their backs, with a favored few (Fascist ruling class of a superior so-called Aryan race), booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately. Under Islamo-Fascism the mass of mankind is born with saddles on their backs, with a favored few (Caliphs and Imams), booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately.
Our Founding Fathers were aware of the lower aspects of human nature. Greed, envy, jealousy, rage and violence are inherent in our lower human nature regardless of religion, lack of religion, nation, tribe, or time in history. The evil inherent in Totalitarian Islamo-Fascism is no different from that of the ancient Chinese despots, Genghis Kahn, Caligula, King George III, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Castro, or Che Guevara. The more things change the more they stay the same. Our struggle for life, liberty and fruit of labor in pursuit of happiness is as old as the human race its self – the same struggle as our Founding Fathers – we are linked to them in this struggle.
In my mind all government (including corrupted medieval Christian, Marxist, Fascist and Islamo-Fascist) which acts on the basis of self-serving superior rights for a small group of ruling people via domination and suppression of individual rights for the great mass of people is Leftist. In my mind government which is limited to securing the individual’s God-given equal rights to life, liberty and fruit of labor in pursuit of happiness is center-right because minimal force is required to secure equal rights. Great force is required to elevate a ruling class with superior (unequal) rights – that is Left – and that use of excessive force – the desire and need to use excessive force on one’s fellow man in order to secure superior rights is the unifying feature of all the Leftist governments mentioned above.
turfmann reply to Liberty_Clinger
I believe your indictment of government throughout history is spot on, your citations of the founders well placed, your observation of our own government’s shortcomings correct.
The correction to our own shortcomings is (hopefully) still available to us at the ballot box.
But what of the invader?
What of the Islamist that seeks to topple by way of terror?
He has no state – he is a nomad that answers only to his own perverted vision of what he believes is his god’s will.
He has no standing army – he does not wear any uniform, he respects no established rules for the conduct of war. His weapon is the horror he unleashes through his acts of terror.
He has no diplomacy – since he has no state, no boundaries, no government, there is no point to begin negotiating with him.
He is a zealot, and among zealots the worst – a religious one.
As he attacks, he is protected by our own laws. To call him out only invites calls of religious intolerance, bigotry, and the denial of religious freedom.
And yet he continues. If you were to imagine ten years ago that we would read of circumstances in this nation of a separate set of laws that were being contemplated – Sharia – that would apply in lieu of the established law of the land for a certain group of people, would you have believed it?
When Germany or Japan took up arms against us many years ago, we knew what to do – declare war right back, raise an army and a navy and fight until one side won.
What do we do now? What tool do we employ to turn back the barbarians at the gates?
Liberty_Clinger reply to Adam Moreira
Communism is a toxic religion which has many similarities to Totalitarian Islam – both are systems of unequal law and unequal rights. Under Marxism the lazy, tax-eating so-called proletariat class and the Marxist ruling class possess superior rights compared to the laboring, tax-paying middle class. Under Islamic Sharia Law Muslims possess superior rights compared to non-Muslims. Thus, the God-given equal rights of our American Declaration of Independence are pitted against the unequal rights inherent in Marxism and the Islamo-Fascist Sharia legal system. Both Marxism and Totalitarian Islam deserve our rational intolerance because both are based on unequal rights – both are forms of tyranny. It is irrational, immoral and cowardly not to be intolerant of tyranny.
Westernman 1 day ago in reply to Novoski
This is MADRASSA kindergarten stuff, Novoski. The Muslim’s scripture tells him to lie to you until he has the military advantage. The Muslim’s scripture tells him not to be your friend, except to gain advantage over you. The Muslim’s scripture tells him that he has a duty to destroy you and your Christian friend, take your wives and daughters, and establish a world subject to Islam and no other, acknowledging no other god and allowing no other form of government. This is all spelled out in the Qu’ran and has been consistently lived out by Muslims throughout their hundreds of years of history.
But you go on being tolerant and noble. If us ignorant, biased, pro-Americans can’t save you from the disaster you’re creating for us all, why, I’m sure your daughter will appreciate your noble heart as she is learning a part of Islam that you will never be subject to.
If Hitler were smarter he would have developed Euro-Fascism into a religion before kicking off World War II. Mohammad was much smarter than Hitler; he developed Islamo-Fascism into a “religion” before setting out on his – and his followers – mass-murdering conquest of the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia. And guess what? They’re back. As Winston Churchill said truthfully of the Euro-Fascist Germans, we can now say truthfully of the Islamo-Fascist Arabs: “The Hun (Totalitarian Islam) is always either at your throat or at your feet.”
Jake Neuman 2 days ago
9/11 WAS THE GREATEST VICTORY IN HISTORY FOR ISLAM. THEY FLEW. THEY CRASHED. THEY CONQUERED
OSAMA BIN LADEN IS DEAD
ISLAM IS NOT DEAD
ALLAH IS NOT DEAD
FREE BOOK PDF DOWNLOAD
For Free Book “Islam and Sharia Law Are Treason: Jihad Is Treason” go to: http://www.godofmoralperfectio…
BOOK BANNED UNDER TITLE: ISLAM EVIL IN THE NAME OF GOD™
PROPHET MUHAMMAD WAS THE FIRST MUSLIM TERRORIST.
Osama bin Laden and ALL The Muslim Men Killers and Murderers Are Good, Moral, Moderate, Holy Men of God Fulfilling The Divine Orders of God To Bring His Almighty Wrath To The Kafirs. They Are Following EXACTLY The Divine Teachings of The Quran and The Sunna of Prophet Muhammad. In Islam, Kafirs are sub Humans Who Can Be Exterminated, Murdered, Tortured, Terrorized, Raped, and Enslaved. These Are Not Crimes But Holy, Divine Acts Guaranteeing Accession To A Virgin Delight Paradise. The Reality is That Prophet Muhammad, Osama bin Laden and All The Other Muslim Killers and Murderers Are True, Blue, Patriotic Muslim Men Obeying The True, Blue Islam. Failure To Understand This Cold Hard Reality Will Lead To The Destruction of Our Democracy and Civilization. Its That Simple.
In this book, you will learn that Islam is totalitarianism with no separation of Mosque and state. Sharia law governs all. There is no free will in Islam: only submission to the will of Allah. Violence is an eternal canonical imperative for supremacy of Islam at all costs.
General Osama bin Laden (the greatest general in history), Mohamed Atta and the other 18 Muslim men have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. By their successful attack on 9/11, (costing $200,000.00 US) they have started the Islamization and conquest of the United States and Europe. If this Islamization is not halted then history will record that the beginning of the end of Western Civilization was 9/11, 2001. Make no mistake about this.
On all newscasts, politicians and media pundits are declaring a great victory. They are calling for moderate Muslims to now rise up and seize Islam from the radical Islamists who they claim usurped Islam’s peaceful roots turning it into a terrorist ideology. President Obama declared that the US was not at war with Islam but only radical Islam. The most important thing you must understand about Islam is that Osama bin Laden was a good, moral, moderate, holy, Muslim man following EXACTLY the teachings of Islam as recorded in the Quran – the divine, holy, unchangeable word of God and the divine example of prophet Muhammad as recorded in Hadith and Sira.
President Obama stated that Osama was not a Muslim because he had killed thousands including Muslims. If this is so, then Prophet Muhammad was not a Muslim because he ordered 60 massacres and participed in 27 of them personally beheading and raping kafirs. Osama is nothing compared to the murderous record of prophet Muhammad. And what about all the nonsense that Muslims don’t kill Muslims. Muhammad killed his own followers. Throughout history, Muslims have killed and murdered Muslims. It is extimated that 11 million Muslims have been killed by their fellow Muslims since 1948. When there is no rule of law – there is no rule of law. There is no law. Noone is safe.
Osama was obeying the divine orders of God to kill kafirs and strike terror into kafir societies. Osama was a true man of God. He was not a radical, Islamist Muslim man. He was a normal Muslim man obeying the commandments of God. Osama understood exactly the teachings of Islam. There was no misunderstanding or misinterpretation of these teachings whatsoever. He was a good, moral Muslim man fulfilling his good, moral, holy Muslim man duty to God. Osama bin Laden was not an aberration of Islam – he is Islam. Osama was as much a Muslim as prophet Muhammad was a Muslim. If you deny Muslimhood to Osama you must deny it to prophet Muhammad.
In Myth of the Moderate Muslim, the writer explains that a radical Muslim man is a Muslim man who declares that the Quran is not the word/teachings of God but the word/teachings of Muhammad and that Muhammad was no prophet of God. Indeed such a Muslim man is so radical that by making these declarations, he has become an apostate of Islam and must be murdered as per Sharia Law and the Quran.
The most dangerous form of jihad is the jihad that occurs from WITHIN a society. That invisible jihad which targets our media, our colleges, our government, our children, our politicians, our laws, our schools, the Internet and our reporters and writers, these are the most dangerous, the most damaging and the most successful of all jihads. Most people roundly condemn the attacks that occurred on 9-11 but few people realize that the slow steady invasion/intrusion of Islam and Shariah Law into our culture and our society is far more dangerous than airplanes crashing into skyscrapers. The attempts to “normalize” Shariah Law/Islam in the U.S. is merely a step towards the eventual overthrow our Constitution/government and to turn America into one more Islamic cesspool. Groups like CAIR, ISNA, MSA and others have been quite successful in their sabotage and subversion of our freedoms. Now to even question the groups and individuals who want nothing more than to destroy America and America’s liberties, is to become a Thought Criminal, reminiscent of Winston Smith in Orwell’s dystopian masterpiece “1984”. Shouts of “McCarthyism”, “racism”, “xenophobia”, “colonialism”, “imperialism” and “Islamaphobia” automatically follow ANY and all inquiries into Islam
In 10 short years America has gone from being a victim of Islamic terror to being viewed as the perpetrator of “crimes against humanity”. My question is where are all of the civil libertarians, where are the atheists who squeal in horror should anything even remotely religious, that is “Judeo-Christian”, attempt to intrude on America’s secular society, where are the feminists, where are all of the human rights organizations, where are the humanitarians when Coptic Christians are terrorized and slaughtered in their homes and churches, where are the feminists when little girls have their genitals removed and are “married” at 6 years of age to 55 year old men, where are all of the civil libertarians when free speech is threatened repeatedly as it is now in America whenever the subject of Islam comes up, where are the humanitarians and our own government when men, women and children are beheaded, disemboweled, stoned, crucified, hung, beaten to death and having limbs amputated and eyes gouged out for merely being non Muslim? Where are you Obama, Hillary, Reid, Franks, Biden, Napolitano, Holder, etc… when these things are occurring on a daily basis throughout the Muslim world? Where are you?
We are not at war with Islam. Islam is at war with us. Islam has been at war with civilization for the past 1400 years. Islam attacked us on 9/11. Good, holy, moral, moderate Muslims attacked us on 9/11. The Quran was the military instruction manual and Osama bin Laden and his 19 killers were the instrument fulfilling God’s justice. (Read the Letter from Mohamed Atta which is printed in its entirety with the Quranic teachings he quoted to justify mass murder.) Make no mistakes about the reality we face – Osama’s death means nothing. The forces he unleashed on 9/11 are destroying the West from within. This destruction of the West by its own political, intellectual and media elites is documented in this work. We will be on the losing end of history if we do not defend our civilization – our democracy and freedom so many millions of valiant patriots died fighting for. If nothing is done Osama will enjoy the last laugh in his grave. http://www.godofmoralperfection.org/p9.htm
lbert Coakes in reply to Jake Neuman
You must check into a facility for mentally disturbed people and you will see how happy you are!
Cynicatgroundzero in reply to Albert Coakes
Albert Coakes – can you be MORE of a mindless tool in support of Islamic terrorism? Or are you simply deaf, dumb, and blind? You are just another progressive-liberal-morally corrupt coward similar to the mindless idiocy put forth by Bertrand Russell in his “Better Red than Dead” craziness.
We are not Red, not Dead, and we will never submit or cower to the murderous barbaric cretins that kill in the name of Allah. Islam is a perversion of religion: it is a hate-filled creed used to subjugate people. You can bow your stupid head to their blade, but Americans will never do that. You are a joke, a moron, and probably a Muslim yourself or at least a toadie for Islamic terrorism.
Hope you find yourself in Hades soon.
FWH 1 day ago in reply to Albert Coakes
Please come back and comment again after your family is blown up at the mall or one of them is beheaded by an Islamist. Better yet please construct your comment at the morgue right after you identify the various body parts of those you loved., assuming of course you do love anyone other than yourself…
2 people liked this.
Maximus_Legitimus 1 day ago
Unionized teachers have indoctrinated our children with a political ideology of liberalism and political correctness. They haven’t instilled within them the ability to reason. Thusly they’ve created youngsters that are able to parrot liberal talking points but are unable to articulate why they believe any one of the tennants they espouse.
Children that think and ask insightful questions become adults that have minds capable of reason. Maturity born of reason is the biggest threat to a liberal mindset. Unionized teachers and liberal leaders do not want a thinking populace because they are harder to control. Liberalism requires robotics.
Mr. Spencer, I think you’re right.
You didn’t mention our immigration policy, but I think that’s one of the biggest symptoms of our willful refusal to look after our own interests. If, as Obama & his atheist-intellectual disciples claim, the US is hopelessly bigoted, xenophobic, & “islamophobic,” then why is there an endless stream of “chain” immigrants from mohammedan-majority countries? Voting “by foot” makes a bigger statement than brandishing a purple finger.
I think that is the deeper question: Why have our elites set themselves apart from the majority culture in this country and dedicated themselves to destroying (i.e., “transforming”) that culture?
This is not a new phenomenon. In any high school or college history class you will be “taught” that the “era of ‘McCarthyism'” wrought the greatest abridgements of human rights since the Spanish inquisition. When the “Venona transcripts” came out after the Soviet bust-up and proved that McCarthy was essentially right, the elites changed neither a jot nor a tittle of their “McCarthy witch-hunt” meme.
Consequently, most people believe the “evil McCarthy” myth, and that belief seems to have poisoned our collective mind on the contemporary questions involving our attitudes about mohammedan aggression abroad and its cancerous growth at home. No one can ask any questions about the mohammedans lest he “take us back to the days of the McCarthy ‘witch hunts.'”
Why do our elites think like that? Where do they come from?
Wanna read a great book? Get Spencer’s “the truth about muhammad” .. excellent read.
Beginning with the abolitionists, the “progressives,” anti-anti-communists, feminists, liberals, islamophiliacs, xenophiles–in short, most of the people who detest what they deride as “fly-over” America & its inhabitants–seem to originate in New England. In fact, that peculiarity predates the abolition period. Think of the “blue-light” Federalist Anglophiles who favored secession from the new American republic during the War of 1812. By the time they got around to calling for a secession convention in Hartford, the war was about over and they cancelled their project. It’s fun to imagine a counter-factual history of the “revised” United States without them.
Sadly, many of our leaders today are like the aforementioned children. How can we achieve victory when they adamantly embrace the bumpersticker mentality the likes of “War is not the answer” or \ “Coexist”? Never once would they consider that victory is achieved by utterly destroying an enemies ability and will to fight.
obama would have Americans believe that they can negotiate with terrorist organizations that have one talking point, “KILL AMERICANS”. How does one find a compromise with an enemy whose only goal is your death?
dredger 10 hours ago
You are absolutely on target sayng ALL of our problems are directly realated to liberalism. But…I am not sure than 1 in 40 have a clue as to how to correct the situation. A clue: liberalism = seculr humanism. As long as we smirk at that….. things aint agoin to change no matter how well intentioned so called conservatives are.
RepublicansHateTheTruth 1 day ago in reply to winston_wolfe
You are the one who threatens all of us. Your sick, twisted ideology is a threat to all mankind. Further, your abject stupidity is a threat to the integrity of the entire human gene pool; as you could set-back the entire evolutionary cycle simply by procreating.
Douglas Lynn 1 day ago
We need to be honest with ourselves. People have committed mass murder in the name of most every religion on earth. Atheists like Stalin and Mao are the all time champions at mass murder. But, today Islam is clearly the most dangerously intolerant belief system in the world. Islamist dictators in Africa have killed millions of Christians. China, Russia, all of Europe, all of Africa and the U.S. all have terrorist problems and the terrorist are Islamic. The dominate voice in every other belief system seem content to allow democracy to determine cultural values. Islamic voices around the world are uniquely willing to murder or at least subjugate all non-believers. There is no equality for non-believers in an Islamic country. Non-believers pay special taxes and are commonly considered less worthly of respect and fairness than blacks were in the pre-civil rights south.
TheNightHawk 1 day ago in reply to Douglas Lynn
Two things to note:
1) There was a crisis awhile back in Sudan. Arab Muslims were killing or enslaving pretty much all black Christians, Pagans, AND Muslims. It was all about race. Bush did quite a bit to stop that.
2) More Muslims are killed by Muslims for religious reasons than are killed by any other group. (Yes this parallels the black community in America)
TheNightHawk 1 day ago in reply to RepublicansHateTheTruth
Dear Republican hater who hates truth.
I was talking to a Palestinian transplant Friday. Nice guy. Relatively mild mannered. Matter of factly told me that you are almost correct.
He was upset that we try to interfere when Muslims execute homosexual men.
Of course, the rest of your post is nonsense.
They hate us because we try to keep them from murdering each other in a struggle for power over each other. We have been trying to make 10th century barbarians act like civilized folk so that truly civilized folk can participate in lawful trade and commerce.
That’s it in a nutshell.
Well, that and the fact that you and the embarrassment in the White House are liars.
Maybe that’s why O-Bumblers poll numbers are in the toilet. He can’t decide if he should pander to gays or if he should pander to Muslims that kill gays for being gay.
Gosh! Who knew that a President could face such difficult decisions?
For your information, the clan mostly consisted of southern democrats. Most clan members were also outright socialists. One such southern democrat clan member was often invited to speak at pro-abortion rallies and meetings at the request of liberal icon Margaret Sanger. The abortion movement and KKK often worked in unison; as they were both enamored with the promotion of eugenics as a means of controlling the population surge amongst minorities in the country during the mid-20th century.
So, if anyone has intrinsic ties to the clan, it is you and your ilk on the left. You are a misinformed, ignorant tool of the most evil, twisted, malignant ideological movement ever known to man. You and your leftist comrades are the direct ideological descendants of the communists, socialists, and fascists. The forefathers of your movement have untold amounts of blood on their hands. You are in no position whatsoever to sit there and make moral assessments of anyone.
Gene Lalor 3 hours ago
Now that the dusty rhetoric has cleared from Ground Zero, the Pentagon, and Shanksville following the politicians’ commemorative politicking at those sites, following the families of relatives of the 2,977 victims of 9/11/2001 publicly and privately expressing their grief in expectations of to closing memories that defy closure, the rats are leaving their ratholes.
To be sure, not every nation ignored 9/11.
Parts of the world paid solemn tribute to America’s incalculable losses on that day and shared our anguish on the tenth anniversary of the darkest day in American history. One of the most stirring expressions of solidarity occurred in Paris where two forty-foot replicas of the Twin Towers were erected in the shadow of the Eifel Tower displaying in two languages France’s national sentiment, “The French Will Never Forget.”
However, far from everyone abroad and at home expressed that emotion. The vermin emerged.
In London, instead of joining hands with Americans on solemn occasions dedicating memorials to the dead of September 11th, 2001 Muslims in London chose to emulate their fellow Islamists who hatefully exulted in the attacks on the World Trade Center and Washington ten years ago by spreading more hatred, compliments of Islam.
As trite as it has become, Santayana’s warning that forgetting the past is a certain path to its repetition, will be forgotten at America’s peril.
lgoldrick 4 days ago in reply to George Stark
There are times when listening to the lamestream media spout their opinions as news that I get discouraged thinking that I am alone in my analysis of the facts. Then I read postings like these & take heart. I am not alone in thinking that BHO is an astonishingly corrupt President who has flouted the law & circumvented the Constitution at every turn since he first attempted to take the oath of office, haltingly & incorrectly thanks in part to John Roberts’ own errors. He made it clear prior to ever running for POTUS that he viewed the Constitution as an impediment to Federal impositions upon the citizenry (that WAS the point of the document afterall) but that on the whole it was not a good thing, that “more enlightened” theories on the use of Federal power would if implemented yield the greater good if only the pesky limitations on that power in the Constitution could be swept away. He did it, with the help of like minded Corruptocrats in Congress & the media.