Notable Quotes

There’s no such thing as a coincidence. Today I’m looking forward to speaking at a pro-life women’s resource center in Nevada. I intend again to remind women that we are strong enough and capable enough to choose life and work together to create a culture that empowers everyone to live to the fullest. How ironic that on this same day President Obama will be headlining a gala event for the highly controversial and repeatedly discredited organization Planned Parenthood. He’s the first sitting president to speak to them, but then again he’s also the first president who is so radically pro-abortion that as a state senator he refused three times to vote in favor of legislation that would simply provide medical attention to babies born alive from botched abortions. Considering the role Planned Parenthood has played in looking the other way while the mass murdering abortion doctor Gosnell butchered babies born alive from his horrific infanticide procedures and abused his women patients, it’s perhaps not surprising that this same president sees nothing wrong with allowing his name to be so openly associated with this organization.

Please take a look at the following excerpt from Jonah Goldberg’s book “Liberal Fascism” for information about the racist and eugenicist origins of Planned Parenthood, then ask yourself again why in the world our president would “bless” the cruel underlying efforts of an organization like this. Do you want him to spend your family’s hard earned tax dollars funding this culture of death? Surely there are people of good conscience within Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion centers who will feel the imperative within themselves to find other ways to help women in their time of need. There are so many better answers than merely eliminating the most precious, promising ingredient we have on earth – innocent human life. May efforts to cull the defenseless and vulnerable not be “blessed,” instead may God bless those who decide that respecting a culture of life in America is the only way to get us out of the mess we’re in.

– Sarah Palin

“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”~ Martin Luther King, Jr.


Oh yes it is over with only the death throes left. And rigor mortis. The greatest, most successful experiment in government and society has failed. It has been brought down by the very thing the Founders feared: human nature. Over the last 75 years or so while the people were busy making livings, winning wars and so on a parasite has infiltrated and taken over the entire education system from pre-K through Ph. D. and beyond. The media has become a propaganda machine Hitler would love (except for the pesky News Corporation). The entertainment industry from sports, movie and music stars to the owners of the mammoth corporations are far left zealots. They are dipping their fingers everywhere and rewarding their advocates with taxpayer money. Worse, they are dictating every second of our lives — all of our lives — from what we eat, what we buy, what we drive to how we think.
So, Bert hits the edges, but the truth is: IT IS OVER FOLKS.

Prelutsky1540 soundnfury

sound: Reagan also said he regretted signing the most liberal abortion bill in the nation while he was governor, and I’m sure he regretted believing the Democrats when they promised to build a fence at the southern border if he’d only sign the amnesty bill. For someone well-known for having said “Trust but verify,” he seemed to be about as skeptical as Little Mary Sunshine.

David Caskey

As I recall, the Reagan tax cuts were supposed to be linked to a massive decrease in Federal spending. Only thing was that Congress would not stop the spending. Rather than shut down the government like Clinton and Obama, Reagan did the best to work with what he had. You can’t get this from history books. You had to understand the times and what you could get from both parties. Then, as now, we knew that the Republicans were just as bad as the Democrats and that they were in Washington to advance their personal agendas and not the best interest of the country.

As to the whistle blowers wanting to keep their jobs, I have ridden that white horse to the forefront for much needed change. What happens is that, as you fight the good fight, all those that would have supported you are at the starting point watching and not helping. You are then trampled by the opposition and your “friends”, “fellow patriots” or whatever you desire to call the spineless peers watch on and assure others that you are a nut and that your views don’t represent theirs. Why sacrifice your financial stability when you don’t have the support of others and your sacrifice will mean something? Did the founding fathers really sacrifice? After Patrick Henry yelled out “give me liberty or give me death”, he got out of Dodge and avoid the British like the plague. Other men gave their lives. Paul Revere certainly did his part with warning of the British, at least until he was captured about a mile of so from his starting point. Then he spent the rest of the war making money and living the big life, to the point that he was almost convicted of treason, fraud and other felonies.
We certainly need to so something about Washington and our broken system. We tried this in 1860, and lost. I am for trying again as I think that our system is broken. Only I am not going to be on the white horse while everyone acts as if they never heard that we have a problem with our political system.

Prelutsky1540 Ken08534

Ken: The problem is that Regan couldn’t justify increased spending because the money mainly went to things that were not the constitutionally-delegated responsibility of the federal government. When you get right down to it, just about the only major ticket item relegated by the Founding Fathers to Washington was national defense. Not education, not health care, not farm subsidies, not welfare.

Jonathan Miller
A dirty usurper that has sued to seal and hide records, bribed, squashed legal proceedings, intimidated witnesses, sequestered family from reporters, blackmailed, extorted, and perhaps killed to keephis fraud hidden brought down by an 80 year old Sheriff a thousand miles away. America should be eating it up.

Americans are too busy watching TV and letting it rot their brains or playing games on their phones, or texting empty words to empty people. Too many Americans are too busy doing nothing and the others are too busy working to support them.

The problem is that anyone with children and a spouse is vulnerable to coercion that comes in the night in the form of an anonymous phone call that mentions the safety of one’s children who go to school at such-and-such location, and visit such-and-such establishments.  What husband and father wouldn’t cave to implied threats against his family?
They all should record all of their phone calls, don’t take any from people they don’t know, and stay away from anonymous emails.  Otherwise the threats will come in and they won’t be able to trust that their family can be protected because the threats will be implied, subtle, ambiguous, -not direct.   If the court rules on anything other than the law, then you will know that they were reached and dissuaded.  AN

Has Corsi made a pip about the impossible birth certificate included in the Democrat Party amicus brief?  If not, why not?  Someone needs to emphasis that such a document is impossible as a result of a scan.  Someone has the original transparent-background text file components and overlaid them on top of a different background.  How in a million years can those fool democrats explain their own submission?  AN

Talking the talk is great, but not enough. Where’s walking the walk? Where’s fidelity to that old dusty antiquated document known as the foundation of our republic? The same one you swore a lying oath to preserve, protect, and defend against all domestic enemies, such RINOs like yourself?

RINOs aren’t bad people.  No, they aren’t.  You can’t lump a mere half-traitor in with a full-blown traitor.  Each deserve their own separate punishment.

If the Angel of Death was commissioned to slay every violator of their oath of Allegiance to the Constitution, then Washington would end up de-populated.  And the well-meaning Rick Santorums wouldn’t survive either.

An oath is a sacred vow before the Judge of the Living and the Dead to fulfill your word, to be faithful to the words sworn.  If politicians are unwilling to be true to their vow, they have no right to be in service to the American people.  We deserve better than a cabal of liars and oath breakers to lead us.  We will never see a Constitution defending Congress in any foreseeable future.  A.Nash  obama–

The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama [Sr.]’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama [Sr.] birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.

However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

RonnieandRicky Ramey
Ben, I wish the mainstream media would please answer this question. Why are they accepting him as legal when they know that he is not? Which inspires a list of other questions I will narrow down. IS our government being held hostage to allow someone they know, who is not a legal, remain president? Is our government being held hostage? This is the only logical answer that I can come up with as to why they continue to allow Obama to be president. Is our government being held hostage seems to be a very important question that I ask myself everyday. It is the only way I can rationalize that our government has allowed such treason and embarrassment to come upon the U.S.

The vast majority of those that should/could do something about this are white. They don’t want to go down in the history books as the ones that caused the great race war in this country. If Obama was white he would never get away with what he has done from the start. But he is the closest thing to black that Democrats have gotten and so he has free reign to do all the damage he wants.

I think it safe to say that Barry Soetoro (BS) aka Barack Obama (BO) is the embodiment of a real bad stench.
Would someone somewhere please find a way to extinguish it?

In a dismissed New Jersey ballot challenge brought on by Mario Apuzzo, Apuzzo was able to get the Obama lawyer to stipulate in open court that White House Obama Birth Certificate in NO WAY proves that Obama was born in Hawaii. In fact, the lawyer stipulated in open court that no evidence existed that showed Obama was born in Hawaii. This was a stipulation made by Obama’s OWN LAWYER.

Liars!  “a computer-generated certified copy”  Anything computer-generated is not a copy because it copies nothing!  It is computer generated, -not photography generated.  And it can’t be certified because it’s an Abstract, and not a True Copy.  Is it certified to be a “True Abstract”?  Such a thing doesn’t exist!

Majority will: “Truly idiotic and blatant racism, elitism and chauvinism. It’s the twisted birther bigot fantasy summed up.”
AR Nash:  I am Spock; you are Scottie.  And as Mr. Spock would say: “I fail to see the logic in your response.”


Helpfully, the Congressional Research Service gathered all of the information relevant to Cruz’s case a few years ago, at the height (nadir?) of Obama birtherism. In short, the Constitution says that the president must be a natural-born citizen. “The weight of scholarly legal and historical opinion appears to support the notion that ‘natural born Citizen’ means one who is entitled under the Constitution or laws of the United States to U.S. citizenship ‘at birth’ or ‘by birth,’ including any child born ‘in’ the United States, the children of United States citizens born abroad, and those born abroad of one citizen parents who has met U.S. residency requirements,” the CRS’s Jack Maskell wrote. So in short: Cruz is a citizen; Cruz is not naturalized; therefore Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and in any case his mother is a citizen. You can read the CRS memo at bottom; here’s a much longer and more detailed 2011 version.

“The weight…of opinion…appears….to support a *notion* (!)  Wow!  What precise accuracy.  What definity! What certainty! Can you imagine a brain surgeon operating on you with that degree of certainty about what he should do?

“Did you know most kids’ books on Obama leave out his Hawaiian story?” she asks as her mother exhibits Obama’s page in a book called “U.S. Presidents” that makes no mention of Hawaii. Borland finds such omissions “flabbergasting,” and points out that they are not confined to children’s books. The Obama biography video shown at the Democratic National Convention in 2008, for example, doesn’t even mention Hawaii.


Citizenship (unlike subjecthood) was always understood to be
people-based relationship between a citizen and his fellow citizens. In
contrast, subjecthood is a land-based relationship between the
individual (subject) who wishes to acquire a permanent license to live
and work on a piece of land, and the king who owns that land.

Since subjecthood is a land-based relationship, it may be acquired from
the land on which you were born. But citizenship, being a people-based
relationship, can ONLY be acquired from the people that your citizenship
would tie you to.

In the literature dating from ancient Greece and Rome, up to the writing
of the US Constitution, dealing with the concept of “citizenship” in
general, whenever citizenship is acquired by birth, it is always
inherited from a parent, never from one’s place of birth. In the
writings of Aristotle, Bodin, Pufendorf, Wolff, Vattel, etc.,
citizenship-at-birth always comes from a parent, never from one’s
birthplace. (See Section 4.4 and footnote 20 in my Tutorial).

Furthermore, in England, the term “natural born” had both a factual
meaning and a legal meaning. With very few exceptions, all English
subjects were natural-born subjects in the eyes of the law. Naturalized
subjects, foreign-born subjects, and nearly all persons born on English
soil had the status or legal position of a natural born subject. But
only those persons who were born within the king’s realm, of parents
owing actual obedience (allegiance) to the king, were natural-born
subjects in fact; all other so-called natural-born subjects were merely
deemed to be so by a “fiction of law”. (See Question 19 in my Tutorial).

Keep up the good work.
Stephen Tonchen

the Chinese Penal Code by Staunton, published in 1810. That Code provided: ‘All persons renouncing their country and allegiance, or devising the means thereof, shall be beheaded; and in the punishment of this offense, no distinction shall be made between principals and accessories. The property of all such criminals shall be confiscated, and their wives and children distributed as slaves to the great officers of state. * * * The parents, grandparents, brothers, and grand-children of such criminals, whether habitually living with them under the same roof or not, shall be perpetually banished to the distance of 2,000 lee.

‘All those who purposely conceal and connive at the perpetration of this crime, shall be strangled. Those who inform against, and bring to justice criminals of this description, shall be rewarded with the whole of their property.

‘Those who are privy to the perpetration of this crime, and yet omit to give any notice or information thereof to the magistrate, shall be punished with 100 blows and banished perpetually to the distance of 3,000 lee.

‘If the crime is contrived, but not executed, the principal shall be strangled, and all the accessories shall, each of them, be punished with 100 blows, and perpetual banishment to the distance of 3,000 lee. * * *’ Staunton’s Pen. Code China, 272, § 255.

Shortly after I got out of the service I thought very seriously about immigrating to Austrailia. I contacted the consulate and was sent information about immigration. 1. UK citizens have preference 2. White has preference 3. Professional (Dr.s, Engineers etc.) have preference 4.Skilled Tradesmen (Electricians, Carpenters, Briclayers Etc.) 5. Others not very PC, but damned efficient.

Wealth creation requires sound money, healthy markets, property rights, reasonable regulation, and the rule of law. It requires an optimistic entrepreneurial class that believes its hard work and capital investments will pay off. When the entrepreneur confronts a task he does not want to do himself, a job is created, as long as the wage is worth his cost in time and money. When his costs are uncertain, he is afraid to hire.

Ken Blackwell · April 15, 2013
But this is an administration that is all about style and never about substance. The first act of President Obama was to sign — with elaborately choreographed pomp and circumstance — his Executive Order closing Guantánamo Bay. Oh, the show it was. Within one year, this “recruiting tool for al Qaeda” would be history, we were assured.

Well, is it? Or is Mr. Obama’s bootless, fruitless Executive Order Zero the real dead letter? And because it’s a dead letter, how seriously does anyone take the words of this administration?

When Ronald Reagan warned the striking air traffic controllers they must return to work — as provided in federal law — or be fired, they balked. He fired them. The world took note. “With Reagan,” the KGB told the Soviet Communist bosses, “words are deeds.”
With Obama, with Kerry, with Hagel, words are just words.

When you give the inmates the right to vote on how the prison is run, there will be problems, big problems.  And when you allow non-taxpayers the right to vote on the selection of those who run the taxing authority of the government (Congress) then you will have even bigger problems since they will always back the benefits that they do not have to pay for.  AN

I was confident that the nation could survive another four years of Obama’s presidency. What I wasn’t so confident about was whether America could survive a population that would re-elect him. That remains my major concern. B.P.

“I do not worry that Obama will become our dictator. He is a lame duck president,”  Better than that is the fact that only Congress has the authority to declare war and to call up the state militia in time of insurrection or invasion.  The President has no authority to declare marital law, since it cannot exist across state lines.  Governors can declare martial law in territories or cities where there is insurrection or anarchy but Presidents can’t, except in Washington DC. and federal territories where federal agents enforce the laws.  AN

“I do not worry that Obama will become our dictator. He is a lame duck president,”  Better than that is the fact that only Congress has the authority to declare war and to call up the state militia in time of insurrection or invasion.  The President has no authority to declare marital law, since it cannot exist across state lines.  Governors can declare martial law in territories or cities where there is insurrection or anarchy but Presidents can’t, except in Washington DC. and federal territories where federal agents enforce the laws.  AN

Adrien Nash Obama’s fraudulence is in the same category as UFOs and human excrement. They aren’t discussed in high society, among the “educated”, the elite, the socially superior, the political insiders. But please don’t try to tell me that they don’t exist. Keeping something top secret is not unusual at all, like the sexual sins of many presidents and the sexuality of certain movie stars. Hell, if you believe the government, then Area 51 also doesn’t exist.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: