The Kenyan Scenario


 By Dan Crosby of THE DAILY PEN,  March 23, 2012  (additions  July-9-2012)


IMPLICATIVE DISCOVERY: A government document found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates that a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory citizenship, within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child born to a U.S. citizen between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa. The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued for this specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than 18 months, among thousands from other parts of the world.

INS records show 1 alien child from Kenya requesting a certificate of citizenship in 1961

INS records of arriving passengers missing for the week Obama was born in 1961

Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport records prior to 1965 destroyed

There’s no record of the whereabouts of Obama’s mother between February-late August 1961.

Obama’s passport records breached in 2008

The INS records of U.S. international arrival is missing only for the first week of August 1961.

Mary and Thomas Ayers (parents of the radical Weather Underground terrorist of the 1960’s Bill Ayers, with whom Obama served on the Annenberg Education Project Fund board for almost 10 years) paid for a black foreign student’s education.  Obama shows up to thank them.
Numerous newspapers around the world report that Obama is Kenyan born

The Kenyan birth records were tampered with according to government officials.

Tim Adams affirms that both hospitals in HI have no records for Obama.

Obama’s electronic images of birth certificates have been tampered with.

Michelle Obama refers to Kenya as Barack’s home country on video twice.


Unverified African Birth Certificate

A Suggested Narrative:
How Obama is physically Born in Kenya but still Obtains Hawaiian Birth Registration Record
By:  CDR Kerchner (Ret)    Originally Written:  Sat Jul 11, 2009 Updated:  Sun Mar 04, 2012

I’ve cogitated on the “facts” about Obama over the last year and finally wrote this in June 2009 but I thought I’d re-post this suggested narrative to explain events we’ve seen to date regarding the Usurper in the Oval Office. If you have Twitter, Facebook, and email lists, feel free to “tweet” or forward this narrative to others. Thanks.

A proposed narrative to explain the various seemingly conflicting statements made about Obama’s birth in Kenya and Hawaii:
Underage U.S. teenager gets pregnant via a significantly older married man from Kenya would have been a very unusual event in 1961.

Mother of teenager is in total shock over the event as would have been many mothers of teenage girls getting pregnant in 1961 and says to her daughter you have ruined your life and will make going to college much harder for yourself and convinces the teenage girl to go to Kenya in the last trimester or two of her pregnancy with the plan to give up the baby to the Kenyan natural family of the natural father of the child to be raised in Kenya by them.

Mother travels to Kenya either directly from Hawaii or via Canada. If she was indeed married to Obama Sr. as claimed she would have been able to get a British passport as the wife of a British Subject, Obama Sr.  Traveling via Canada would allow her easier access to Kenya since as the spouse of a British Subject she would be flying from one British Commonwealth nation, Canada, to a British Colony. That would make travel to and entry into Kenya much easier. And getting into and out of Canada for an American citizen (the mother) was easy back in 1961.

The Kenyan paternal step-grandmother of the child attends Obama’s birth in Kenyan hospital in Mombasa Kenya (The Kenyan paternal step-grandmother has attested to that fact she was there at the birth of Obama in Kenya and held him in her arms in Mombasa Hospital in a sworn affidavit.) and is ready to take custody of the child and raise the child for the foot-loose and fancy-free natural father with multiple wives. The U.S. teenage mother is supposed to return to Hawaii, or fly directly to Washington State, or fly to Washington State via Vancouver, Canada, leaving the child with the natural father’s family in Kenya and restart her life back in Hawaii and/or in college in Washington State minus the child … and go to college, re-starting her life anew. In 1961, a pregnant teenage girl giving up a child to restart their lives anew was not unusual.

But nature and maternal instincts throws the plan a curve ball. Maternal instincts kick in and mother cannot leave the baby in Kenya, either due to pure maternal instincts or in seeing the poor conditions in Kenya that her child would be raised in with a mostly absentee father over there. Thus she changes her mom’s plan and she takes the baby and Kenyan hospital birth certificate issued by the Mombasa Hospital to the American Embassy or consulate in Kenya and shows them the Kenyan Birth Certificate for her child and “explains” the baby was born unexpectedly in Kenya while there visiting her “husband’s” family. U.S. officials then stamp her passport as traveling with an infant child.

Mother gets on plane or ship carrying the child and travels back to Hawaii and appears at the airport or port upon arrival with the new baby in tow, or to Washington State, or to Vancouver, Canada, and calls her mother in Hawaii telling her what she did, much to the shock of her mother, the child’s U.S. grandmother. Baby easily is passed through U.S. entry officials due to the U.S. Embassy stamp on mother’s passport and the supporting Kenyan birth certificate showing her, a U.S. citizen, is the mother, or Obama’s mom brings him across the border from Vancouver, Canada, to Washington State to start college in the fall of 1961.

The date of arrival back in the USA is on or about 4 Aug 1961. Obama II would likely be a few weeks old by that time putting his real date of birth sometime in mid or early July 1961 in Kenya.

Child’s U.S. grandmother is very much beside herself at this change in plans by her daughter, the mother of the child. The child’s grandmother then knowing or learning from legal advisers how lax Hawaiian birth registration laws were in 1961, then cooks up a plan and scheme with the child’s mother, to lie to Hawaiian officials and swear and sign an affidavit at the birth registry office that the child was born in Hawaii at home on 4Aug 1961, the circa date of return to the USA and not the real date of birth, with no witnesses but them, in order to get the child U.S. citizenship (a highly desirable status) to make future travel and life easier on the family and new child.
They committed this fraud and lie and cover-up simply to gain U.S. citizenship for the child, a highly coveted status for any child, not knowing that this child might someday grow up and try to become the President and thus risk having their fraud, plans, and lies exposed.

Birth registration office then routinely issues the announcements to the two newspapers ( , as was the office’s custom at the time, i.e., to send the papers lists of babies birth registrations, of the birth event which at its source was only based on the false sworn testimony of the grandmother or mother.  If the mother was not in Hawaii at the time, the grandmother may have even forged Stanley Ann Dunham’s signature on the affidavit. Thus the birth notices in the newspapers are not independent data; they all came from the same source, the false sworn statements from the mother and/or grandmother that the child Obama II was born in Hawaii.

Thus under this narrative the birth records in the vaults in Hawaii may be simply sworn affidavits of the mother and grandmother saying Obama was born at home with no witnesses, all based on lies and fraud, which seems to be a common occurrence with Mr. O’s entire life. Obama’s birth may be REGISTERED as having occurred in Hawaii, but he was not physically born there.

In addition a couple years later Obama II may have been legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii (with those records hidden to us like many other records for Obama).  Lolo was the 2nd husband of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama.  Thus, Obama’s legal name of record in the Hawaiian system is now still Barry Soetoro or Soebarkah, or something else.  Thus Obama cannot show the world what Hawaiian authorities are sending him and thus the need to forge and alter document before proffering them to the world via the internet images.  Possibly he is quietly and secretly working to have his named changed back to Barack Hussein Obama II in the Hawaii system.
When the truth and facts do finally come out, it will be interesting to see how close this suggested narrative using the facts, data, statements, which we now have access to from two sides of the word, which I have analyzed as an experienced genealogist and composed this narrative to fit that data in hand thus far, actually fits the reality of what happened back in the spring and summer of 1961.

This suggested narrative is thus hereby offered to the world to explain events and facts as revealed thus far.  It is subject to change as new facts emerge. Comments and feedback are welcome.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA (


Testimony from a Mombasa science teacher and the Mombasa
Registrar of births, that Obama’s birth certificate from Mombasa is genuine. A
copy of President Obama’s birth certificate that Lucas Smith obtained through
the help of a Kenyan Colonel who got it recently directly from the Coast
General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya .

This also contains many things from BHO’s past that I have never heard before.
“I asked a British history buff I know if he could find out who the colonial registrar was for Mombasa in 1961.
He called me up a few minutes ago and said “Sir Edward F. Lavender”
Source(s): ” Kenya Dominion Record 4667 Australian library.”
Posted by Alan Peters

See this Alan Keyes video:

“On August 4, 1961 Obama’s mother, father and grandmother were attending a Muslim festival in Mombassa, Kenya. Mother had been refused entry to airplanes due to her 9 month pregnancy. It was a hot August day at the festival so the Obama’s went to the beach to cool off. While swimming in the ocean his mother experienced labor pains so was rushed to the Coast Provincial General Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya where Obama was born a few hours later at 7:21 pm on August 4, 1961. Four days later his mother flew to Hawaii and registered his birth in Honolulu as a certificate of live birth which omitted the place and hospital of birth.”

Barack Hussein Obama is the first U.S. president born in Africa at the Coast Provincial Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya. The Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery and of no value.

A video showing how an Obama staffer forged above green certificate of live birth.

The Washington state case also alleges, “Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal as a contributing writer and published an article on June 9, 2008, stating that a research team went to Mombasa, Kenya, and located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at Coast General Maternity Hospital, to his father, a Kenyan citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen.

Video of Grandmother stating she was present at Obama’s birth in Mombasa, Kenya.

Letter from Kitau in Mombasa, Kenya:

I happen to be Kenyan. I was born 1 month before Obama at Mombasa medical center. I am a teacher here at the MM Shaw Primary School in Kenya. I compared my birth certificate to the one that has been put on by Taitz and mine is exactly the same.
I even have the same registrar and format. The type is identical.
I am by nature a skeptical person. I teach science here and challenge most things that cannot be proven.
So I went to an official registrar today and pulled up the picture on the web. They magnified it and determined it to be authentic. There is even a plaque with Registrar Lavenders name on it as he was a Brit and was in charge of the Registrar office from 1959 until January of 1964.
The reason the date on the certificate says republic of Kenya is that we were a republic when the “copy” of the original was ordered. I stress the word “copy”. My copy also has republic of Kenya.
So what you say is true about Kenya not being a republic at the time of Obama’s birth, however it was a republic when the copy was ordered.
The birth certificate is genuine. I assure you it will be authenticated by a forensic auditor. We are very proud Obama was born here.
We have a shrine for him and there are many people who remember his birth here as he had a white mother. They are being interviewed now by one of your media outlets.
Fortunately they even have pictures of his parents with him immediately after his birth at the Mombasa hospital with the hospital in the back ground.
It will be a proud day for us when it is proven that he was born here and a Kenyan became the most powerful man in the world.
I encourage anyone to come here and visit. I will be happy to take you and show you the pictures at the hospital myself as well as my document and many others that are identical to what Taitz posted.

God Bless.  Kitau

5 Responses to The Kenyan Scenario

  1. arnash says:

    A Few Questions Mr. President from an unknown citizen
    Barry, why did you fly from Illinois to Kenya in 2006, to attend a ceremony honoring your “Kenyan place of birth”?

    Why did you NOT stand up and tell the authorities and dignataries, that you would be UNABLE to accept such an award, as you were born in Hawaii?

    In 2006, Senator Barack Hussein Obama and wife Michelle visited his family and his birth place in Kogelo, Kenya. The Kenyan government dedicated Obama’s birth place and made it an official national landmark. His Kenyan family and government all acknowledge that he was born there in Kogelo

    Prior to his visit, the people of Kogelo had dedicated their small 4 room school to the US Senator, naming it the Senator Obama Kogelo Secondary School. The school had been built on land that Obama’s paternal grandfather had donated for the school.

    When the senator saw the conditions of the school, which had no running water, no electricity and no sanitation, he promised Yuanita Obiero, the school’s principle,”I know you are working very hard and struggling to bring up the school, but I have said I will assist the school, and I will do so.”

    Five years later, the school has received no assistance from its honored namesake and the town is beginning to give up hope of ever getting anything from him. They feel he has broken his promise to help, but then what else is new?

    Mr. President,
    You have championed so many causes battling discrimination. Your success ending DTDA policy makes me wonder why you have ignored more rampant discrimination particularly gender bias regarding the Armed Services. When do you plan to have females register for Selective Services? When are females going to be denied access to higher learning because they refuse to register? You are the champion of ending gender bias also are you not? Or do you support gender discrimination if it is politically correct? Why is the ACLU silent on this matter?

    Mr. President,
    In your book “Dreams From My Father” you mention looking at your birth certificate while you were in high school (page 26 of the 2004 paperback edition). This would have been most likely a certified photocopy of the original certificate that would show the name of the attending physician or nurse and other details normally shown on an original certificate.

    Have you lost that copy of your birth certificate? If you have, please say so. If not, you would be doing both yourself and the nation a great service if you would make it, or a certified scanned copy, available to

    the public. Such a scanned copy would be more acceptable to me, and I am sure to many millions of others, than the so obviously doctored image that was published earlier this year.

  2. arnash says:

    Sissy Space Mar 24, 2012

    I remember when I was a teen-ager in the ’80’s. If a teenage girl became pregnant, their families would go to great lengths to hide it. In the ’60s you did not use the term ‘pregnant’, you whispered the word ‘expecting’.

    Is it possible that Obama’s mum left America for Kenya in Feb to hide her pregnancy and deliver there. It is not looking good for his legitimacy.

    A.R.Nash: Back then great shame was attached to pregnancies out of wedlock. Back then there was a family across the street from my home with a teenage daughter whom my older brother may have impregnated, -which is what I suspect because one day they were simply gone off the face of the earth, -like they never lived there. No good-bye. Nothing. Poof!

    C.A. HollyMar 24, 2012
    And then there’s this:


    Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Apr 25, 2011

    turretman1stMar 24, 2012 10:41 AM

    you can download the imigration book for 1961 and 1962 at in pdf format. just go there and type title in and get it yourself. real hard to forge that or hide it. JUST DOWNLOADED 30 MINS AGO BOTH BOOKS.

    BOOKS TITLE was not shown in article. -title here:
    annual report of the immigration and naturalization service 1961 or (1962)

    Remember that during the campaign the ONLY birth document shown was a CertificaTION of Live Birth. (Which indeed were issued in Hawaii for “Residents Of Hawaii For ONE-YEAR” whenever they had a baby while temporarily out-of-state/country.)

    But curiously, (or not so curiously), it has now been changed to be less definitive.

    cfkerchnerMar 25, 2012
    How the two birth announcements got placed in the two HI newspapers. All birth registration announcements were placed by the Health Dept, not the parents. A birth registered due to falsified information provided to the Health Dept or using loopholes in the HI laws to say a birth occurred in HI when it actually did not resulted in the birth announcement. The old database adage applies … garbage in, garbage out. Listen to this Bill Cunningham radio show explanation back in Aug 2009:

    Penbrook OneMar 25, 2012
    Moreover, what is most interesting about the newspaper announcement saga is that an announcement for a marriage license for the Obama’s alleged marriage in February appears nowhere in any paper.

    The Model State Vital Statistics Act and Hawaii Revised Statutes clearly mandate such an application and that the Department of Health must post them in a public site. Notice the other marriage applications during the same time around Obama’s DOH birth announcements.

    I personally do not doubt that a “CertificaTION of Live Birth” was indeed filed/recorded around Aug. 4, 1961, and THAT would indeed have triggered the “Public Notice” to the newspapers, (for printing if they chose).

    The PROBLEM is that the COLB can be filed by any “Resident Of Hawaii For ONE-YEAR”, (Hawaii DOH rule #338 – 17.8).

    Surprisingly (even today) the way it is written, not ONE WORD of “proof” of an actual “baby” is required. The ONLY “proof” required is that the filer be a “Resident Of Hawaii For ONE-YEAR”. (google it: Hawaii Department of Health $338 – 17.8)

    I am sure that statute has been “revised” but most probably was even looser back in 1961 as it is now.
    NOTE that there is also NO PROOF OF DATE OF BIRTH required. (Mike Zullo stated on March 1 that they have proof of at least one “3yo” that was listed as a NEWborn.

    I was amazed that the 338 – 17.8 rule was (and IS STILL) so loosely written, but look it up for yourself if you don’t believe it.

    cfkerchnerMar 25, 2012 12:05 PM

    AZ: As with all the lawsuits in the courts it was turned using court created legalisms such as “standing” and “jurisdiction” to avoid taking the case. It was appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court but SCOTUS refused to take it. Neither the Congress nor the courts are willing to address this matter on the merits. Our government is in direct opposition to the requests of We the People. What once was a minority, a significant one but still in the minority, requesting that Obama’s true legal ID be investigated on the natural born Citizen issue (they investigated McCain in Congress), is now a majority in many polls. But still Congress does nothing. Why, because they know the answer. Obama is not constitutionally eligible and they are all political cowards and afraid of Obama and his cronies. Here is a link to my webpage in which you can find out about both my federal lawsuit filed in Jan 2009 and my PA state lawsuit filed in Feb 2012. The courts are turning a blind eye and deaf ear to the people. But we are gaining on this fraud. It is only a matter of time and the truth will come out. It always does. The question is how much damage the usurper and conman in chief will have done to our nation before his exposed and brought to justice.

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)

  3. arnash says:


    An interesting statement, attributed to Stanely Ann Dunham Obama was, “how easy it was to become the mother of a young newborn black baby”. Something to that effect. From one of the friends or roommates at Washington State. This being said after enduring her first pregnancy, labor and still incapable of changing the infants diaper. The timeline is only several weeks between the arrival in Washington and the purported birth. Her birthdate, November 29, 1942(?). I believe, Ann’s father had moved earlier to Hawaii sometime in ’59 as he is pictured meeting Barack Sr. at his arrival to Hawaii to begin his studies. Somehow a convenient affair with an unconveniant result, Barack, Jr. Needless to say, Barack Sr. was very much older in his mid-twenties and a foreign student of a burgeoning trend toward international relations. A international, “rock-star” in his day.It is possible that Ann, a newcomer was shown the town and campus life by the friend of the family, Barack Sr. One of Barack Sr. known sons George looks very much like Barack Jr. A sea cruise does sound plausible with then the child to be adopted and raised by Barrack Sr., first wife in Kenya. Either way, the adoption doesn’t happen. Ann returns by sea to Seattle and begins her studies at Washington State. Everything is prearranged to keep the scandal, as low key as possible and yet allow the “rock-star” to continue his education and future international relations with the then soon to be independent nation of Kenya. BOAC regulations would not have permitted an infant to travel under the age of three months in the day, (or any other airline) from Hawaii. A prearranged ocean voyage for the pregnancy with a return port stateside is about the only remedy to a birth event in Kenya. I seriously doubt she was alone most likely a mid-wife was hired to accompany her if she went to Kenya, as may be likely. Strange as how the National Archives microfilm records are missing for first week in August. Though their was an INS docket which showed an infant with an American mother returning from Kenya. Question is does the docket reflect air travel or maritime. The missing week of microfilm may have shown the passport entry of Mrs. Obama or Dunham. The port of entree is the key.

    That is some fairly logical speculation. But it has its flaws, beginning with the lack of acknowledgement of the immense inconvenience of a long ocean voyage that would take probably a month each way, beginning and ending in Hawaii and probably requiring more than one change of ships in order to reach the eventual destiny of Kenya. For a pregnant teenager, that would require something solid in the way of assurance that the expected adoption was a certainly, -not an iffy hoped-for result.
    To save themselves, and Obama Sr, from the inevitable embarrassment, and possible loss of his permission to remain in the U.S. (after impregnating in 1960 a white teenage minor) Ann would have had to leave the island before the pregnancy become very noticeable, or lived outside of the Dunham circle of friends and acquaintances (or never left the house).

    But the known facts, along with the unknown facts, leave no reason to assume that she was not already living in Seattle when she gave birth. It was the only place where she had developed roots (during her formative teenage years) so if she left the island, (and there’s no evidence that she remained in Hawaii after February ’61) then that would be the place to move back to. The Salvation Army would have been enlisted to try to find adoptive parents. There is not one speck of reason to speculate that she would ever contemplated a long and extremely boring voyage half-way around the world to leave her infant with people that she didn’t know, didn’t care about, had no communication with, nor a promise to adopt the infant that would not have been perceived as being a blessing since the father was already married with children.

    If Dunham was living in Seattle, then there would have been no reason to forge the long form BC, but if he were born across the border in Vancouver, then there would have been a very strong reason to do so since the Obama camp was/is relying on American ignorance of the Constitution in order to pass him off a being eligible to be president merely due to a U.S. birth location. His entire legitimacy rests on the assumption that he was born in the U.S. If his original record with the Hawaiian Dept. of Health is not a certificate from a Hawaiian hospital, then the presumption that he was born in the U.S. flies out the window, and the certainty of his eligibility along with it. See by article on THE VANCOUVER SCENARIO AR Nash

  4. B. Steadman says:

    “BOAC regulations would not have permitted an infant to travel under the age of three months in the day, (or any other airline) from Hawaii.”

    MY COMMENT: According to the information given at the following ‘British Airways’ link, under the caption, “Making a booking for your infant or child” – It states: “Infants: 0 – 23 months
    You must always have a ticket for your infant’s journey.”

    British Airways (BA) was created in 1974, when the British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC) and British European Airways Corporation (BEA) were combined.

    I have not been able to locate any information specific to BOAC regarding travel restrictions on newborn children in the 1960s. I assume there were NO RESTRICTIONS then, just as there are none today on BA. This makes sense and I can’t think of any reason why newborn children should not be allowed to fly, when accompanied by a responsible adult.

    There were then and now, of course, restrictions on women flying during the advanced stages of pregnancy for obvious reasons.

    I read over “The Vancouver Scenario”. I believe it generally makes a lot of sense for the birth of BHO-II to have taken place in Canada, except for ONE TROUBLING DEFICIENCY; There is absolutely no documentation or even sketchy anecdotal reports indicating that this might have indeed occurred. I’m not saying it couldn’t have occurred, but just that I have not seen ANY evidence indicating that it actually DID occur.

    However, there is LOTS of evidence indicating that BHO-II WAS born in Kenya:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: