Conclusive Evidence of Ineligibility

  The Implications of Unanswered Questions

   “No person…except a natural born citizen, is eligible to the office of the President,…” US Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

   Much has been written regarding the clear proof that Barack Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen since his  father was not an American citizen but instead was a foreign visitor, which is clearly outside of the definition of what a natural born citizen is.  Mario Apuzzo and Leo Donofrio, as well as myself and others have written extensively on the subject, conveying the irrefutable reasons why someone with a foreign father is automatically ineligible to the office of the President, and what we’ve written isn’t based on speculation or unknown facts, but rather, on facts that are known and not hidden, facts stated plainly on the counterfeit images of supposedly existing official Hawaiian birth documents, as well as in his autobiographic writings.
The fact that an alien was the father of Barack Obama, not an American citizen,  led to him basing his alleged eligibility on the assumption that he was born within the United States rather than on the qualification of having been born to an American mother and an American father.  He was relying on the baseless assumption that being a US citizen via the 14th Amendment makes one a natural born citizen and therefore eligible to be President.  But there is a huge problem with that assumption.

It is due to the fact that no one whose citizenship is dependent on the 14th Amendment has ever been eligible to be the President since it was written for those who are not natural born citizens but rather, have an alien parent, or parents.  When it was written, slaves and their children faced discrimination due to not having a legally defined right to U.S. citizenship, and also, children of resident domiciled foreigners were in a legal limbo since it wasn’t legally determined whether or not they were to be considered citizens of the U.S.  or of the  nation of their parents former lives.  While those issues needed to be settled, what did not need to be settled, and never has been, is the citizenship of natural born Americans. It was not addressed in the Constitution, nor any amendment, nor any legislation, nor any court ruling because it is a fact automatically.  It is a fact based on natural law,  The Law of Nations, English tradition, Western tradition, Roman tradition, and human tradition.  It is “a given””, -a fundamental fact based on political birthright.
But recently the White House has severed its connection to  pro-Obama web pages that extolled the fact that the 14th Amendment declares that Barack Obama is a United States citizen and therefore is eligible to be President.  It must be assumed that someone with a brain in their head finally realized that 14th Amendment citizenship precludes one from being eligible to be the President.  So they had that connection scrubbed from all the previous White House links. Evidence of radical alteration is seen in the fact that the original “fight the smears”.com web page (http://web.archive.org/web/20100102233242/http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html) now re-directs to: http://my.democrats.org/page/content/president-obama-birth-certificate -and most of the page is newer than the date he released the pdf image of a long-form birth certificate in late April, 2011 yet the copyright year for the page only extends to 2010.  What is the Obama camp trying to hide?  It is these words from the original web page:

FACTCHECK.ORG    “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.   Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
This statement means he was born with dual-citizenship, and no person with dual-citizenship is eligible to be the President, and that fact has begun to be recognized, so they had to re-think and retreat from that fact and hide it.

So since he isn’t eligible merely for being a U.S. citizen, then what is the basis of his eligibility?  Well…actually there is none.  He must rely on the pretense that since he is a citizen, and all American citizens can grow up to be the President (?), therefore he is just like everyone else.  The problem is that he isn’t just like everyone else.  Most of us don’t personally know a lot of citizens who had a foreign father, and those who do are not natural born citizens like you and I and nearly all the people we know.  They are Constitutionally different.  Their citizenship is founded on statutes and court decisions, not on an unalienable incontestable right.

But the situation regarding Obama’s eligibility gets even worse.  No one who was not even born as a U.S. citizen is eligible to be President, and that is a fact that the public isn’t deceived about, and a fact that is behind all of the intrigue surrounding Obama’s birth documents, (-documents that do not really exist or else they would be viewable by the public, bu instead, the only things viewable by the public are computer manufactured look-alike images of such documents, images that are not the result of a scan of real paper documents but the result of digitally composited images using essential parts of various documents from which text was extracted in order to create the counterfeits).

The far ranging facts related to Obama’s two birth-document images are inexplicable, unless one is willing to deduce the logical conclusion that can and should be drawn from what is known.  Listed below are many of the reasons why nothing but mystery surrounds them, but first I’ll just cut to the chase.  The conclusion that one will come to sooner or later as a result of the fact that he has released two manufactured fakes, is that he can’t show real Hawaiian birth documents either because the hand-written affidavit in the Hawaiian records office, which accompanies the typed record, reveals that he was born in Canada, or because his mother failed to provide credible documentation as to where he was actually born and therefore no long form certificate could be produced.  Either of these possibilities, would be something he would have to hide in order to avoid talk and action of impeachment, or or the loss of credibility needed to be qualified to run again.

Lack of evidence that he was born in the U.S. results in the presence of the possibility that he wasn’t.  And that makes possible a scenario in which his mother returned to Seattle (her home of five formative teen years) to assuage her homesickness, intending to give birth there and give the child up for adoption, but for some unknown good reason did it in Vancouver instead of Seattle.  That is a scenario which would make all of the evidence of forgery surrounding the phoney Certification of Live Birth jpg image, and the eventual Certificate of Live Birth pdf image, make sense.
The accepted fact that she was in Seattle two weeks after the purported birth date of her son, and not with her bigamist husband in Hawaii, is evidence that she liked Seattle, and probably had close friends there, and would have wanted to spend some time with them after being away for a year in Hawaii, -along with preferring to attend college there.
So who has proof that she was not in Seattle near the time of her delivery?  No one.  Who has evidence that she would not have made the normal decision for her situation and chosen adoption, (which she found she couldn’t follow through on)?  The “proof” that he was born in Vancouver is no more or less verified than that he was born in Hawaii.  Also, there exists no evidence that it is not possible nor that it is false.  Can’t prove it…but no one can disprove it.
These facts, and the ones below, lead one eventually to realize that Obama has a very good reason for not showing a real examinable hard-copy that Hawaii will certify as being from their Health Dept.  He simply cannot present evidence that does not exist, and the reason it does not exist is because his birth was not on U.S. soil where evidence would exist if that were true.  That is the conclusion that one will eventually find inescapable when seeking an explanation for what is known and unknown about the evidence of the birth of Barack Obama.
If he were not born on U.S. soil, then he would not have been a U.S. citizen at birth according to U.S. law at that time because his mother was slightly too young to be able to pass her citizenship to her off-spring if born outside the U.S.  If he was not a U.S. citizen at birth, then it would be clear to all that he could not be considered to be a natural born citizen.  Then he would be viewed as a charlatan, an imposter who bamboozled everyone, -except his fellow Democrat leaders who knew the truth but hid it from the American people, and certified him anyway.

So the birth certificate issue matters, where he was born matters, because birth outside the U.S. would knock him right out of the arena of eligibility for the Presidency.  While the fact that he is not a natural born citizen is quite clear, there is little to no hope of blocking him from running again based on that ineligibility because people are either totally ignorant regarding the subject, or know the truth but don’t want to open that Pandora’s Box, or want him to remain as President anyway.  But if people knew, or were aware of the highly suspicious lack of facts regarding his place of birth, and the fact that his presented “birth certificate” images were both fakes, then they would insist that his eligibility be positively proven before allowing him on their state ballots.  That would be the end of his candidacy because he is unable to prove that he was born in the United States, -or else he would have done so already, instead of producing fake evidence.

[ Why not birth in Kenya?  Because his father was probably born in the Mombasa hospital and has the same name so it’s true that Barack  Obama (Sr.) was born in Mombasa; his father was in Hawaii at the the time of the birth; his mother would have had no reason, nor financial wherewithal to make such a long costly trip; and his mother probably had no U.S. passport at just 18 years of age because she never needed one.  Kenyans could be easily confused and self-deluded by the fact that there were two Barack Obamas, and prefer to just go with the feeling that what’s true of the father is true of the son also.]

A.R. Nash  Aug. 2011 This is  http://obama–nation.com http://photobucket.com/obama_bc

Read the “Catalog of Evidence” at:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html  Here’ s an abridged version of many of the facts:  (reuse permission pending)

No Hawaii official has yet to confirm that the online image and picture of Obama’s COLB is a true and accurate image of the paper COLB that they allegedly issued to Obama in 2007. They also have yet to confirm that they ever even issued the COLB to Obama. When citizen journalists (Miss Tickly and the Post & Email, etc.) asked Hawaii officials for their opinion of the COLB image and pictures, they did not answer their inquiries. In response to a question from WorldNetDaily, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama’s short-form Certification of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online, the image produced by the Obama campaign and the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii Department of Health, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino’s initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.

(21) In 1961 it was not very difficult for a family member to defraud the State of Hawaii by registering and claiming a child was born there when he or she was not and obtain a Hawaiian birth certificate. Birth registration fraud was easy in Hawaii and other areas.

25) No government, political commission, (including the Federal Election Commission), security, or police agency or media entity has confirmed for the American people that Obama was born in Honolulu. These official agencies simply assumed that everyone else did their due diligence on the question of where Obama was born. The simple truth is that none of these agencies did any due diligence and now want to simply sweep this constitutional crisis under the rug to save political face.

(26) Nancy Pelosi, in her capacity as the Chair of the Democratic National Convention, signed an affidavit to 50 states certifying that Obama was nominated for the Office of President. In many of the 50 states, Pelosi did not address the issue of Obama’s Article II “natural born citizenship” qualifications. Nowhere in the unusual nominating documents that Pelosi provided to many States does it say he is qualified to serve as President per the Article II Constitutional requirements, if he is elected. What Pelosi filed in these states simply says that Obama has been nominated as the Democratic candidate for the Office of President. [with the language used in previous Presidential elections removed].

A copy of Pelosi’s signed document for Hawaii and the 2nd and different version sent to many other states may be found at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30784035/DNC-Chairperson-Nancy-Pelosi-Issued-Signed-Two-Different-Certification-Forms-for-Obama-in-2008

(28) Susan and Gretchen Nordyke (“the Nordyke twins”) were born at Kapi’olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital Aug. 5, 1961, one day after Obama was allegedly born at the same facility on August 4, 1961. These twins produced for the public copies of their long-form birth certificates, otherwise known as a Certificate of Live Birth, issued by the Hawaii Department of Health.  Ross Dolan of The Daily Republic on Friday, May 15, 2010, interviewed Eleanor Nordyke. The interview may be read at http://www.mitchellrepublic.com/event/article/id/43081/.

Mrs. Nordyke makes some outlandish statements, accusing “birthers” of being motivated by racism and money in pursuing the Obama eligibility issue. On the birth certificate numbers, she said: “‘My daughters’ birth certificates were 10637 and 10638, and Obama’s was 10641, so his mother must have come in after I did,’ Nordyke said, though she never met Obama’s mother.” Not so Mrs. Nordyke. You must have forgotten that Obama was allegedly born August 4, 1961 and your twins were born a day later on August 5, 1961. And in those days women stayed in the hospital after giving birth for a week or more. How you two new moms could not have met in that small hospital maternity ward during your many days stay there is not so easy to explain away, especially a young 18 year old teenager in Hawaii having just given birth to a black baby (this was the 60s and that would have been unusual for those times and would have been whispered about back then in the maternity ward) unless of course Obama’s mom and baby Obama were never there. Mrs. Nordyke’s statement clearly shows her bias for Obama.  Nevertheless, Mrs. Nordyke did make some important concessions. She admitted that she would have been in the same maternity ward as Obama’s mother if Obama’s mother was there at Kapi’olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital (now called Kapi’olani Medical Center) on Friday, August 4, 1961; while one would not reasonably expect her to remember everyone who was with her in the maternity ward, she did say that she never saw Obama’s mother in the maternity ward while she was there and yet Obama’s mother allegedly gave birth the day before Mrs. Nordyke did. [allegedly, but I’ll allege that she did not]

(33) A college instructor who worked as a Senior Elections Clerk for the City and County of Honolulu in 2008 has stated in May 2010 that Obama was not born in Hawaii, and that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate does not exist in that State. Tim Adams now teaches English at Western Kentucky University, in Bowling Green, Ky. “There is no birth certificate,” said Tim Adams. “It’s like an open secret. There isn’t one. Everyone in the government there knows this.” Adams told WND, “I managed the absentee-ballot office”.  At the time, there were conflicting reports that Obama had been born at the Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu or the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children across town. So Adams says his office investigated at and contacted both facilities. He adds: “They told us, ‘We don’t have a birth certificate for him.'” “They told my supervisor, either by phone or by e-mail, neither one has a document that a doctor signed off on saying they were present at this man’s birth.” To date, no hospital has been willing to confirm that Obama was born there.  Adams stressed, “In my professional opinion, [Obama] definitely was not born in Hawaii. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that he was not born in Hawaii because there is no legal record of him being born there”.  A very good YouTube summary of this new news can be heard at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo3Aj2eqmS8

Earth Frisk Blog says they have contacted every hospital in Honolulu and says there is no record of Obama’s birth at any Hawaii hospital and no record for Obama’s mother at any Hawaii hospital.

All of the following hospitals were called or visited from November 20 through December 2nd, 2008.  It was confirmed that Obama was not born in any hospital in Honolulu County!  NONE!

Hospital employees were bribed and some gave info for free.  Hospitals you can check yourself:

The Queen’s Medical Center – Honolulu, Hawaii  — Obama claims as his birth hospital — Obama and Mom Never Here

Kapi’ olani Medical Center — Obama’s sister claims Barack Obama born here — Obama and Mom Never Here

Honolulu Shriners Hospital  — Never a patient — Mom or Obama; Straub Clinic & Hospital  — Never a patient -Mom or Obama
Hawaii Health Systems Corporation — Honolulu, Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama
Cancer Institute of Maui — Wailuku, Hawaii — No Comment???
Kuakini Hospital — Honolulu, Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama
Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific — Honolulu, Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama
St. Francis Healthcare System of Hawaii — Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama
Straub Heatlh — Honolulu, Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama
Tripler Medical Center — Honolulu, Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama
Wahiawa General Hospital — Wahiawa, Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama
Wilcox Memorial Hospital — Lihue, Kauai, Hawaii — Never a patient — Mom or Obama

Earth Frisk Blog contends they were pretty detailed in their calls and visits thanks to dozens of native Hawaiian patriots.  To the College Republicans all over the Island kudos.  You can look at every hospital here and call or visit any of them.  Barack Obama was never born in a hospital in Hawaii as claimed.

There are many problems with simply relying on a birth certificate as conclusive evidence of the place and date of birth. Birth certificate fraud is a real problem in the United States. The U.S. Office of Inspector General published a report in September 2000, entitled Birth Certificate Fraud. The report explains that over the last 25 years there have been a number of studies addressing the problem of birth certificate fraud. The report states that there exist misconceptions among the public as to the integrity of birth certificates. The report says that with current technological advances with computers and the internet, it is easier to produce counterfeit birth certificates. It explains that many times the alleged birth certificates produced by a government agency are based on false or fraudulent information or do not even have documentary evidence to corroborate the veracity of the birth event as stated in the birth certificate. It explains how a birth certificate that is “spawned” by false information or documents is itself fraudulent. The report concludes that “birth certificates alone do not provide conclusive or reliable proof of identity.” It adds that “[w]hen used in combination with other documents, birth certificates can add to the level of proof in establishing eligibility and identity.” The report recommends that birth certificates should be used “only with other documents.”
“The Puerto Rican government, in cooperation with the departments of State and Homeland Security, has enacted a new law that invalidates all Puerto Rico birth certificates issued on or before June 30. The law, which takes effect July 1, is intended to combat the fraudulent use of Puerto Rico birth certificates to obtain U.S. passports, Social Security benefits and other federal services, according to the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration”). See also Department of Justice news release on fraudulent birth certificates from the Hudson County Office of Vital Statistics (HCOVS), in New Jersey. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1349297/posts. (“As part of the investigation, federal agents executed a search warrant of the HCOVS on Feb. 18, 2004, which resulted in the seizure of hundreds of suspect Certificates of Live Birth which falsely indicated that the named individuals were born in Jersey City, when in fact, they were born outside the United States and were in the United States illegally”).